Politico Admits Biden Is Involved In Family Businesses

[gatomontes99]

Since 2019, Joe Biden has repeatedly distanced himself from his family’s business dealings, saying that he has never so much as discussed them with his relatives or with anyone else. But House impeachment inquiry interviews, public records and emails reviewed by POLITICO show that members of his inner circle were regularly enmeshed in those dealings: Many of the president’s closest staffers and advisers have doubled as his relatives’ business associates, both during and after their stints working for the man at the center of the Biden family orbit.

The most corrupt president is our time is being forced out by his own party. They just don't want to admit it, so they leak this info to make it seem like it's just politics moving Joe out. He will be removed at the DNC convention.

Edited June 10, 2024 by gatomontes99

[ironstone]

Maybe he'll be replaced by Gavin Newsom, the slickest(literally) politician on the planet.

[WestCanMan]

4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Since 2019, Joe Biden has repeatedly distanced himself from his family’s business dealings, saying that he has never so much as discussed them with his relatives or with anyone else. But House impeachment inquiry interviews, public records and emails reviewed by POLITICO show that members of his inner circle were regularly enmeshed in those dealings: Many of the president’s closest staffers and advisers have doubled as his relatives’ business associates, both during and after their stints working for the man at the center of the Biden family orbit.

The most corrupt president is our time is being forced out by his own party. They just don't want to admit it, so they leak this info to make it seem like it's just politics moving Joe out. He will be removed at the DNC convention.

Were those 'staffers and advisers' working on the public's dime when they aided in the Biden family's crimes? 

[Hodad]

That's good and thorough reporting. But it's rather naive to read more into it (as if we've just discovered, for the first time ever) than people work with people they've worked with and with the people those people have worked with. That's the whole premise behind "networking." 

Either Joe is involved (no evidence and everyone else says explicitly that he's not) or he isn't. If Joe is involved that's a problem, but if they share a lawyer or a PI or something, NBD.

Edited June 10, 2024 by Hodad

[gatomontes99]

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Were those 'staffers and advisers' working on the public's dime when they aided in the Biden family's crimes? 

Good question.

[WestCanMan]

44 minutes ago, Hodad said:

That's good and thorough reporting. But it's rather naive to read more into it (as if we've just discovered, for the first time ever) than people work with people they've worked with and with the people those people have worked with. That's the whole premise behind "networking." 

Either Joe is involved (no evidence and everyone else says explicitly that he's not) or he isn't. If Joe is involved that's a problem, but if they share a lawyer or a PI or something, NBD.

You've somehow managed to out-idjit yourself again. FYI your first paragraph contains the proof that Joe actually is involved, but your iron-clad confirmation bias somehow prevented your cerebral cortex from unpacking those words while they migrated across the minuscule noodle.

IF BIDEN'S PEOPLE WERE WORKING FOR HUNTER, HOW COULD JOE NOT HAVE KNOWN NOR BEEN INVOLVED?

Joe: "Hey Cindy, where were you guys yesterday when you were supposed to be here at work? It seemed like you were all at Hunter's suite in our basement, because you cars were there, and I heard you all talking an' stuff."

Cindy: "Oh, uh, it was his birthday, so we were just hanging out there."

Joe: "Why didn't I get invited to my own daughter's stag, or whatever it was? Wait, his birthday? That's in December, and it's only Feberary right now. His birthday is still 2 weeks away."

Cindy: "Actually his birthday is in April and it's August right now. That's why you're wearing shorts outside."

Joe: "So you lied?"

Cindy: "Yep. But it's ok. You won't remember this by tomorrow."

[Hodad]

19 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You've somehow managed to out-idjit yourself again. FYI your first paragraph contains the proof that Joe actually is involved, but your iron-clad confirmation bias somehow prevented your cerebral cortex from unpacking those words while they migrated across the minuscule noodle.

IF BIDEN'S PEOPLE WERE WORKING FOR HUNTER, HOW COULD JOE NOT HAVE KNOWN NOR BEEN INVOLVED?

Joe: "Hey Cindy, where were you guys yesterday when you were supposed to be here at work? It seemed like you were all at Hunter's suite in our basement, because you cars were there, and I heard you all talking an' stuff."

