Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

 

i-aint-reading-all-that-im-happy-for-you

You have to plead the 5th amendment in a political forum debate  🤣 

Gutless loser. Now you know why your nickname is Black B!tch.

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
Just now, WestCanMan said:

You have to plead the 5th amendment in a political forum debate  🤣 

Gutless loser. Now you know why your nickname is Black B!tch.

That's not what pleading the fifth is you retarded mongrel.

And I'm not gonna waste my time getting onto another pointless round and round with a mentally ill person who thinks absolute numbers are more relevant than rates here. 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I'm right here, and you're lying.

You're running, boy. You had to plead the fifth:

i-aint-reading-all-that-im-happy-for-you😭

  • Like 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You're running, boy. You had to plead the fifth:

i-aint-reading-all-that-im-happy-for-you😭

Again: thats' not what pleading the 5th means shithead.

1 minute ago, User said:

OK, so what should we call a fake vagina then?

What's a fake vagina? Like what exactly are you describing here.

Edited by Black Dog
Posted
1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

Again: thats' not what pleading the 5th means shithead.

Yeah it is. You were backed into a corner and you couldn't give an answer without proving that you're a liar and an 1d1ot, so you pulled out that stupid meme to get your fat outta the fire.

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Yeah it is. You were backed into a corner and you couldn't give an answer without proving that you're a liar and an 1d1ot, so you pulled out that stupid meme to get your fat outta the fire.

No I just didn't want to read all that shit given the garbage source.

6 minutes ago, User said:

Keep running coward. 

 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 

Gender affirming surgery can be used to create a vulva and vagina. It involves removing the penis, testicles and scrotum.

During a vaginoplasty procedure, tissue in the genital area is rearranged to create a vaginal canal (or opening) and vulva (external genitalia), including the labia. A version of vaginoplasty called vulvoplasty can create a feminine-appearing outer genital area with a shallow vaginal canal.

link

Feminizing surgery, also called gender-affirming surgery or gender-confirmation surgery, involves procedures that help better align the body with a person's gender identity.... Bottom surgery can involve removal of the testicles, or removal of the testicles and penis and the creation of a vagina, labia and clitoris.

link

The most common vaginoplasty technique is some variation of the penile inversion procedure. In this technique, a vaginal vault is created between the rectum and the urethra, in the same location as a non-transgender female between the pelvic floor (Kegel) muscles, and the vaginal lining is created from penile skin. An orchiectomy is performed, the labia majora are created using scrotal skin, and the clitoris is created from a portion of the glans penis. The prostate is left in place to avoid complications such as incontinence and urethral strictures. Furthermore, the prostate has erogenous sensation and is the anatomic equivalent to the "g-spot." Great care is taken to limit the external scars from a vaginoplasty by locating the incisions appropriately and with meticulous closure. Typical depth is 15 cm (6 inches), with a range of 12-16cm (5-6.5 inches); in comparison, typical vaginal depth in non-transgender females is between 9-12cm (3.5 to 5 inches).

link

Edited by Black Dog
Posted
42 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I knew back in spring of 2020 that young, healthy people didn't need the vax. And not just from conspiracy theorists. I saw Dr Oz talk about it on TV, so a lot of people knew.

This is my new favorite quote. 

OMFG! 🤣🤣🤣

Posted
1 hour ago, Hodad said:

This is my new favorite quote. 

OMFG! 🤣🤣🤣

Yeah, but you ended the quote right before the critical part, dummy: 

  • And unlike you I don't just believe everything I see on TV, so I looked for stats to either prove or disprove it, and it turns out he was correct.

You see, before I just assumed that Dr Oz was correct, I went and found the stats for "Covid deaths by age" for my entire country and they couldn't have pointed out a stronger correlation between age and covid vulnerability.

You clearly didn't hold your 'sources' to the same scrutiny that I held mine, because you still just look like an id10t every time you open your mouth about covid. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
1 hour ago, Hodad said:

This is my new favorite quote. 

OMFG! 🤣🤣🤣

People like Hodad heard the WHO and Dr. Fauci say don't wear masks, so like good robots, they obeyed, and then the next day, when the WHO and Dr. Fauci said, "OMG, Wear Masks!" even if it is just a piece of folded cloth over your face, the folks like Hodad folded up their old shirts into masks and obeyed. 

They also stood behind Plexiglass in the crowded Lowes, thinking that protected them... never wondering how it was safe in Lowes, but their local restaurant that went out of business because they were ordered closed was not safe... 

and then they cheered on California leaders as they filled in their skate parks with sand, but then went out and had their own private dinners without wearing masks at exclusive wineries... 

Never once did it occur to folks like Hodad to question any of this... nope. Pelosi can get her hair cut, but they must all be good robots and obey. 

