The Loon Faction of the GOP has become a real threat to national security.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Allowing WOMEN to have the CHOICE is NOT "inflicting its ideology on others."

In FACT, freedom of CHOICE is the OPPOSITE of "inflicting."

This isn't about choice. The choice is the same either way. This is about who pays for it.  If you could pls pay attention, this will go faster.

[WestCanMan]

So weird to see liberals suddenly caring about the military lately. 

For as long as I can remember our LPOC has been doing everything they could to de-fund our military, and in the States they're also weakening it by feminizing it. 

"YAY! Welcome to the new military, where weakness and ineptitude are celebrated and everyone gets a prize!"

[CdnFox]

8 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

So weird to see liberals suddenly caring about the military lately. 

For as long as I can remember our LPOC has been doing everything they could to de-fund our military, and in the States they're also weakening it by feminizing it. 

"YAY! Welcome to the new military, where weakness and ineptitude are celebrated and everyone gets a prize!"

Well i'm not sure that this actually represents an increase in 'military' interest per se.  I mean - they're not TACTICAL abortions.

[Rebound]

12 hours ago, Deluge said:

Travel expenses should come out of pocket when mom wants to murder her unborn. 

Tuberville is doing the right thing. 

In the United States, we are free to live wherever we wish. We are free to travel. A pregnant woman is free to travel to a state which permits abortions.  
 

But, if a woman is in the military, she can be moved to a state or foreign country in which abortion is illegal.  She has now lost a freedom which all Americans have. 
 

Nobody here is pro-abortion. I don’t want anyone to have an abortion, but it is their legal right. 

[reason10]

9 hours ago, robosmith said:

NO ONE is "murdering." That is ILLEGAL. They are getting reimbursed for expenses to go where it is LEGAL. Duh.

But nobody really NEEDS an abortion, any more than anybody NEEDS a high capacity semi automatic pistol/rifle.

There are sensible measures that can be taken. All we're talking about is SENSIBLE abortion laws.

13 minutes ago, Rebound said:

In the United States, we are free to live wherever we wish. We are free to travel. A pregnant woman is free to travel to a state which permits abortions.  
 

But, if a woman is in the military, she can be moved to a state or foreign country in which abortion is illegal.  She has now lost a freedom which all Americans have. 
 

Nobody here is pro-abortion. I don’t want anyone to have an abortion, but it is their legal right. 

Liberals (aka FEMI NAZIS) are ALL PRO ABORTION. They want as many ABORTIONS to take place as possible because it is their religion, their holy sacrament, their deliverance from a paternally controlled society.

Babies have to die just to make liberals HAPPY, just as Jews had to die to make Nazis happen, hence the Limbaugh term "FemiNazi."

[robosmith]

9 hours ago, CdnFox said:

This isn't about choice. The choice is the same either way. This is about who pays for it.  If you could pls pay attention, this will go faster.

When a service woman is assigned on a base in a state where abortion is illegal, she needs time and money to go elsewhere. Low ranking service personnel often have NEITHER, so their CHOICE depends on having the time and the money being PROVIDED. Duh.

I'm paying attention; it is YOU who IS LOST.

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

So weird to see liberals suddenly caring about the military lately. 

For as long as I can remember our LPOC has been doing everything they could to de-fund our military, and in the States they're also weakening it by feminizing it. 

"YAY! Welcome to the new military, where weakness and ineptitude are celebrated and everyone gets a prize!"

It is ONLY YOUR ASSUMPTION that opening up opportunities to those who were previously denied them "weakens" the military. YOU offer NO EVIDENCE to support that OPINION.

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, reason10 said:

But nobody really NEEDS an abortion, any more than anybody NEEDS a high capacity semi automatic pistol/rifle.

Sorry but YOU don't get to decide who "needs" an abortion.

A woman in the military MAY BE discharged for being pregnant and NEED to keep her job. Duh.

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, reason10 said:

But nobody really NEEDS an abortion, any more than anybody NEEDS a high capacity semi automatic pistol/rifle.

There are sensible measures that can be taken. All we're talking about is SENSIBLE abortion laws.

 

Can open.... worms everywhere! ....  

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

Sorry but YOU don't get to decide who "needs" an abortion.

A woman in the military MAY BE discharged for being pregnant and NEED to keep her job. Duh.

Sure he does - by the same power that liberals get to decide who deserves a gun to protect their life,

 

[CdnFox]

7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

When a service woman is assigned on a base in a state where abortion is illegal, she needs time and money to go elsewhere.

She is collecting a paycheque -  she can pay to go elsewhere.  He's not disputing giving her the day off, he just doesn't want to pay for her travel expenses.  Nobody else gets that - why should she? millions and millions of people have to pay to go get medical treatment, she can too.

