Rep. Cammack to Newsmax: Colo. Ruling Is 'Judicial Activism'

[Deluge]

It sure is. As I've been educating robotool, the 14th Amendment does not support those cultist poseurs in Colorado. 

In a Wednesday appearance on Newsmax, Rep. Kat Cammack, R-Fla., criticized the recent Colorado Supreme Court ruling removing former President Donald Trump from the primary ballot, calling it "judicial activism at its worst."

"This is judicial activism at its worst. You know, we know that this ruling it's garbage, it's trash," stated Rep. Cammack during her interview on "The Chris Salcedo Show."

Cammack expressed confidence that the U.S. Supreme Court would overturn the decision, emphasizing concerns about the broader impact on elections and a perceived assault on Trump.

https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/cammack-colo-scotus/2023/12/20/id/1146703/

[Guest]

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/12/21/luttig-14th-amendment-trump-00132792

[robosmith]

15 minutes ago, Deluge said:

It sure is. As I've been educating robotool, the 14th Amendment does not support those cultist poseurs in Colorado. 

In a Wednesday appearance on Newsmax, Rep. Kat Cammack, R-Fla., criticized the recent Colorado Supreme Court ruling removing former President Donald Trump from the primary ballot, calling it "judicial activism at its worst."

"This is judicial activism at its worst. You know, we know that this ruling it's garbage, it's trash," stated Rep. Cammack during her interview on "The Chris Salcedo Show."

Cammack expressed confidence that the U.S. Supreme Court would overturn the decision, emphasizing concerns about the broader impact on elections and a perceived assault on Trump.

https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/cammack-colo-scotus/2023/12/20/id/1146703/

Let's see: Kat Cammack is:

Quote

Kat is a third-generation commercial sandblaster who grew up on a cattle ranch outside Denver, Colorado, participating in local 4-H programs, the local rodeo, and sports.

 

9 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/12/21/luttig-14th-amendment-trump-00132792

And Michael Luttig is a lawyer and former Federal Judge:

Quote

On April 23, 1991, President George H. W. Bush nominated Luttig to fill a newly created seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. He was confirmed by the United States Senate on July 26, 1991, and received his commission on August 2, 1991.^[11] He became the youngest judge (at age 37) on a federal appeals court at the time of his appointment.

On the bench, Luttig was compared to Justice Antonin Scalia for his analytical rigor and for criticizing his colleagues for inconsistencies or embellishments in their judicial opinions.^[12] He was also similar to Scalia in that his judicial philosophy sometimes led to opinions that were at odds with conservative legal orthodoxy.^[3][10]

That means Cammack's "legal argument":

Quote

"This is judicial activism at its worst. You know, we know that this ruling it's garbage, it's trash,"

is BULLSHIT.

Thanks again, DELUGINAL, for posting another easily rebutted argument and continuing to demonstrate just how weak your posts are.

 

[Deluge]

15 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/12/21/luttig-14th-amendment-trump-00132792

Luttig agrees with the wokejobs. That means he's an activist, not a judicial expert.

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, Deluge said:

Luttig agrees with the wokejobs. That means he's an activist, not a judicial expert.

No, it means your NOT AN EXPERT Cammack very weak OPINION post is BULLSHIT.

[Deluge]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

Let's see: Kat Cammack is:

 

And Michael Luttig is a lawyer and former Federal Judge:

That means Cammack's "legal argument":

is BULLSHIT.

Thanks again, DELUGINAL, for posting another easily rebutted argument and continuing to demonstrate just how weak your posts are.

 

And let's see: Cammack understands the 14th Amendment, and you and Luttig don't. 

Aren't you tired of being wrong? I know Luttig must be, as he's also a Trump hating sociopath. 

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

No, it means your NOT AN EXPERT Cammack very weak OPINION post is BULLSHIT.

No, it means you and Luttig hate Donald Trump and will say and do anything to take him off the campaign trail. 

God, you f*ckers are unreal. LOL

[Guest]

24 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Luttig agrees with the wokejobs. That means he's an activist, not a judicial expert.

Sure, if you like.  I'm not interested in arguing the issue.

I posted it as a public service in response to your OP, which was the opinion of a deluded wingnut expressed on a questionable, biased source.

I just wanted to post a sane opinion.  Do with it what you will.

Edited December 21, 2023 by bcsapper

[Deluge]

3 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

Sure, if you like.  I'm not interested in arguing the issue.