  • Like 2

 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Yeah, but you ended the quote right before the critical part, dummy: 

  • And unlike you I don't just believe everything I see on TV, so I looked for stats to either prove or disprove it, and it turns out he was correct.

You see, before I just assumed that Dr Oz was correct, I went and found the stats for "Covid deaths by age" for my entire country and they couldn't have pointed out a stronger correlation between age and covid vulnerability.

You clearly didn't hold your 'sources' to the same scrutiny that I held mine, because you still just look like an id10t every time you open your mouth about covid. 

Bless your heart.

Watching Dr. Oz for scientific content is like watching Alex Jones for news.

Like magic, the puzzle pieces of your alarming condition (and impeccable judgment) are starting to align!🤣

Posted
1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

No I just didn't want to read all that shit given the garbage source.

"...he says as he lustily devours all the latest Kamala propaganda and disinformation he can find" lol.

You literally disregarded the easily verifiable truths of my post, because they hurt your feelings, and headed off in search of more bias-confirming CNN drivel 🤣

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
Just now, Hodad said:

Bless your heart.

Watching Dr. Oz for scientific content is like watching Alex Jones for news.

Like magic, the puzzle pieces of your alarming condition (and impeccable judgment) are starting to align!🤣

You watch CNN for scientific content, dummy. And unlike CNN, Dr Oz was 100% correct.

You even admitted your self that you figured out that coved deaths were almost exclusively among the very elderly in 2022.

Well, thanks to my better choice of sources, I was two full years ahead of you on the learning curve.

Your id10tic post would have made sense if Dr Oz was wrong and your sources accidentally told the truth for once, but Dr Oz was right and you were floundering again, with your mouth going full speed in the wrong direction. You shouldn't be pretending to take a victory lap right now dummy. If you had any shame at all your posts would be more contrite and less m0r0nic.

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
21 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

"...he says as he lustily devours all the latest Kamala propaganda and disinformation he can find" lol.

You literally disregarded the easily verifiable truths of my post, because they hurt your feelings, and headed off in search of more bias-confirming CNN drivel 🤣

Ok grandpa now let's get you back top the home.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Ok grandpa now let's get you back top the home.

Oh, dummy, tell me again how you noticed that the vast majority of covid deaths were occurring among the elderly IN 2022.

🤣 

Thanks, Sherlock. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
22 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You watch CNN for scientific content, dummy. And unlike CNN, Dr Oz was 100% correct.

You even admitted your self that you figured out that coved deaths were almost exclusively among the very elderly in 2022.

Well, thanks to my better choice of sources, I was two full years ahead of you on the learning curve.

Your id10tic post would have made sense if Dr Oz was wrong and your sources accidentally told the truth for once, but Dr Oz was right and you were floundering again, with your mouth going full speed in the wrong direction. You shouldn't be pretending to take a victory lap right now dummy. If you had any shame at all your posts would be more contrite and less m0r0nic.

No, dummy, everyone has known all along that the elderly were at higher risk--we had that conversation multiple times regarding priority vaccination of the elderly. But it does not mean that the deaths were "almost exclusively" among the very elderly. That's (still) a lie.

Of 1.14 million COVID deaths in the CDC database, about a quarter of those deaths were among people under 65.

image.thumb.png.adbf78ccca01079a328cf4b28ff45d20.png

Yeah, yeah. Fark the data. Your feelings are all that matters. Well, your feelings and your phony narratives.

Posted
2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

 

Yeah keep telling on yourself here.

 

LOL again just repeating that doesn't make it true :) I posted the specific laws and cites.  Sorry kiddo  you're in the wrong here. The gov't says so, the dictionary says so, common sense says so.  Hard fail on your part  

So now you're butt hurt and the only thing you have left is posting little down arrows to make yourself feel like somehow you can fight back against the mean person who beat you up so bad.  It's like hearing you wimper every time you do it ? :)

And  i see you're in denial with @User and sticking your head in the sand with your fingers in your ears with @WestCanMan

So denial, whimpering subservient behavior, and refusal to face the facts.   LOL God you're a mess :) 

Now give me my downarrow you subservient biatch ;) 

  • Like 2

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
18 minutes ago, Hodad said:

No, dummy, everyone has known all along that the elderly were at higher risk--we had that conversation multiple times regarding priority vaccination of the elderly. But it does not mean that the deaths were "almost exclusively" among the very elderly. That's (still) a lie.

Of 1.14 million COVID deaths in the CDC database, about a quarter of those deaths were among people under 65.

image.thumb.png.adbf78ccca01079a328cf4b28ff45d20.png

Yeah, yeah. Fark the data. Your feelings are all that matters. Well, your feelings and your phony narratives.

