The Democrats newest conspiracy theory: Trump faked his own assassination

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Yes. When they double-down after being proven stupid and continue to try to push fake election theories, you know they're either really, really dumb or downright evil. 

Fake election theories like 'russian collusion'?  the "Steel dossier"? Ones like that? for like 8 FLIPPING YEARS after an intense investigation with dozens of fbi agents found nothing?

Agreed.  They are stupid AND evil, two things can be true at the same time. 

[Chrissy1979]

17 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Fake election theories like 'russian collusion'?  the "Steel dossier"? Ones like that? for like 8 FLIPPING YEARS after an intense investigation with dozens of fbi agents found nothing?

 

You shouldn't have to lie to make your point.

[CdnFox]

37 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

You shouldn't have to lie to make your point.

That WAS my point   So why did you feel you had to?

Or are you saying that the dems didn't mention russian collusion? Just in my head was it? I'm remembering that wrong, nobody brought it up? There was no such thing as the 'steel dossier"? There was no investigation?

Sigh.  Is there anyone anywhere on the left that has even a single honest bone in their body?

[Chrissy1979]

27 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

That WAS my point   So why did you feel you had to?

Or are you saying that the dems didn't mention russian collusion? Just in my head was it? I'm remembering that wrong, nobody brought it up? There was no such thing as the 'steel dossier"? There was no investigation?

Sigh.  Is there anyone anywhere on the left that has even a single honest bone in their body?

You're saying Russian collusion didn't happen? It happened. The Mueller Report spelled it out but you pretended it didn't.

Why do you think Trump's campaign manager Paul Manafort went to jail? He was working for Russia and lied about it under oath.

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

You're saying Russian collusion didn't happen?

Exactly. 

Quote

It happened. The Mueller Report spelled it out but you pretended it didn't.

The report is crystal clear that it didn't.  Or if it did there's no evidence of it.  And yes i've read it cover to cover.

Quote

Why do you think Trump's campaign manager Paul Manafort went to jail?

It wasn't russian collusion. Sorry. And most of the activities that the FBI were upset about went back long before he was part of trump's campaign. 

Which is why of course neither trump nor trump's campaign was ever charged.  In fact - why believe me? Listen to Meuller - his own words: did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”

Uh oh -  mueller says you're a liar  

No russian collusion or conspiracy or coordination. 

How about that. 

Quote

He was working for Russia and lied about it under oath.

Not exactly. He lobbied the russians on behalf of people who WERNT trump for years and lied about it.  Pretty massive difference. 

 

Sorry kid - that was a complete fail on your part. 

[Chrissy1979]

If you read the Mueller Report, you would be aware of the many, many ways the Russians worked to get Trump elected. You would have also read this:

"[a] statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.... The investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.”

Does this sound like an exoneration to you?

"Mueller found that Trump campaign members Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner met with Russian nationals in Trump Tower in New York June 2016 for the purpose of receiving disparaging information about Clinton as part of 'Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump,' according to an email message arranging the meeting. This meeting did not amount to a criminal offense, in part, because Mueller was unable to establish 'willfulness,'that is, that the participants knew that their conduct was illegal."

Mueller found that Trump campaign members Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner met with Russian nationals in Trump Tower in New York June 2016 for the purpose of receiving disparaging information about Clinton as part of “Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump,” according to an email message arranging the meeting. This meeting did not amount to a criminal offense, in part, because Mueller was unable to establish “willfulness,” that is, that the participants knew that their conduct was illegal. Mueller was also unable to conclude that the information was a “thing of value” that exceeded $25,000, the requirement for campaign finance to be a felony, as opposed to a civil violation of law. But the fact that the conduct did not technically amount to conspiracy does not mean that it was acceptable.

 Trump campaign members welcomed foreign influence into our election and then compromised themselves with the Russian government by covering it up.

Mueller found other contacts with Russia, such as the sharing of polling data about Midwestern states where Trump later won upset victories, conversations with the Russian ambassador to influence Russia’s response to sanctions imposed by the U.S. government in response to election interference, and communications with Wikileaks after it had received emails stolen by Russia. While none of these acts amounted to the crime of conspiracy, all could be described as “collusion.”

https://time.com/5610317/mueller-report-myths-breakdown/

[Nationalist]

21 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

If you read the Mueller Report, you would be aware of the many, many ways the Russians worked to get Trump elected. You would have also read this:

"[a] statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.... The investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.”

Does this sound like an exoneration to you?

"Mueller found that Trump campaign members Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner met with Russian nationals in Trump Tower in New York June 2016 for the purpose of receiving disparaging information about Clinton as part of 'Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump,' according to an email message arranging the meeting. This meeting did not amount to a criminal offense, in part, because Mueller was unable to establish 'willfulness,'that is, that the participants knew that their conduct was illegal."