Cindy: "Oh, uh, it was his birthday, so we were just hanging out there."

Joe: "Why didn't I get invited to my own daughter's stag, or whatever it was? Wait, his birthday? That's in December, and it's only Feberary right now. His birthday is still 2 weeks away."

Cindy: "Actually his birthday is in April and it's August right now. That's why you're wearing shorts outside."

Joe: "So you lied?"

Cindy: "Yep. But it's ok. You won't remember this by tomorrow."

Spoken like someone who has never had a professional network--or a profession.🙄

I know my accountant. I know some other people who are clients of my accountant. I don't know anything about their business books or taxes. I'm sure you think that's implausible, but that's a "you problem."

 

[WestCanMan]

15 hours ago, Hodad said:

Spoken like someone who has never had a professional network--or a profession.🙄

I know my accountant. I know some other people who are clients of my accountant. I don't know anything about their business books or taxes. I'm sure you think that's implausible, but that's a "you problem."

 

You sound like someone who has never done any professional work, and has never run a business. In fact, you sound like someone who can't even build a wall with lego. 

Joe Biden was the VPOTUS, in case you didn't know. He has never been anything but a politician. All of his staffers and advisers are highly qualified, specialized people whose services come at a premium. 

They didn't all just go work for the Biden family crime syndicate without coming away with a sense of what Hunter was up to. Hunter didn't just randomly find them all in the yellow pages. 

And don't forget that Joe has always said in the past that he didn't have any knowledge of Hunter's overseas business dealings, that's why the Devon Archer photo was such a big deal. Not only did Joe know Hunter's associates, all of Joe's own staffers and advisers were "Hunter's associates". 

[Deluge]

23 hours ago, ironstone said:

Maybe he'll be replaced by Gavin Newsom, the slickest(literally) politician on the planet.

Newsom may be the biggest scumbag of 'em all. 

No wonder he's so popular with the DNC. 

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

Newsom may be the biggest scumbag of 'em all. 

No wonder he's so popular with the DNC. 

His picture is in the dictionary beside "smarmy". Even Trudeau looks businesslike compared to him. 

They're co-leaders of the "Rule for thee, but not for me" club though. 

[Rebound]

18 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

You've somehow managed to out-idjit yourself again. FYI your first paragraph contains the proof that Joe actually is involved, but your iron-clad confirmation bias somehow prevented your cerebral cortex from unpacking those words while they migrated across the minuscule noodle.

IF BIDEN'S PEOPLE WERE WORKING FOR HUNTER, HOW COULD JOE NOT HAVE KNOWN NOR BEEN INVOLVED?

Joe: "Hey Cindy, where were you guys yesterday when you were supposed to be here at work? It seemed like you were all at Hunter's suite in our basement, because you cars were there, and I heard you all talking an' stuff."

Cindy: "Oh, uh, it was his birthday, so we were just hanging out there."

Joe: "Why didn't I get invited to my own daughter's stag, or whatever it was? Wait, his birthday? That's in December, and it's only Feberary right now. His birthday is still 2 weeks away."

Cindy: "Actually his birthday is in April and it's August right now. That's why you're wearing shorts outside."

Joe: "So you lied?"

Cindy: "Yep. But it's ok. You won't remember this by tomorrow."

So a man was on Biden’s Secret Service detail. Then he retired from the Secret Service, and Jim Biden hired him to investigate a Chinese businessman.  
 

Where is there malfeasance in that, or in these other relationships? The article doesn’t even suggest that malfeasance or conflict of interest exists.  

[WestCanMan]

27 minutes ago, Rebound said:

So a man was on Biden’s Secret Service detail. Then he retired from the Secret Service, and Jim Biden hired him to investigate a Chinese businessman.  
 

Where is there malfeasance in that, or in these other relationships? The article doesn’t even suggest that malfeasance or conflict of interest exists.  

So you distilled "many of the president's closest staffers and advisers" down to "a man that was on Biden's Secret Service detail"? 

