Jump to content
A Note on Topic Titles – Be Clear & Descriptive!

Comparing Republicans to Nazis

CouchPotato
 Share

Recommended Posts

CouchPotato Mentor

CouchPotato

Posted
Posted

Just found this interesting article by Larry Elder from 2012. It makes you wonder when this sort of thing will ever get old.

Comparing Republicans To Nazis—Who Started It?

Quote

Maybe comparing Republicans to Nazis started with the 1964 Goldwater/Johnson presidential race.

Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater accepted an invitation to visit an American military installation located in Bavaria, Germany. On “CBS Evening News” hosted by Walter Cronkite, correspondent Daniel Schorr said: “It is now clear that Sen. Goldwater’s interview with Der Spiegel, with its hard line appealing to right-wing elements in Germany, was only the start of a move to link up with his opposite numbers in Germany.” The reaction shot — when the cameras returned to Cronkite — showed the “most trusted man in America” gravely shaking his head.

Or maybe it began when Goldwater accepted the Republican nomination, and Democratic California Gov. Pat Brown said the “stench of fascism is in the air.”

Quote

How casually Democrats make Hitler-Nazi-fascist references to demean their political opponents is astonishing. By calling political opponents “fascists” because of policy disagreements, Democrats trivialize a regime responsible for exterminating 6 million Jews in a war that resulted in the deaths of over 50 million people.

https://www.larryelder.com/columns/comparing-republicans-to-nazis-who-started-it/

  • Thanks 1
CouchPotato Mentor

CouchPotato

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

Even Vice President JD Vance compared Trump to Hitler...

But he has since seen the light. You persist in your folly.

The truth is it doesn't matter who the Republican candidate is the democrats will call him a Nazi or a fascist. It's been part of their playbook for years now.

NAME REMOVED Grand Master

NAME REMOVED

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CouchPotato said:

But he has since seen the light.

You mean that he realised that his career would benefit to speak positively about Trump, one he won the Republican nomination in 2016.  Coincidentally, many of Hitler's critics, had a change of heart, once he became Chancellor of Germany.  It's self-preservation.

  • Thanks 1
NAME REMOVED Grand Master

NAME REMOVED

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

 

The truth is it doesn't matter who the Republican candidate is the democrats will call him a Nazi or a fascist. It's been part of their playbook for years now.

Actually, it is just Trump. I don't recall anyone calling Mitt Romney, John McCain, or Bob Dole a "Nazi". Very few people compared George W Bush to one. Trump is different than any leader of a major political party in America, in the past 50 years. He definitely has autocratic tendencies similar to Hitler, Mussolini, and most Third World dictators. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
robosmith Grand Master

robosmith

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

But he has since seen the light. You persist in your folly.

The FACT is you don't know what "light" he's seen. All you know is what he SAYS.

Could be the only light he's seen is that caused by the huge personal payoff he's achieved.

17 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

The truth is it doesn't matter who the Republican candidate is the democrats will call him a Nazi or a fascist. It's been part of their playbook for years now.

Thing is, you don't know the strong parallels between Hitler's rise to power and Trump's.

So far in Trump's 2nd term he's continued along Hitler's path; already trying to neutralize the Constitutional power of the Senate over his appointments.

gatomontes99 Grand Master

gatomontes99

Posted
Posted

 

29 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

Actually, it is just Trump. I don't recall anyone calling Mitt Romney, John McCain, or Bob Dole a "Nazi". Very few people compared George W Bush to one. Trump is different than any leader of a major political party in America, in the past 50 years. He definitely has autocratic tendencies similar to Hitler, Mussolini, and most Third World dictators. 

It started as far back as Goldwater:

Quote

Maybe comparing Republicans to Nazis started with the 1964 presidential race. Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater accepted an invitation to visit an American military installation in Germany. On "CBS Evening News,"correspondent Daniel Schorr said:

"It is now clear that Sen. Goldwater's interview with Der Spiegel, with its hard line appealing to right-wing elements in Germany, was only the start of a move to link up with his opposite numbers in Germany."

https://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/democrats-have-long-history-of-calling-republicans-nazis/

How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power

Axelrod Stays Classy With Romney/Hitler Comparison

Reductio ad Hitlerum: 60 years of Democrats falsely calling the Republican nominee a fascist

I could go on but this bores me. They lie when they are easily proven wrong.

See this @Black Dog? His alternate reality, my actual reality.

  • Like 2

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Nationalist Grand Master

Nationalist

Posted
Posted

The Democrats will never learn. Fortunately they've used this NAZI crap so much, that nobody pays attention to them anymore.

It a public joke now.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

gatomontes99 Grand Master

gatomontes99

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

In today's world.. anyone that does not align with you is a nazi. Am beyond tired of the term. Both sides use it whenever they look to give their message shock value. 

