Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Think about it. He already advises investment groups to buy pipelines and oil production in brazil and other places like that.  All he has to do to make them more money is prevent canadian oil from getting to market and compteting. Which he's already pushing for.  That will be worth billions to them, a cushy position when he's done will be no problem. ETc etc.

 

image.gif.3cd6789504ac4696d41be6c5b2425ded.gif

 

Stephen Harper sits on a bunch of boards of directors too.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
4 hours ago, Army Guy said:

Not sure why the left is even chirping about PP, the guy is not even in power and still is an unknown for what he will do well except the fact he eats baby's , beats seals, and is just a terrible person over all 

I don't know. I mean, we know Trudeau beats women and is a fascist dictator, he's clearly on his way to history's dustbin and Poilievre can't shut up about him. The future is that way 

 

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
2 hours ago, eyeball said:

I don't know. I mean, we know Trudeau beats women and is a fascist dictator, he's clearly on his way to history's dustbin and Poilievre can't shut up about him. The future is that way 

 

Justin is not gone yet, but soon....the liberals however are still in power until they finish their mandate....which could be until the next election....if the NDP bring them down..

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted
1 hour ago, Army Guy said:

Justin is not gone yet, but soon....the liberals however are still in power until they finish their mandate....which could be until the next election....if the NDP bring them down..

I know right?  The guy is STILL prime minister, is CURRENTLY the one handling a major economic conflict that threatens to be more damaging than covid was to us,  and the left is like 'trudeau hasn't been here for years why are you still talking about him?"

He's the effing PM guys :) 

Posted (edited)

If I were advising Poilievre, I would suggest less visibility with alternate policies and more of a consensual tone supporting the government. Don’t fight the falling poll numbers. The public is in no mood for division in our political ranks at this moment of peril - there will be ample time for normal politicking to resume down the road. Clement Attlee loyally served in Churchill’s government right through WWII and still gave him an absolute hiding in 1945. In terms of style, the crisis is a good opportunity for Poilievre to soften his image and sound less partisan. Bring us more of the guy we heard at Mulroney’s funeral.

Edited by SpankyMcFarland
  • Like 3
Posted
2 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

If I were advising Poilievre, I would suggest less visibility with alternate policies and more of a consensual tone supporting the government. Don’t fight the falling poll numbers. The public is in no mood for division in our political ranks at this moment of peril - there will be ample time for normal politicking to resume down the road. Clement Attlee loyally served in Churchill’s government right through WWII and still gave him an absolute hiding in 1945. In terms of style, the crisis is a good opportunity for Poilievre to soften his image and sound less partisan. Bring us more of the guy we heard at Mulroney’s funeral.

True

  • Like 1
Posted

Did I just hear Poilievre saying Trudeau's failure to protect our border was actually deliberate - to help establish the post nationalist borderless world dreamed up by globalists at WEF?

LMAO!

Poilievre's supporters have just about completely rubbed off on him. Next he'll be talking about space lasers with a straight face.

Politicians of all stripes everywhere are losing their shit.

  • Like 1

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
14 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Did I just hear Poilievre saying Trudeau's failure to protect our border was actually deliberate - to help establish the post nationalist borderless world dreamed up by globalists at WEF?

LMAO!

Poilievre's supporters have just about completely rubbed off on him. Next he'll be talking about space lasers with a straight face.

Politicians of all stripes everywhere are losing their shit.

That was actually something Trudeau pretty much admitted. And you'll recall his initial tweets to the world saying that they everyone should come to Canada and arguing that everybody should be allowed. It was also part of his century plan to have 100 million Canadians by the turn of the century

I love that your hero is so stupid that even when you think of the most ridiculous things possible he's actually done them :) 

Posted
8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

That was actually something Trudeau pretty much admitted.

We might as well blame Gene Roddenberry and Capt Kirk for warping people's minds.

  • Like 1

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
40 minutes ago, eyeball said:

We might as well blame Gene Roddenberry and Capt Kirk for warping people's minds.

Sure, that's pretty much the equivalent of Trudeau admitting what his plans are and then you having a hissy fit later when someone points it out.  :) 

It's like you're allergic to facts or something

  • Haha 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, eyeball said:

We might as well blame Gene Roddenberry and Capt Kirk for warping people's minds.

Might as well. After all, you are an avid user of the Dillon-Wagoner Gravitron Polarity Generator. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, eyeball said:

Did I just hear Poilievre saying Trudeau's failure to protect our border was actually deliberate - to help establish the post nationalist borderless world dreamed up by globalists at WEF?

LMAO!

Poilievre's supporters have just about completely rubbed off on him. Next he'll be talking about space lasers with a straight face.

Politicians of all stripes everywhere are losing their shit.

When you don't do something for 10 years then yes it is deliberate, why they choose that route is baffling to everyone except the left, they clapped at it....more social programs...

  • Haha 1

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Sure, that's pretty much the equivalent of Trudeau admitting what his plans are and then you having a hissy fit later when someone points it out.

LMAO!

Just wait until the election and Trump comes out and endorses Poilievre 🤣

No doubt Betsy will have an orgasm but you can count on it shaving 20 points off Poilievre's lead.

So I wonder when Poilievre will be announcing an investigation into UFO's and climate change satellites changing the weather or is it the other way around?

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
1 hour ago, eyeball said:

LMAO!

Just wait until the election and Trump comes out and endorses Poilievre 🤣

Why, will that change what Trudeau said in the past?