Funny, that's not what Politico said (from Gato's link):

• Since 2019, Joe Biden has repeatedly distanced himself from his family’s business dealings, saying that he has never so much as discussed them with his relatives or with anyone else. But House impeachment inquiry interviews, public records and emails reviewed by POLITICO show that members of his inner circle were regularly enmeshed in those dealings: Many of the president’s closest staffers and advisers have doubled as his relatives’ business associates, both during and after their stints working for the man at the center of the Biden family orbit.

Did your cognitive bias read "members (plural) of his inner circle" and "many (plurality again) of the president’s closest staffers and advisers" as "just one, single, solitary ex-Sec Svc member"?

I just wanna know how your little pea brain "works". 

How often does the word "many" refer to just one person, in your personal experience? Was it a guy with multiple personality disorder or something? (Is that even a "disorder" anymore? Or is it just another letter tagged on at the end of LGBTQ2+P#KMW*@V?) Do Sec Svc detail members often double as "part of the president's inner circle", and his "closest staffers and advisers"? Those are some pretty valuable dudes. Maybe they shouldn't be jumping in front of bullets anymore, hey? They need to get some bodyguards for the Sec Svc guys.  

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

His picture is in the dictionary beside "smarmy". Even Trudeau looks businesslike compared to him. 

They're co-leaders of the "Rule for thee, but not for me" club though. 

Absolutely.

He knows he's completely f*cking that state but he keeps playing it off like California is entering its golden age. lol

[WestCanMan]

14 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Absolutely.

He knows he's completely f*cking that state but he keeps playing it off like California is entering its golden age. lol

Biden's doing the same.

If you were to listen to KJP (not related to KJU or KJI, but with the same personality traits) or Biden speak, this is the peak of American civilization and the world is singing Kumbayah. 

[Rebound]

50 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

So you distilled "many of the president's closest staffers and advisers" down to "a man that was on Biden's Secret Service detail"? 

Funny, that's not what Politico said (from Gato's link):

• Since 2019, Joe Biden has repeatedly distanced himself from his family’s business dealings, saying that he has never so much as discussed them with his relatives or with anyone else. But House impeachment inquiry interviews, public records and emails reviewed by POLITICO show that members of his inner circle were regularly enmeshed in those dealings: Many of the president’s closest staffers and advisers have doubled as his relatives’ business associates, both during and after their stints working for the man at the center of the Biden family orbit.

Did your cognitive bias read "members (plural) of his inner circle" and "many (plurality again) of the president’s closest staffers and advisers" as "just one, single, solitary ex-Sec Svc member"?

I just wanna know how your little pea brain "works". 

How often does the word "many" refer to just one person, in your personal experience? Was it a guy with multiple personality disorder or something? (Is that even a "disorder" anymore? Or is it just another letter tagged on at the end of LGBTQ2+P#KMW*@V?) Do Sec Svc detail members often double as "part of the president's inner circle", and his "closest staffers and advisers"? Those are some pretty valuable dudes. Maybe they shouldn't be jumping in front of bullets anymore, hey? They need to get some bodyguards for the Sec Svc guys.  

No, I merely cited one of the examples listed in the article. I can’t see how it’s any conflict of interest.  
 

So can you show me even one example in this article which is a conflict of interest?  

[WestCanMan]

18 minutes ago, Rebound said:

No, I merely cited one of the examples listed in the article. I can’t see how it’s any conflict of interest.  

No, you merely misrepresented the entire body of information in that article by reducing "many of Joe's closest staffers and advisers" to "just one guy whose only job is just to shoot guns, punch people an' stuff".

You're a sleazy little liar and you got busted with both hands in the cookie jar. 

Fact is that Joe's best contacts were loaned out to Hunter, so this is just more evidence of how intertwined the office of the VPOTUS was with Biden Crimez Incorporated. They're two hands in the same pair of bloody gloves, committing crimes together.

Just remember that even using Joe's aides to work with foreign adversaries is influence peddling: those aides have their hands close enough to the levers of power to accomplish a lot for the Chinese gov't.

Edited June 11, 2024 by WestCanMan

[Rebound]

8 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

No, you merely misrepresented the entire body of information in that article by reducing "many of Joe's closest staffers and advisers" to "just one guy whose only job is just to shoot guns, punch people an' stuff".

