Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've often mentioned that Dems use words to shackle blacks/immigrants: I claim that they tether them to the lowest rungs of the economic ladder by discouraging them from going the academic route, and by ensuring that they have a bad outlook on their employment opportunities. 

I'll leave a link to an article here, it's from a month after M Brown's shooting, and I urge you to form your own opinion of how Obama's message is interpreted by people of color, and especially by little black kids who take his word as gospel truth, before you go on to read my interpretation of it.

While you're reading the article, just keep in mind that Obama had known for 30 days at that point that M Brown had been videotaped committing a violent robbery in the moments before he was shot. Ergo, Barack Obama knew for certain that Brown wasn't singled out because of his skin color when he gave this speech at a Congressional Black Caucus event:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/sep/28/obama-says-michael-browns-death-in-ferguson-stains/

ScreenShot2023-08-09at12_37_28PM.thumb.png.c2a139d78aed0cf13c7bf6a8a2d0121e.png

 

 

Quote

 

President Obama said the shooting death of a black teen by a white police officer last month in Ferguson, Missouri, exposed the racial divide in the American justice system that “stains the heart of black children.”

Speaking at the annual Congressional Black Caucus Foundation dinner in Washington on Saturday night, Mr. Obama said the death of Michael Brown “awakened our nation” to a reality that black citizens already understood.

 

“In too many communities around the country, a gulf of mistrust exists between local residents and law enforcement,” Mr. Obama said. “Too many young men of color feel targeted by law enforcement — guilty of walking while black or driving while black, judged by stereotypes that fuel fear and resentment and hopelessness.”

 

 

Quote

About the same time Mr. Obama was speaking Saturday night, a Ferguson police officer was shot in the arm after an encounter with two men at a community center in the St. Louis suburb. St. Louis County Police Chief Jon Belmar said at a media briefing early Sunday that the officer approached the men around 9:10 p.m. Saturday because the community center was closed.

As the officer approached, the men ran away. When the officer gave chase, “one of the men turned and shot,” Chief Belmar said.

Was Obama's narrative about the M Brown shooting accurate?

If it was inaccurate, was it misleading, and by how much? Is it possible that Barack Obama made a really big mistake by mischaracterizing it so badly? 

 

If it was misleading, does it err on the side of "fomenting racial division/hatred"? 

- Yeah, it would be hard for black people to not hate white people and cops in general if there was any truth whatsoever in A Crock O' Blahblah's message. 

 

  • Like 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

I've often mentioned that Dems use words to shackle blacks/immigrants: I claim that they tether them to the lowest rungs of the economic ladder by discouraging them from going the academic route, and by ensuring that they have a bad outlook on their employment opportunities. 

I'll leave a link to an article here, it's from a month after M Brown's shooting, and I urge you to form your own opinion of how Obama's message is interpreted by people of color, and especially by little black kids who take his word as gospel truth, before you go on to read my interpretation of it.

While you're reading the article, just keep in mind that Obama had known for 30 days at that point that M Brown had been videotaped committing a violent robbery in the moments before he was shot. Ergo, Barack Obama knew for certain that Brown wasn't singled out because of his skin color when he gave this speech at a Congressional Black Caucus event:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/sep/28/obama-says-michael-browns-death-in-ferguson-stains/

ScreenShot2023-08-09at12_37_28PM.thumb.png.c2a139d78aed0cf13c7bf6a8a2d0121e.png

 

 

 

Was Obama's narrative about the M Brown shooting accurate?

If it was inaccurate, was it misleading, and by how much? Is it possible that Barack Obama made a really big mistake by mischaracterizing it so badly? 

 

If it was misleading, does it err on the side of "fomenting racial division/hatred"? 

- Yeah, it would be hard for black people to not hate white people and cops in general if there was any truth whatsoever in A Crock O' Blahblah's message. 

 

Why was M Brown killed by the cop when Brown was UNARMED?

