Jump to content

BOOM!!! Mark Meadows FLIPS! Testifies Against Trump to Grand Jury!!!


Recommended Posts

Mark Meadows has been granted immunity from Federal prosecution and has FLIPPED against Donald Trump!

Meadows has already testified to the grand jury, stating under oath that he told Donald Trump three times that Trump lost and that there was no massive fraud which could have overturned the election. Meadows told prosecutors that he told Donald Trump on November 4 that Trump's declaration of victory and claims of fraud where underhanded and false. 

Donald Trump isn't going to the Oval Office, he's going to jail. Three Trump lawyers and now his Chief of Staff are going to testify against him. Meadows was Trump's closest aid throughout the election, January 6 and the post-election period when Donald Trump illegally removed classified documents from the White House. 

 

https://abcnews.go.com/US/chief-staff-mark-meadows-granted-immunity-tells-special/story?id=104231281

Edited by Rebound
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

Meadows told prosecutors that he told Donald Trump on November 4 that Trump's declaration of victory and claims of fraud where underhanded and false. 

Listen to yourself, stupid...

You're saying "ONE GUY told Trump THREE TIMES on Nov 4th that he didn't really win, but Trump ignored him for 2 days! THIS IS A REALLY BIG DEAL!!!!"

Compare that to:

1) Van Jones acknowledged that he knew "Russian collusion was a big nothingburger" on a hidden camera, HIMSELF, and despite the fact that he knew that, he kept on pretending that "RUSSIAN COLLUSION IS THE BIGGEST DEAL IN THE WORLD!" for another 1.5 years. How did Van know it but none of the other resident liars at CNN knew? Of course they knew. I live in Canada and I knew. 

2) The FBI were lying, committing crimes and spying on Americans under false pretences for at least 2 years (FISA warrant was acquired by FBI crimes) in the Russian collusion investigation.  

3) Hillary knew that Russian collusion was false for more than 3 years, it was mainly based on her own false intel, and she kept on pushing it on TV that whole time.

You know all of the above, but you don't care. 

Your theoretical "gotcha" moment actually just exposes your own hypocrisy, lying and stupidity:  CNN, the FBI and Hillary all knew that collusion was false for a lot longer than 2 days, dummy. 

Edited by WestCanMan
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Listen to yourself, stupid...

You're saying "ONE GUY told Trump THREE TIMES on Nov 4th that he didn't really win, but Trump ignored him for 2 days! THIS IS A REALLY BIG DEAL!!!!"

Compare that to:

1) Van Jones acknowledged that he knew "Russian collusion was a big nothingburger" on a hidden camera, HIMSELF, and despite the fact that he knew that, he kept on pretending that "RUSSIAN COLLUSION IS THE BIGGEST DEAL IN THE WORLD!" for another 1.5 years. How did Van know it but none of the other resident liars at CNN knew? Of course they knew. I live in Canada and I knew. 

2) The FBI were lying, committing crimes and spying on Americans under false pretences for at least 2 years (FISA warrant was acquired by FBI crimes) in the Russian collusion investigation.  

3) Hillary knew that Russian collusion was false for more than 3 years, it was mainly based on her own false intel, and she kept on pushing it on TV that whole time.

You know all of the above, but you don't care. 

Your theoretical "gotcha" moment actually just exposes your own hypocrisy, lying and stupidity:  CNN, the FBI and Hillary all knew that collusion was false for a lot longer than 2 days, dummy. 

None of that deflection has anything to do with Trump’s lawyers pleading guilty and testifying against Trump. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, West said:

You'll be sorely disappointed when NOBODY goes to jail

You SHOULD be disappointed when ANYONE like Trump who swore an oath to uphold the Constitution turns out to be a LIAR and tries to overturn an election when he was told by most everyone that HE LOST.

But you'll celebrate instead because your allegiance to the law is non-existent. AKA, a criminal.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, robosmith said:

You SHOULD be disappointed when ANYONE like Trump who swore an oath to uphold the Constitution turns out to be a LIAR and tries to overturn an election when he was told by most everyone that HE LOST.

But you'll celebrate instead because your allegiance to the law is non-existent. AKA, a criminal.

They for good reason thought there was fraud. The vote counting all the sudden stopped with Trump up big only to then have his hundred thousand vote leads disappear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, West said:

They for good reason thought there was fraud. The vote counting all the sudden stopped with Trump up big only to then have his hundred thousand vote leads disappear.

They thought there was fraud because they were incredibly stupid people who were easily manipulated by a con man.  And the GOP set it up to work out that way, because they passed laws to prevent ANY counting of absentee and vote by mail ballots until the polls closed.  
 