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

No doubt Betsy will have an orgasm

Sigh.  Ah yes.  And once again when a leftie starts to lose they give up on rational thought and turn to sexual fantasies because that's how you win an argument. 🙄

Every. Single. Time. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Why, will that change what Trudeau said in the past?

Who?

image.jpeg.42087cc9a06be00ed6c1b840c4af0000.jpeg

LMAO!

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
On 2/2/2025 at 1:34 PM, eyeball said:

Because he's not a dingbat would be my guess.

That's a childish response. Why would someone without any real emotional attachment to Canada care if it was part of the United States? Perhaps it even makes sense, economically.

On 2/2/2025 at 1:34 PM, eyeball said:

If anything his global connections could be an asset when distancing ourselves from America and we go looking for better partners.

Ah yes, the 'better partners' we've been searching for for decades. China was supposed to be that 'better partner' at one point. We haven't found another.

Posted
On 2/2/2025 at 6:36 PM, eyeball said:

 

image.gif.3cd6789504ac4696d41be6c5b2425ded.gif

 

Stephen Harper sits on a bunch of boards of directors too.

Of course. Every former prime minister either does or does lecture tours for insane amounts of money or both. Even when you're doing things perfectly legally and on the up and up there's lots of money to be made from having been the prime minister. And he was prime minister for 10 years

However, harper wasn't doing business with any of those people before he became prime minister. And nothing he did as prime minister would have particularly helped them.

Carney however Will be in a direct position to benefit people he's already working with and making deals with tremendously. The rewards he'll be able to reap Would be exponentially larger. You can make good money working the system honestly that you can make insane money if you are corrupt like Trudeau was and like carney would be

But hey, if you can't trust a multi-millionaire international banker with three different citizenships, who can you trust?

 

You going to still pretend you care anything at all about government corruption? 

Posted
35 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You going to still pretend you care anything at all about government corruption? 

I always cared and even embrace the horror that people view corruption as the grease that keeps the ship of state running smoothly. Of course on a real boat corruption is synonymous with corrosion and so the whole notion will always seems particularly nuts to me.

It is what it is.

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

But hey, if you can't trust a multi-millionaire international banker with three different citizenships, who can you trust?

I trust what I can see. That's why you have inspection hatches and things on a boat so you can see the corrosion and treat it.

We even use lists with boxes we check with an x to keep track of inspections. Every day though, not every 4-5 years or if the mood strikes us.

Anyways you just keep pretending I don't care - it's the grease that keeps you grinding away.

You are what you are.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
35 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I always cared and even embrace the horror that people view corruption as the grease that keeps the ship of state running smoothly. 

Well you do support the liberals so it shouldn't be a shock that you support corruption

Which is why you try and blame harper for all of Trudeau's misdeeds and insist that voter shouldn't hold Trudeau to account.

But like I said you get what you vote for

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

But like I said you get what you vote for

I think we're getting what you put up with.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted

I've been keeping track of the seat count on Canada 338. In the last two weeks, the CPC has dropped 18 seats (238 to 220) and the Grits are up 22 seats (41 to 63) If we go back 4 weeks, the LPC is up 28 seats. What should have Mr. Poilieve worried is the NDP have dropped 10 seats in 4 weeks, down to 15. If you were Mr. Singh, would you want to go to the polls with that trend and those numbers? 

 

A Conservative stands for God, King and Country

Posted
1 hour ago, Queenmandy85 said:

I've been keeping track of the seat count on Canada 338. In the last two weeks, the CPC has dropped 18 seats (238 to 220) and the Grits are up 22 seats (41 to 63) If we go back 4 weeks, the LPC is up 28 seats. What should have Mr. Poilieve worried is the NDP have dropped 10 seats in 4 weeks, down to 15. If you were Mr. Singh, would you want to go to the polls with that trend and those numbers? 

 

There's little doubt that that's a serious concern. In fact mr Singh's own riding is seriously in jeopardy and has been for a while. Which is why he was so worried about his pension.

But I think they realize they've painted themselves into a corner. It only gets significantly worse for them if they wait and go back on their word to bring the government down.

I have said many many times since they formed their deal with the liberals that the junior partner in these relationships historically and universally gets the crap kicked out of them at the next election and the NDP is certainly facing that. Most of their support has already left for the conservatives and what's left appears to be leaning towards shoring up the liberals.

And that's before we get to the big problem of voter turnout which is going to strongly impact both. You can never say for certain but just like we've seen it Ontario for example when the liberals and NDP are that low in the polls and that despised by that many people very frequently their voters turn out in a low numbers and that dramatically reduces their seat count even compared to the polling. 

But like i said, i don't know if it gets better for them. They would have been in better shape if they'd gone earlier and i suspect by fall they'll be thinking the same thing again.

Posted
19 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

There's little doubt that that's a serious concern. In fact mr Singh's own riding is seriously in jeopardy and has been for a while. Which is why he was so worried about his pension.

I'm sure you are privy to information I am not, but from what little I know of Mr. Singh's personal situation, if I had his money, I'd burn mine.

 

21 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Most of their support has already left for the conservatives and what's left appears to be leaning towards shoring up the liberals.

It appears, based on Canada 338, that it is going to the grits. I'm not worried though. My MP is Kevin Waugh and his seat is safe.

A Conservative stands for God, King and Country

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,896
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    postuploader
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User earned a badge
      One Year In
    • josej earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • josej earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dave L went up a rank
      Contributor
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...