Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Yes yes, we know you hate black people, no need to harp on it. 

I see you're back to your tricks of fake quoting people because the truth doesn't suit your purposes. 

Are you...talking to yourself here, you delusional dipshit?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Are you...talking to yourself here, you delusional dipshit?

Why would i talk to myself about YOUR racism and bigotry? That would be odd. 

So you're one of those 'can dish it can't take it' Types :) 

(also stop hating black people)

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
10 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Not my people regardless :)  I didn't care about some statues being taken down in the states :)  But the fact that SOME of the protesters are neo nazis does not at all mean all were. The reports at the time were clear that many groups were involved. 

Yes marchers included members of the alt-right, neo-Confederates, neo-fascists, white nationalists, neo-Nazis, Klansmen, and far-right militias. Those are your very fine people.

Quote

Sorry kiddo, it wasn't a neo nazi rally.  And while the nazi's definitely showed up there it was a protest about removing the statues and other people were there. In fact several groups which the papers clumped in as "alt-right" were involved.

The alt-right being Nazis. Like the term was literally coined by Richard Spencer, you dolt.

Quote

And the problem for small minded people like you is that there really are good people on both sides, not just here but in general.  There's "white nationalists' who are otherwise honest people and good members of their communities same as there's some excellent people who are on the far left violent facists BLM "burn the piggies" side. 

The trick is to reach out to the good people on both sides and open a dialogue.

LOL. LMAO, even.

Quote

 

But you're more interested in spreading lies and hatred.  Which would make you on about the same footing as the nazis. 

 

Not sure how this is supposed to be an insult since you just said you think Nazis can be good guys.

Quote

Umm no. No it isn't :)   That's pretty stupid :)  LOL thanks for the chuckle tho :) 

Oh I forgot, you don't know the definition of many of these terms, like the time you tried to argue the Confederates were socialists.

4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Why would i talk to myself about YOUR racism and bigotry? That would be odd. 

So you're one of those 'can dish it can't take it' Types :) 

(also stop hating black people)

You aren't supposed to huff solvents while using the library computers dude, they're gonna kick you out.

Posted
Just now, Black Dog said:

Yes marchers included members of the alt-right, neo-Confederates,

Soooo  not nazis.  So you lied. Well there you go. 

 

Quote

The alt-right being Nazis. Like the term was literally coined by Richard Spencer, you dolt.

Nope, sorry.

 

Quote

Not sure how this is supposed to be an insult since you just said you think Nazis can be good guys.

No, i said they weren't all nazis.  Man this would go faster if i didn't have to explain everything twice. 

Quote

Oh I forgot, you don't know the definition of many of these terms, like the time you tried to argue the Confederates were socialists.

Ummm  i've never argued that the confederates were socialists  i argued that the democrats at the time were socialist. LOL

You always have to lie to try to make your point, and as i've often said if you have to lie to make your point, you probably don't have a very good point. 

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Soooo  not nazis.  So you lied. Well there you go. 

Just different brands of Nazis.

Quote

Nope, sorry.

Not an argument.

Quote

No, i said they weren't all nazis.  Man this would go faster if i didn't have to explain everything twice. 

Yes I know you keep saying stupid, wrong shit. But if you think there's a meaningful difference between Nazis, Klansmen, altrighters and the rest of the scumbags who turned out for Unite The Right you're even dumber than you came across, which, again, is very, very dumb.

Quote

Ummm  i've never argued that the confederates were socialists  i argued that the democrats at the time were socialist. LOL

LOL you absolutely did you lying b!tch.

Quote

You always have to lie to try to make your point, and as i've often said if you have to lie to make your point, you probably don't have a very good point. 

Guy-pointing-at-mirror-meme-8.jpg

Posted
2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Just different brands of Nazis.

No, you just lied and are now trying to backpeddal. They weren't all nazi's by any stretch at all.  But thanks for admitting it :) 

 

Quote

Yes I know you keep saying stupid, wrong shit.

You've already admitted you lied.  Simple fact is that they weren't nazis, nor were they all clansmen or the like. 

I know you are DESPERATE to try to dehumanize them like that but nope.  

