23 Nobel Prize-Winning Economists Endorse Harris on the economy

[Hodad]

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Big deal.

Reporters at WAPO and NYT got awards for lying.

Those Nobel prizes have been reduced to a bad joke.

Well, you can't say I didn't predict this reaction. 

[Hodad]

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Indeed you Libbies howl this constantly. 

Yet by simply checking the results of both presidecies, it's clear who did a better job.

BTW...high gas prices drive inflation. Were you born yesterday?

Or just ignoring blatant reality...to sooth your TDS...?

Indeed, one administration changed the trajectory of the economy and the other didn't. 

But I forgot that your feelings are more compelling than economic data. And apparently more compelling than the analysis of Nobel laureates. You really think highly of your feelings.

Edited October 31, 2024 by Hodad

[Yakuda]

1 minute ago, Hodad said:

Well, you can't say I didn't predict this reaction. 

Obama got a nobel prize for don't what exactly? They should rename it the Nobel Boobie prize 

[Hodad]

1 minute ago, Yakuda said:

Obama got a nobel prize for don't what exactly? They should rename it the Nobel Boobie prize 

That was the Nobel Peace Prize. You're welcome to debate whether he deserved it or not. 

However, that is an entirely different beast than a prize in the sciences. 

[robosmith]

47 minutes ago, Deluge said:

They're whatever the globalists tell them to be. They're even bigger tools than you, robopleasewalkallovermeIlikeit.  

^MORE DELUGINAL BULLSHIT

[robosmith]

6 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Indeed, one administration changed the trajectory of the economy and the other didn't. 

But I forgot that your feelings are more compelling than economic data. And apparently more compelling than the analysis of Nobel laureates. You really think highly of your feelings.

gnat girl cognitive dissonance is IMPENETRABLE.

6 minutes ago, Yakuda said:

Obama got a nobel prize for don't what exactly? They should rename it the Nobel Boobie prize 

For lowering the international temperature and therefore promoting PEACE. Duh

[Deluge]

12 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^MORE DELUGINAL BULLSHIT

robowoke really struggles with the truth.  

[NAME REMOVED]

3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

People who think high gas prices are the end of the world have no idea.

This tarrif plan is insane.

It's going to drive the World into a great depression similar to the 1930s. 

The common denominator? We saw a dramatic rise of protectionist policies, and right wing governments, who did the exact same thing as many countries are doing today.  People who fail to learn from history, are doomed to repeat it.

 

 

 

[gatomontes99]

Are these the same Nobel winning economists that said the Build Back Better plan was a good idea?

17 Nobel Prize–winning economists back Biden’s $3.5 trillion Build Back Better plan

 

[Legato]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

You're so DELUGINALLY stupid you try to claim that ECONOMISTS are part of "industrial complexes."

Economists are intellectuals, NOT "industrial." Duh

Without industry there would be no need for economists.

[Hodad]

46 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Are these the same Nobel winning economists that said the Build Back Better plan was a good idea?

17 Nobel Prize–winning economists back Biden’s $3.5 trillion Build Back Better plan

 

Most likely. You can assume they are correct on both counts. 

[Deluge]

4 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

 

Looks like America's going to have to get their kids working again. I had a job throughout high school and YOUR kids can too, democrats. I mean those of you beef headed psychopaths that still believe in families, of course.  

[Legato]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

gnat girl cognitive dissonance is IMPENETRABLE.

For lowering the international temperature and therefore promoting PEACE. Duh

U.S. military forces have been at war for all eight years of Obama’s tenure, the first two-term president with that distinction. He launched airstrikes or military raids in at least seven countries: Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan.

 

https://www.latimes.com/projects/la-na-pol-obama-at-war/

[NAME REMOVED]

2 minutes ago, Legato said:

U.S. military forces have been at war for all eight years of Obama’s tenure, the first two-term president with that distinction. He launched airstrikes or military raids in at least seven countries: Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan.

 

https://www.latimes.com/projects/la-na-pol-obama-at-war/

George W Bush launched a war against Afghanistan in 2001, and Iraq in 2003. These battles were not resolved  during his second term.

Bill Clinton launched operations in Somalia in 1993, then against Yugoslavia in 1995 and 1999. 

Richard Nixon was involved in the Vietnam War for every year he was President. He was technically a 2-term president (even though he resigned in disgrace in 1974).

I am sure there were others.

[gatomontes99]

7 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Most likely. You can assume they are correct on both counts. 

That's interesting, because that bill had bipartisan opposition and couldn't pass a democrat led house or senate.

[Hodad]

4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

That's interesting, because that bill had bipartisan opposition and couldn't pass a democrat led house or senate.

And? What does that have to do with the support of the world's preeminent economists?

And the revised version was passed as the IRA, which has indeed already begun delivering value and is part of why our economy is as strong as it is RN. 

[CdnFox]

Kamala hasn't released an economic plan so it seems pretty unlikely that they're speaking from any point of having actual data

[gatomontes99]

1 minute ago, Hodad said:

And? What does that have to do with the support of the world's preeminent economists?

And the revised version was passed as the IRA, which has indeed already begun delivering value and is part of why our economy is as strong as it is RN. 

Oh really?

