Witness Tampering!! Trump Faces IMMEDIATE Imprisonment

[Rebound]

On 8/20/2023 at 4:57 PM, robosmith said:

The whole Jan 6th protest was ORGANIZED by Trump and his co-conspirators.

Without Trump, it might have happened on any other day, OR NOT AT ALL.

Trump TOLD THEM to come on Jan 6th and "it will be WILD." Duh

AKA, you are delusional.

You mean YOU DON'T THINK.

Former Mafia boss, 88, convicted of ordering several murders

 

You have NO IDEA what evidence Smith has. You have even read the Jan 6th Committee final report. Duh.

He has the TITLE of Head of State. Duh

What he did FITS the definition.

Not YET.

You don't know US LAW.

No, proving YOU WRONG and STUPID.

“While in prison,, the elderly felon cannot get around without a wheelchair due to chronic arthritis, has clouded and worsening vision, lost all of his teeth, and has made pleas for medical help – including handwritten notes for cortisol shots – that are not answered promptly.”

That will soon be Donald’s fate. 

[robosmith]

On 8/20/2023 at 3:18 PM, Nationalist said:

He posts his opinion and notes the guy's partisan RINO positions.

And? Really...this is faking pathetic. It's also childish, and plain old dumb.

A mafia boss...lol. you really have zero idea what your saying.

Advocating a witness breaking the law is illegal and a violation of his bail terms. ^Here YOU ARE defending criminal activity AGAIN. ?

 

[robosmith]

On 8/20/2023 at 8:04 PM, CdnFox said:

No, it isn't.  As i said before if it doesn't come with a 'what if' then it's not witness tampering.  Simply saying "he shouldn't testify" does not stop or hinder or even necessarily deter the winess from fully freely and truthfully testifying .  It's just an opinion.

Let me put it another way - the prosecution lawyers and the judge probably know the law better than you.  Is he in jail? End of story.

Nope. You AGAIN prove that you have no understanding of US law and the discretion of the prosecutor.

They are giving Trump enough rope to HANG HIMSELF.

On 8/21/2023 at 5:41 AM, Nationalist said:

Lol...you make some pretty dumb statements. 

And all you do is post lDIOTIC CLAIMS about them instead of ANY REASON.

Did you NEVER LEARN DEBATE? LMAO

[robosmith]

On 8/21/2023 at 7:41 AM, Deluge said:

Having a different opinion is intimidation for you snowflakes. 

This is a nothing burger.

When it's directly involved in a criminal case, it is MORE than JUST "different opinion."

Esp with Trump who is known to incite violence in his CULT MEMBERS.

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Nope it doesn't.  And your opinion is irrelevant and you should know that.  Now if you can get a judge to convict him of planning a revolt then that's different but nobody's even charged him with that.  Like... at all. So it's a ridiculous thing to say. If the evdence was crystal clear that trump planned an insurrection then he'd be up on charges and he's not.

Your futile attempts to defend Trump's OBVIOUS ACTIONS and MOTIVATIONS are PATHETIC.

No one with any brains is buying what you're selling aside from the MAGA CULT.

[Nationalist]

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

Advocating a witness breaking the law is illegal and a violation of his bail terms. ^Here YOU ARE defending criminal activity AGAIN. ?

 

Defending from what? Having an opinion?

Go fish man.

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

Nope. You AGAIN prove that you have no understanding of US law and the discretion of the prosecutor.

They are giving Trump enough rope to HANG HIMSELF.

And all you do is post lDIOTIC CLAIMS about them instead of ANY REASON.

Did you NEVER LEARN DEBATE? LMAO

I will debate with rational people...of which...you are not.

Edited August 23, 2023 by Nationalist

[Deluge]

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

When it's directly involved in a criminal case, it is MORE than JUST "different opinion."

Esp with Trump who is known to incite violence in his CULT MEMBERS.

You mean when it's directly involved in some politically charged bullshit case. You woketards are the laughing stock of this entire country. lol

[impartialobserver]

Starting in 2015.. every time Trump utters a word.... certain folks just have to react and do so vehemently. Every single time. I would tire of losing my cookies every time that the master of verbal diarrhea spews more nonsense. However, he is not the topic. It is those who react to him every time.. Do you not tire of repeating yourself?

 

[CdnFox]

13 hours ago, robosmith said:

Your futile attempts to defend Trump's OBVIOUS ACTIONS and MOTIVATIONS are PATHETIC.

No one with any brains is buying what you're selling aside from the MAGA CULT.

Oooops -  we hit the "leftist crybaby freakout" stage - looks like you've cracked again   LOL

It's a simple truth kiddo. You and yours have been promising he's broken the law and will be behind bars shortly for 7 years and it's never happened.

