West Posted October 19, 2023 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 (edited) 6 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: With 91 felony charges, we're gunna see who the real b_tch is very soon. My guess is the vast majority get tossed out just like the half dozen or so charges against Sidney Powell. Just red meat for the 'tards like yourself to foam at the mouth over. What they REALLY don't like is the fact Trump beat Hillary in 2016. That's what it's really about Edited October 19, 2023 by West Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted October 19, 2023 Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 26 minutes ago, West said: Who the f cares? Probably very few Canadians, but you obviously care if Trump is convicted or you wouldn't be here DEFENDING HIS CRIMES. 1 minute ago, West said: My guess is the vast majority get tossed out just like the half dozen or so charges against Sidney Powell. Just red meat for the 'tards like yourself to foam at the mouth over. Difference is there is NO BIG FISH for Trump to flip on. Duh 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted October 19, 2023 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 (edited) 6 minutes ago, robosmith said: Difference is there is NO BIG FISH for Trump to flip on. Lol.. What this boils down to is the following: 1. Rudy Giuliani mopped the floor with the mob in New York. Democrats didn't like that. 2. Sidney Powell wiped the floor with them in the Flynn case. They don't like that. 3. Jenna Ellis laid an ars whooping on Newsom in California over targeted harassment of Pastor John McArthurs church during covid. They didn't like that. 4. Donnie mopped the floor with Hillary in the 2016 election. They didn't like that. 5. Allan Dershowitz has provided strong legal analysis over the unconstitutional attacks on politicians. They don't like that. This isn't just an assault on Trump. It's an assault on the US as a whole. They want to intimidate people into complying with their stalinism. Sidney Powell should have NEVER been charged for looking at election machines. She's a lawyer representing her clients. Why they've all the sudden ATTACKED lawyers should tell you all you need to know Edited October 19, 2023 by West Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TreeBeard Posted October 19, 2023 Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 If they did nothing wrong, why did two of Trump’s cronies plead guilty? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted October 19, 2023 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 33 minutes ago, TreeBeard said: If they did nothing wrong, why did two of Trump’s cronies plead guilty? The fact they made Powell plead guilty to looking at a voting machine shows everything you need to know about whether or not America as a country should be taken seriously any longer 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted October 19, 2023 Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 Come on guys, we all know she took a plea deal because the prosecution had no case. Trump Cult logic. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted October 19, 2023 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Aristides said: Come on guys, we all know she took a plea deal because the prosecution had no case. Trump Cult logic. They didn't in the FELONY convictions moe-ron. If they did Phony Fani Willis would've went to trial on much more SERIOUS offenses than looking at a voting machine Edited October 19, 2023 by West Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted October 19, 2023 Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 Just now, West said: They didn't in the FELONY convictions moe-ron So why didn't she just plead not guilty? Genius. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted October 19, 2023 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Aristides said: So why didn't she just plead not guilty? Genius. They withdrew the charges. The prosecutor has a DUTY to pursue FELONY convictions if there's a strong case. I dont care if she looked at voter machines. She's a hero if that's what she's being charged by lunatic leftists for Edited October 19, 2023 by West Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted October 19, 2023 Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 2 hours ago, West said: Lol.. What this boils down to is the following: 1. Rudy Giuliani mopped the floor with the mob in New York. Democrats didn't like that. 2. Sidney Powell wiped the floor with them in the Flynn case. They don't like that. 3. Jenna Ellis laid an ars whooping on Newsom in California over targeted harassment of Pastor John McArthurs church during covid. They didn't like that. 4. Donnie mopped the floor with Hillary in the 2016 election. They didn't like that. 5. Allan Dershowitz has provided strong legal analysis over the unconstitutional attacks on politicians. They don't like that. This isn't just an assault on Trump. It's an assault on the US as a whole. They want to intimidate people into complying with their stalinism. Sidney Powell should have NEVER been charged for looking at election machines. She's a lawyer representing her clients. Why they've all the sudden ATTACKED lawyers should tell you all you need to know Powell was NOT AUTHORIZED to access the voting machines and that's ILLEGAL. Duh Thing you don't understand is, once the machines are tampered with, they have to be REPLACED because no one knows with what virus they've been INFECTED. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted October 19, 2023 Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 27 minutes ago, West said: The fact they made Powell plead guilty to looking at a voting machine shows everything you need to know about whether or not America as a country should be taken seriously any longer You may be dumb enough to believe ^this tripe, but that's just cause you have NO UNDERSTANDING of US LAW nor ELECTION PROCEDURES. 4 minutes ago, West said: They withdrew the charges. The prosecutor has a DUTY to pursue FELONY convictions if there's a strong case. I dont care if she looked at voter machines. She's a hero if that's what she's being charged by lunatic leftists for NO ONE in the judicial system cares what you care about. They care about what the LAW SAYS. Duh 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted October 19, 2023 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 12 minutes ago, robosmith said: You may be dumb enough to believe ^this tripe, but that's just cause you have NO UNDERSTANDING of US LAW nor ELECTION PROCEDURES. NO ONE in the judicial system cares what you care about. They care about what the LAW SAYS. Duh Lol.. like a caged hamster. Why I don't have respect for the so called legal system which is a joke in your country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrakHoBarbie Posted October 19, 2023 Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 3 hours ago, West said: My guess is the vast majority get tossed out just like the half dozen or so charges against Sidney Powell. Just red meat for the 'tards like yourself to foam at the mouth over. What they REALLY don't like is the fact Trump beat Hillary in 2016. That's what it's really about I wonder who's gunna flip on Donald next. I'm guessing there's gunna be a lot more co-conspirators wanting to avoid incarceration. Who's next? