Vikek and Truth or Consequences

[Hodad]

45 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

"We" didn't fail them.

"YOU" did. You Libbies and your climate horseshit is destroying the entire global economy.

African nations now saddling up with BRICS...China and Russia are bringing North Korea into their sphere of influence...gas prices are insane...which makes everything more expensive.

You dumb fcks need to stop or be stopped. This is insanity.

Yeah, yeah. We know. You, with absolutely no qualifications and little reasoning to show, have decided that you know more than the entire global scientific community. They're all just "dumb fcks." Stoopid scientists!

Meanwhile, over in the soft sciences they have to recalibrate the Dunning Kruger scale to accommodate folks like you.

[BeaverFever]

John Bolton Says Ramaswamy Reminds Him of Ex-Boss Trump: ‘Firm Opinions on Subjects He Knows Absolutely Nothing About’

The former national security advisor said the 2024 GOP hopeful 'may as well be in kindergarten' talking about Ukraine

……

https://themessenger.com/politics/john-bolton-says-ramaswamy-reminds-him-of-ex-boss-trump-firm-opinions-on-subjects-he-knows-absolutely-nothing-about

[Nationalist]

6 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Yeah, yeah. We know. You, with absolutely no qualifications and little reasoning to show, have decided that you know more than the entire global scientific community. They're all just "dumb fcks." Stoopid scientists!

Meanwhile, over in the soft sciences they have to recalibrate the Dunning Kruger scale to accommodate folks like you.

Riiight...

https://www.fraserinstitute.org/article/tsunami-nonsense

https://www.discoursemagazine.com/ideas/2022/05/02/the-fake-scientific-consensus-on-climate-change/

https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/there-is-no-climate-emergency-say-500-experts-in-letter-to-the-united-nations/

 

 

https://www.biznews.com/global-citizen/2022/10/05/climate-change-2

Now...take your doomsday horseshit and go play in the hi-way. Your greenie crap is destroying the entire global economy and the lives of our own children.

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

OK...I have to take a moment...stand back in awe of your stupidity.

No kidding...you're just dumb!

Are you still trying to figure out something intelligent to post in your lame attempt at refutation? LMAO

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Perspektiv said:

The fact you wish to argue with low brow dimwits says a lot about you.

You're essentially a crackhead who gets their new shopping cart stolen, looking down on that other one pushing a rusted one around with the creaky wheels.

Its still a crackhead o_O

"Yeah, but at least I pee in shopping mall washrooms, vs on buildings.."

Yeah, but you still would suck d*** for crack.

"I only did once, and at least use a condom!"

You're essentially arguing in the same tangent, and all am hearing is "I at least don't have HIV!" after admitting to deepthroating someone for a vial.

And you're wrestling in the mud with him. 

[Legato]

2 hours ago, Hodad said:

No, those young people and their potential are the ones who will have to live with the consequences of our failure to arrest climate change. They will be the ones bearing the cost in misery and money to adapt to new ways of living. 

Their rage will be directed at the aging know-nothings who arbitrarily dismissed decades of dire warnings from the entire global community of scientists because they felt mitigation would be inconvenient. 

They aren't as susceptible to "internet wisdom" as you old people and are engaged on the topic already. They know you're farking them over.

The fact that you think mans puny attempts to stop the Earths climate from changing (which it always has) demonstrates large holes in your reasoning.

[robosmith]

50 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Riiight...

https://www.fraserinstitute.org/article/tsunami-nonsense

https://www.discoursemagazine.com/ideas/2022/05/02/the-fake-scientific-consensus-on-climate-change/

https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/there-is-no-climate-emergency-say-500-experts-in-letter-to-the-united-nations/

 

 

https://www.biznews.com/global-citizen/2022/10/05/climate-change-2

Now...take your doomsday horseshit and go play in the hi-way. Your greenie crap is destroying the entire global economy and the lives of our own children.

You completely destroyed your credibility on climate by citing Lomborg as some kind of expert when he ONLY has a PhD in poli-sci.

