Giuliani Gets His Ass Handed to Him!

[Rebound]

Indicted felon Rudolph Giuliani today lost a Federal defamation lawsuit filed against him by two Georgia election workers.  
 

Throughout the discovery process, Giuliani continually made excuses to ignore the judge’s orders to turn over disclosure materials and provide a financial disclosure.  Giuliani also filed a bizarre stipulation in which he said he conceded that the statements he made about the election workers were false, but that he was not admitting to any wrongdoing.  
 

After one different excuse after another, the judge had enough and sanctioned Mr. Giuliani with guilty for “defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, civil conspiracy and punitive damage claims.” The case will now go to a jury only for the purpose of awarding damages.  
 

Giuliani’s legal woes don’t end there. He is also facing a massive civil lawsuit from Dominion Voting Systems, and is facing felony criminal charges in Georgia.

Edited August 31, 2023 by Rebound

[NYLefty]

I hope those two ladies wring him dry of every last penny 

[Caswell Thomas]

This trial certainly proves one thing well, Trump will have many friends with him in federal.prison. 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Caswell Thomas said:

This trial certainly proves one thing well, Trump will have many friends with him in federal.prison. 

Well he's got to pay money but he's not going to jail is he?

I think slagging those two ladies was a million yards over the line and he should pay. But i don't think he's faced any criminal charges just yet.

[Rebound]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Well he's got to pay money but he's not going to jail is he?

I think slagging those two ladies was a million yards over the line and he should pay. But i don't think he's faced any criminal charges just yet.

Trump has been charged with 91 felonies.  

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Well he's got to pay money but he's not going to jail is he?

I think slagging those two ladies was a million yards over the line and he should pay. But i don't think he's faced any criminal charges just yet.

Obstructing an official Federal process and coercing a state official to change the vote count are certainly felonies warranting prison terms.

Why should his muscle go to prison and him NOT? That is for what RICO was INVENTED.

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

Trump has been charged with 91 felonies.  

And convicted of none  i believe.  So thus far neither of them is in jail.

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Obstructing an official Federal process and coercing a state official to change the vote count are certainly felonies warranting prison terms.

Which he hasn't been convicted of.  Your brain just can't process more than one thought at a time can it.

Sometimes watching you try to think is like watching my dog growling at the closed door. He knows that there's stuff in there he doesn't understand,  and thinks  if he just growls at it somehow whatever it is will be sufficiently intimidated   So far the vacuum appears to be indifferent.

[Nationalist]

Rudolph Giuliani. "America's Mayor".

Now...because he sided with Orangemanbad, the Libbies are trying to destroy him.

Oh I can hardly wait for revenge.

[Rebound]

6 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Which he hasn't been convicted of.  Your brain just can't process more than one thought at a time can it.

Sometimes watching you try to think is like watching my dog growling at the closed door. He knows that there's stuff in there he doesn't understand,  and thinks  if he just growls at it somehow whatever it is will be sufficiently intimidated   So far the vacuum appears to be indifferent.

We know this. But clearly they committed these crimes. 

Just now, Nationalist said:

Rudolph Giuliani. "America's Mayor".

Now...because he sided with Orangemanbad, the Libbies are trying to destroy him.

Oh I can hardly wait for revenge.

“The Libbies”? 
You mean, the two innocent women whose lives he destroyed? Those people?

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

We know this. But clearly they committed these crimes. 

“The Libbies”? 
You mean, the two innocent women whose lives he destroyed? Those people?

He didn't destroy anyone's life. Get a grip on yourself. This is nothing more than TDS horseshit and as I've said...revenge...I hope it comes and then interest is collected.

[Aristides]

31 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

He didn't destroy anyone's life. Get a grip on yourself. This is nothing more than TDS horseshit and as I've said...revenge...I hope it comes and then interest is collected.

He knowingly told lies that resulted in people being harassed and getting death threats. They are getting justice.

[Nationalist]

19 minutes ago, Aristides said:

He knowingly told lies that resulted in people being harassed and getting death threats. They are getting justice.

Oh? Did Rudy threaten someone's life? No?