 

Quote

LOL you absolutely did you lying b!tch.

Nope - we were discussing the Democrats - you claimed that they were not on the left in those days, i pointed out why they absolutely were,  LOLOLOL  -  go look it up kiddo :)   Sorry but you are yet again wrong. 

Have you ever thought about being right from time to time? Nobody would see it coming so you could take your opponents by surprise :) 

If you have to lie to make your point - you don't have a very good point. 

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)
52 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Ummm  i've never argued that the confederates were socialists  i argued that the democrats at the time were socialist. LOL

Receipts here, take a lap b!tch.

On 7/8/2024 at 4:18 PM, Black Dog said:

Tell me, what specific policies or beliefs made the KKK or the CSA "leftists"? Both were conservatives in the most literal sense of the word.

On 7/8/2024 at 5:39 PM, CdnFox said:

100 percent leftists.  They believed that slavery should be maintained for the public good (social). They stood up for what they called the rights of the working farmers to work their land (and they coudln't without slavery) .  And they believed that those that disagreed with their point of view should be dealt with violently (classic leftism there). 

Sorry kiddo - those were your guys not ours. 

Screenshot 2024-07-25 at 5.13.24 PM.png

Edited by Black Dog
added screenshot
Posted (edited)
35 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

No, you just lied and are now trying to backpeddal. They weren't all nazi's by any stretch at all.  But thanks for admitting it :) 

No, they were Nazis going by different names, but there's no real difference between them ideologically speaking (and again, you may want to look that word up).

Quote

You've already admitted you lied.  Simple fact is that they weren't nazis, nor were they all clansmen or the like. 

I know you are DESPERATE to try to dehumanize them like that but nope.  

Look at you trying to pretend that the distinction between Nazis, neo-fascists, white nationalists, neo-Nazis, Klansmen, and far-right militias is at all meaningful and not just different names of different categories of Nazi scum. But then I'm really not sure why you're taking such umbrage at the claim thatTrump called Nazis fine people since you quite literally believe the same thing.

Quote

Nope - we were discussing the Democrats - you claimed that they were not on the left in those days, i pointed out why they absolutely were,  LOLOLOL  -  go look it up kiddo :)   Sorry but you are yet again wrong. 

Cooked you on this already, you daft twat.

Quote

Have you ever thought about being right from time to time? Nobody would see it coming so you could take your opponents by surprise :) 

If you have to lie to make your point - you don't have a very good point. 

Like you were just lying about me "altering quotes", f*cking loser.

Edited by Black Dog
Posted
2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

 

Come to me for your information from now on, I'm far more reliable than the worthless losers that you currently look up to. 

He was a Republican and Trump was hit with glass from the teleprompter, which found it to be a great honor to take a bullet for the country.

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

He was a Republican and Trump was hit with glass from the teleprompter, which found it to be a great honor to take a bullet for the country.

There was no damage to any of the teleprompters at the event. Also, a NY Times photographer managed to get a photograph of the bullet on it's trajectory. Do you think the USSS and the New York Times are in cahoots to boost Trump's image?

Edited by CouchPotato
Posted
4 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

There was no damage to any of the teleprompters at the event. Also, a NY Times photographer managed to get a photograph of the bullet on it's trajectory. Do you think the USSS and the New York Times are in cahoots to boost Trump's image?

Why are we still talking about this, it's old news lol.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Why are we still talking about this, it's old news lol.

Well, that's kind of subjective isn't it. I mean, some might say that the attempted assassination of a former president is pretty important news that would understandably get coverage for quite a while. I don't know either way.

In any case, if you look above my post, you will see that someone else was posting about it. Being on a forum, and being the kind of guy who does the things that people on forums do, I responded to it. Guess I am just crazy like that.

Posted
2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

Receipts here, take a lap b!tch.

Screenshot 2024-07-25 at 5.13.24 PM.png

Soo  you mean where i referred to the KKK?  And arguably the dems which i'd referred to in the previous post?

You were the one who mentioned the confederate states not me :) 

The dems and the kkk were precisely as i described :) 

AWwwww did you get caught making shit up AGAIN?!?! LOLOLOL

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
57 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

He was a Republican and Trump was hit with glass from the teleprompter, which found it to be a great honor to take a bullet for the country.