 

Quote

The Skeptical Environmentalist[edit]

Main article: The Skeptical Environmentalist

In 2001, he attained significant attention by publishing The Skeptical Environmentalist, a controversial book whose main thesis is that many of the most-publicized claims and predictions on environmental issues are wrong. The book received negative reviews among the scientific community, including from the Union of Concerned Scientists, Nature and Scientific American, with many scientists criticising its assertions as poorly supported, selectively using data and misrepresenting sources. However, it was well received in popular media and brought Lomborg to international attention.^[7]

Formal accusations of scientific dishonesty[edit]

After the publication of The Skeptical Environmentalist, Lomborg was formally accused of scientific dishonesty by a group of environmental scientists, who brought a total of three complaints against him to the Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty (DCSD), a body under Denmark's Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MSTI). Lomborg was asked whether he regarded the book as a "debate" publication, and thereby not under the purview of the DCSD, or as a scientific work; he chose the latter, clearing the way for the inquiry that followed.^[8] The charges claimed that The Skeptical Environmentalist contained deliberately misleading data and flawed conclusions. Due to the similarity of the complaints, the DCSD decided to proceed on the three cases under one investigation.

Try peer reviewed scientific JOURNALS, IF you can understand them.

[Hodad]

3 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Riiight...

https://www.fraserinstitute.org/article/tsunami-nonsense

https://www.discoursemagazine.com/ideas/2022/05/02/the-fake-scientific-consensus-on-climate-change/

https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/there-is-no-climate-emergency-say-500-experts-in-letter-to-the-united-nations/

 

 

https://www.biznews.com/global-citizen/2022/10/05/climate-change-2

Now...take your doomsday horseshit and go play in the hi-way. Your greenie crap is destroying the entire global economy and the lives of our own children.

Well, let's see. You've got:

1. An op-ed from a non-scientist that has to be close to 20 years since publish.

2. An op-ed from a non-scientist published last year

3. An op-ed from a non-scientist published by an entity that's been engaged in an oil-funded climate disinformation campaign for decades.

4. A youtube jackass interviewing the same non-scientist who wrote op-ed #1

5. A youtube lecture of the same non-scientist who wrote op-ed #1

 

A looooooong slow clap for you. I'm not sure I could have supported my argument any better than this sorry display does. I'm taking this as acknowledgement that you have no science to support your point of view. And yet, you chase after these non-experts and dubious sources as if they have value, solely because they feed you a steady drip of convenient answers and excuses. 

[Hodad]

16 minutes ago, Legato said:

The fact that you think mans puny attempts to stop the Earths climate from changing (which it always has) demonstrates large holes in your reasoning.

^^This post demonstrates the "hole" in your sentence.

Whatever you were trying to communicate here, it boils down to disregarding every scientific body and authority on the planet. Pretty farking dumb. The scientific consensus has been coalescing for over 40 years. Now you have to look far and wide to find anyone peddling heterodox science. 

Like smokers and lung cancer research, you don't want to hear the truth. Unlike smokers and lung cancer research, you climate deniers will let others pay the price for your folly.

[Nationalist]

38 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Are you still trying to figure out something intelligent to post in your lame attempt at refutation? LMAO

No. Intelligent would be way over your head.

[Guest]

29 minutes ago, robosmith said:

And you're wrestling in the mud with him. 

You're proving my point o_O

If am an low brow dimwit, and you're choosing to argue with me....you can't claim superiority or one not being worth your time. You're spending a lot if your time talking to me.

If I suck d*** in the mud for cigarettes, and you do so at motels for a can of Fanta, if anything, it makes your situation more laughable. You feel superior to me. 

I know what I am and who I am.

You're essentially that woman looking down on others in the sex trade, talking about she's only doing it to put herself through school, yet is 46 with 5 kids. O_O

[Nationalist]

16 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You completely destroyed your credibility on climate by citing Lomborg as some kind of expert when he ONLY has a PhD in poli-sci.