Brown pushing his way out of a store with a bag of chips (or whatever) does not qualify him for the death penalty.

Was it because the cop was afraid Brown would kill him with his bare hands?

IF so, Maybe the cop should have backed off, and waited for reinforcements. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I've often mentioned that Dems use words to shackle blacks/immigrants: I claim that they tether them to the lowest rungs of the economic ladder by discouraging them from going the academic route, and by ensuring that they have a bad outlook on their employment opportunities. 

I'll leave a link to an article here, it's from a month after M Brown's shooting, and I urge you to form your own opinion of how Obama's message is interpreted by people of color, and especially by little black kids who take his word as gospel truth, before you go on to read my interpretation of it.

While you're reading the article, just keep in mind that Obama had known for 30 days at that point that M Brown had been videotaped committing a violent robbery in the moments before he was shot. Ergo, Barack Obama knew for certain that Brown wasn't singled out because of his skin color when he gave this speech at a Congressional Black Caucus event:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/sep/28/obama-says-michael-browns-death-in-ferguson-stains/

ScreenShot2023-08-09at12_37_28PM.thumb.png.c2a139d78aed0cf13c7bf6a8a2d0121e.png

 

 

 

Was Obama's narrative about the M Brown shooting accurate?

If it was inaccurate, was it misleading, and by how much? Is it possible that Barack Obama made a really big mistake by mischaracterizing it so badly? 

 

If it was misleading, does it err on the side of "fomenting racial division/hatred"? 

- Yeah, it would be hard for black people to not hate white people and cops in general if there was any truth whatsoever in A Crock O' Blahblah's message. 

 

Marxist Obamarama is just another race hating hustling white racist who really has no love for white folk. Obamarama never talks about all of the killings going on in cities like Chicago and Baltimore where black on black crime goes on every day. Obama only likes to talk about white cops shooting black criminals and likes to make it appear as though all white cops are out to get all black people. Many white folk get shot by white cops also. 

It seems like scum Obama and others want to try and get a race war started in America and that would be a big bloody mistake for him and blacks. As one black preacher once said "don't make the white man angry". If this anti-white racism does not stop, then we may just start to see more white folk getting angry, and white people do have more guns then they do. 

It's the same dam white MSM that will never report any black on black crime. But if a white cop shoots and kills a black man in self defense, then that same white MSM will go ballistic and shout racism. There can be no denying that blacks commit more crimes than white folk do. We see that happening on TV, especially on FOX NEWS, where they have reported and shown that the majority of the violators are black and we see them looting, rioting, and burning buildings down. This is not fictional news, this is fact news. Enough already of this anti-white racism. Works for me. ?

  • Like 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

M Brown got what he deserved.!

I think he was just a guy who made some really bad choices on a really bad day, and it was dumb AF, and he paid the ultimate price. 

I don't think he deserved to die, but he put that cop in a position where he had to defend his life.

The sad part about all of this is that leftists actually encourage abusive language and violence towards cops. M Brown was being "a good little peon" by attacking that cop. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Why was M Brown killed by the cop when Brown was UNARMED?

Brown pushing his way out of a store with a bag of chips (or whatever) does not qualify him for the death penalty.

Was it because the cop was afraid Brown would kill him with his bare hands?

IF so, Maybe the cop should have backed off, and waited for reinforcements. 

Typical lefty white guilt ridden liberal. Always looking for an excuse to call a white cop a murderer. The cop must of had a good reason for shooting the criminal Brown. That Brown guy would be still alive today if he had decided to buy whatever he stole instead of trying to steal other people's property. I do not feel sorry for Brown being shot and killed. It seems that these days society wants to start feeling sorry for the criminal and not the innocent victims. Brown committed a criminal act and he paid for it with his life. Do the crime, do the time, or like in some cases get shot and killed. Too bad. ?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, taxme said:

Typical lefty white guilt ridden liberal. Always looking for an excuse to call a white cop a murderer. The cop must of had a good reason for shooting the criminal Brown. That Brown guy would be still alive today if he had decided to buy whatever he stole instead of trying to steal other people's property. I do not feel sorry for Brown being shot and killed. It seems that these days society wants to start feeling sorry for the criminal and not the innocent victims. Brown committed a criminal act and he paid for it with his life. Do the crime, do the time, or like in some cases get shot and killed. Too bad. ?