Quote

Inflation is down, but the Inflation Reduction Act likely doesn’t deserve the credit

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/inflation-is-down-but-the-inflation-reduction-act-likely-doesnt-deserve-the-credit

Quote

Democrats Cover Up the Costly Failures of the Inflation Reduction Act

https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/08/democrats-cover-up-the-costly-failures-of-the-inflation-reduction-act/

Quote

Biden admits Inflation Reduction Act had 'less to do with reducing inflation' than he originally said

'I wish I hadn't called it that,' said Biden

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-admits-inflation-reduction-act-less-inflation-originally-sold-americans

It's funny how the inflation reduction act did nothing to reduce inflation and spent billions on chargers that never materialized.

I wonder if these Nobel Laureates talked to the "current and former intelligence" officials that all said the Hunter laptop was Russian disinformation. 

Look, we know your shtick. You guys use these appeal to authority fallacies to manufacture narratives with the hope that people will apply legitimacy based on the qualifications of the supporters rather than the substance of the policy.

Harris's economic policy will be a disaster to everyone. Just as one example, her tax on unrealized gains will destroy the stock market and your retirement. By taxing the value of stocks above and beyond what was invested, investors will have to raise cash to pay the taxes. To do that, they will likely have to sell stocks. The more people sell, to less the stocks will be worth. That will make it harder for businesses to raise money and make the value of your investments worth less.

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said:

Oh really?

It's funny how the inflation reduction act did nothing to reduce inflation and spent billions on chargers that never materialized.

I wonder if these Nobel Laureates talked to the "current and former intelligence" officials that all said the Hunter laptop was Russian disinformation. 

Look, we know your shtick. You guys use these appeal to authority fallacies to manufacture narratives with the hope that people will apply legitimacy based on the qualifications of the supporters rather than the substance of the policy.

Harris's economic policy will be a disaster to everyone. Just as one example, her tax on unrealized gains will destroy the stock market and your retirement. By taxing the value of stocks above and beyond what was invested, investors will have to raise cash to pay the taxes. To do that, they will likely have to sell stocks. The more people sell, to less the stocks will be worth. That will make it harder for businesses to raise money and make the value of your investments worth less.

Inflation is down because the economy is threatening to slow. Government spending inflates some measures but the reality on the ground is different. Which is why so many people were p*ssed off at Biden And his economy even before the disastrous debate. They know they can't afford as much as they used to, they know that things aren't going well for them.

The democrats can hire as many economists as they want to say how great things are but the reality is when these people walk into the store and walk out having spent all their money and not having enough food all of a sudden they realize that something is wrong and you can't just magically number that away

[Yakuda]

1 hour ago, Hodad said:

That was the Nobel Peace Prize. You're welcome to debate whether he deserved it or not. 

However, that is an entirely different beast than a prize in the sciences. 

Debate what? He didnt do a think for peace other than aggrevate it. 

 

I gave examples of people who got nobel prizes for science that were crap 

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

gnat girl cognitive dissonance is IMPENETRABLE.

For lowering the international temperature and therefore promoting PEACE. Duh

How did he do that exactly? You people are dense 

[Hodad]

20 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Oh really?

It's funny how the inflation reduction act did nothing to reduce inflation and spent billions on chargers that never materialized.

I wonder if these Nobel Laureates talked to the "current and former intelligence" officials that all said the Hunter laptop was Russian disinformation. 

Look, we know your shtick. You guys use these appeal to authority fallacies to manufacture narratives with the hope that people will apply legitimacy based on the qualifications of the supporters rather than the substance of the policy.

Harris's economic policy will be a disaster to everyone. Just as one example, her tax on unrealized gains will destroy the stock market and your retirement. By taxing the value of stocks above and beyond what was invested, investors will have to raise cash to pay the taxes. To do that, they will likely have to sell stocks. The more people sell, to less the stocks will be worth. That will make it harder for businesses to raise money and make the value of your investments worth less.

Yes, the economic analysis of Nobel laureate economists is an "appeal to authority." When we all know everyone's opinion on economic policy is equally valuable. 

 

[gatomontes99]

1 minute ago, Hodad said:

Yes, the economic analysis of Nobel laureate economists is an "appeal to authority." When we all know everyone's opinion on economic policy is equally valuable. 

 

They were dead wrong about BBB and IRA. Maybe we don't believe them. Just like we shouldn't believe the lying intelligence officials.

[User]

9 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Yes, the economic analysis of Nobel laureate economists is an "appeal to authority." When we all know everyone's opinion on economic policy is equally valuable. 

Economic analysis?

You presented this as little more than a bunch of them support Harris. 

So what?

You read their petition, and it is a political statement based on political ideology, like "equity"

This is why you hide from me. I point out the silly games you are engaged in like this. 

[West]

Of course they do. They probably have the nazi World Economic Forum logo beside their names and participate in the global leadership summit as well. 

The same azzholes that advocated for killing north American manufacturing and promoting cheap slave labor in China. 

Edited October 31, 2024 by West

[Hodad]

1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said:

They were dead wrong about BBB and IRA. Maybe we don't believe them. Just like we shouldn't believe the lying intelligence officials.

No, they were correct. That legislation has been very effective. Massive investment has followed. We have a construction boom. The forecast is mighty bright.