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrakHoBarbie Posted October 19, 2023 Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 36 minutes ago, West said: They withdrew the charges. She flipped on Donald to save her ass from prison. Now, she definitely will testify against Donald. I see you're having difficulty accepting this fact. Dont worry, boy. It will sink in soon enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodad Posted October 19, 2023 Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 1 hour ago, West said: The fact they made Powell plead guilty to looking at a voting machine shows everything you need to know about whether or not America as a country should be taken seriously any longer "Looking" at a voting machine? Well, that's a lie and a half. Prosecutors allege that Powell conspired with Hall and others to access election equipment without authorization and hired computer forensics firm SullivanStrickler to send a team to Coffee County, in south Georgia, to copy software and data from voting machines and computers there. The indictment says a person who is not named sent an email to a top SullivanStrickler executive and instructed him to send all data copied from Dominion Voting Systems equipment in Coffee County to an unidentified lawyer associated with Powell and the Trump campaign. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted October 19, 2023 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Hodad said: "Looking" at a voting machine? Well, that's a lie and a half. Prosecutors allege that Powell conspired with Hall and others to access election equipment without authorization and hired computer forensics firm SullivanStrickler to send a team to Coffee County, in south Georgia, to copy software and data from voting machines and computers there. The indictment says a person who is not named sent an email to a top SullivanStrickler executive and instructed him to send all data copied from Dominion Voting Systems equipment in Coffee County to an unidentified lawyer associated with Powell and the Trump campaign. Right.. im not desputing what she did.. they examined/looked at a voter machine. Why can't someone do that in a functioning democracy to ensure basic fundamental rights, such as the right to vote, is upheld? Edited October 19, 2023 by West Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodad Posted October 19, 2023 Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 2 minutes ago, West said: Right.. they examined a voter machine. Why can't someone do that in a functioning democracy to ensure basic fundamental rights, such as the right to vote, is upheld? I dunno man. Why? Go to Amazon, order a thinking cap, strap it on and ponder why it should be illegal for any random person to steal proprietary software for our voting systems and voter data? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legato Posted October 19, 2023 Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 3 hours ago, robosmith said: Difference is there is NO BIG FISH for Trump to flip on. Duh There is...That large Sucker fish I caught was returned back to the swamp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted October 19, 2023 Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 48 minutes ago, West said: Lol.. like a caged hamster. Why I don't have respect for the so called legal system which is a joke in your country. You don't know ANYTHING about the US Legal system which is why ALL YOU DO is make GRATUITOUS CLAIMS without so much as a SINGLE REASON, let alone ACTUAL CORROBORATION. Let us know when you FIND SOME from ACTUAL EXPERTS. Until then you're just like Gnat-man and CdnFckWad: amateurs who ONLY BELIEVE they know better than actual EXPERTS. AKA Dunning-Kruger on DISPLAY HERE. Duh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted October 19, 2023 Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 8 minutes ago, Legato said: There is...That large Sucker fish I caught was returned back to the swamp. Why would you do that if you're not an lDIOT? Of course, it never happened and you're JUST TROLLING. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legato Posted October 19, 2023 Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 8 minutes ago, robosmith said: you're JUST TROLLING. That's how caught the fish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted October 19, 2023 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 39 minutes ago, Hodad said: I dunno man. Why? Go to Amazon, order a thinking cap, strap it on and ponder why it should be illegal for any random person to steal proprietary software for our voting systems and voter data? It's not a random person it was the lawyer from a political campaign and nobody "stole" anything lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted October 19, 2023 Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 2 hours ago, West said: They withdrew the charges. The prosecutor has a DUTY to pursue FELONY convictions if there's a strong case. I dont care if she looked at voter machines. She's a hero if that's what she's being charged by lunatic leftists for The withdrew them as part of the plea deal. I'll ask again, if they had no case, why didn't she plead not guilty? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted October 19, 2023 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Aristides said: The withdrew them as part of the plea deal. I'll ask again, if they had no case, why didn't she plead not guilty? She didn't have to. They were withdrawn. A plea deal isn't an admission of guilt on the six felony charges. They caught her for essentially Jay walking. Nothing significant Edited October 19, 2023 by West Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted October 19, 2023 Report Share Posted October 19, 2023 Just now, West said: She didn't have to. They were withdrawn. Because she did a plea deal. If they just withdrew them before there was a deal, why would she plead guilty to anything? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.