Go fish. You jack-asses lie as a matter of course. this is just another in a mountain of reasons that the Republicans need to take control of both houses and the Whitehouse, trash the FBI and JOD, install their own heads for both, and go after all Democrats with a vengeance that dwarfs even this current chickenshit.

You wanted to play this game...I say fine. Buckle up.

[Rebound]

5 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Oh? Did Rudy threaten someone's life? No?

Go fish. You jack-asses lie as a matter of course. this is just another in a mountain of reasons that the Republicans need to take control of both houses and the Whitehouse, trash the FBI and JOD, install their own heads for both, and go after all Democrats with a vengeance that dwarfs even this current chickenshit.

You wanted to play this game...I say fine. Buckle up.

Actually, it’s Giuliani who lied. And he filed a statement in court admitting that the things he said about these two campaign workers were untrue. And he’s been found guilty.  
 

Defamation begins with lying. And who’s been found guilty of defamation? Why, Giuliani and Trump.  They are now Convicted Liars.  

Edited September 1, 2023 by Rebound

[robosmith]

9 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Which he hasn't been convicted of.  Your brain just can't process more than one thought at a time can it.

Sometimes watching you try to think is like watching my dog growling at the closed door. He knows that there's stuff in there he doesn't understand,  and thinks  if he just growls at it somehow whatever it is will be sufficiently intimidated   So far the vacuum appears to be indifferent.

You MAY believe ^these cute little fantasies of yours are clever, but in reality they're just you desperately grasping at straws to cover for you IGNORANCE about the EVIDENCE against Trump.

Winter is coming, and your ass is hanging out.

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Rudolph Giuliani. "America's Mayor".

Now...because he sided with Orangemanbad, the Libbies are trying to destroy him.

Oh I can hardly wait for revenge.

No, it's because ever since he started working for Trump's campaign, he's been LYING HIS ASS OFF.

He destroyed his once mighty reputation long ago. LMAO

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

He didn't destroy anyone's life. Get a grip on yourself. This is nothing more than TDS horseshit and as I've said...revenge...I hope it comes and then interest is collected.

Just because you didn't see it on FOS LIES, does not mean it didn't happen. Duh

Guess  they never report all the MAGA CULT THREATS that Trump INSPIRES. 

You need to get out more.

[Nationalist]

22 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Actually, it’s Giuliani who lied. And he filed a statement in court admitting that the things he said about these two campaign workers were untrue. And he’s been found guilty.  
 

Defamation begins with lying. And who’s been found guilty of defamation? Why, Giuliani and Trump.  They are now Convicted Liars.  

So no...he didn't threaten anyone's life. Got it.

[Rebound]

Just now, Nationalist said:

So no...he didn't threaten anyone's life. Got it.

Nobody said that he threatened anyone’s life. 
 

You’re upset that “the Liberals” are putting these criminals on trial. Yet, here Giuliani was sued by two women. And here is Giuliani’s sworn confession that, yes, he did lie and his lies were defamatory, signed by Giuliani and submitted to court:

 

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.238720/gov.uscourts.dcd.238720.84.2.pdf

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

We know this. But clearly they committed these crimes. 

 

ROFL - do you even hear yourself?!?! 

He's committed a crime when a judge says he has.  OR - people are guilty when they LOOK guilty before a trial - in which case biden and hunter are guilty as hell and so is hillary.

And like i said your side has been 'the boy who cried trump' for close to a decade. You and the left have ZERO credibility in that regard.

If you want to say something like "based on what we've been told so far and knowing he hasn't had a trial it looks like he might be guilty of these crimes" then fine.  But you chronically insist hunter and biden are innocent despite there being a BUTTLOAD of evidence they were up to shady business - Hillary was DEFINITELY guilty and the fbi agents wanted her charged until there was political interference and you claim she was innocent...  you can't have it both ways and not be looked at like a bit of a tard.

[Nationalist]

17 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You MAY believe ^these cute little fantasies of yours are clever, but in reality they're just you desperately grasping at straws to cover for you IGNORANCE about the EVIDENCE against Trump.

