Biological sources of CO2 (like termites) DO NOT increase atmospheric concentrations of GHG which CAUSE CLIMATE CHANGE.

[taxme]

On 7/17/2023 at 7:11 AM, reason10 said:

WRONG.

You have LOST this argument and you cannot spin it.

The earth warmed and cooled CENTURIES before the first fossil fuels.

Crawl under your rock, TROLL.

First the fools believed the covid hoax and lie. Now, the new covid of today is climate change. Next it will be aliens from outer space. For all we know, nature might be doing some house cleaning with all of those fires in BC. It's probably natures way of cleaning up the old dead brush and replacing it with new trees and brush. 

Carbon is not going to kill anyone except if that is all that is left to breath. Carbon is good for everything green. And that greenery gives us the oxygen that we all need to breath and stay alive. I am not worried about this so called excessive carbon in the air. Nature will replace it with oxygen.  

Climate change is just another pile of money making nonsense. Climate change has been going on for millions of years. Many people became millionaires during covid. Now, many are making plenty of money from this hoax called climate change. If anyone thinks that the globalist elite are going to give up on using their private jets, and big gas guzzlers, and all the air conditioned homes that they all own you are truly mistaken.

Buying an EV is playing their globalist con game of you will end up owning nothing and you will be happy and will enjoy living in your 15 minute city. I will keep on driving my fossil fuel running car for as long as I can. If they want my car, they will not get it w/o a fight. ?

[Hodad]

6 hours ago, Deluge said:

Because unlike you, I don't like the idea of Pat and Chris mimicking Janet and Steve at the altar of marriage. Tradition holds that marriage is between man and woman, and God has decreed it in the Old Testament. There is nothing good about homosexuals getting married, in fact it's bad. 

It doesn't matter whether it affects me directly or not. I'm interested in living in a stable, law abiding, Christian society and homosexual marriage is not conducive to that kind of setting. 

I argue that marriage is between a man and a woman and that's it - anything aside from that is just gaslighting.

Ah, theocracy. There we have it. You want laws based on your own religious interpretations. So you can stop pretending you're into freedom and the constitution and stuff. 

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, taxme said:

First the fools believed the covid hoax and lie. Now, the new covid of today is climate change. Next it will be aliens from outer space. For all we know, nature might be doing some house cleaning with all of those fires in BC. It's probably natures way of cleaning up the old dead brush and replacing it with new trees and brush. 

Carbon is not going to kill anyone except if that is all that is left to breath. Carbon is good for everything green. And that greenery gives us the oxygen that we all need to breath and stay alive. I am not worried about this so called excessive carbon in the air. Nature will replace it with oxygen.  

Climate change is just another pile of money making nonsense. Climate change has been going on for millions of years. Many people became millionaires during covid. Now, many are making plenty of money from this hoax called climate change. If anyone thinks that the globalist elite are going to give up on using their private jets, and big gas guzzlers, and all the air conditioned homes that they all own you are truly mistaken.

Buying an EV is playing their globalist con game of you will end up owning nothing and you will be happy and will enjoy living in your 15 minute city. I will keep on driving my fossil fuel running car for as long as I can. If they want my car, they will not get it w/o a fight. ?

Should I introduce you to Mr Dunning & Kruger or do you already know them from participating in their study?

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, taxme said:

First the fools believed the covid hoax and lie. Now, the new covid of today is climate change.

https://nypost.com/2023/01/14/dr-leana-wen-writes-that-covid-deaths-are-being-overcounted/

Quote

Towards the end of her piece, Wen declared, “To be clear, if the COVID death count turns out to be 30 percent of what’s currently reported, that’s still unacceptably high.”

?

The number of covid lies from the CDC, MSM and leftard leaders in NA are what's unacceptably high.

[robosmith]

45 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

https://nypost.com/2023/01/14/dr-leana-wen-writes-that-covid-deaths-are-being-overcounted/

?

The number of covid lies from the CDC, MSM and leftard leaders in NA are what's unacceptably high.

Please refrain from discussing your COVID conspiracy theories in this thread. That is OFF TOPIC.

[Deluge]

On 7/21/2023 at 3:35 PM, Hodad said:

Ah, theocracy. There we have it. You want laws based on your own religious interpretations. So you can stop pretending you're into freedom and the constitution and stuff. 

