Trump Says Hunter Biden Should’ve Gotten the Death Penalty for Not Paying His Taxes on Time

[robosmith]

Trump Says Hunter Biden Should’ve Gotten the Death Penalty for Not Paying His Taxes on Time

Quote

Last month, Hunter Biden, son of President Joe Biden, reached a deal with prosecutors to plead guilty to two misdemeanor tax charges stemming from paying his taxes late in 2017 and 2018. (As part of the deal, he also agreed to be charged, but not prosecuted, for purchasing a handgun at a time when he was using drugs, which is contingent on him never owning a firearm again and remaining drug-free for two years.) Naturally, this deal enraged conservatives, who have insisted for some time now that president’s son is the most corrupt person to walk the face of the earth, that his dad is just as bad, and that as punishment, both Hunter and Joe should be sent to Guantánamo Bay in a deal that also involves Donald Trump being installed as president for life.

Obviously, that whole Guantánamo Bay/Trump-as-emperor is merely a parody of the things Republicans have said about the Biden Boys; while it’s pretty close, no one has actually called for them to be sent to the notorious detention camp known for housing terrorists. But as of Tuesday, at least one person had suggested that Biden the Younger should have been sentenced to death for his crimes, and you can probably take a guess as to who that person was.

Yes, that’s former a U.S. president and current presidential candidate raging on Truth Social 

that federal prosecutor David Weiss did not give Hunter Biden “a death sentence” for his aforementioned crimes, which, as a reminder, were paying his taxes late two years in a row and buying a gun when he was using drugs.

Off the MAGA CULT rails. Just like the Central Park 5

[reason10]

15 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Trump Says Hunter Biden Should’ve Gotten the Death Penalty for Not Paying His Taxes on Time

Off the MAGA CULT rails. Just like the Central Park 5

Excuse me, but Hunter Biden's name is not mentioned in that post.

As usual, YOU ARE LYING AGAIN.

[robosmith]

4 minutes ago, reason10 said:

Excuse me, but Hunter Biden's name is not mentioned in that post.

As usual, YOU ARE LYING AGAIN.

Do you not understand to whom the name Weiss refers? LMAO

㊙️ It is David Weiss the prosecutor appointed by Trump, who negotiated the plea deal with Hunter Biden. Duh.

In fact, ALL YOU'VE done with YOUR POST is expose YOUR IGNORANCE, AGAIN. 

[Legato]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

Do you not understand to whom the name Weiss refers? LMAO

㊙️ It is David Weiss the prosecutor appointed by Trump, who negotiated colluded the plea deal with Hunter Biden. Duh.

In fact, ALL YOU'VE done with YOUR POST is expose YOUR IGNORANCE, AGAIN. 

Fixed for accuracy.

[robosmith]

8 minutes ago, Legato said:

Fixed for accuracy.

Negotiation is collusion and plea deals are ALWAYS NEGOTIATED.

Nothing negative about that. In FACT, it's EXPECTED. Duh.

[NYLefty]

Think we've all figured out when Mango Mussolini opens his fat mouth sh!t falls out.

[Nationalist]

I wonder what's gonna happen when Trump wins the next election? Will he roast and cage all these liars and re-form the justice system?

[Rebound]

14 hours ago, Legato said:

Fixed for accuracy.

For accuracy, can you fine me example of anyone else actually being convicted because they filed their Federal taxes just one year late?  Should be very easy to do, if it’s happened.

Hunter wasn’t accused of tax fraud, just late filing. Twice.  Not uncommon.  

[CdnFox]

15 minutes ago, Rebound said:

For accuracy, can you fine me example of anyone else actually being convicted because they filed their Federal taxes just one year late?  Should be very easy to do, if it’s happened.

Hunter wasn’t accused of tax fraud, just late filing. Twice.  Not uncommon.  

Capone.  Interesting comparison tho

42 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

I wonder what's gonna happen when Trump wins the next election? Will he roast and cage all these liars and re-form the justice system?

Remember he was going to throw Hillary in jail but then back down as soon as he actually became president. However that was because someone explained to him that you don't go after your political rivals unless you're in a banana republic.

 

Now that he has been attacked by them in contravention of that tradition he may feel the gloves are off. If he can find willing to prosecutors and Investigators they may very well find that they're dealings come under a hell of a lot of scrutiny and that charges are laid.

[Rebound]

12 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Capone.  Interesting comparison tho

Remember he was going to throw Hillary in jail but then back down as soon as he actually became president. However that was because someone explained to him that you don't go after your political rivals unless you're in a banana republic.

 

Now that he has been attacked by them in contravention of that tradition he may feel the gloves are off. If he can find willing to prosecutors and Investigators they may very well find that they're dealings come under a hell of a lot of scrutiny and that charges are laid.

No, Al Capone was not convicted for filing his taxes one year late.  Are you truly that uninformed? 
 

I remember one rally after another where he lead enormous crowds chanting “Lock her up!” I also remember former Governor and Federal Prosecutor Chris Christie leading that cheat at the 2016 Republican National Convention.  Are you seriously suggesting that a Federal Prosecutor did not know about the imaginary “rule” that you just made up? 
 