I posted it as a public service in response to your OP, which was the opinion of a deluded wingnut expressed on a questionable, biased source.

I just wanted to post a sane opinion.  Do with it what you will.

There's nothing sane about Trump Derangement Syndrome and the misuse of the 14th Amendment. 

Your side is wrong and my side is right. 

[robosmith]

7 minutes ago, Deluge said:

And let's see: Cammack understands the 14th Amendment, and you and Luttig don't. 

Aren't you tired of being wrong? I know Luttig must be, as he's also a Trump hating sociopath. 

No, it means you and Luttig hate Donald Trump and will say and do anything to take him off the campaign trail. 

God, you f*ckers are unreal. LOL

The FACT that you place the "legal OPINION" of a wholly unqualified fellow MAGA CULT member above a conservative former Federal Judge, just shows how desperate and easily rebutted your posts are.

Grow up and learn to make respectable posts. LMAO

[Deluge]

5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The FACT that you place the "legal OPINION" of a wholly unqualified fellow MAGA CULT member above a conservative former Federal Judge, just shows how desperate and easily rebutted your posts are.

Grow up and learn to make respectable posts. LMAO

I'm sorry diapers, but you've put your trust in globalist a$$holes. Trump is a political threat and they want him removed from the race - it's that simple. 

Now pull your head out of the Left's ass and think for once in your life. 

 

[robosmith]

13 minutes ago, Deluge said:

I'm sorry diapers, but you've put your trust in globalist a$$holes. Trump is a political threat and they want him removed from the race - it's that simple. 

Now pull your head out of the Left's ass and think for once in your life. 

You need to pull your head out of MAGA CULT'S (Trump's) ass. Break free! You can do it!

Your parents may need to use one of those cult extraction services. LMAO

[sharkman]

5 hours ago, bcsapper said:

Sure, if you like.  I'm not interested in arguing the issue.

I posted it as a public service in response to your OP, which was the opinion of a deluded wingnut expressed on a questionable, biased source.

I just wanted to post a sane opinion.  Do with it what you will.

Hey bc "sapper", Merry Christmas!

[Deluge]

20 hours ago, robosmith said:

Joe Biden was the correct pedo-racist for our 2020 election rigging campaign. He was very docile and compliant. 

Thank you for your honesty, roboredemption. It means a lot. 

Merry Christmas. 

[Rebound]

23 hours ago, Deluge said:

And let's see: Cammack understands the 14th Amendment, and you and Luttig don't. 

Aren't you tired of being wrong? I know Luttig must be, as he's also a Trump hating sociopath. 

No, it means you and Luttig hate Donald Trump and will say and do anything to take him off the campaign trail. 

God, you f*ckers are unreal. LOL

He did not explain the 14th amendment, so how can you say he understands it?

Engaged in insurrection: Check. Court wrote 100 page finding of fact.

Previously took oath to defend Constitution: Check

Ineligible for federal office: Check

[impartialobserver]

Trump was not going to win Colorado even if he was on the ballot so this does not change the eventual outcome. What will impact it is the results of Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, and Pennsylvania

 

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

I am a prolific LIAR all the time, robosmith. What I say means NOTHING. 

Merry Christmas. 

Thank you for your honesty.

[Fluffypants]

One thing to remember is that, Democrats are being watched and they won't have power forever. This abuse of power being done by Democrats will backfire on them.

Here is thing, the only case against Trump that has any merit is the classified documents case which got severely weakened when Biden was keeping them next to his car in his garage and Hilary had them going into unsecured servers.

We have never seen a party go after a current Presidential candidate like this before but they hold all the cards. If Trump wins the game changes.

In the past no one wanted to be the first to pull the trigger on political opponents due to optics, it is the reason Hilary wasn't indicted.

Now they have gone all in on going after Trump.

I guarantee you riots WILL break out if Trump wins and it will make January 6th look like a picnic in the park. Heck they rioted when he won last time and you all have ramped up the Nazi rhetoric 1000 fold. There are a lot of politicians right now calling Trump a Nazi and evil and a potential super dictator so by Colorado's standard that WILL mean insurrection when violence breaks out after Trump wins. You all better not even question the election if it is close because that will be an insurrection. You Tube better not let the Democrats say anything about election and ban them if the do, just like they did to the right.