Nah, a Constitutional Republic founded on Christian principles. This isn't Sharia, so LGBT should be on its knees praising Jesus for not allowing THAT shit to overrun this country. 

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, Deluge said:

Nah, a Constitutional Republic founded on Christian principles. This isn't Sharia, so LGBT should be on its knees praising Jesus for not allowing THAT shit to overrun this country. 

The FIRST AMENDMENT specifically disavows "Christian principles" as the basis for our Constitution.

"Congress shall MAKE NO LAW respecting an establishment of religion" Duh

[Hodad]

6 hours ago, Deluge said:

Nah, a Constitutional Republic founded on Christian principles. This isn't Sharia, so LGBT should be on its knees praising Jesus for not allowing THAT shit to overrun this country. 

Actually, that's exactly parallel to what Sharia is: laws based on the religious interpretations of those in power rather than upon a foundation of reasoned freedom.

Of course, that's insanity. Depending who is in power at any given moment it may or may not be against the law to eat bacon. 

You want a county, it's just not America as it was founded and exists today.

[Rebound]

14 hours ago, Deluge said:

Nah, a Constitutional Republic founded on Christian principles. This isn't Sharia, so LGBT should be on its knees praising Jesus for not allowing THAT to overrun this country. 

Edited July 23, 2023 by Rebound

[Deluge]

4 hours ago, Rebound said:

 

4 hours ago, Rebound said:

My religion prohibits this:

Your belief system perpetuates it. 

[robosmith]

4 minutes ago, Deluge said:

My religion prohibits this:

So don't do it.

4 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Your belief system perpetuates it. 

Mere beliefs do NOTHING.

[Deluge]

Just now, robosmith said:

So don't do it.

Mere beliefs do NOTHING.

So pull your head out of your ass and don't vote democrat.

[Deluge]

12 hours ago, Hodad said:

Actually, that's exactly parallel to what Sharia is: laws based on the religious interpretations of those in power rather than upon a foundation of reasoned freedom.

Of course, that's insanity. Depending who is in power at any given moment it may or may not be against the law to eat bacon. 

You want a county, it's just not America as it was founded and exists today.

Actually, you're full of shit.

If Sharia ruled this country, LGBT would all be dead or hiding. 

Do you want to live with freedom loving Christians, or do you want to live under the iron fist of Sharia law? You seem to prefer the latter. 

Edited July 23, 2023 by Deluge

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, Deluge said:

So pull your head out of your ass and don't vote democrat.

I'll vote for whomever I want, your juvenile insults notwithstanding. IOW, go ef yourself.

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Actually, you're full of shit.

If Sharia ruled this country, LGBT would all be dead or hiding. 

 

Do you want to live with freedom loving Christians, or do you want to live under the iron fist of Sharia law? You seem to prefer the latter. 

Stop posting OFF TOPIC in MY THREAD.

[Deluge]

5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I'll vote for whomever I want, your juvenile insults notwithstanding. IOW, go ef yourself.

Stop deviating from your own moronic thread. 

[Hodad]

Just now, Deluge said:

Actually, you're full of shit. If Sharia ruled this country, LGBT would all be dead or hiding. 

Do you want to live with freedom loving Christians, or live under the iron fist of Sharia law? You seem to prefer the latter. 

Living with "freedom loving Christians" would be fine. That's just not who you are. You do not love freedom. You would prefer to oppress non-harm liberties and force people to live according to your interpretation of some ancient texts.

[Deluge]

11 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Living with "freedom loving Christians" would be fine. That's just not who you are. You do not love freedom. You would prefer to oppress non-harm liberties and force people to live according to your interpretation of some ancient texts.

I love freedom more than you do. A LOT more than you do. 

Your problem is that your own idea of freedom is completely out of whack. As I've already told these other stunted perverts, freedom does not mean doing whatever the f*ck you want, when you want. 

See, in a successful free society, you still have to have laws and rules to maintain order. When some selfish a$$hole grows weary of the existing rules and laws, he tries to twist them to fit his own selfish desires. This is what happened in 2015 when a bunch of degenerates were able to redefine marriage - an institution that has stood so much longer than anything you hold close to your heart. 