  1. 28,000 people above 60 in Canada in the first 2 years. 
  2. Less than 2,000 people below 60 in that same time frame, and that's the vast majority of the population. Don't talk to me about data, m0r0n. Your IQ is honestly about 3 standard deviations below the mean.  
  3. YOU'RE THE ONE WHO TRIED TO ACT LIKE IT WAS WORTH NOTING THAT COVID DEATHS WERE MOSTLY AMONG THE ELDERLY IN 2022. I DIDN'T MAKE YOU PRETEND THAT WAS SHOCKING NEWS, DUMMY.  

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
14 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

LOL again just repeating that doesn't make it true :) I posted the specific laws and cites.  Sorry kiddo  you're in the wrong here. The gov't says so, the dictionary says so, common sense says so.  Hard fail on your part  

So now you're butt hurt and the only thing you have left is posting little down arrows to make yourself feel like somehow you can fight back against the mean person who beat you up so bad.  It's like hearing you wimper every time you do it ? :)

And  i see you're in denial with @User and sticking your head in the sand with your fingers in your ears with @WestCanMan

So denial, whimpering subservient behavior, and refusal to face the facts.   LOL God you're a mess :) 

Now give me my downarrow you subservient biatch ;) 

I may get the odd thing wrong (kinda like you with the Nazi thing or the confederates were socialists thing lol) but I will never ever be a bigger loser than someone who cries about downvotes on a message board.

I mean good god, look at this shit lmao.

On 10/23/2023 at 7:26 PM, CdnFox said:

Oh look - the coward @CITIZEN_2015 hides behind his downvote again :)   Little terrorists like you always hide from the truth and honest men.  What a coward :)  Just like the hamas terrorist you love hide behind the civilians :)  

On 10/23/2023 at 4:22 PM, CdnFox said:

@CITIZEN_2015,  It's typical of those of you on the left that you'd hide behind a downvote because you haven't got the balls or the brains to address my post directly.

You might as well admit i'm right and you can't defend your pathetic defense of terrorists if you're going to bother doing that.

On 11/10/2023 at 11:40 AM, CdnFox said:

C'mon @ExFlyer,  don't just downvote the guy because you disagree with his opinion , downvotes are for more serious things than that.  Otherwise the board is just one big downvote or splits into 'factions' who run around upvoting and downvoting each other just because.

I get this is an emotional issue and can lead to extreme frustration for both sides.  It's hard sometimes when you feel people are genuinely suffering, whichever side you empathize with.  But we shouldn't let it drive us over the edge here right?

No reply necessary or anything - i just wanted to put that out there for you to think about.

On 8/19/2024 at 12:59 PM, CdnFox said:

you're going to downvote me because i said something 100 percent truthful and you don't like it?

what a pathetic weasel.  You're just proving me right.  Have a few in return, 

On 6/22/2024 at 2:53 AM, CdnFox said:

And he down voted you for that. He hates the truth so much that rather than just reply he chose to downvote you for stating what are verifiable facts.

Welcome to the left these days

On 3/6/2024 at 2:24 PM, CdnFox said:

You have to be the worst kind of loser to downvote someone just because they posted an article you don't like. What an unmitigated a**hole you are. The kind of loser who knows he's wrong and just wants to lash out at his betters.

 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:
  1. 28,000 people above 60 in Canada in the first 2 years. 
  2. Less than 2,000 people below 60 in that same time frame, and that's the vast majority of the population. Don't talk to me about data, m0r0n. Your IQ is honestly about 3 standard deviations below the mean.  
  3. YOU'RE THE ONE WHO TRIED TO ACT LIKE IT WAS WORTH NOTING THAT COVID DEATHS WERE MOSTLY AMONG THE ELDERLY IN 2022. I DIDN'T MAKE YOU PRETEND THAT WAS SHOCKING NEWS, DUMMY.  

1. Good for you, Canada! Since you don't understand rates and can only speak to raw numbers, you must conclude that Canadian COVID is much less dangerous.🙄

2. Awww, your feelers are obviously hurt. That's a tough thing when feelings are all you have. If that were true of my IQ it would be terrible news for you. 

3. Of course it's worth noting. When the elderly are prioritized for vaccination and vaccinating at a much higher rate it obviously skews the risk profile for the vaccinated cohort. You never managed to understand that either--also not shocking news.

So sad that you've been repeating the same dumb shit for 2 years, looking at irrefutable data demonstrating vaccine efficacy and pretending like it doesn't exist. You incel trolls have a lot of free time though.

 

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I may get the odd thing wrong (kinda like you with the Nazi thing or the confederates were socialists thing lol) but I will never ever be a bigger loser than someone who cries about downvotes on a message board.

I mean good god, look at this shit lmao.

You're a guy who pleads the 5th on a message board. 🤣

 i-aint-reading-all-that-im-happy-for-you😭  "Waaah, mammy, make WCM stop!"

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,911
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...