So they PASSED LAWS to make it IMPOSSIBLE to have final results on Election Day, then tell their faithful to only vote in person, so they can pretend something is amiss. 
 

It is EASY to know on election night whether a candidate has decisively won: How large is his margin compared to the uncounted ballots.  It was clear that there were many outstanding uncounted ballots in PA, GA, AZ and MI on election night. 
 

You people just make up these ridiculous lies, which work with your stupld friends but not with j reliant people. Certainly not with judges. 
 

And now THREE of Trump’s election lawyers ADMIT they know Trump lost the election and they were part of a scheme to lie and commit illegal acts of outright fraud to overturn the legitimate election results. These lawyers include a Harvard educated lawyer and a former Federal prosecutor; safe to say that if they thought they could plead innocent and avoid jail time, they would. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Rebound said:

They thought there was fraud because they were incredibly stupid people who were easily manipulated by a con man.  And the GOP set it up to work out that way, because they passed laws to prevent ANY counting of absentee and vote by mail ballots until the polls closed.  
 

So they PASSED LAWS to make it IMPOSSIBLE to have final results on Election Day, then tell their faithful to only vote in person, so they can pretend something is amiss. 
 

It is EASY to know on election night whether a candidate has decisively won: How large is his margin compared to the uncounted ballots.  It was clear that there were many outstanding uncounted ballots in PA, GA, AZ and MI on election night. 
 

You people just make up these ridiculous lies, which work with your stupld friends but not with j reliant people. Certainly not with judges. 
 

And now THREE of Trump’s election lawyers ADMIT they know Trump lost the election and they were part of a scheme to lie and commit illegal acts of outright fraud to overturn the legitimate election results. These lawyers include a Harvard educated lawyer and a former Federal prosecutor; safe to say that if they thought they could plead innocent and avoid jail time, they would. 

Dude you were grifted by Hillary Clinton over collusion and still to this day bought into the lies. 

At least I based my skepticism on observable occurances such as the bullshit of using covid to push mail in ballots and vote tallying stopping with Trump well ahead in the count 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, West said:

 

At least I based my skepticism on observable occurances 

"Observable occurrences" don't mean shit in a court of law.

One thing Donald has never had is evidence of fraud viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law.

if Donald had evidence of fraud viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law, he'd have already presented it.

Instead he's got his moronic crack head pals like Mike Pillow "claiming" to have explosive new evidence that never gets presented....... Do you know why?

Because it doesn't exist.

And all the stu pid suckers like yourself are eating up Donalds shit with a spoon.

You should probably wipe your mouth after all that shit eating.

 

  • Like 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

"Observable occurrences" don't mean shit in a court of law.

One thing Donald has never had is evidence of fraud viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law.

if Donald had evidence of fraud viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law, he'd have already presented it.

Instead he's got his moronic crack head pals like Mike Pillow "claiming" to have explosive new evidence that never gets presented....... Do you know why?

Because it doesn't exist.

And all the stu pid suckers like yourself are eating up Donalds shit with a spoon.

You should probably wipe your mouth after all that shit eating.

 

He had like 3 weeks to examine what Joe Biden called the "most extensive voter fraud organization in history". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, West said:

He had like 3 weeks to examine what Joe Biden called the "most extensive voter fraud organization in history". 

Let me guess, you think the "fire department" is responsible for starting fires?

You think an opioid task force distributes opioids? 

 ?

How about this, regardless of time and resources (which were ample!) just as a baseline for decent and responsible behavior, don't claim massive election fraud without evidence. That shouldn't need to be said, but there are some slow folks out there--and some slow ex-presidents.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Let me guess, you think the "fire department" is responsible for starting fires?

You think an opioid task force distributes opioids? 

 ?

How about this, regardless of time and resources (which were ample!) just as a baseline for decent and responsible behavior, don't claim massive election fraud without evidence. That shouldn't need to be said, but there are some slow folks out there--and some slow ex-presidents.

 

I believe Joe when he says he engaged in voter fraud. 

He admitted his guilt

Edited by West
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Rebound said:

They thought there was fraud because they were incredibly stupid people who were easily manipulated by a con man.  

Dude, leftards have no room to call anyone "easily manipulated". You've been on the 'stooged' end of every major news story of the last ten years.

You guys are so accustomed to defending untenable positions that things like "A 3-year smear campaign based entirely on Dem/FBI lies and crimes is no big deal" just roll off your tongue and you don't even flinch.