Mueller found that Trump campaign members Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner met with Russian nationals in Trump Tower in New York June 2016 for the purpose of receiving disparaging information about Clinton as part of “Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump,” according to an email message arranging the meeting. This meeting did not amount to a criminal offense, in part, because Mueller was unable to establish “willfulness,” that is, that the participants knew that their conduct was illegal. Mueller was also unable to conclude that the information was a “thing of value” that exceeded $25,000, the requirement for campaign finance to be a felony, as opposed to a civil violation of law. But the fact that the conduct did not technically amount to conspiracy does not mean that it was acceptable.

 Trump campaign members welcomed foreign influence into our election and then compromised themselves with the Russian government by covering it up.

Mueller found other contacts with Russia, such as the sharing of polling data about Midwestern states where Trump later won upset victories, conversations with the Russian ambassador to influence Russia’s response to sanctions imposed by the U.S. government in response to election interference, and communications with Wikileaks after it had received emails stolen by Russia. While none of these acts amounted to the crime of conspiracy, all could be described as “collusion.”

https://time.com/5610317/mueller-report-myths-breakdown/

Lol...sharing polling data...OMG!

So weak. So pathetic. 

Chrissy Baby...this chickenshit is over and done with. You freaks tried to buy an impeachment...and failed. You tried again...and failed. You tried to use the fbi and cia...and have failed. You even tried to assassinate Trump...and failed.

Now you all tie your horses to Kamala Harris...ROFOMAO...and are failing...yet again.

Trump is still standing. Your lawfare has been made a public joke of. And for the coup de grase.. Chrissy Baby...everything Brandon and Kanala have done, will be dismantled so peace and prosperity can reign again.

Enjoy the election...Chrissy Baby.

Edited July 28, 2024 by Nationalist

[Chrissy1979]

So you have no rebuttal to the  deconstruction of your argument that Trump didn't collude with Russia, other than to say, "yeah, so?" Very typical. You lie to save face and, when caught in the lie, try to pretend what you were lying about didn't matter.

Do you even have balls under those gym shorts, baby?

[Nationalist]

4 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

So you have no rebuttal to the  deconstruction of your argument that Trump didn't collude with Russia, other than to say, "yeah, so?" Very typical. You lie to save face and, when caught in the lie, try to pretend what you were lying about didn't matter.

Do you even have balls under those gym shorts, baby?

Yes and...I know you don't get to see or enjoy real ball ever but...again...that would be your fault.

You have failed miserably on all accounts. And now you dumb sh1ts are saddled with.. 

lol...

 

[Chrissy1979]

So after being schooled on how a jury trial works, you can't even answer why you called it a kangaroo trial. You, sir, are light work.

[Nationalist]

2 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

So after being schooled on how a jury trial works, you can't even answer why you called it a kangaroo trial. You, sir, are light work.

And you're a lyin', cheatin' good for nothing Tweenkie.

Have a warm and fuzzy Sunday...

Chrissy Baby.

[Chrissy1979]

See what I meant by "neutered"? 😂 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

If you read the Mueller Report, you would be aware of the many, many ways the Russians worked to get Trump elected.

did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”

You lose.  Period. 

I have no doubt that the russians preferred trump to hillary.  That is not collusion. I also have no doubt the russians WANTED to "help" trump and have him "owe them favours" if it was at all possible. That is not collusion. 

They could not find that trump, his campaign, OR ANYONE ASSOCIATED WITH IT , conspired OR COORDINATED with the russian gov't. 

Almost 70 FBI agents worked night and day looking for evidence for a couple of years. If there was anything substantial they'd have found it. 

 

There was no collusion. period. you lose. End of story 

Yet for 8 years the democrats screamed that there absolutely was, that trump conspired and colluded and the proof was coming any day now blah blah blah... 

It's all a lie kid. And you can either realize that and move on or you can be a pitiful loser who revels in self delusion.  Your call. 

[ironstone]

1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said:

So you have no rebuttal to the  deconstruction of your argument that Trump didn't collude with Russia, other than to say, "yeah, so?" Very typical. You lie to save face and, when caught in the lie, try to pretend what you were lying about didn't matter.

Do you even have balls under those gym shorts, baby?

Soon you'll be claiming that the information in the Steele dossier wasn't false. And that Hillary didn't pay for it either.

[CouchPotato]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

 I have no doubt that the russians preferred trump to hillary.  That is not collusion. I also have no doubt the russians WANTED to "help" trump and have him "owe them favours" if it was at all possible. That is not collusion.

I have no doubt that every country with enough power to do so tries to influence other countries elections.

[CdnFox]

6 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

I have no doubt that every country with enough power to do so tries to influence other countries elections.

To one degree or another.  

They are quite certain that nothing the Russians did made any difference.  And it's not the 'direct' kind of interference (like we've seen in canada with china) so it's kind of considered 'Fair game" more or less. 

But it's pretty clear that there was no coordinated effort between trump and the russians to affect the election nor was the election affected.  But... 8 years of  "Russian collusion". 

[Reg Volk]