There was talk that it might have been glass from a teleprompter very early on, but it was a democrat assassin's bullet.

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

No, they were Nazis going by different names, but there's no real difference between them ideologically speaking (and again, you may want to look that word up).

No kiddo, they're not.   

You're trying to pretend that just because you don't like someone that makes them a nazi. Or that anyone who believes in a white nation is a nazi. Or that all "alt rights" are nazi 

It's simply not true. SO we've already established you were full of shit. 

Quote

Look at you trying to pretend that the distinction between Nazis, neo-fascists, white nationalists, neo-Nazis, Klansmen, and far-right militias is at all meaningful and not just different names of different categories of Nazi scum.

Look at you, desperately pretending they're the same thing when they're not. :)   THey're not even close. 

Sorry kiddo you can't lie your way out of this one. About the best you might get away with is you might say that the people who are there to prevent the destruction of the statues were right wingests including extreme right wing people. They weren't even all racists. They definitely weren't all Nazis. You were just plain wrong as you so often are and now you're desperately trying to backpedal and you can't

 

Quote

Cooked you on this already, you daft twat.

Nope. As your post proved you were the one that mentioned them, looking through the thread I'm the one that mentioned the democrats and the KKK. Once again you desperately try to twist something you've said to mean something different and it just doesn't.

Let's recap. The democrats and the KKK were socialistic in their day. They are very similar to the way the democrats are now. The people at the demonstration we are discussing we're not all Nazis. In fact the majority of them probably weren't Nazis. Just because there's someone you don't like doesn't make them a Nazi

LOL  pretty epic fail :) 

and stop altering quotes. If you can't debate based on what people actually said, faking what they said is pretty disgusting. It makes you look even more of a re tard than you already do which is saying something

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Soo  you mean where i referred to the KKK?  And arguably the dems which i'd referred to in the previous post?

You were the one who mentioned the confederate states not me :) 

 

AWwwww did you get caught making shit up AGAIN?!?! LOLOLOL

And you replied that they were leftists/socialists. whoops.

Quote

The dems and the kkk were precisely as i described :) 

LOL no, that whole exchange was a hilarious example of you being completely and utterly put of your depth. I got a good chuckle re-reading it, actually.

Quote

 

AWwwww did you get caught making shit up AGAIN?!?! LOLOLOL

 

It's right there in black and white dummy! Your denials just make you even more pathetic.

Posted
2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

No, they were Nazis going by different names, but there's no real difference between them ideologically speaking (and again, you may want to look that word up).

A lot of people just don't believe in tearing down statues of historic figures. That's not Nazism. It doesn't even mean they think these people were wonderful. History is complex and the people in it have all kinds of warts. There's no end to the statues you could tear down if you really examine the lives and ideas of a lot of these historic people. You can't conceive of the idea that some people might just believe in preserving the landmarks without being white supremacists?

Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

No kiddo, they're not.   

You're trying to pretend that just because you don't like someone that makes them a nazi. Or that anyone who believes in a white nation is a nazi. Or that all "alt rights" are nazi 

It's simply not true. SO we've already established you were full of shit. 

LOL sure man just keep going "nuh uh" like the dumb little parrot you are. You couldn't name a difference if you tried.

Quote

Look at you, desperately pretending they're the same thing when they're not. :)   THey're not even close. 

The KKK, white supremacists and Nazis aren't even close? Did you have an unfortunate close range accident with a nail gun at some point?

Quote

Sorry kiddo you can't lie your way out of this one. About the best you might get away with is you might say that the people who are there to prevent the destruction of the statues were right wingests including extreme right wing people. They weren't even all racists. They definitely weren't all Nazis. You were just plain wrong as you so often are and now you're desperately trying to backpedal and you can't

I love how you can say this with the confidence of a very stupid person without any sort of evidence at all. Where were all these "very fine people" who weren't racists, Nazis or adjacent? Can you point them out in this picture:

211117160940-01-unite-the-right-charlott

Quote

Nope. As your post proved you were the one that mentioned them, looking through the thread I'm the one that mentioned the democrats and the KKK. Once again you desperately try to twist something you've said to mean something different and it just doesn't.