No, you have no idea what it means to be free. The ONLY thing that interests you is some warped notion of personal rights, and you don't give a f*ck what the consequences might be if you get them. 

 

Edited July 23, 2023 by Deluge

[Guest]

53 minutes ago, Deluge said:

No, you have no idea what it means to be free. The ONLY thing that interests you is some warped notion of personal rights,

?

[Hodad]

4 hours ago, Deluge said:

I love freedom more than you do. A LOT more than you do. 

Your problem is that your own idea of freedom is completely out of whack. As I've already told these other stunted perverts, freedom does not mean doing whatever the f*ck you want, when you want. 

See, in a successful free society, you still have to have laws and rules to maintain order. When some selfish a$$hole grows weary of the existing rules and laws, he tries to twist them to fit his own selfish desires. This is what happened in 2015 when a bunch of degenerates were able to redefine marriage - an institution that has stood so much longer than anything you hold close to your heart. 

No, you have no idea what it means to be free. The ONLY thing that interests you is some warped notion of personal rights, and you don't give a f*ck what the consequences might be if you get them. 

 

Look, it's pretty clear that you don't have any knowledge or understanding of political philosophy. That's probably something worth exploring before you try to define freedom. 

Freedom does, in fact, mean that you get to do whatever you want. And within the context of a formal society in which liberty is negotiated and traded for other benefits, freedom means doing whatever you like as long as it's not harming others. The prevention of harm is the function of the laws. Laws are passed to prevent one person's freedom from impinging upon another person's freedom. Colloquially, my right to swing my arms around ends where doing so would impact your body. Your freedom not to be struck supercedes my right to do whatever I want. 

The fact that you think red ties are ugly is not grounds to limit my freedom to wear a red tie by passing laws to prohibit it. It doesn't harm you, or anyone else. There is no justification.

You may think that gay marriage is "yucky" but, like heterosexual marriage, there is no harm or risk to anyone outside of the consenting couple. Therefore there is no justification to make it illegal 

This is a pretty simple proposition. If you can't demonstrate harm (you can't) then you are taking away or limiting someone else's rights simply because of your arbitrary preferences. That's inherently antagonistic toward freedom. You favor religious oppression and forced conformity over liberty. That's just the facts as they stand, and it couldn't be more plain.

 

Edited July 24, 2023 by Hodad

[Aristides]

Deluge wants the freedom to tell others what their freedoms are. 

[Deluge]

2 hours ago, Hodad said:

Freedom does, in fact, mean that you get to do whatever you want.

And that's the problem. Below is your idea of getting to do whatever you want:

See, you can sit there and pontificate with your head up the Left's ass, because that's your right as a US citizen. The problem is that you have no idea what you are talking about. YOU and poeple LIKE YOU are what's wrong with America, and we're headed to a place that none of us really want to go because of that. 

[Deluge]

4 hours ago, bcsapper said:

?

bcsapper's utopia.

 

Edited July 24, 2023 by Deluge

[Hodad]

23 minutes ago, Deluge said:

And that's the problem. Below is your idea of getting to do whatever you want:

See, you can sit there and pontificate with your head up the Left's ass, because that's your right as a US citizen. The problem is that you have no idea what you are talking about. YOU and poeple LIKE YOU are what's wrong with America, and we're headed to a place that none of us really want to go because of that. 

Oh, you want to go on record claiming that, in your view, robbery does no harm? 

No, because that would be a stupid claim? Okay, so then it obviously doesn't fall under the description of freedom that I, or the founding fathers, describe.

So why don't you try again with something that better resembles a reasoned critique.

Edited July 24, 2023 by Hodad

[Deluge]

11 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Oh, you want to go iyn record claiming that, in your view, robbery does no harm? 

No, because that would be a stupid claim? Okay, so then it obviously doesn't fall under the description of freedom that I, or the founding fathers, describe.

So why don't you try again with something that better resembles a reasoned critique.

Slow down, friend. 

You do understand that this excessive crime takes place in blue states and blue cities, right? 

Why do you think that is? 

Wrong. 

It's because blue cities and states are not interested in anything the resembles a moral code. It's why you a$$holes support things like legalized abortion and illegal immigration, and go completely unfazed when shit like below happens. 

 

Edited July 24, 2023 by Deluge