You're a sleazy little liar and you got busted with both hands in the cookie jar. 

Fact is that Joe's best contacts were loaned out to Hunter, so this is just more evidence of how intertwined the office of the VPOTUS was with Biden Crimez Incorporated. They're two hands in the same pair of bloody gloves, committing crimes together.

Just remember that even using Joe's aides to work with foreign adversaries is influence peddling: those aides have their hands close enough to the levers of power to accomplish a lot for the Chinese gov't.

Please cite a specific example from the article, just one, instead of making these generalizations. Or else admit that you’re a “sleazy little liar.”

[Hodad]

18 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

No, you merely misrepresented the entire body of information in that article by reducing "many of Joe's closest staffers and advisers" to "just one guy whose only job is just to shoot guns, punch people an' stuff".

You're a sleazy little liar and you got busted with both hands in the cookie jar. 

Fact is that Joe's best contacts were loaned out to Hunter, so this is just more evidence of how intertwined the office of the VPOTUS was with Biden Crimez Incorporated. They're two hands in the same pair of bloody gloves, committing crimes together.

Just remember that even using Joe's aides to work with foreign adversaries is influence peddling: those aides have their hands close enough to the levers of power to accomplish a lot for the Chinese gov't.

Holy crap. You just invented your own article and decided to react to that. lol Lunatic.

[robosmith]

37 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

No, you merely misrepresented the entire body of information in that article by reducing "many of Joe's closest staffers and advisers" to "just one guy whose only job is just to shoot guns, punch people an' stuff".

You're a sleazy little liar and you got busted with both hands in the cookie jar. 

Fact is that Joe's best contacts were loaned out to Hunter, so this is just more evidence of how intertwined the office of the VPOTUS was with Biden Crimez Incorporated. They're two hands in the same pair of bloody gloves, committing crimes together.

Just remember that even using Joe's aides to work with foreign adversaries is influence peddling: those aides have their hands close enough to the levers of power to accomplish a lot for the Chinese gov't.

^Pure SPECULATION. You don't even quote the Political article to back ^this up.

[WestCanMan]

36 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Please cite a specific example from the article, just one, instead of making these generalizations. Or else admit that you’re a “sleazy little liar.”

• Since 2019, Joe Biden has repeatedly distanced himself from his family’s business dealings, saying that he has never so much as discussed them with his relatives or with anyone else. But House impeachment inquiry interviews, public records and emails reviewed by POLITICO show that members of his inner circle were regularly enmeshed in those dealings: Many of the president’s closest staffers and advisers have doubled as his relatives’ business associates, both during and after their stints working for the man at the center of the Biden family orbit.

There ya go you sleazy little liar

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, Hodad said:

Holy crap. You just invented your own article and decided to react to that. lol Lunatic.

It's from Gato's Politico link you illiterate little dweeb, right from the same page, above. Learn to navigate a thread, dummy. 

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

^Pure SPECULATION. You don't even quote the Political article to back ^this up.

It's from the OP of this thread, right on this exact same page. Just look up, stupid. 

Edited June 11, 2024 by WestCanMan

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

It's from Gato's Politico link you illiterate little dweeb, right from the same page, above. Learn to navigate a thread, dummy. 

It's from the OP of this thread, right on this exact same page. Just look up, stupid. 

You didn't quote it, like I said, DUMMY.

What is fantasized about what Politico "admits" means NOTHING, and it's really stupid to pretend it does.

[CdnFox]

considering that the family business is peddling Biden's influence, wouldn't he kind of have to be a part of it regardless?

Edited June 12, 2024 by CdnFox

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

You didn't quote it, like I said, DUMMY.

What is fantasized about what Politico "admits" means NOTHING, and it's really stupid to pretend it does.

Politico is a left-leaning dungheap, and when they admit that the Bidens' BS story is unravelling the jig is up. 

[robosmith]

35 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Politico is a left-leaning dungheap, and when they admit that the Bidens' BS story is unravelling the jig is up. 

Sorry, they are NOT an authority backing your fantasies.

You can't even quote what you imagine HERE.