Are you seriously suggesting that we forget the Whitewater investigations, the Benghazi investigations and the Hillary email investigations? The Watergate investigations? The Federal prosecution of presidential candidate John Edwards? The current efforts to investigate President Biden? 
 

So… YEAH, you are completely full of BS.  Nothing you’re saying is remotely true. What is most true of all is there is no “rule” that politicians are immune from criminal prosecution. That would make them above the law.  This simply is not true. 

Edited July 14, 2023 by Rebound

[Nationalist]

7 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Capone.  Interesting comparison tho

giggle...

7 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Remember he was going to throw Hillary in jail but then back down as soon as he actually became president. However that was because someone explained to him that you don't go after your political rivals unless you're in a banana republic.

 

Now that he has been attacked by them in contravention of that tradition he may feel the gloves are off. If he can find willing to prosecutors and Investigators they may very well find that they're dealings come under a hell of a lot of scrutiny and that charges are laid.

True. And I hope The Donald knows the gloves are off. It past time this pack of destructive jack-asses are dealt with definitively.

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, Rebound said:

No, Al Capone was not convicted for filing his taxes one year late.  

He was convicted for the same tax evasion charges biden would have been up against.

Sorry kiddo - but lots of people have been dinged for it .  It's not like hunter came forward and said "oh i forgot to file these.." , he was caught.

 

[Rebound]

4 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

giggle...

True. And I hope The Donald knows the gloves are off. It past time this pack of destructive jack-asses are dealt with definitively.

True? It’s not true! America doesn’t have a law or a “convention” that politicians are allowed to commit crimes.  

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

He was convicted for the same tax evasion charges biden would have been up against.

Sorry kiddo - but lots of people have been dinged for it .  It's not like hunter came forward and said "oh i forgot to file these.." , he was caught.

 

Now you’re inventing things. Hunter was convicted for late filing. There’s no charge that his filings were fraudulent, which is a far more serious charge.  

[Nationalist]

5 minutes ago, Rebound said:

True? It’s not true! America doesn’t have a law or a “convention” that politicians are allowed to commit crimes.  

True. America has a law/convention/edict that one is innocent until proven guilty.

Then there's that darn Presidential Records Act...

[Rebound]

12 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

True. America has a law/convention/edict that one is innocent until proven guilty.

Then there's that darn Presidential Records Act...

Yes, so Trump will go on trial to prove his guilt or innocence. That's how it works.

Meantime... let's read the Presidential Records Act, ok? You can actually read it for yourself instead of listening to the lies you're getting from Fox News or whatever.

The term "Presidential records" means documentary materials, or any reasonably segregable portion thereof, created or received by the President.

(B) does not include any documentary materials that are (i) official records of an agency (as defined in section 552(e) of title 5 USC [because they are the property of that Federal Government Agency]

The term "personal records" means all documentary materials, or any reasonably segregable portion thereof, of a purely private or nonpublic character which do not relate to or have an effect upon the carrying out of the constitutional, statutory, or other official or ceremonial duties of the President. 

§ 2202. Ownership of Presidential records

The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records.

(g)(1) Upon the conclusion of a President’s term of office, or if a President serves consecutive terms upon the conclusion of the last term, the Archivist of the United States shall assume responsibility for the custody, control, and preservation of, and access to, the Presidential records of that President. 

 

Edited July 14, 2023 by Rebound

[West]

Hunter and Joe should get the death penalty for their treasonous behavior like selling out the USA to China for a pound of cocaine

[CdnFox]

40 minutes ago, Rebound said:

True? It’s not true! America doesn’t have a law or a “convention” that politicians are allowed to commit crimes.  

 

It is true and always has been.  Sorry to burst your bubble kiddo

Quote

Now you’re inventing things. Hunter was convicted for late filing. There’s no charge that his filings were fraudulent, which is a far more serious charge.  

Oh there's no question his fillings were fraudulent.  That's why he was convicted. He was convicted of "WILLFULLY' not paying his taxes, and he had filed fraudulent claims.

About the best you can say is he didn't come up with some elaborate plan to hide them, he didn't shuffle money between companies or keep his books in code, etc. Which was their excuse for letting him off.

Now that i think of it - capone was ALSO convicted of carrying a pistol illegally.  Huh - they had more in common than i thought!

 

 

[Rebound]

14 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It is true and always has been.  Sorry to burst your bubble kiddo

Oh there's no question his fillings were fraudulent.  That's why he was convicted. He was convicted of "WILLFULLY' not paying his taxes, and he had filed fraudulent claims.

About the best you can say is he didn't come up with some elaborate plan to hide them, he didn't shuffle money between companies or keep his books in code, etc. Which was their excuse for letting him off.

Now that i think of it - capone was ALSO convicted of carrying a pistol illegally.  Huh - they had more in common than i thought!

 

 

Oh? There’s “no question”?