I ASKED QUESTIONS. Since you have NO ANSWERS, STFU!

Posted
28 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I ASKED QUESTIONS. Since you have NO ANSWERS, STFU!

Sure you ask questions? If you did, you would not be condoning those racist hustlers behavior's as you appear to be doing. You would have your answer already and know as to who is committing all of the riots, looting's and burning's. But yet you are to cowardly to say so. It is liberals like you that have no answers. Only just more leftist liberal bull chit. You STFU. ?

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

I think he was just a guy who made some really bad choices on a really bad day, and it was dumb AF, and he paid the ultimate price. 

I don't think he deserved to die, but he put that cop in a position where he had to defend his life.

The sad part about all of this is that leftists actually encourage abusive language and violence towards cops. M Brown was being "a good little peon" by attacking that cop. 

Youre more forgiving than i. Brown was a career crook as far as I can tell. Don't wanna get shot by a cop...don't be a criminal.

Edited by Nationalist
  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted

Why did Barry Soetoro go by "Barry" throughout most of his life then when he wanted to run for president with his skin color being his main policy platform did he go by his more formal, black sounding name "Barack Obama"? Who advised him to run on his blackness and why are Democrats so infatuated with the race card?

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, West said:

Why did Barry Soetoro go by "Barry" throughout most of his life then when he wanted to run for president with his skin color being his main policy platform did he go by his more formal, black sounding name "Barack Obama"? Who advised him to run on his blackness and why are Democrats so infatuated with the race card?

Around the late 50s the Democrats decided to stop being so outwardly racist and began a campaign of anti-racism...or so it appeared. However, since then the plight of black Americans has gotten worse.

Instead of promoting segregation and racism, they promoted financial racism. Welfare. The Great Society. Look at the results. Inner cities have become racial war zones. Blacks are now killing each other at an alarming rate. They've been convinced that white America is their enemy. It's sickening to do the analysis and see what the Democrats have done, all hidden behind the guise of "caring for black folk".

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, taxme said:

Typical lefty white guilt ridden liberal. Always looking for an excuse to call a white cop a murderer. The cop must of had a good reason for shooting the criminal Brown. That Brown guy would be still alive today if he had decided to buy whatever he stole instead of trying to steal other people's property. I do not feel sorry for Brown being shot and killed. It seems that these days society wants to start feeling sorry for the criminal and not the innocent victims. Brown committed a criminal act and he paid for it with his life. Do the crime, do the time, or like in some cases get shot and killed. Too bad. ?

Would you please show me the US law which says that the punishment for stealing a box of cigars is summary execution? Thanks! 

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Around the late 50s the Democrats decided to stop being so outwardly racist and began a campaign of anti-racism...or so it appeared. However, since then the plight of black Americans has gotten worse.

Instead of promoting segregation and racism, they promoted financial racism. Welfare. The Great Society. Look at the results. Inner cities have become racial war zones. Blacks are now killing each other at an alarming rate. They've been convinced that white America is their enemy. It's sickening to do the analysis and see what the Democrats have done, all hidden behind the guise of "caring for black folk".

Is Jim Crow he “America Great Again” that you keep talking about? Are you saying that black people had it better when they had to live under the yoke of legally-enforced segregation and discrimination? 
 

 

Edited by Rebound
  • Like 2

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Is Jim Crow he “America Great Again” that you keep talking about? Are you saying that black people had it better when they had to live under the yoke of legally-enforced segregation and discrimination? 
 

