Trump / Kamala Debate -- it's on!

[WestCanMan]

On 8/4/2024 at 12:32 PM, Aristides said:

She should counter with a full audience debate at CNN or MSNBC. You clowns would have a stroke. Trump can't risk a debate in a neutral forum that isn't stacked by his cult so he chickening out

Your pitiful attack rings hollow.

Trump just spanked Biden on CNN, with CNN moderators, and he even took questions at ABC's black journalists convention in Chicago, where they trotted out their usual stupid lies like "Why did you refer to immigrants as animals"?

Vance just walked across the tarmac at an airport to talk to Dem-owned reporters and Kamala/Walz, and they all just ran away and hide like little children.

Biden and Harris refuse to even take questions that are true, from reporters who work for them. 

Your sh1t-talk is bizarre and weak, dummy. You should leave lying about Trump and Kamala to people with higher IQs.

[WestCanMan]

On 8/4/2024 at 12:40 PM, Aristides said:

Trump had it easy in the last debate and not just because of Biden. There was no one there to fact check and call him on his lies. The guy is a snowflake.

Stop with your "fact-checking" BS you gutless wonder.

CNN calls any inconvenient truths lies, and it has nothing to do with the veracity of what's been said.

The biggest lies that anyone told at a debate in recent years were "I didn't know anything about my son's overseas business dealings" and "The laptop is Russian disinformation". CNN still doesn't acknowledge those things as false.

[WestCanMan]

On 8/4/2024 at 1:13 PM, Rebound said:

[Aristides]

31 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Stop with your "fact-checking" BS you gutless wonder.

CNN calls any inconvenient truths lies, and it has nothing to do with the veracity of what's been said.

The biggest lies that anyone told at a debate in recent years were "I didn't know anything about my son's overseas business dealings" and "The laptop is Russian disinformation". CNN still doesn't acknowledge those things as false.

I don't watch CNN or FOX. Maybe you shouldn't either. 

[CdnFox]

Honestly it kind of makes him look weak to accept the original scheduled one after saying he wouldn't unless he gets something like the other two debates.

 

[CouchPotato]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Honestly it kind of makes him look weak to accept the original scheduled one after saying he wouldn't unless he gets something like the other two debates.

 

Maybe not.  I mean if she is willing to debate on FOX as well that's sort of a compromise.

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, Aristides said:

I don't watch CNN

No one does, yet somehow every cultist on this forum manages to say the exact same things that they say on CNN, word for word. 

Is that weird?

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Honestly it kind of makes him look weak to accept the original scheduled one after saying he wouldn't unless he gets something like the other two debates.

I don't get it...

How does it make him look weak if he wants debates on channels that basically work for the Dems?

The chances of Kamala favourable debate questions and getting the debate questions in advance, like Hillary, are quite high.

[CouchPotato]

6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I don't get it...

How does it make him look weak if he wants debates on channels that basically work for the Dems?

The chances of Kamala favourable debate questions and getting the debate questions in advance, like Hillary, are quite high.

I think he means because he said he didn't want to do a debate on ABC and now he has backed down. I think it's ok because he is also getting a debate he wants.

I wonder how Trump will handle the two debates in hostile territory.

Edited August 8, 2024 by CouchPotato

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, CouchPotato said:

Maybe not.  I mean if she is willing to debate on FOX as well that's sort of a compromise.

For sure but my understanding is she hasn't agreed to that yet but he has committed to the ABC one

[CouchPotato]

Just now, CdnFox said:

For sure but my understanding is she hasn't agreed to that yet but he has committed to the ABC one

I think he won't agree unless she commits to the FOX debate. We shall see.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

I don't get it...

How does it make him look weak if he wants debates on channels that basically work for the Dems?

The chances of Kamala favourable debate questions and getting the debate questions in advance, like Hillary, are quite high.

It wouldn't if he had stuck to the original agreement, but by saying he wouldn't do that and she had to do it his way, and then caving and doing it her way, it looks like she's bossing him around and he gains nothing out of it. That's not a strong look. He should only have agreed to it if she agreed to meet him on Fox or something like that. As it is it looks like she got everything she wanted and he got nothing and that just isn't the look you want to send.

4 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

I think he won't agree unless she commits to the FOX debate. We shall see.

I had heard he'd already committed again to the abc one without her saying yes to fox.  Maybe i heard wrong. 

[CouchPotato]

26 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I had heard he'd already committed again to the abc one without her saying yes to fox.  Maybe i heard wrong. 

Oh, maybe so.

[Reg Volk]

I can't believe it, cowardly cackling Kamala actually talked to the media.  Yeah it was only for 2 minutes, but at least she talked to them.  I love it that Trump wants to debate her 3 times, it's going to be 3 really ugly smack downs.  He is going to destroy that low-functioning fraud.

[CdnFox]

10 minutes ago, Reg Volk said:

I can't believe it, cowardly cackling Kamala actually talked to the media.  Yeah it was only for 2 minutes, but at least she talked to them.  I love it that Trump wants to debate her 3 times, it's going to be 3 really ugly smack downs.  He is going to destroy that low-functioning fraud.

yeah..... that MIGHT be why she's hesitant to do more debates. 

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

It wouldn't if he had stuck to the original agreement, but by saying he wouldn't do that and she had to do it his way, and then caving and doing it her way, it looks like she's bossing him around and he gains nothing out of it. That's not a strong look. He should only have agreed to it if she agreed to meet him on Fox or something like that. As it is it looks like she got everything she wanted and he got nothing and that just isn't the look you want to send.

I had heard he'd already committed again to the abc one without her saying yes to fox.  Maybe i heard wrong. 