[Rebound]

Unconstitutional:

”Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress.”

Edited July 12, 2023 by Rebound

[Americana Antifa]

Is it really the loon faction when it's virtually the entire party?

[Deluge]

10 hours ago, Rebound said:

In the United States, we are free to live wherever we wish. We are free to travel. A pregnant woman is free to travel to a state which permits abortions.  
 

But, if a woman is in the military, she can be moved to a state or foreign country in which abortion is illegal.  She has now lost a freedom which all Americans have. 
 

Nobody here is pro-abortion. I don’t want anyone to have an abortion, but it is their legal right. 

Then she shouldn't join the military knowing that there's the risk that she could be placed in a red state. Maybe you activists should petition the military to station troops according to their political affiliation. 

In addition to that, as a tax payer, I don't want to be paying for someone's elective surgery. 

Edited July 12, 2023 by Deluge

[WestCanMan]

11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Well i'm not sure that this actually represents an increase in 'military' interest per se.  I mean - they're not TACTICAL abortions.

Yeah but holding up military appointments should just be ducky with liberals, I don't know why this irks them. 

[Aristides]

Just now, WestCanMan said:

Yeah but holding up military appointments should just be ducky with liberals, I don't know why this irks them. 

When have they ever held up military appointments?

[WestCanMan]

15 minutes ago, Aristides said:

When have they ever held up military appointments?

I don't know if liberals ever held up military appointments and I never accused them of it. Maybe they did, maybe they didn't.

But right now a member of the GOP is holding up military appointments and it's making liberals cry real tears. 

They must have some more transgender admirals to appoint or another General Miley type. 

Edited July 12, 2023 by WestCanMan

[reason10]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

Unconstitutional:

”Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress.”

1. The line you are quoting IS FROM THE CONSTITUTION, so it's kinda STUPID for you to suggest it is unconstitutional.

2. This has NOTHING to do with the subject of the thread.

[robosmith]

13 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Sure he does - by the same power that liberals get to decide who deserves a gun to protect their life,

Who is claiming they "decide who DESERVES A GUN to protect their life."

Quote it NOW or admit you're LYING.

13 hours ago, CdnFox said:

She is collecting a paycheque -  she can pay to go elsewhere.  He's not disputing giving her the day off, he just doesn't want to pay for her travel expenses.  Nobody else gets that - why should she? millions and millions of people have to pay to go get medical treatment, she can too.

She gets that because her employer DICTATES where she lives at the drop of a hat. Duh

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, Deluge said:

Then she shouldn't join the military knowing that there's the risk that she could be placed in a red state. Maybe you activists should petition the military to station troops according to their political affiliation. 

In addition to that, as a tax payer, I don't want to be paying for someone's elective surgery. 

Too bad. If you don't like it, you're free to MOVE OUT. And the sooner the better.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Too bad. If you don't like it, you're free to MOVE OUT. And the sooner the better.

Well no - he's free to demand they don't and that's exactly where it's going at the moment  Thats kind of what the thread is about. 

 

[Aristides]

7 hours ago, Deluge said:

Then she shouldn't join the military knowing that there's the risk that she could be placed in a red state. Maybe you activists should petition the military to station troops according to their political affiliation. 

In addition to that, as a tax payer, I don't want to be paying for someone's elective surgery. 

Great idea but I doubt some of  the red states would like losing their military bases.

[Hodad]

8 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Great idea but I doubt some of  the red states would like losing their military bases.

No indeed they wouldn't like losing those bases. A lot of them are hugely dependent on that federal spending (mostly subsidized by high-GDP states). I think there are 4 or 5 bases in Tuberville's "moocher" state of Alabama.

[Aristides]

7 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I don't know if liberals ever held up military appointments and I never accused them of it. Maybe they did, maybe they didn't.

But right now a member of the GOP is holding up military appointments and it's making liberals cry real tears. 

They must have some more transgender admirals to appoint or another General Miley type. 

Military appointments aren't supposed to be political, they are a matter of national security.

[CdnFox]

36 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Military appointments aren't supposed to be political, they are a matter of national security.

Everything that's done by politicians is political.  And the appointments are done by politicians

This is one of the reasons i don't like the republic system the states use.

I get what you mean. And I agree that this should not be something that politics affects. But that's just not the way the system is designed. If you don't want something to become political don't give it to a politician especially not in the states.

 

[WestCanMan]

49 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Military appointments aren't supposed to be political, they are a matter of national security.

For once we agree on something. So I guess that you're disappointed with Gen Miley then, and Admiral Tranny? 

[Aristides]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

For once we agree on something. So I guess that you're disappointed with Gen Miley then, and Admiral Tranny? 

Why?