Jump to content

Do right wingers here really believe that Trump's appointees (Gaetz, RFK, & Gabbard) are actually QUALIFIED for those offices?


Recommended Posts

Posted
12 hours ago, robosmith said:

They have one thing in common: ZERO experience of management at that level, and ZERO professional knowledge of those complex fields.

One fact. The Dems hate all choices that are not theirs, it's that simple. The fact that you don't see this speaks volumes.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Ignore.  Ignore.

The left sure has gotten ignore happy on here. I, for one, enjoy debating because it either sharpens my point of view are molds it. But I work off of an intellectual basis rather than an emotional one. I assume that if my positions were purely emotional that I would give someone enough power to upset me enough that I couldn't handle their written words.

I did ignore one person, but that posters was clearly here to post flame bait and then take his own bait. I wasn't going to respond to him any way, so away he went.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
6 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

The left sure has gotten ignore happy on here. I, for one, enjoy debating because it either sharpens my point of view are molds it. But I work off of an intellectual basis rather than an emotional one. I assume that if my positions were purely emotional that I would give someone enough power to upset me enough that I couldn't handle their written words.

I did ignore one person, but that posters was clearly here to post flame bait and then take his own bait. I wasn't going to respond to him any way, so away he went.

What's funny is they claim to put you on ignore so that they can not have to respond to posts that contain information that they don't like so that they can pretend that they didn't see it later. Answer that they can avoid conversations which are awkward for them because they don't have a counter argument.

Frankly I don't believe in ignoring people. There are definitely some readers that I tend to skip over their stuff or not pay much attention to their posts but I've never believed that sticking your head in the sand and running away from Awkward conversations while pretending that it's because you can't be bothered is cowardly and the sign of a weak mind.  Sure there may be a special case here and there but for the most part the left is very disingenuous in that regard. 

Posted
11 hours ago, West said:

She's more qualified for that post than the guy selected to be transportation secretary because he's married to a dude.

 

That guy was MAYOR of a city and had experience dealing with transportation issues like all mayors do. Duh

Posted
3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Fixed it for ya 😉

Only two qualifications, dummy:

  1. black
  2. female

Ohhh, snap! Right from CNN, hey? That's gonna leave a mark 😘

ScreenShot2024-11-15at7_28_56AM.thumb.png.ce47cfca16dfa3129ce03bc5da34d6a7.png

Your IGNORANCE of the politics IN YOUR OWN COUNTRY is not actually all that surprising on account of the fact that THE MSM IN THE US IS DESIGNED TO GROOM CULTIST MUPPETS LIKE YOU.

Just cause you make up shit spout it here does not make it true. 

Being black and female does not negate the other MORE IMPORTANT QUALIFICATIONS which you've completely IGNORED due to your agenda driven IGNORANCE. 🤮 

Posted
3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

That guy was MAYOR of a city and had experience dealing with transportation issues like all mayors do. Duh

That guy blew his budget and didn't get anything done  as mayor - so he's experienced at being incompetent maybe. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

Qualified?

Yes.

What qualifications do you imagine they have for TOP LEVEL CABINET POSITIONS?

Aside that is, from superior ass kissing ability. Trump has already proven that is the main qualification. 

I'm sure you'd hire a good ass kisser, too. LMAO

1 hour ago, Legato said:

One fact. The Dems hate all choices that are not theirs, it's that simple. The fact that you don't see this speaks volumes.

The FACT is that you cannot name their qualifications and just ^TROLL DRIVEL.

Posted
6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...Am I ever savoring the Libbie meltdown. Their desperation is so delicious. All their dreams of destruction...shattered. All their lawfar...laid bare for the public to see. Their DEI poster lady...beaten soundly.

This is just so satisfying to watch.

Just wait until Trump's appointees blow up in his face like they did LAST TIME, when 5 of them had to leave due to SCANDAL.

I expect at least one of these 3 (probably Gaetz) won't even make the cut. Or if he does, someone else will replace him before he breaks the china with his bull like behavior. See Michael Flynn, another Trump disaster from 2017.

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

Yes. I know this because they will have the tools to fight the biggest liars & cheaters the world has ever known - the democrat party. 

This next four years may get ugly but it's the price we will have to pay for EVERYONE'S freedoms, not just the special interest groups. 

I for one, cannot wait. :D 

^Desperate PROJECTION.

Posted
23 minutes ago, robosmith said:

What qualifications do you imagine they have for TOP LEVEL CABINET POSITIONS?

Aside that is, from superior ass kissing ability. Trump has already proven that is the main qualification. 

I'm sure you'd hire a good ass kisser, too. LMAO

The FACT is that you cannot name their qualifications and just ^TROLL DRIVEL.

Matt Gaetz- "Gaetz, who was the subject of a federal sex trafficking investigation that concluded after the Biden administration declined to bring charges in 2023, received his Juris Doctor from William & Mary Law School in 2007. He was admitted to the Florida Bar the following year and worked in private practice before launching his campaign for state representative in 2010.

Gaetz is in good standing and eligible to practice law, according to the Florida Bar.

https://www.newsweek.com/matt-gaetz-law-career-attorney-general-1985422

QUALIFIED. 

RFK Jr - An environmental lawyer and activist who has protested against forced Rona vaccination, the CDC and FDA which really upsets the swamp. He's also the son of RFK and nephew of JFK.

