Jump to content

What will Harris do first if it wins the election?   

6 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Deluge said:

Oh, I've heard you a$$holes try to connect Trump to Epstein before, but nothing ever came of it.

I was just thinking that someone like you, an advanced stage TDS sufferer, might be carrying around some more bullshit. I guess that's not the case. ;) 

I mean it's mighty obvious Trump is a pedo, a rapist and a general sick creep. You know it too: it's what you love about him.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I mean it's mighty obvious Trump is a pedo, a rapist and a general sick creep. You know it too: it's what you love about him.

I see you're back to having your weird sexual fantasies again :)  Were you losing an argument or something?

 

Edited by CdnFox

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
17 hours ago, Deluge said:

That's already been established, but thanks for agreeing that Harris is a useless piece of shit. ;) 

You are whacked...as i said.

Reading comprehension issues too LOL

Harris will be laughing her ass of when trump loses...like so may other Americans. ....and that will finally spell the end of trump...he will never have a chance to run again LOL

The sentiment is correct but the name is wrong, it is trump that is the useless piece of shit, an embarrassment to the world.

 

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

You are whacked...as i said.

Reading comprehension issues too LOL

Harris will be laughing her ass of when trump loses...

And then what, stupid? 

Talk about next steps. Talk about how the stupid b*tch won't be pissing her pants when she has to meet a world leader without a teleprompter and CNN feeding her lines. lol.

Posted
1 hour ago, Deluge said:

And then what, stupid? 

Talk about next steps. Talk about how the stupid b*tch won't be pissing her pants when she has to meet a world leader without a teleprompter and CNN feeding her lines. lol.

And then Trump phucks off and goes away ...forever cause he will be dead before the next election LOL

Calling me names makes you sound like those hillbilly trumpians that we see on tiktok and instagram memes....duhhh talk about fools and stupid bi*ches...that is what trumpiand are.

What are the  next steps for you when Harris wins? You go away like trumpy will? I sure hope so LOL

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted

I think Harris would do all of the above on that list.

Or basically whatever Obama tells her to do.

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
1 hour ago, ironstone said:

I think Harris would do all of the above on that list.

Or basically whatever Obama tells her to do.

Here's the thing that we've kind of danced around.

I doubt very much she will be the president even if she wins. They will prop her up and she will do what she's told and we won't know who's really pulling the strings.

So who are the democrats really actually electing if they elect her? I doubt even they know.

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

And then Trump phucks off and goes away ...forever cause he will be dead before the next election LOL

Calling me names makes you sound like those hillbilly trumpians that we see on tiktok and instagram memes....duhhh talk about fools and stupid bi*ches...that is what trumpiand are.

What are the  next steps for you when Harris wins? You go away like trumpy will? I sure hope so LOL

Well, your TDS will subside a bit, but then you'll still have to deal with Vance or Ramaswamy or some other true American that you hate, and the derangement syndrome will start all over again. 

You perverts are like zombies: No moral compass or discernable intellect, just self triggering a$$holes desperate for blood. lol.

Trump's going to win, by the way. ;) 

Edited by Deluge
Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Well, your TDS will subside a bit, but then you'll still have to deal with Vance or Ramaswamy or some other true American that you hate, and the derangement syndrome will start all over again. 

You perverts are like zombies: No moral compass or discernable intellect, just self triggering a$$holes desperate for blood. lol.

Trump's going to win, by the way. ;) 

Ha Ha Ha..

A loser tries to defend himself and fails...again and again and again.  

When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser LOL

 

Edited by ExFlyer

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted

Joe already floated the idea of expanding the SC to overwhelm it with alt-left cultists and it didn't get enough support. 

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, CdnFox said:

I see you're back to having your weird sexual fantasies again :)  Were you losing an argument or something?

Leftists can look at actual photos of Joe Biden making out with his granddaughter, watch him sniff a bunch of different kids' hair, see him smooching young boys on the lips, and see evidence from his now drug-addicted daughter's own personal diary that Joe took inappropriate showers with her, and pretend that they don't see any evidence that he was a pedophile, then they'll turn around and accuse Trump with no evidence whatsoever.

There's really no level of lying and slander that Demi cultists won't stoop to. They're truly vile, abominable people. 

And it's not just the low-level trolls here, CNN, Hillary, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris are all about lies and slander 24/7. 