Actually I did. And who do you think I was talking about when I said "Civil War era Democrats" but the future traitors that went on to form the CSA? I don't expect you know that because you don't actually know the history, probably watched one prager U video on it or some dumb shit.

Quote

Let's recap. The democrats and the KKK were socialistic in their day.

Hilariously and spectacularly wrong and ahistorical.

Quote

They are very similar to the way the democrats are now.

See above.

Quote

The people at the demonstration we are discussing we're not all Nazis. In fact the majority of them probably weren't Nazis.

The majority of the people at the neo Nazi rally planned and organized by prominent neo Nazis weren't Nazis is some serious dumbf*ckery/denial.

Quote

Just because there's someone you don't like doesn't make them a Nazi

No, the torches, Nazis flags and Hitler salutes and the antisemitism.racism does, dipshit.

Quote

and stop altering quotes. If you can't debate based on what people actually said, faking what they said is pretty disgusting. It makes you look even more of a re tard than you already do which is saying something

The only person who has altered any quotes here is you, c*nt. Stop projecting or arguing with your other personality or whatever the hell you're doing here. Put up or stfu and die.

16 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

A lot of people just don't believe in tearing down statues of historic figures. That's not Nazism. It doesn't even mean they think these people were wonderful. History is complex and the people in it have all kinds of warts. There's no end to the statues you could tear down if you really examine the lives and ideas of a lot of these historic people. You can't conceive of the idea that some people might just believe in preserving the landmarks without being white supremacists?

At that particular rally organized by a prominent neo Nazi and attended by neo Nazis and their ilk? Come on man.

It is so funny because you would think that denouncing a hate rally headlined by a bunch of neo-Nazis that ended with one of said Nazis attempting to murder a bunch of people and killing one person would be the easiest thing in the word to denounce but because Dear leader said some of them were very fine people, right wing nuts have to contort themselves into pretzels to defend f*ckin' Nazis.

Edited by Black Dog
Posted
26 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

And you replied that they were leftists/socialists. whoops.

Nope - was talking about the kkk which is what i'd been talking about earlier. Didn't even really notice you'd tried to sneak the whole confederate states into the issue, which doesn't even make sense given the context. 

LOL - but sure, something YOU said that I never talked about is MY fault that YOU said it.  Why not :) 

man - you may be wrong all of the time but you're consistent by god. :) 

The dems back in the day were a left wing org, the kkk were their people, both were socialist in their policy and procedure for the very reasons i mentioned. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Nope - was talking about the kkk which is what i'd been talking about earlier. Didn't even really notice you'd tried to sneak the whole confederate states into the issue, which doesn't even make sense given the context. 

You didn't mention the KKK. The closest you got was talking about "the original democrats who campaigned on trying to preserve slavery." I know, reading is hard when you've got a rusty nail lodged in your frontal lobe, but that's the facts, jack.

Quote

LOL - but sure, something YOU said that I never talked about is MY fault that YOU said it.  Why not :) 

Huh? What is this tantrum here now? Again this started because I said you said the Confederates and Klan were socialists. Which you denied you said, only to turn around and reiterate it here because you have no self awareness or object permanence..

Quote

The dems back in the day were a left wing org, the kkk were their people, both were socialist in their policy and procedure for the very reasons i mentioned. 

Yes you were spectacularly wrong then and continue to be so., just like you're wrong about Unite the Right not being a Nazi rally. But I know this won't sink in because you're the epitome of proverbial chess playing pigeon.

Edited by Black Dog
Posted
16 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

LOL sure man just keep going "nuh uh" like the dumb little parrot you are. You couldn't name a difference if you tried.

LOL - kid it's not my fault you were wrong.  You know who were the nazis' there? The nazis.  Know who wasn't the nazis there? The people who werne't nazis. 

You've admitted there were many groups there.  You've already admitted you were wrong. And with both know it. Trying to pretend NOT-nazi somehow means Nazi is just dumb

Quote

The KKK, white supremacists and Nazis aren't even close?

