Legato Posted September 10 Report Posted September 10 12 minutes ago, Black Dog said: Literally a fake quote, you stunned Boomer c*nts will believe anything. Quote
Black Dog Posted September 10 Report Posted September 10 10 minutes ago, Legato said: *laughs in Charles Whitman* Quote "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit
Legato Posted September 10 Report Posted September 10 3 minutes ago, Black Dog said: *laughs in Charles Whitman* Although Whitman's autopsy revealed a pecan-sized tumor in the white matter above his amygdala, the tumor was not connected to any sensory nerves. Nonetheless, some experts believe this tumor may have contributed to the violent impulses which Whitman had been exhibiting for several years prior to the massacre.[3]: 54 [5] So the person not the gun. 1 Quote
Black Dog Posted September 10 Report Posted September 10 9 minutes ago, Legato said: Although Whitman's autopsy revealed a pecan-sized tumor in the white matter above his amygdala, the tumor was not connected to any sensory nerves. Nonetheless, some experts believe this tumor may have contributed to the violent impulses which Whitman had been exhibiting for several years prior to the massacre.[3]: 54 [5] So the person not the gun. He didn't kill 17 people and wound 31 more with his tumor. Quote "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit
Legato Posted September 10 Report Posted September 10 48 minutes ago, Black Dog said: He didn't kill 17 people and wound 31 more with his tumor. Not with but as a result of. What part of "violent impulses" do you not understand? Oh now I see, you thought the rifle had violent impulses. Quote
Black Dog Posted September 10 Report Posted September 10 1 minute ago, Legato said: Not with but as a result of. What part of "violent impulses" do you not understand? Oh now I see, you thought the rifle had violent impulses. It always cracks me up that you people acknowledge there are violent and disturbed people out there and also think they should be able to have basically unfettered access to firearms. Quote "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit
CdnFox Posted September 10 Report Posted September 10 1 hour ago, Black Dog said: He didn't kill 17 people and wound 31 more with his tumor. Yeah. He did. That's why he killed people. The tool is irrelevant. They'd be just as dead if he'd used a knife or a truck or a bomb or gasoline or whatever So the only common denominator is the tumor and the person. Take THAT away - no killings. It's not the tool. Also you're the tool 42 minutes ago, Black Dog said: It always cracks me up that you people acknowledge there are violent and disturbed people out there and also think they should be able to have basically unfettered access to firearms. It always cracks me up that of the two things you just mentioned you think firearms are the problem Quote
User Posted September 10 Report Posted September 10 1 hour ago, Black Dog said: It always cracks me up that you people acknowledge there are violent and disturbed people out there and also think they should be able to have basically unfettered access to firearms. Still waiting for you to stop being a coward. Tell us what it is you support. Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."
CdnFox Posted September 11 Report Posted September 11 1 hour ago, User said: Still waiting for you to stop being a coward. Tell us what it is you support. His echo chamber. Whether it makes sense or not 1 Quote
impartialobserver Posted September 11 Report Posted September 11 Banning all guns, in theory, would cut down on the number of school shootings. But we have the second amendment and zero chance of it going away. So then we have to find other ways. 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted September 11 Report Posted September 11 Just now, impartialobserver said: Banning all guns, in theory, would cut down on the number of school shootings. But increase the number of school stabbings, burnings, chokings etc. If we care about the amount of death, then that's one thing. If we ONLY care about murders involving GUNS and all other murders are fine then sure, it may possibly help. Quote
impartialobserver Posted September 11 Report Posted September 11 1 minute ago, CdnFox said: But increase the number of school stabbings, burnings, chokings etc. If we care about the amount of death, then that's one thing. If we ONLY care about murders involving GUNS and all other murders are fine then sure, it may possibly help. Hence why I added the word, "shootings". Like it or not, folks view stabbings different from shootings. Shootings are inherently less personal. Walk into a room, not know any of them, but still open fire and kill some or all of them. It speaks to a lack of control. Where as a stabbing, you have to be at most 12 inches away and most times someone has to stab the victim multiple times. The victim may have little to no control over the outcome depending on the situation but they can only stab one person at a time. Quote