Edited by WestCanMan
  • Like 1

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
7 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Leftists can look at actual photos of Joe Biden making out with his granddaughter, watch him sniff a bunch of different kids' hair, see him smooching young boys on the lips, and see evidence from his now drug-addicted daughter's own personal diary that Joe took inappropriate showers with her, and pretend that they don't see any evidence that he was a pedophile, then they'll turn around and accuse Trump with no evidence whatsoever.

Even better, put Bill Clinton who raped his way through the office staff and house help up as a prime speaker at the dNC convention along with Hillary who helped him cover it up and then lecture people about how could they possibly support trump who's a rapist😂

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
7 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Even better, put Bill Clinton who raped his way through the office staff and house help up as a prime speaker at the dNC convention along with Hillary who helped him cover it up and then lecture people about how could they possibly support trump who's a rapist😂

And their "rape" story is atrocious.

Have you read the actual excerpt from her book?

  1. she met him for the very first time on the street out from of Bergdorf's apartment store
  2. she verbally consented to model lingerie for him within a few minutes of meeting him
  3. she never offered any objection to him coming right into the change-room with her, she simply said "after the door closed...." I don't know if she verbally invited him in, that detail is left out, but she never said that she tried to close the door, and she never said that she objected to him coming in either. If that's not a series of green lights, I don't know what is.
  4. so after the infamous door had closed behind them, he pushed her against the wall and kissed her, and by her own admission, she giggled. So, was he wrong to think that a girl who just said that she was gonna model lingerie for him, and allowed him into change-room, wanted to be kissed? I'd say that the things that she did to that point amounted to not only implied consent for that level of sexual behaviour, but she seemed really eager for it. He'd look like a wimp if he just stood the with his hands in his pockets at that point. She was clearly expecting more from a guy that she had already brought into her change-room to model lingerie for.
  5. After the kissing and giggling, he stuck his fingers into her grimy cooch, and she giggled again. And I never even thought about this part before, but he could't possibly have achieved that without at least some lateral movement of her legs, which is again implied consent. So, by her own admission, his groping was right on their mutually agreed upon track.
  6. Then he managed to get his penis out and stick it in her, which probably took more than a tenth of a second, and which he could't possibly have achieved without very intentional lateral movement of her legs and even a bit of pelvis tilting. No dude can penetrate a woman who is standing straight up with her legs together, he'd have to have a really long, skinny, upwards-tilting penis 
  7. At that point, while wearing 4" heels, and still holding her own bag in one hand, she managed to push a 6'3 collegiate athlete off of herself with her other hand, just one hand, and that somehow constitutes "rape" to all the mindless leftard losers here. 

Any decent woman should just hate the fact that what happened there was compared to actual 'rape'.

Rape doesn't sound like "I agreed to model lingerie for him, and let him come into the changeroom to watch me undress, and then we kissed and giggled, I spread my legs so that he could stuck his fingers in me and I giggled, then I opened up enough for him to get his penis inside of me, then I pushed him away and he let me go."

That sounds like the first ten minutes of a 14-minute scene from 50 Shades of Gray which has a happier ending. 

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
23 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

You're claiming the video of Trump and Epstein together where Trump looks like Epstein's coked-up lapdog aren't real?

image.gif.5968a045bf592a45527b1e022970335f.gif

OMG, a six-second clip of him talking to someone 25 years ago, who he went on to ban from his properties for over 2 decades! That's gotta be proof of something, right, stupid? 

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
Just now, WestCanMan said:

OMG, a six-second clip of him talking to someone 25 years ago, who he went on to ban from his properties for over 2 decades! That's gotta be proof of something, right, stupid? 

My bad, it's from 32 years ago. 1992. And it's more like 5 seconds long. 

Didn't Biden eulogize Sen Byrd? And Hillary Clinton said that Margaret Sanger was her mentor or some sh!t like that. Clinton flew on the Lolita Express without his secret service detail 4 times, and every one of those flights occurred after that video was shot. And there were a lot more than 4 flights, it was like 20-something, but he left his SS detail behind for 4 of them.

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said:

 Nobody voted for Bill Clinton after his ties with Epstein were revealed,

Voted for his wife plenty even though she obviously helped cover things up and was clearly complicit.

Brought him to speak at the DNC Convention as a perfect example of democratic values.