And he's not even being CHARGED with the "absolute crimes" you claim he's "Definitely done absolutlely"  LOLOL!! 

there was no russian 'collusion', there's no obstruction of justice,  he didn't "lead a coup', etc etc etc.  We'll see if any of the current charge stick but i wouldn't want to bet on it.

When he's convicted of a crime then we can talk about it but right now everyone just sees you as the loser who cried trump. Wait for the trials like everyone else and THEN tell me what he's guilty of.  Assuming he doesn't become president and pardon himself before then.

 

[Guest]

1 hour ago, impartialobserver said:

Starting in 2015.. every time Trump utters a word.... certain folks just have to react and do so vehemently. Every single time. I would tire of losing my cookies every time that the master of verbal diarrhea spews more nonsense. However, he is not the topic. It is those who react to him every time.. Do you not tire of repeating yourself?

 

How 'bout them Cubs?

[BeaverFever]

33 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

there's no obstruction of justice,

Point of fact:   Nobody ever found there was no obstruction of Justice. His own AG (the third to serve in one term which ought to tell you something) had sole authority to authorize the investigation of a sitting president and simply declined to do so. It’s like if Gerald Butts declined to investigate Trudeau

[CdnFox]

4 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

How 'bout them Cubs?

And amusingly that was the right response.

Had the dems and the media talked about ANYTHING other than trump after the elections - i doubt trump would even really be a factor now.

But - they wanted to drag out jan 6th for some reason like it was pearl harbour - they kept holding hearings that went no where and coming up with useless charges they couldn't get to stick and talking about him night and day

That kept him alive and in the papers and made him a 'martyr'. 

They should have just shut up and ignored the hell out of him.'  I doubt he'd even be a consideration for this nomination.

Too late now.

[impartialobserver]

17 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

How 'bout them Cubs?

Not too terrible.. 3 games in back of the MIlwaukee Brewers for first place in the NL Central Division.

still... i get the joke and thanks for playing along. I tire of talking about Trump every single day. Its not like he is any different today than he was last month or last year. Same old, inane, verbal diarrhea. 

[Rebound]

2 hours ago, impartialobserver said:

Starting in 2015.. every time Trump utters a word.... certain folks just have to react and do so vehemently. Every single time. I would tire of losing my cookies every time that the master of verbal diarrhea spews more nonsense. However, he is not the topic. It is those who react to him every time.. Do you not tire of repeating yourself?

 

That’s because Donald Trump is a disgusting human being. 

[Guest]

27 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And amusingly that was the right response.

Had the dems and the media talked about ANYTHING other than trump after the elections - i doubt trump would even really be a factor now.

But - they wanted to drag out jan 6th for some reason like it was pearl harbour - they kept holding hearings that went no where and coming up with useless charges they couldn't get to stick and talking about him night and day

That kept him alive and in the papers and made him a 'martyr'. 

They should have just shut up and ignored the hell out of him.'  I doubt he'd even be a consideration for this nomination.

Too late now.

 

14 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Not too terrible.. 3 games in back of the MIlwaukee Brewers for first place in the NL Central Division.

still... i get the joke and thanks for playing along. I tire of talking about Trump every single day. Its not like he is any different today than he was last month or last year. Same old, inane, verbal diarrhea. 

I understand both points, but I don't see how either would have been possible.  January 06 did happen, and it was a big deal.  Trump was the POTUS, and that was a big deal.

And there are still a lot of people who think he won in 2020, and he has "done nothing wrong", and he would actually make a good choice for POTUS in 2024.  Somebody has to put them right.

Edited August 23, 2023 by bcsapper

[CdnFox]

36 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

I understand both points, but I don't see how either would have been possible.  January 06 did happen, and it was a big deal.  Trump was the POTUS, and that was a big deal.

Go after those who were caught in the riots.  They were never going to pin anything on trump - talk about what a jackass trump is for a week and then never mention it again.  You can still talk about the rioters and how terrible the event was

Has talking about it changed anything? Nope. it didn't put trump in jail but it could very well put him back in the white house.

38 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

And there are still a lot of people who think he won in 2020, and he has "done nothing wrong", and he would actually make a good choice for POTUS in 2024.  Somebody has to put them right.

Nobody has to put them right - and the more you talk about it the more people believe trump.  Let it die and they'll eventually get bored and find something else to conspire about.

EVERY side after EVERY election in the states claims the election was stolen or rigged.  Remeber the hanging chads? Remember russian collusion?  Nancy is STILL out there saying directly the election was stolen and trump isn't legit.

But nobody takes them seriously and it all dies - instead with trump they make it 24 7 coverage and now he's neck and neck with biden.

 

They just needed to SHUT UP.  And now they've made him back into a serious contender for the next election.

[CdnFox]

50 minutes ago, Rebound said:

That’s because Donald Trump is a disgusting human being. 

Does whining about it and making false promises of imminent incarceration make him LESS of a disgusting human being or something?   Because it looks like it's going to wind up putting him back in power.