I thought that the debate that they agreed to was on Fox. No?

[CouchPotato]

20 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I thought that the debate that they agreed to was on Fox. No?

Trump said he would do three debates. FOX, ABC and NBC.

Edited August 9, 2024 by CouchPotato

[CdnFox]

56 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I thought that the debate that they agreed to was on Fox. No?

My understanding (and remembering the situation is fluid)  is that trump proposed 3 debates, fox abc nbc and said he'd commit to those dates and that the original abc one was fine even if the other two didn't go. 

Kamala has said she will not 'have that conversation" about more debates until after the 12th which is the ABC debate and after the proposed fox debate. 

She's kind of pushing him around here. 

[NAME REMOVED]

8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

 

She's kind of pushing him around here. 

She's standing up to the bully.

Trump can only win a debate with Kamala by cheating. He managed to survive the first debate, simply due to having a challenger in more  of a cognitive decline than himself. He will not be so fortunate vs Kamala. 

[WestCanMan]

9 hours ago, CdnFox said:

My understanding (and remembering the situation is fluid)  is that trump proposed 3 debates, fox abc nbc and said he'd commit to those dates and that the original abc one was fine even if the other two didn't go. 

Kamala has said she will not 'have that conversation" about more debates until after the 12th which is the ABC debate and after the proposed fox debate. 

She's kind of pushing him around here. 

Trump needs the debate, no matter how unfair the terms are.

Kamala would rather just keep reading from the teleprompter, dodging reporters, and letting the MSM be her campaign. 

She'd be happier and better off not to debate at all. That's why she has the power. 

The MSM will keep going with the story of Kamala the strong, beautiful, perfect coloured woman and they'll never take her to task for pushing riots, pimping bail funds, opening the border, and just being generally useless and inappropriate.

The only chance Americans will see Kamala exposed as the failure and the id10t she is is for her to go on the debate stage and have to think and speak for herself. 

My guess is that she'll do 1 debate and if she even has 2 or 3 decent moments, the MSM will package that up into a Superbowl highlight reel and she'll stay off the debate stage for the rest of the cycle. 

[Black Dog]

12 hours ago, Reg Volk said:

I can't believe it, cowardly cackling Kamala actually talked to the media.  Yeah it was only for 2 minutes, but at least she talked to them.  I love it that Trump wants to debate her 3 times, it's going to be 3 really ugly smack downs.  He is going to destroy that low-functioning fraud.

You guys love your fanfic, huh? Anything to avoid confronting the grim reality that Doddering Donald is anything but cooked as his sloppy, low-energy press conference yesterday showed. I wonder if he'll even hit the campaign trail or if they'll keep up doped up at Mar A Lago for the duration.

[Reg Volk]

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

You guys love your fanfic, huh? Anything to avoid confronting the grim reality that Doddering Donald is anything but cooked as his sloppy, low-energy press conference yesterday showed. I wonder if he'll even hit the campaign trail or if they'll keep up doped up at Mar A Lago for the duration.

Kamala and her weirdo running mate are cooked as soon as they have to answer real questions.  The Dem cultists just want to keep believing that two low IQ fools (Cackling Kamala and Weirdo Walz) can keep hiding like cowards until the election.  Ain't gonna work, weirdos.

[Black Dog]

5 minutes ago, Reg Volk said:

Kamala and her weirdo running mate are cooked as soon as they have to answer real questions.  The Dem cultists just want to keep believing that two low IQ fools (Cackling Kamala and Weirdo Walz) can keep hiding like cowards until the election.  Ain't gonna work, weirdos.

You stupid f*ckers can't even come up with an original line of attack. Absolutely rinsed political movement.

[CdnFox]

8 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Trump needs the debate, no matter how unfair the terms are.

Kamala would rather just keep reading from the teleprompter, dodging reporters, and letting the MSM be her campaign. 

She'd be happier and better off not to debate at all. That's why she has the power. 

The MSM will keep going with the story of Kamala the strong, beautiful, perfect coloured woman and they'll never take her to task for pushing riots, pimping bail funds, opening the border, and just being generally useless and inappropriate.

The only chance Americans will see Kamala exposed as the failure and the id10t she is is for her to go on the debate stage and have to think and speak for herself. 

My guess is that she'll do 1 debate and if she even has 2 or 3 decent moments, the MSM will package that up into a Superbowl highlight reel and she'll stay off the debate stage for the rest of the cycle. 

Sure. She's like to run a 'basement' campaign like biden did,  never answer a question (it's been almost a month and no presser yet) and never be off teleprompter because she sucks at it, and that's why she got hammered during her run for the presidency. 

Trump needs a debate to  get her in the public eye. She thinks she can manage the damage from one debate even if she doesn't do great and that could be true.  Trump needs the election to focus on her and her policies and the fact that this is a VERY 'woke' ticket.   He needs people to be looking at her, he needs her to be forced to answer questions. 

So she's backing him into a corner and pushing him around, and its visible. He should have shut up and just stuck with the orginal and not said he wasn't going to do it in the first place.  THEN proposed others and called her a chicken when she said no -  "I agreed to 2 debates with the presidential nominee - you switched nominees - i want my two debates or you're a coward". 

This is going to be a tight election. The media is already lining up lock step behind harris,  and not doing their jobs or asking any questions.  He can't afford any errors from here in. 

[CouchPotato]

Apparently Trump is getting Tulsi Gabbard to help him prepare for his debate with Kamala. Sounds like a pretty good move by the Trumpmeister General.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/16/us/politics/trump-debate-tulsi-gabbard.html

Edited August 16, 2024 by CouchPotato