QUALIFIED.

Tulsi Gabbard - "American politician and United States Army Reserve officer. She served as U.S. Representative for Hawaii's 2nd congressional district from 2013 to 2021. Gabbard is serving as a lieutenant colonel in the US Army Reserve[2] after 17 years of service with Hawaii Army National Guard from 2003 to 2020.[3][4] Gabbard was the first Samoan-American member of Congress, and the youngest woman elected to the Hawaii state legislature.[5] She was a candidate in the 2020 Democratic presidential primaries.[6][7] She left the Democratic Party in October 2022 to become an independent, before joining the Republican Party in 2024."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsi_Gabbard

QUALIFIED

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
55 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

That guy blew his budget and didn't get anything done  as mayor - so he's experienced at being incompetent maybe. 

Perfect for being a democrat!

  • Haha 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
42 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Matt Gaetz- "Gaetz, who was the subject of a federal sex trafficking investigation that concluded after the Biden administration declined to bring charges in 2023, received his Juris Doctor from William & Mary Law School in 2007. He was admitted to the Florida Bar the following year and worked in private practice before launching his campaign for state representative in 2010.

Gaetz is in good standing and eligible to practice law, according to the Florida Bar.

https://www.newsweek.com/matt-gaetz-law-career-attorney-general-1985422

QUALIFIED. 

Thousands of ex-practicing lawyers have better qualifications than Gaetz. You know, those who actually were PROSECUTORS. Duh

42 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

RFK Jr - An environmental lawyer and activist who has protested against forced Rona vaccination, the CDC and FDA which really upsets the swamp. He's also the son of RFK and nephew of JFK.

QUALIFIED.

So genetic heritage is a qualification in your mind. LMAO

Not to mention protesting and "really upsets the swamp." LMAO

42 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Tulsi Gabbard - "American politician and United States Army Reserve officer. She served as U.S. Representative for Hawaii's 2nd congressional district from 2013 to 2021. Gabbard is serving as a lieutenant colonel in the US Army Reserve[2] after 17 years of service with Hawaii Army National Guard from 2003 to 2020.[3][4] Gabbard was the first Samoan-American member of Congress, and the youngest woman elected to the Hawaii state legislature.[5] She was a candidate in the 2020 Democratic presidential primaries.[6][7] She left the Democratic Party in October 2022 to become an independent, before joining the Republican Party in 2024."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsi_Gabbard

QUALIFIED

No involvement in INTELLIGENCE. Not even the Intelligence Committee in Congress.

^DESPERATION FAIL. LMAO

Posted
2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

The left sure has gotten ignore happy on here. I, for one, enjoy debating because it either sharpens my point of view are molds it. But I work off of an intellectual basis rather than an emotional one. I assume that if my positions were purely emotional that I would give someone enough power to upset me enough that I couldn't handle their written words.

I did ignore one person, but that posters was clearly here to post flame bait and then take his own bait. I wasn't going to respond to him any way, so away he went.

KSU: "Pardon me, sir. I don't mean to interrupt your crazy rant. People will think I'm super special if I stop and engage you in a debate about the crazy shit you're saying. I apparently have a loooot of free time and endless patience. Do you have any literature I might peruse." You know, to help me sharpen my arguments."
christian-street-preacher-proselytizing-

  • Thanks 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Thousands of ex-practicing lawyers have better qualifications than Gaetz. You know, those who actually were PROSECUTORS. Duh

So genetic heritage is a qualification in your mind. LMAO

Not to mention protesting and "really upsets the swamp." LMAO

No involvement in INTELLIGENCE. Not even the Intelligence Committee in Congress.

^DESPERATION FAIL. LMAO

Not at all.

Gaetz is a lawyer and a congressman. 

Kennedy is lawyer and has been right all along about the CDC and FDA.

Gabbard is a veteran, state rep, congresswoman.

All 3 are qualified and all 3 have been attacked by the Democrats. Lol...isn't this gonna be fun to watch?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Hodad said:

KSU: "Pardon me, sir. I don't mean to interrupt your crazy rant. People will think I'm super special if I stop and engage you in a debate about the crazy shit you're saying. I apparently have a loooot of free time and endless patience. Do you have any literature I might peruse." You know, to help me sharpen my arguments."
christian-street-preacher-proselytizing-

Huh?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted

Welcome to the the thread that reveals leftie heads exploding in real time.

What's next from our illustrious Democrats? Maybe an all out drivel war.

Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, robosmith said:

They have one thing in common: ZERO experience of management at that level, and ZERO professional knowledge of those complex fields.

Harris didn't know shit, and she still doesn't. The point is, they ALL have ZERO experience at those levels unless they are incumbents. 

Honestly, robolimp, how desperate does one cultist have to be? 

Edited by Deluge
Posted
5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

well you broke him.  You broke Hodad.  NOW who are we going to laugh at?  Hope you're happy. 

I have been doing that a lot lately.

  • Haha 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
7 minutes ago, Legato said:

Welcome to the the thread that reveals leftie heads exploding in real time.

What's next from our illustrious Democrats? Maybe an all out drivel war.

Honestly there should be a 'spash zone' warning in the title....... 

Posted

I guess the Trump haters in here are longing for the days of Biden's brilliant appointees.

sam-brinton.png

  • Like 1

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,894
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Dave L
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...