[robosmith]

16 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

One thing to remember is that, Democrats are being watched and they won't have power forever. This abuse of power being done by Democrats will backfire on them.

Here is thing, the only case against Trump that has any merit is the classified documents case which got severely weakened when Biden was keeping them next to his car in his garage and Hilary had them going into unsecured servers.

We have never seen a party go after a current Presidential candidate like this before but they hold all the cards. If Trump wins the game changes.

In the past no one wanted to be the first to pull the trigger on political opponents due to optics, it is the reason Hilary wasn't indicted.

Now they have gone all in on going after Trump.

I guarantee you riots WILL break out if Trump wins and it will make January 6th look like a picnic in the park. Heck they rioted when he won last time and you all have ramped up the Nazi rhetoric 1000 fold. There are a lot of politicians right now calling Trump a Nazi and evil and a potential super dictator so by Colorado's standard that WILL mean insurrection when violence breaks out after Trump wins. You all better not even question the election if it is close because that will be an insurrection. You Tube better not let the Democrats say anything about election tand ban them if the do, just like they did to the right.

Thanks for your completely uninformed and unhinged post. You've clearly not been paying attention to anything but FOS LIES and you've posted ZERO evidence for your wild claims.

FWIW, Comey explained exactly why Hillary wasn't indicted and it wasn't "optics." Maybe google that and cure your ignorance. ?

 

[Deluge]

10 hours ago, robosmith said:

Thank you for your honesty.

You're welcome. I LOVE smacking you around with the truth. It makes the Christmas season that much brighter.  

[Deluge]

11 hours ago, Rebound said:

He did not explain the 14th amendment, so how can you say he understands it?

Engaged in insurrection: Check. Court wrote 100 page finding of fact.

Previously took oath to defend Constitution: Check

Ineligible for federal office: Check

He doesn't; that's the point. 

Questioning the liars who rigged the election? Check. 

Previously took oath to defend Constitution? Check. 

Eligible for Federal Office? Check. 

Continuing with draining the swamp in 2025? Soon to be check. 

Edited December 23, 2023 by Deluge

[robosmith]

9 hours ago, Deluge said:

You're welcome. I LOVE smacking you around with the truth. It makes the Christmas season that much brighter.  

I doubt Jesus would approve of any of your "smacking around," esp since it's just your FANTASY on drugs.

[Rebound]

10 hours ago, Deluge said:

He doesn't; that's the point. 

Questioning the liars who rigged the election? Check. 

Previously took oath to defend Constitution? Check. 

Eligible for Federal Office? Check. 

Continuing with draining the swamp in 2025? Soon to be check. 

How do you expect Donald Trump to beat a man who rigged a national election without leaving his basement, and leaving absolutely no trace? 

[Deluge]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

How do you expect Donald Trump to beat a man who rigged a national election without leaving his basement, and leaving absolutely no trace? 

I don't. Biden can't even change his own diapers, so he's not the one to go after. 

We need to round up all the a$$holes who were near the voting precincts in battleground states and interrogate the f*ck out of them. Get everything that's available (video, emails, EVERYTHING) and go through all of it. If too much evidence has been destroyed then at the very least, we take mail in balloting back to pre Covid conditions for this next election and staff two Reupublicans for every democrat in every precenct and go round the clock to ensure ZERO chance of cheating. 

It's extreme, I know, but it's obvious you 14th Amendment abusers will stop at nothing to get Biden a second illegitimate term. 

Edited December 23, 2023 by Deluge

[Deluge]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

I doubt Jesus would approve of any of your "smacking around," esp since it's just your FANTASY on drugs.

Jesus agrees; you're the biggest liar on this forum. You should be ashamed of yourself - I know I'm ashamed of you. 

[WestCanMan]

On 12/22/2023 at 9:05 AM, impartialobserver said:

Trump was not going to win Colorado even if he was on the ballot so this does not change the eventual outcome.

True, and I think that the Dems were relying on the GOP just letting it slide for that reason, establishing a precedent for other states in the future. 

Quote

What will impact it is the results of Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, and Pennsylvania

It will be a complete subversion of democracy if a few SCJs manage to remove a candidate from a ballot just because the other party accused them of something. 

IMO the judges in Colorado need to face some form of punishment for removing Trump from the ballot just because they assume that Trump was involved in an insurrection despite the fact that he has never been convicted, indicted, or even credibly accused of anything of the sort.