Was Kamala's 60 Minutes Interview Worse than Biden's Debate?

[WestCanMan]

I'll make this brief: Kamala didn't even answer the questions she was asked, what she said was stupid, and she was very rude to the interviewer, who was very friendly and polite to her for that whole session.

She couldn't have been any worse, and that's after her interview was edited by a media outlet that is extremely supportive of her. Were the parts that they edited out even worse than what they showed? Is that even possible? 

 

Kamala's interview was painfully bad and I don't think anyone can even debate that. Leftists on this site started reverting back to "Trump's going to jail" after that interview came out.

Was she worse than Biden?

[CdnFox]

29 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I'll make this brief: Kamala didn't even answer the questions she was asked, what she said was stupid, and she was very rude to the interviewer, who was very friendly and polite to her for that whole session.

She couldn't have been any worse, and that's after her interview was edited by a media outlet that is extremely supportive of her. Were the parts that they edited out even worse than what they showed? Is that even possible? 

 

Kamala's interview was painfully bad and I don't think anyone can even debate that. Leftists on this site started reverting back to "Trump's going to jail" after that interview came out.

Was she worse than Biden?

It was better than Biden I think. But that's a lot like comparing a head-on train crash with one just going off the rails. I don't think it was a good look for her.

I don't know about anyone else but I find the head nodding thing really off-putting. Anybody who knows anything about body language knows that that's a trick that shysters pull to try and make their arguments seem more convincing. Nod your head yes and hopefully other people will parrot you and also not their heads yes and it makes them feel like agreeing with you. But to anybody who's actually paying attention it just looks like they're desperate for you to believe them. 

My feeling is the only reason she did this is that she's actually doing less well in the polls then the public pools would suggest. I'm not sure this will help

[Legato]

Sixty minutes after the interview CBS shipped 4 tons of salad to the local foodbank.

[ironstone]

I was surprised that she actually was asked tough questions.

She was clearly expecting another softball interview.

[Nationalist]

I wonder how much she screamed at the interviewer afterwards?

A lot I bet.

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

I wonder how much she screamed at the interviewer afterwards?

A lot I bet.

Enough apperently - they edited the interview for her. 

She was asked a question about israel and her original answer was leaked in a sneak peak thing but the version that was finally released by CBS was COMPLETELY edited, where they took another answer from a different question and edited it in because her original was complete word salad. 

It's pretty obvious they're covering for her. This is insanely blatant. 

 

[WestCanMan]

9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Enough apperently - they edited the interview for her. 

She was asked a question about israel and her original answer was leaked in a sneak peak thing but the version that was finally released by CBS was COMPLETELY edited, where they took another answer from a different question and edited it in because her original was complete word salad. 

It's pretty obvious they're covering for her. This is insanely blatant. 

Trump takes interviews from the most hostile reporters in America and they'd edit the sh!t out of them to make them look bad if they could, but they couldn't. 

Kamala took 1 interview from friendlies, and after they edited the hell out of it to make her look better, she still looks like an angry id10t who refuses to answer the questions she's asked. 

[gatomontes99]

4 hours ago, Legato said:

Sixty minutes after the interview CBS shipped 4 tons of salad to the local foodbank.

I had to think for 2 seconds about that.

[gatomontes99]

4 hours ago, ironstone said:

I was surprised that she actually was asked tough questions.

She was clearly expecting another softball interview.

The best thing an interviewer can do to help a candidate is to ask tough, fair questions that aren't loaded with bias. The candidate should have good, prepared answers and will come off looking far better.

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

Trump takes interviews from the most hostile reporters in America and they'd edit the sh!t out of them to make them look bad if they could, but they couldn't. 

Kamala took 1 interview from friendlies, and after they edited the hell out of it to make her look better, she still looks like an angry id10t who refuses to answer the questions she's asked. 

And that was just the start. 

She went on the view and they gave her a total set up softball question and asked if she'd do anything different than biden.  IT was a golden opportunity for her to distance herself and say something like "i'm proud of what we accomplished but yes,  i am different and there's definitly stuff i'd do differently".. 