 

Try peer reviewed scientific JOURNALS, IF you can understand them.

Try go fck yourself, instead of fcking the young.

[Nationalist]

15 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Well, let's see. You've got:

1. An op-ed from a non-scientist that has to be close to 20 years since publish.

2. An op-ed from a non-scientist published last year

3. An op-ed from a non-scientist published by an entity that's been engaged in an oil-funded climate disinformation campaign for decades.

4. A youtube jackass interviewing the same non-scientist who wrote op-ed #1

5. A youtube lecture of the same non-scientist who wrote op-ed #1

 

A looooooong slow clap for you. I'm not sure I could have supported my argument any better than this sorry display does. I'm taking this as acknowledgement that you have no science to support your point of view. And yet, you chase after these non-experts and dubious sources as if they have value, solely because they feed you a steady drip of convenient answers and excuses. 

Ya well...you Tweekie-ass fcks can go ahead and destroy everything you jack-asses touch.

In the end...I truly hope each and every one of you...get exactly what you deserve.

[CdnFox]

19 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Well, let's see. You've got:

1. An op-ed from a non-scientist that has to be close to 20 years since publish.

2. An op-ed from a non-scientist published last year

3. An op-ed from a non-scientist published by an entity that's been engaged in an oil-funded climate disinformation campaign for decades.

4. A youtube jackass interviewing the same non-scientist who wrote op-ed #1

5. A youtube lecture of the same non-scientist who wrote op-ed #1

 

A looooooong slow clap for you. I'm not sure I could have supported my argument any better than this sorry display does. I'm taking this as acknowledgement that you have no science to support your point of view. And yet, you chase after these non-experts and dubious sources as if they have value, solely because they feed you a steady drip of convenient answers and excuses. 

Hold on.  That's not how this works.

He's presented his evidence - if you disagree with it then you have to provide evidence that shows why his is wrong.

If all you do is dismiss his as being not to your liking - then you're saying you have nothing to refute this at all, you just don't like it.

Lets see your counter evidence that shows this is all inaccurate.

[robosmith]

21 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

No. Intelligent would be way over your head.

Nope, way over your LAZY ability.

[robosmith]

23 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Try go fck yourself, instead of fcking the young.

Ironically it's you who is advocating leaving them a planet that will be increasingly difficult to inhabit due to your luddite anti-science beliefs and false economy.

 

[robosmith]

16 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Hold on.  That's not how this works.

He's presented his evidence - if you disagree with it then you have to provide evidence that shows why his is wrong.

If all you do is dismiss his as being not to your liking - then you're saying you have nothing to refute this at all, you just don't like it.

Lets see your counter evidence that shows this is all inaccurate.

OPINIONS from a political scientist is about ACTUAL SCIENCE is NOT EVIDENCE, just like yours are not.

You guys mock Greta Thunberg, who at least has scientific consensus to back up her OPINIONS.

[Legato]

28 minutes ago, Hodad said:

^^This post demonstrates the "hole" in your sentence.

Whatever you were trying to communicate here, it boils down to disregarding every scientific body and authority on the planet. Pretty farking dumb. The scientific consensus has been coalescing for over 40 years. Now you have to look far and wide to find anyone peddling heterodox science. 

Like smokers and lung cancer research, you don't want to hear the truth. Unlike smokers and lung cancer research, you climate deniers will let others pay the price for your folly.

And all the futile attempts to change the climate have resulted in absolutely nothing. Consensus and science are in opposition to each other.

[Nationalist]

31 minutes ago, Hodad said:

^^This post demonstrates the "hole" in your sentence.

Whatever you were trying to communicate here, it boils down to disregarding every scientific body and authority on the planet. Pretty farking dumb. The scientific consensus has been coalescing for over 40 years. Now you have to look far and wide to find anyone peddling heterodox science. 

Like smokers and lung cancer research, you don't want to hear the truth. Unlike smokers and lung cancer research, you climate deniers will let others pay the price for your folly.