Nope. How are they close? About the only thing they share is that they're racists, but the KKK doesn't currently believe in a state controlled market, or the harnessing of the industrial might of the nation for the purposes of expansion by war as a primary duty the way the nazis did, they have RADICALLY different policies.  Hell even the KKK and white nationalists do - the white nationalists don't even think that other races are that bad, they just believe strongly in segregation and most wouldn't support slavery in the slighest. 

And racism isn't even a part of alt-right thinking. they just don't want MORE rights given to groups like gays and trans.  Most are fine with cohabiting with them. 

Complete swing and a miss on your part kiddo. THat's why we have different names for them. 

 

Quote

I love how you can say this with the confidence of a very stupid person without any sort of evidence at all. Where were all these "very fine people" who weren't racists, Nazis or adjacent? Can you point them out in this picture:

Is that a picture of everyone who was there? No?  Hmmmm

I tell you what - you give me a list of all the people there and explain YOUR proof that they  are a card carrying nazi and then we'll go from there. 

What kind of snit-for-brains !diot calls someone out for not providing evidnece when they haven't provided any evidence :)  LOLOLOL

Quote

Actually I did. And who do you think I was talking about when I said "Civil War era Democrats" 

Actually you didn't.  And when we were talking about the democrats i thought you were talking about the democrats - not the states themselves. Bit of a difference.  I've said from the begining of this that the dems were on the left back then.  

LOLOL  -  did you confuse yourself again? Well that happens when you have to change your story that often. :) 

Quote

Hilariously and spectacularly wrong and ahistorical.

Completely accurate, See above :)  The fact that it hurts "Ur Feels" dosesn't change that. 

 

Quote

The majority of the people at the neo Nazi rally planned and organized by prominent neo Nazis weren't Nazis is some serious dumbf*ckery/denial.

Uh huh. Can you point out where i said "Most"?

You said ALL - i said not all.  Not "Most" :)

But hey - thanks for taking the opportunity to show everyone yet again that you have to lie to make your point you probably dont' have a very good point ;) 

 

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

 "You had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. ... I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name. ... So you know what, it's fine. You're changing history. You're changing culture. And you had people — and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally — but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. OK? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly. Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people. But you also had troublemakers, and you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets and with the baseball bats. You had a lot of bad people in the other group.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/10/02/trump-and-white-supremacy-he-did-condemn-and-has-repeatedly-column/5883336002/

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 7/22/2024 at 2:00 PM, WestCanMan said:

I heard that someone who was supposed to testify against Hillary shot himself in the back of the head with an arrow.

Twice.

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

You didn't mention the KKK. The closest you got was talking about "the original democrats who campaigned on trying to preserve slavery."

Pretty sure i did - are you saying you just brought up the kkk and the states themselves randomly out of the blue? Well - odd to admit to being THAT stupid but if you like :) 

Anyway the KKK was the 'muscle' arm of the dems and i normally do mention them, they're just a part of the dem party. 

 

 

Quote

Huh? What is this tantrum here now?

Laughing at you isn't a tantrum :) 

You're claiming (again) that something i didn't say that YOU said is somehow MY fault and that therefore  I said it even tho it was you who said it. 

That's how twised your brain is. :)

 

Quote

Again this started because I said you said the Confederates and Klan were socialists.

And i didn't.  I said the democrats were socialist and agree the kkk is (thought i said that, you now claim i didn't but i would have). 

Sooooo.  Strange that you'd point out you're a loser but... 

 

Quote

Yes you were spectacularly wrong then and continue to be so., just like you're wrong about Unite the Right not being a Nazi rally. But I know this won't sink in because you're the epitome of proverbial chess playing pigeon.

Kid -  if they were all nazis......  why would they need to 'unite them'? They'd already be nazis :) 

You've failed here so hard it's hilarious :)The dems of old were socialist  (and the kkk), not everyone at  the rally was nazi :)   Sorry kid - you'll have to put another 25 cents in the machine to play again :)  

Edited by CdnFox

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

 

1 minute ago, Legato said:

Twice.

 

Probably one of them semi auto bows.  Semi auto bows should be banned.  WHEN ARE PEOPLE GOING TO THINK OF THE CHILDREN!?!?!!?

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...