FYI the reason that so many people thought there was election fraud is because the Dems have such an extensive history of committing voter fraud. When they're not busy cheating on another election they're pushing ridiculously fraud-friendly election reforms like "no voter ID" and "the mass-mailing of unsolicited ballots with no requirement for signature matching".

"Look mommy, another ballot arrived in the mail. This one's for a 'Mrs. Sampson'. I've never heard of her: what do we do?" 

"That's one more vote for the Bidolt, kid. We've already voted for him fifty times ?. Now get your clothes on - we're gonna take the phone book to a few different polling stations and vote with no ID. Ain't democracy grand? Thank you Nancy Pelosi!"

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, West said:

I believe Joe when he says he engaged in voter fraud. 

He admitted his guilt

Except that he never said it. Not that it matters. You have no honor and no shame, so you'll just keep lying about it.

Every audit, every recount, every court case--and there were MANY of each, determined the same thing: the voting was fair and true and Joe Biden won by a mile. 

And, as always, if there had been fraud, and your team couldn't produce any evidence in the most scrutinized election in history, the Republicans clearly aren't fit to lead. Either way, they've been outsmarted and beaten. They're welcome to vote in the next election, but until then they should either produce evidence or stop bleating and STFU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, West said:

They are extremely dishonest.

Rigged their own primary. Have lied about multiple stories. Then expect us not to be suspicious

Biden ran the worst campaign ever: mainly hid in his basement and mumbled for half an hour a day, couldn't name the town he was in at rallies, got his wife and sister mixed up, got lost walking off stages, shook hands with the air, got the sports team on his jacket mixed up, and had almost no rallies, but when he did they sometimes had less than 20 people at them. His biggest was probably 2K.

His campaign was basically run by the FBI (Russian and Ukrainian collusion farces, blocking the laptop story, and the FBI's own Whitmer kidnapping plot) and CNN. Biden did nothing himself to prove that he was a worthy POTUS - he was just less of a radical id10t than the rest of the DNC at their primary debates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Except that he never said it.

Quote
October 25, 2020

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said Saturday that his campaign has put together "the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization" in American political history.

There ya go, liar, Biden said those exact words himself: https://freebeacon.com/elections/biden-we-have-the-most-extensive-and-inclusive-voter-fraud-organization/

Leftards like to pretend that he misspoke, and it's a fairly solid defence because Joe can't speak English anymore so he screws up almost everything he tries to stutter out, but if he didn't intend to tell the truth there then it was a Freudian slip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@HodadAnd to be honest, how does one party unilaterally create the most extensive anti-fraud election ever?

Regardless of his Freudian slip, Biden is acknowledging that his party took complete control of overseeing and controlling the election

On election night CNN, the world's biggest election skeptics, were already calling the election 100% legitimate, and Biden wasn't even leading yet... the truckloads of midnight ballots hadn't saved the day yet.

How did CNN go from"the world's biggest election skeptics" to "absolute believers in election integrity" in one month? I call it foreshadowing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

There ya go, liar, Biden said those exact words himself: https://freebeacon.com/elections/biden-we-have-the-most-extensive-and-inclusive-voter-fraud-organization/

Leftards like to pretend that he misspoke, and it's a fairly solid defence because Joe can't speak English anymore so he screws up almost everything he tries to stutter out, but if he didn't intend to tell the truth there then it was a Freudian slip.

Except he didn't say he had committed voter fraud, dummy. No more than a mayor who boasts that they have the best fire department in the state are boasting about their capacity to start fires. 

Literally everyone knows exactly what he said and exactly what he meant. Only you dishonest, desperate goons are trying to actively misinterpret it. Because you have no honor, no shame, and nothing to lose.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Except he didn't say he had committed voter fraud, dummy.

Stop splitting hairs, dummy. Why would they create the world's most extensive voter fraud org and then not use it, dummy?

We all know that they cheated in 2020, just some of us (the liars, like you) won't admit to it. The Dems are proven election cheaters and they're by far the biggest liars in the world: you'd have to be a complete ****** to even consider for a second that they didn't cheat. They have the FBI committing crimes for them all the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, West said:

They for good reason thought there was fraud. The vote counting all the sudden stopped with Trump up big only to then have his hundred thousand vote leads disappear.

Just cause you're buying ^this BULLSHIT does not make it "good reason." Duh

Meadows (among others) has testified he told Trump that there was NO EVIDENCE of voter fraud sufficient to change the election results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,748
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Charliep
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • CrazyCanuck89 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • CDN1 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • CDN1 earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • User went up a rank
      Experienced
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...