 

No...the Jim Crow laws were a product of which party?

Make America Great Again means exactly that. Making ALL of America Great Again...as in before this insanity and the lies about Conservatives being racist. All you Libbies have done is re-open an old wound and rubbed salt in it for political purposes. Frankly, y'all should be disgusted with this. But ya ain't. Instead...you push and push.

  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

No...the Jim Crow laws were a product of which party?

Make America Great Again means exactly that. Making ALL of America Great Again...as in before this insanity and the lies about Conservatives being racist. All you Libbies have done is re-open an old wound and rubbed salt in it for political purposes. Frankly, y'all should be disgusted with this. But ya ain't. Instead...you push and push.

Yet, Every Single Time civil rights leaders point to a case of racial discrimination or propose a solution, you attack it. And when the governor of Florida imposes education that teaches that slaves benefitted from slavery, you support it. 
 

So you aren’t going to convince anybody that you aren’t racist. You are.  
 

As for MAGA: What year was America “great”? If it’s Make America Great AGAIN, then what specific year was the Great Year in America? 

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Yet, Every Single Time civil rights leaders point to a case of racial discrimination or propose a solution, you attack it. And when the governor of Florida imposes education that teaches that slaves benefitted from slavery, you support it. 
 

So you aren’t going to convince anybody that you aren’t racist. You are.  
 

As for MAGA: What year was America “great”? If it’s Make America Great AGAIN, then what specific year was the Great Year in America? 

Man you lie as a matter of course...don't you.

I said that the point the author was making was valid. You can whine, kick and scream (which you already have) all you like. The validity of the statement must be acknowledged, no matter how it makes your feewings hurt.

I am racist? Gee...that's a bold statement. Especially since you cannot prove it. In which case...its outright slander. But hey...who are we kidding? We both know that the race card is the final fig leaf of Libbies when they run out of real arguments. So I guess congarats to you are due for approaching the end of your usefulness to the conversation.

When was America Great? 2016 to 2018 comes to mind. But basically, MAGA to me, means returning America to what made it powerful in the first place. A strong economy. A strong military. A controlled boarder. Capitalism.

Edited by Nationalist
  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
34 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Man you lie as a matter of course...don't you.

I said that the point the author was making was valid. You can whine, kick and scream (which you already have) all you like. The validity of the statement must be acknowledged, no matter how it makes your feewings hurt.

I am racist? Gee...that's a bold statement. Especially since you cannot prove it. In which case...its outright slander. But hey...who are we kidding? We both know that the race card is the final fig leaf of Libbies when they run out of real arguments. So I guess congarats to you are due for approaching the end of your usefulness to the conversation.

When was America Great? 2016 to 2018 comes to mind. But basically, MAGA to me, means returning America to what made it powerful in the first place. A strong economy. A strong military. A controlled boarder. Capitalism.

Under Joe Biden, America has a stronger economy that we did under Trump. 
Under Joe Biden, America has a strong military that’s powerfully unified with NATO and taking on Russian military aggression, not cowering from it, as Traitor Trump wants to do.  

If you believe our “boarder” [SIC] security needs improvement, then why aren’t you criticizing House Republicans for failing to enact any immigration reform legislation? A Federal Judge just quashed Biden’s efforts to limit immigration. The President cannot create his own laws.  Trump restricted immigration as a result of the Covid emergency, but that cannot be used anymore.  
 

Right now, as usual, the GOP is great at criticizing but totally inept at proposing any solutions to our problems.  

  • Thanks 1

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Rebound said:

Would you please show me the US law which says that the punishment for stealing a box of cigars is summary execution? Thanks! 

Stop lying. The cops were there because of the violent nature of the robbery, and you know that he wasn't shot for "robbery".

Trying to kill a cop can get you killed on the spot and you'd think that everyone in America would know that by now but some people still have to find out the hard way.  