You are such a Nazi!

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
gatomontes99 Grand Master

gatomontes99

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

So are you.. can we keep this up for another hour? 

Anything less than 3 is an abomination.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
gatomontes99 Grand Master

gatomontes99

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

And so this makes 4. 

Hours

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
WestCanMan Grand Master

WestCanMan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, impartialobserver said:

In today's world.. anyone that does not align with you is a nazi. Am beyond tired of the term. Both sides use it whenever they look to give their message shock value. 

That's clearly a bothsideism. 

Not only do leaders in the DNC and LPOC regularly call their political opponents extremists, fascists, racists, misogynists, etc, their MSM lackeys march along in lock step with them. 

Can you find some examples of Fox News, Trump, Poilievre, Scheer, Harper, or any other high-level GOP or CPC politician calling Kamala, Trudeau, etc any of those names? 

I think that I'm pretty much alone in calling attention to the dangerous level of fascism in the DNC. Other conservatives here don't go that far. 

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Yakuda Mentor

Yakuda

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, CouchPotato said:

Just found this interesting article by Larry Elder from 2012. It makes you wonder when this sort of thing will ever get old.

Comparing Republicans To Nazis—Who Started It?

https://www.larryelder.com/columns/comparing-republicans-to-nazis-who-started-it/

What I would like to know is why, after YEARS of telling us trump is a fascist, a Nazi, a racist, a felon and an existential threat to democracy, leftists are just going to let trump waltz into thr white house.  

NAME REMOVED Grand Master

NAME REMOVED

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, Yakuda said:

What I would like to know is why, after YEARS of telling us trump is a fascist, a Nazi, a racist, a felon and an existential threat to democracy, leftists are just going to let trump waltz into thr white house.  

Ideally, Biden would cause an insurrection, and save the country from Trump and Musk.

However, Democrats are losers, so they accept the election results. It's almost like the did not want to win the 2024 election, as Harris was as poor of a choice for President as Hilary Clinton in 2016.

Deluge Grand Master

Deluge

Posted
Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

Even Vice President JD Vance compared Trump to Hitler...

But then he pulled his head out of the Left's ass once he realized how absurd that side is. 

Edited by Deluge
gatomontes99 Grand Master

gatomontes99

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

Ideally, Biden would cause an insurrection, and save the country from Trump and Musk.

However, Democrats are losers, so they accept the election results. It's almost like the did not want to win the 2024 election, as Harris was as poor of a choice for President as Hilary Clinton in 2016.

Wow. What a defense of democracy you have there.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
NAME REMOVED Grand Master

NAME REMOVED

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Wow. What a defense of democracy you have there.

 

 

Just now, DUI_Offender said:

Trump attempted it in 2021. He failed.

The democrats are really going to have to fight fire with fire. 

If I was Biden, I would block the transition outright, and call in the army to arrest Trump and all of his minions, and jail them for treason. 

Take a page from Trump's own playbook....

 

Edited by DUI_Offender
gatomontes99 Grand Master

gatomontes99

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

 

....

 

Trump did not attempt an insurrection. There was a protest that turned into a riot. Some people did some really bad stuff. But Trump did not attempt an insurrection. Even the banana republic couldn't come up with charges.

Just let it go man. You lost. You lost voters in every demographic.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Fluffypants Mentor

Fluffypants

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Wow. What a defense of democracy you have there.

They only love Democracy when they win.

You have Democrat election officials in Pennsylvania literally saying "screw the law we are going to count every ballot we got" in the attempt to change the election result.

They did everything they could to keep RFK and Trump off of ballots, super pro democracy.

They were using the DOJ, New York and Georgia courts during an election to go after him.

 

 

 

Deluge Grand Master

Deluge

Posted
Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, robosmith said:

Thing is, you don't know the strong parallels between Hitler's rise to power and Trump's.

So far in Trump's 2nd term he's continued along Hitler's path; already trying to neutralize the Constitutional power of the Senate over his appointments.

There are no parallels, meat head. You're pulling this out of your ass. 

He isn't neutralizing anything, wokefilth, he's putting his team together - that's it. 

Edited by Deluge
Fluffypants Mentor

Fluffypants

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Deluge said:

There are no parallels, meat head. You're pulling this out of your ass. 

He isn't neutralizing anything, wokefilth, he's putting his team together - that's it. 

They equating his desire to use recess appointments to get his people in faster to what Hitler did.

I guess that means Obama followed the path of Hitler too, he made 32 recess appointments

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,903
    • Most Online
      1,403
    LinkSoul60
    Newest Member
    LinkSoul60
    Joined

  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Barquentine
      Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Week One Done
      Dave L
      Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      Ana Silva
      Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Scott75
      Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Rising Star
      Political Smash
      Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...