CdnFox Posted September 11 Report Posted September 11 41 minutes ago, impartialobserver said: Hence why I added the word, "shootings". Like it or not, folks view stabbings different from shootings. well as the saying goes there should be a special place in hell reserved for anyone who shows up to heaven with that kind of thinking. It would be complete hypocrisy to say that a person dying by a knife or being run over by a truck or burned to death or poisoned is somehow less tragic than one dying by a gun. I really can't help people who are that far gone, their civilization is collapsing anyway. Quote
Black Dog Posted September 11 Report Posted September 11 (edited) 4 hours ago, CdnFox said: Yeah. He did. That's why he killed people. The tool is irrelevant. They'd be just as dead if he'd used a knife or a truck or a bomb or gasoline or whatever So the only common denominator is the tumor and the person. Take THAT away - no killings. It's not the tool. Also you're the tool I'm not sure he would have hurt anyone with a knife from up in the tower and it wouldn't have been pretty hard to get a truck up there. Seriously if it's just as easy to kill a large number of people with any of the other methods you list, why are they so much less common than guns? It's because guns are the perfect combination of cheap, easy to use and highly effective compared to everything else. Quote It always cracks me up that of the two things you just mentioned you think firearms are the problem In the hands of psychopaths with violent tendencies they are. Without the means, these people are just disturbed individuals. And of course I'll point out again that you have absolutely no solutions for reducing mass killings, gun crime, or suicides; none at all. Quote But increase the number of school stabbings, burnings, chokings etc. If we care about the amount of death, then that's one thing. If we ONLY care about murders involving GUNS and all other murders are fine then sure, it may possibly help. Forcing would-be killers to resort to far less lethal means would quite obviously reduce the amount of deaths, you utter m0r0n. The Sandy hook shooter killed 27 people in five minutes; what do you think the death toll would have been if he was trying to commit a mass-choking attack? 4 hours ago, User said: Still waiting for you to stop being a coward. Tell us what it is you support. Lol you've never once bothered to even ask me you f*cking loser. Edited September 11 by Black Dog Quote "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit
User Posted September 11 Report Posted September 11 39 minutes ago, Black Dog said: Lol you've never once bothered to even ask me you f*cking loser. Still being a coward. Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."
Black Dog Posted September 11 Report Posted September 11 10 hours ago, User said: Still being a coward. I'll post my gun control plan when you share your people control plan, loser. Quote "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit
User Posted September 11 Report Posted September 11 10 minutes ago, Black Dog said: I'll post my gun control plan when you share your people control plan, loser. I did. That is when you said you would rather have the good guys with guns wait outside while the little kids were bleeding to death inside. Don't want a firefight. Just let the bad guy kill as many as he wants to. That is your plan. Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."
Black Dog Posted September 11 Report Posted September 11 (edited) 14 minutes ago, User said: I did. LOl you want SROs, which more than half of schools in the U.S. already have and for which there's no evidence they reduce mass shootings, and armed teachers, which is such a incredibly stupid idea it could only come from someone like you who who jacks off to images of dead kids. Nothing about how to manage mental health (which you claim is the real problem) or keeping psychopaths from arming themselves in the first place. Quote That is when you said you would rather have the good guys with guns wait outside while the little kids were bleeding to death inside. lol seriously this such a pathetic lie that it's clear you know you've been well and truly beaten here. Edited September 11 by Black Dog Quote "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit
User Posted September 11 Report Posted September 11 1 hour ago, Black Dog said: there's no evidence they reduce mass shootings Yeah, sure, if you ignore the evidence. 1 hour ago, Black Dog said: lol seriously this such a pathetic lie that it's clear you know you've been well and truly beaten here. Not a lie. You said you were more fearful of the shootouts stopping a bad guy. Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."
Black Dog Posted September 11 Report Posted September 11 2 minutes ago, User said: Yeah, sure, if you ignore the evidence. You haven't given any evidence to prove that. Quote Not a lie. You said you were more fearful of the shootouts stopping a bad guy. That's also a lie. Quote me or STFU forever, f*cko. Quote "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.