Sorry sweetie, any chance you had to claim trump is a Rapist and therefore we shouldn't vote for him went out the window when you brought up Bill Clinton.

Edited by CdnFox

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

You're blaming his wife? That's pathetic. The fact is, Clinton's political career was over once the allegations came out. Trump's career only got stronger because you incels identify with rapists because that's the only way you can get laid 

Posted
4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

And their "rape" story is atrocious.

Have you read the actual excerpt from her book?

  1. she met him for the very first time on the street out from of Bergdorf's apartment store
  2. she verbally consented to model lingerie for him within a few minutes of meeting him
  3. she never offered any objection to him coming right into the change-room with her, she simply said "after the door closed...." I don't know if she verbally invited him in, that detail is left out, but she never said that she tried to close the door, and she never said that she objected to him coming in either. If that's not a series of green lights, I don't know what is.
  4. so after the infamous door had closed behind them, he pushed her against the wall and kissed her, and by her own admission, she giggled. So, was he wrong to think that a girl who just said that she was gonna model lingerie for him, and allowed him into change-room, wanted to be kissed? I'd say that the things that she did to that point amounted to not only implied consent for that level of sexual behaviour, but she seemed really eager for it. He'd look like a wimp if he just stood the with his hands in his pockets at that point. She was clearly expecting more from a guy that she had already brought into her change-room to model lingerie for.
  5. After the kissing and giggling, he stuck his fingers into her grimy cooch, and she giggled again. And I never even thought about this part before, but he could't possibly have achieved that without at least some lateral movement of her legs, which is again implied consent. So, by her own admission, his groping was right on their mutually agreed upon track.
  6. Then he managed to get his penis out and stick it in her, which probably took more than a tenth of a second, and which he could't possibly have achieved without very intentional lateral movement of her legs and even a bit of pelvis tilting. No dude can penetrate a woman who is standing straight up with her legs together, he'd have to have a really long, skinny, upwards-tilting penis 
  7. At that point, while wearing 4" heels, and still holding her own bag in one hand, she managed to push a 6'3 collegiate athlete off of herself with her other hand, just one hand, and that somehow constitutes "rape" to all the mindless leftard losers here. 

Any decent woman should just hate the fact that what happened there was compared to actual 'rape'.

Rape doesn't sound like "I agreed to model lingerie for him, and let him come into the changeroom to watch me undress, and then we kissed and giggled, I spread my legs so that he could stuck his fingers in me and I giggled, then I opened up enough for him to get his penis inside of me, then I pushed him away and he let me go."

That sounds like the first ten minutes of a 14-minute scene from 50 Shades of Gray which has a happier ending. 

Dude, just because your I want Trump to do that shit to you doesn't mean other people don't have standards. 

Found liable, in court. Deal with it. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Hodad said:

Dude, just because your I want Trump to do that shit to you doesn't mean other people don't have standards. 

Found liable, in court. Deal with it. 

No. That is a lie

The left always does this. He was not found guilty or of rape or found liable for rape in court at all.

When he was suing someone else who had claimed he had raped her the judge said that given the fact that the word is now used Loosely to describe a lot of things that aren't rape it was okay for her to describe the situation as rape even if it technically wasn't and therefore she wasn't liable for slander.

Leftists constantly try and conflate those two cases and pretend that trump was found guilty of rape in a civil court and that never happened he was never charged in any way shape or form. No judge has ever found that he raped anyone

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
2 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

You're blaming his wife?

For covering it up like she did? For aiding and abetting it and allowing it to continue?

You're trying to blame trump voters because they're voting for someone you think might have committed a rape at some point despite never having been found to have done so in court, But you're going to turn your nose up at blaming someone who not only was certain that the other person did it but actively participated in allowing it to go covered up and continue

You want to walk us through that logic? Those are some strange morals you've got there. It's horribly wrong to vote for someone who has never been even accused of rape in court but it's perfectly fine to assist someone that you know actually did rape to cover up their crime

 

Do you really want to keep going with this? seriously every single post you look like a worse person

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
57 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

You have absolutely no self-awareness and it's hilarious. That's what comes from only having sex with your hand. 😂 

Well i'd hate to argue with an expert :) 

 ZZZZINNNNGNGGGGG!!!!!! 

GIF damn, funny, funny s, best animated GIFs lols, free download

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    TheGx Forum
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...