Inflation is killing people and the economy and you wanna wax away about smoking.

Disgusting.

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Ironically it's you who is advocating leaving them a planet that will be increasingly difficult to inhabit due to your luddite anti-science beliefs and false economy.

 

Bullshit! We can resolve all issues at once if we had rational thinkers in power who didn't cave to you Tweenkies.

Ur a m0ron and you always will be a m0ron.

[Nationalist]

27 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Hold on.  That's not how this works.

He's presented his evidence - if you disagree with it then you have to provide evidence that shows why his is wrong.

If all you do is dismiss his as being not to your liking - then you're saying you have nothing to refute this at all, you just don't like it.

Lets see your counter evidence that shows this is all inaccurate.

Don't waste your time @CdnFox. All these insufferable little shits understand is destruction and hatred.

I say we give then what they understand. I'm sorry but I've run out of patience with this never ending stream of sheer destruction these fcks leave behind them like a trail of slime from a slug.

[Hodad]

34 minutes ago, Legato said:

And all the futile attempts to change the climate have resulted in absolutely nothing. Consensus and science are in opposition to each other.

On the contrary, all scientific evidence points to the fact that we have successfully changed the climate. It's neither dream nor fantasy, yet science follows where the data leads.

 

We have never made a concerted effort sufficient to meet any target projected to reverse warming. In other words, we've never even tried. It's hard to gather any political will with you folks putting your heads in the sand and screaming about how the scientists are all wrong.

Edited September 5, 2023 by Hodad

[Hodad]

40 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Inflation is killing people and the economy and you wanna wax away about smoking.

Disgusting.

Bullshit! We can resolve all issues at once if we had rational thinkers in power who didn't cave to you Tweenkies.

Ur a m0ron and you always will be a m0ron.

Inflation is (almost) entirely unrelated to climate change. We have so little "green" efforts that it's economically negligible. Meanwhile, increasingly extreme weather will drive inflation. 

You're not even remotely fit to be calling anyone aimoron. Just a know-nothing chest beater proud to wallow in ignorance. It takes a special kind of stupid to look at nearly every scientific expert in the field and say, "Nah, I know better!"

[Nationalist]

1 minute ago, Hodad said:

Inflation is (almost) entirely unrelated to climate change. We have so little "green" efforts that it's economically negligible. Meanwhile, increasingly extreme weather will drive inflation. 

You're not even remotely fit to be calling anyone aimoron. Just a know-nothing chest beater proud to wallow in ignorance. It takes a special kind of stupid to look at nearly every scientific expert in the field and say, "Nah, I know better!"

What?

Quote

Inflation is (almost) entirely unrelated to climate change.

Ur an id1ot.

[Hodad]

33 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Don't waste your time @CdnFox. All these insufferable little shits understand is destruction and hatred.

I say we give then what they understand. I'm sorry but I've run out of patience with this never ending stream of sheer destruction these fcks leave behind them like a trail of slime from a slug.

^^Happily destroying the habitability of the planet according to all scientific thinking. Yet, entirely lacking all self awareness, accuses others of a stream of sheer destruction. 

Again, a special kind of stupid to hear the scientific consensus and then just wave your hands claiming the opposite. Like going to 10 doctors, listening as 9 or 10 of them tell you that your cholesterol levels are killing you, and then eating a slab of bacon with a smile because some jackass on youtube says it's fine! 

It boggles the mind that you people haven't put your tongues in electrical outlets or drowned looking up at the rain. 

7 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

What?

Ur an id1ot.

Inflation is not being driven by greening efforts. What part of that sentence confuses you? All of it? 

[Legato]

22 minutes ago, Hodad said:

On the contrary, all scientific evidence points to the fact that we have successfully changed the climate. It's neither dream nor fantasy, yet science follows where the data leads.

 

We have never made a concerted effort sufficient to meet any target projected to reverse warming. In other words, we've never even tried. It's hard to gather any political will with you folks putting your heads in the sand and screaming about how the scientists are all wrong.

What, where and ditto.