The evidence in the case was that he filed his returns late for 2017 and 2018, and subsequently filed them and paid his taxes owed. Do you have other evidence? The Trump-appointed Federal Prosecutor would be happy to hear from you.

[CdnFox]

20 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Oh? There’s “no question”?

 

Nope.

Quote

The evidence in the case was that he filed his returns late for 2017 and 2018, and subsequently filed them and paid his taxes owed. Do you have other evidence? The Trump-appointed Federal Prosecutor would be happy to hear from you.

Nope.  Sorry.

First off he plead guilty so no evidence was filed.

Second off the reason he pleaded guilty was that they had extensive evidence that he did so willfully to avoid paying taxes - hence him pleading guilty to WILLFULLY doing it.  That's what willful means.

They had a lot of evidence of crimes - they settled on a lesser plea that was STILL more than you're claiming

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/06/hunter-biden-tax-gun-charges/

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/federal-probe-hunter-bidens-taxes-intensifies-sources/story?id=83770321

So no - it's not that he just forgot and paid his taxes late

[Rebound]

24 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Nope.

Nope.  Sorry.

First off he plead guilty so no evidence was filed.

Second off the reason he pleaded guilty was that they had extensive evidence that he did so willfully to avoid paying taxes - hence him pleading guilty to WILLFULLY doing it.  That's what willful means.

They had a lot of evidence of crimes - they settled on a lesser plea that was STILL more than you're claiming

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/06/hunter-biden-tax-gun-charges/

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/federal-probe-hunter-bidens-taxes-intensifies-sources/story?id=83770321

So no - it's not that he just forgot and paid his taxes late

Obviously you did not read those two articles, but I did. They don’t say anything about additional crimes. They only say the Feds were investigating whether Hunter properly paid tax on income he made overseas.  It did not say that he failed to pay his taxes or that he underreported his income. 
 

So as usual, you’re making up nonsense. 

[Deluge]

18 hours ago, robosmith said:

Trump Says Hunter Biden Should’ve Gotten the Death Penalty for Not Paying His Taxes on Time

Off the MAGA CULT rails. Just like the Central Park 5

Are you woketards always this literal? 

[Nationalist]

3 hours ago, Rebound said:

Yes, so Trump will go on trial to prove his guilt or innocence. That's how it works.

Meantime... let's read the Presidential Records Act, ok? You can actually read it for yourself instead of listening to the lies you're getting from Fox News or whatever.

The term "Presidential records" means documentary materials, or any reasonably segregable portion thereof, created or received by the President.

(B) does not include any documentary materials that are (i) official records of an agency (as defined in section 552(e) of title 5 USC [because they are the property of that Federal Government Agency]

The term "personal records" means all documentary materials, or any reasonably segregable portion thereof, of a purely private or nonpublic character which do not relate to or have an effect upon the carrying out of the constitutional, statutory, or other official or ceremonial duties of the President. 

§ 2202. Ownership of Presidential records

The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records.

(g)(1) Upon the conclusion of a President’s term of office, or if a President serves consecutive terms upon the conclusion of the last term, the Archivist of the United States shall assume responsibility for the custody, control, and preservation of, and access to, the Presidential records of that President. 

 

Dude.

1. The records act and precedent to it clearly show that he could retain whatever he liked.

2. The espionage charges will not stick.

3. He's the leading contender for the Whitehouse. I do not think anything will be brought to the courts before the 2024 election.

Ergo...all they can do is give the guy yet another bleeding nose...from which it appears he recovers from and his base do not hold against him. I think the only realistic chance you pleasant folks have, is to see Trump not elected POTUS in 2024. That could happen. But Biden is about 2/3 into his term and has not given anyone a reason to even take him seriously.

[robosmith]

6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

I wonder what's gonna happen when Trump wins the next election?

He's never gonna win if he keeps spouting STUPID SHIT like the "truth" quoted above.

6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Will he roast and cage all these liars and re-form the justice system?

You believe death penalty for late tax filing is "reform"? That is delusional. LMAO

Edited July 14, 2023 by robosmith

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Capone.  Interesting comparison tho

Remember he was going to throw Hillary in jail but then back down as soon as he actually became president. However that was because someone explained to him that you don't go after your political rivals unless you're in a banana republic.

Or they commit SERIOUS crimes and DEMONSTRATE HOSTILE TO THE LAW INTENT.

5 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Now that he has been attacked by them in contravention of that tradition he may feel the gloves are off. If he can find willing to prosecutors and Investigators they may very well find that they're dealings come under a hell of a lot of scrutiny and that charges are laid.

Trump's DEMONSTRATED HOSTILITY TO THE LAW INTENT is contravention of tradition.

None of the others who were found with MARKED classified documents refused to give them back. Duh.

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

True. America has a law/convention/edict that one is innocent until proven guilty.

Then there's that darn Presidential Records Act...

Trump is not charged with violating the PRA despite what HE TELLS YOU.

In FACT, it says the documents HE STOLE are government property, so HE COULD have been charged under it AFTER refusing to return them.

He's really got you bamboozled. Duh