Instead of being used as a teachable moment, it was used to foment racial hatred and violence. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted

Why was M Brown killed by the cop when Brown was UNARMED?

He wasn't unarmed. His gorilla size made him a threat.

Brown pushing his way out of a store with a bag of chips (or whatever) does not qualify him for the death penalty.

A bag of chips?

https://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video;_ylt=AwrFaIJLJ9VkCKAR6EJXNyoA;_ylu=Y29sbwNiZjEEcG9zAzEEdnRpZANDQVRDT05UUk9MXzEEc2VjA3BpdnM-?p=michael+brown+robbery&fr2=piv-web&fr=yfp-t#id=1&vid=0adfa0859ea654762b1db3ea5c6090e0&action=vie

That animal didn't get the death penalty for the store robbery. He got shot IN FUGGING SELF DEFENSE.

IF so, Maybe the cop should have backed off, and waited for reinforcements. 

That animal was charging the officer. And that animal got what it deserved. And Obama is a RACIST FUG.

obama.thumb.jpeg.4079026e309409034ca8057ac724af27.jpeg

This is what happens when people vote race over qualifications.

If that ashhole had been Caucasian, he wouldn't have been elected dog catcher.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
18 hours ago, robosmith said:

I ASKED QUESTIONS. Since you have NO ANSWERS, STFU!

You don't really have the authority to order someone to answer questions and then shut the fug up. Maybe the first few times you were arrested for meth possession, an officer might have told you to shut the fug up and answer the questions, but this is not an arrest situation. Nobody here has been read his/her/its rights. This is just a discussion. And if you don't like the fact that you aren't always going to get the answer you want, the safest route for you to talk would be

20uzoy.jpg

Posted
On 8/10/2023 at 9:15 AM, Rebound said:

Under Joe Biden, America has a stronger economy that we did under Trump. 
Under Joe Biden, America has a strong military that’s powerfully unified with NATO and taking on Russian military aggression, not cowering from it, as Traitor Trump wants to do.  

If you believe our “boarder” [SIC] security needs improvement, then why aren’t you criticizing House Republicans for failing to enact any immigration reform legislation? A Federal Judge just quashed Biden’s efforts to limit immigration. The President cannot create his own laws.  Trump restricted immigration as a result of the Covid emergency, but that cannot be used anymore.  
 

Right now, as usual, the GOP is great at criticizing but totally inept at proposing any solutions to our problems.  

It is the red states, and not the blue states, that are doing just fine. BiDumb is trying to take credit for what the Republicans are doing in those states. The useless buffoon has done not a dam thing to try and make America great again. But on the other hand, BiDumb has tried everything he can to erase what Trump did for America which was to make America  great again.

Look at the bloody mess at the Mexican border. All BiDumbs fault. Millions of illegals have entered America illegally, and BiDumb will do nothing about it. Drugs and child trafficking is now big business at the border, especially for the Mexican cartels. Trump fixed the border, BiDumb phkd it all up. 

NATO is a war making machine. It is there to take on anyone leader of any country that tries to not tow the elite globalist/banksters lies. NATO would never dare try and attack Russia at all. For if they did, you and me and thee may be trying to find a safe place to run and hide from all of the nuclear warheads flying over our heads. 

It is NATO that is trying to keep this war in Ukraine going by continually butting in the business of a war between Russia and Ukraine. The warmongers in globalist controlled Washington do want to try and have a war with Russia. A stupid and bloody mistake to try and take on Russia. 

Most Republicans do have the solution, but it is some of the RINO's in Washington that are holding things up. When it comes to solutions, the demonrats have no solutions at all. They are just great at f'n things up. Stupid communists. ?

On 8/10/2023 at 8:28 AM, Rebound said:

Yet, Every Single Time civil rights leaders point to a case of racial discrimination or propose a solution, you attack it. And when the governor of Florida imposes education that teaches that slaves benefitted from slavery, you support it. 
 