Instead she's like .."UHHHHhhhh... nope!  Can't think of anything!!!"   Got lambasted for it in the dem sympathetic talk shows as well. 

She screwed up a couple of others too and these are as easy as they get. 

very fact she's doing these is telling me that her internal polling is not as positive as she might like. She knows this is her weak spot and she's out doing it anyway

[WestCanMan]

12 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And that was just the start. 

She went on the view and they gave her a total set up softball question and asked if she'd do anything different than biden.  IT was a golden opportunity for her to distance herself and say something like "i'm proud of what we accomplished but yes,  i am different and there's definitly stuff i'd do differently".. 

Instead she's like .."UHHHHhhhh... nope!  Can't think of anything!!!"   Got lambasted for it in the dem sympathetic talk shows as well. 

She screwed up a couple of others too and these are as easy as they get. 

very fact she's doing these is telling me that her internal polling is not as positive as she might like. She knows this is her weak spot and she's out doing it anyway

If the election was today I think that voter apathy among Demis would be huge. 

It's one thing to pay her lip service, in order to look woke, it's another thing entirely to be willing to bear the responsibility for putting a f-tard like her in the WH. 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

If the election was today I think that voter apathy among Demis would be huge. 

It's one thing to pay her lip service, in order to look woke, it's another thing entirely to be willing to bear the responsibility for putting a f-tard like her in the WH. 

I've said similar things myself. The dems are going to have a serious problem with voter turn out.  Ballot harvesting won't be quite so easy this time, and i think getting the people motivated and out to vote is going to be easier for trump than her. 

Of course you never know what the voters are going to do and advance polling makes it harder to predict but i suspect at the moment the advantage is in trump's favor.

[Fluffypants]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

I've said similar things myself. The dems are going to have a serious problem with voter turn out.  Ballot harvesting won't be quite so easy this time, and i think getting the people motivated and out to vote is going to be easier for trump than her. 

Of course you never know what the voters are going to do and advance polling makes it harder to predict but i suspect at the moment the advantage is in trump's favor.

What she is doing isn't going to help, even the 60 minute interview was Charmin soft with her preferred interviewer and they edited it to help her and the sick thing is in their preview she had a completely different answer to the Israel question and they did a damn voice over where the interviewer answered the question for her and made it so damn obvious.

She has been asked the same question 1000 times she should have an actual answer by now. Problem with the Democrat party as a whole is they made themselves so diverse that they have to walk on eggshells with everything because if you show something definitive some factions of your party are going to be pissed off. They have no unifying message other "we all hate Trump right?"

At some point she will have to bite the bullet and go on Fox because Howard Stern, Colbert and the View aint gonna get you votes because the only people who watch/listen to those shows are voting for her anyway. If she is worried about bias she should do the interview live.

 

Edited October 9, 2024 by Fluffypants

[WestCanMan]

4 hours ago, CdnFox said:

 

60 Minutes has hit "Rock Bottom"

Honestly, what Rock Bottom did is exactly the same thing that 60 Mins did.

Bill Whitaker is the real-life Godfrey Jones 😉

Edited October 9, 2024 by WestCanMan

[robosmith]

23 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

60 Minutes has hit "Rock Bottom"

Honestly, what Rock Bottom did is exactly the same thing that 60 Mins did.

Bill Whitaker is the real-life Godfrey Jones 😉

Or Murdoch's Sky News is LYING.

The FACT is, there was no word salad  as Harris' ALLEGED answer was completely understandable IF you're NOT A M0R0N.

Quote

word salad

noun [ C or U ]

 

us 

 

 /ˈwɜ˞ːd ˌsæl.əd/ uk 

 

 /ˈwɜːd ˌsæl.əd/

 

Add to word list 

a mixture of words or phrases that is confused and difficult to understand:

Your explanation is a pompous word salad, with absolutely no meaning.

Speech disorganization can involve words blended together into incomprehensible statements, also known as word salad.

 

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, robosmith said:

Or Murdoch's Sky News is LYING.

They're not. This has been reported in numerous locations and the original footage is available. So we know it's true.

Turns out the democfrats are juost full of ROS LIES!!