Winter is coming, and your ass is hanging out.

No, it's because ever since he started working for Trump's campaign, he's been LYING HIS ASS OFF.

He destroyed his once mighty reputation long ago. LMAO

 

[Rebound]

6 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

ROFL - do you even hear yourself?!?! 

He's committed a crime when a judge says he has.  OR - people are guilty when they LOOK guilty before a trial - in which case biden and hunter are guilty as hell and so is hillary.

And like i said your side has been 'the boy who cried trump' for close to a decade. You and the left have ZERO credibility in that regard.

If you want to say something like "based on what we've been told so far and knowing he hasn't had a trial it looks like he might be guilty of these crimes" then fine.  But you chronically insist hunter and biden are innocent despite there being a BUTTLOAD of evidence they were up to shady business - Hillary was DEFINITELY guilty and the fbi agents wanted her charged until there was political interference and you claim she was innocent...  you can't have it both ways and not be looked at like a bit of a tard.

There is no such buttload of evidence regarding the Bidens. If there were, I’d be giving my money to Newsom. 

[CdnFox]

8 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Nobody said that he threatened anyone’s life. 
 

You’re upset that “the Liberals” are putting these criminals on trial. Yet, here Giuliani was sued by two women. And here is Giuliani’s sworn confession that, yes, he did lie and his lies were defamatory, signed by Giuliani and submitted to court:

 

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.238720/gov.uscourts.dcd.238720.84.2.pdf

That's not quite accurate exactly.

He says he's not saying that the statements aren't defamatory in and of themselves but that no defamation took place because reasons/constitution.       To put it another way , calling someone a jerk may be defamatory but if it's in the course of exercising your constitutionally protected rights then no crime or injury has happened.  So even tho the term may be considered defamatory in and of itself - his use in that situation would not.

Do you see why it's important to be honest and thorough? He's not admitting that he defamed those women at ALL. He's claiming that while those terms can be defamatory his use in those specific circumstances are not.

So now you look like a liar. You claimed he admitted to defamation which he definitely did not.

As it turns out the judge didn't like that defense, and maybe THAT'S what you should have ponited out instead of being untruthful about what he confessed to.

 

[CdnFox]

Just now, Rebound said:

There is no such buttload of evidence regarding the Bidens. If there were, I’d be giving my money to Newsom. 

Yeah - there is.  But you willfully choose to ignore it in that case yet are certain trump colluded with the russians unlawfully for the 2016 election  

You  pick and choose what you're going to ignore despite fact and what you're going to demand is true without fact.

Thats why it's best to leave it to a judge. 

[robosmith]

28 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

"Bullshit"

^Intellectual bankruptcy AGAIN.

[robosmith]

20 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Yeah - there is.  But you willfully choose to ignore it in that case yet are certain trump colluded with the russians unlawfully for the 2016 election  

You  pick and choose what you're going to ignore despite fact and what you're going to demand is true without fact.

^This is what you're doing. Do you even know ANY of the SWORN TESTIMONY EVIDENCE by WH INSIDERS against Trump? LMAO 

The sworn testimony before Congress from Archer says he has NO KNOWLEDGE of WRONGDOING by Joe Biden. Duh

What is the SWORN TESTIMONY against Joe Biden? 

27 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

That's not quite accurate exactly.

He says he's not saying that the statements aren't defamatory in and of themselves but that no defamation took place because reasons/constitution.       To put it another way , calling someone a jerk may be defamatory but if it's in the course of exercising your constitutionally protected rights then no crime or injury has happened.  So even tho the term may be considered defamatory in and of itself - his use in that situation would not.

Do you see why it's important to be honest and thorough? He's not admitting that he defamed those women at ALL. He's claiming that while those terms can be defamatory his use in those specific circumstances are not.

So now you look like a liar. You claimed he admitted to defamation which he definitely did not.

As it turns out the judge didn't like that defense, and maybe THAT'S what you should have ponited out instead of being untruthful about what he confessed to.

 

The judge ruled Giuliani is GUILTY. All that remains is determination of the PENALTY.