So you aren’t going to convince anybody that you aren’t racist. You are.  
 

As for MAGA: What year was America “great”? If it’s Make America Great AGAIN, then what specific year was the Great Year in America? 

2016 - 2020. ?

Posted
1 hour ago, taxme said:

It is the red states, and not the blue states, that are doing just fine. BiDumb is trying to take credit for what the Republicans are doing in those states. The useless buffoon has done not a dam thing to try and make America great again. But on the other hand, BiDumb has tried everything he can to erase what Trump did for America which was to make America  great again.

Look at the bloody mess at the Mexican border. All BiDumbs fault. Millions of illegals have entered America illegally, and BiDumb will do nothing about it. Drugs and child trafficking is now big business at the border, especially for the Mexican cartels. Trump fixed the border, BiDumb phkd it all up. 

NATO is a war making machine. It is there to take on anyone leader of any country that tries to not tow the elite globalist/banksters lies. NATO would never dare try and attack Russia at all. For if they did, you and me and thee may be trying to find a safe place to run and hide from all of the nuclear warheads flying over our heads. 

It is NATO that is trying to keep this war in Ukraine going by continually butting in the business of a war between Russia and Ukraine. The warmongers in globalist controlled Washington do want to try and have a war with Russia. A stupid and bloody mistake to try and take on Russia. 

Most Republicans do have the solution, but it is some of the RINO's in Washington that are holding things up. When it comes to solutions, the demonrats have no solutions at all. They are just great at f'n things up. Stupid communists. ?

2016 - 2020. ?

You’re Putin’s Puppet.

  • Like 1

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
On 8/9/2023 at 2:21 PM, robosmith said:

Why was M Brown killed by the cop when Brown was UNARMED?

Brown pushing his way out of a store with a bag of chips (or whatever) does not qualify him for the death penalty.

Was it because the cop was afraid Brown would kill him with his bare hands?

IF so, Maybe the cop should have backed off, and waited for reinforcements. 

On 8/9/2023 at 4:16 PM, robosmith said:

I ASKED QUESTIONS. Since you have NO ANSWERS, STFU!

On 8/9/2023 at 4:51 PM, taxme said:

Sure you ask questions? If you did, you would not be condoning those racist hustlers behavior's as you appear to be doing. You would have your answer already and know as to who is committing all of the riots, looting's and burning's. But yet you are to cowardly to say so. It is liberals like you that have no answers. Only just more leftist liberal bull chit. You STFU. ?

Yes, I am absolutely SURE. And SURE that you have NO ANSWERS; just stupid OPINIONS. so STFU.

 

 

Posted
On 8/10/2023 at 11:16 AM, reason10 said:

You don't really have the authority to order someone to answer questions and then shut the fug up. Maybe the first few times you were arrested for meth possession, an officer might have told you to shut the fug up and answer the questions, but this is not an arrest situation. Nobody here has been read his/her/its rights. This is just a discussion. And if you don't like the fact that you aren't always going to get the answer you want, the safest route for you to talk would be

Only a-holes reply to a post asking questions with NO ANSWERS. And that includes YOU.

Posted
On 8/11/2023 at 8:32 PM, Rebound said:

You’re Putin’s Puppet.

You're HITLER's puppet

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Only a-holes reply to a post asking questions with NO ANSWERS. And that includes YOU.

I don't owe you any answers, especially since you're too fugging STUPID to handle the truth. I know this reminds you of your last days in public school when the teacher gave you a test and you couldn't answer even one question. Not my problem. I work in a RED STATE public school, which is definitely superior to whatever underachieving diploma mill shat you.

Posted
On 8/11/2023 at 5:32 PM, Rebound said:

You’re Putin’s Puppet.

As a matter of fact, I will be visiting my friend Putin next week. So, how long have you been a corrupt Nazi Zelensky puppet? Just asking. ?

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...