My Criteria for judging mental Defectives

[CdnFox]

50 minutes ago, Deluge said:

I'm right about you being wrong, and that's all that matters in our discussions.

PFFFTT  -  quit patting yourself on the back, you're nothing special.  EVERYBODY'S right about him being wrong.  There's 5 year old kids out there who are right about him being wrong. The average house cat is right about him being wrong. He got outwitted last week by a dung beetle that really wasn't even paying attention. It's not exactly an achievement, it's a game the whole family can play!

Trying to get him to UNDERSTAND why he's wrong...  now THAT would be Nobel Prize material.

[WestCanMan]

22 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Trying to get him to UNDERSTAND why he's wrong...  now THAT would be Nobel Prize material.

Because he's an 1d10t. Where's my prize?

[WestCanMan]

7 hours ago, Contrarian said:

This is where you spend your time, debating MAGA trolls from Canada when you can't hold up to real conservatives. 

Instead of fostering discussion, this is what a former security clearance member spends his time with, using CAPS LOCKS against some covid lost souls? Don't you have any shame for your profession or for the level of discussion?

Awww, sorry I roughed up your little hero, Dr Fauci.

I'm sure that he had a very good reason for funding GoF research on that virus, and then lying about it (by omission). 

Just a quick question: Trump signed a lot of contracts as well while he was POTUS, likely far more than Dr Fauci and on a far wider range of topics, if he "accidentally" or "unknowingly" signed a contract funding child pornography would you be able to excuse him as readily as you excused Dr Fauci? 

When that virus first came out do you think that Fauci might have scratched his head for a second and thought "Geez, didn't we send those guys some money? I wonder what that was for...."

This whole topic is just another example of leftard lies, stonewalling, confirmation bias, hypocrisy, and abject stupidity. You posting here just put the cherry on top. 

[Rebound]

5 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Awww, sorry I roughed up your little hero, Dr Fauci.

I'm sure that he had a very good reason for funding GoF research on that virus, and then lying about it (by omission). 

Just a quick question: Trump signed a lot of contracts as well while he was POTUS, likely far more than Dr Fauci and on a far wider range of topics, if he "accidentally" or "unknowingly" signed a contract funding child pornography would you be able to excuse him as readily as you excused Dr Fauci? 

When that virus first came out do you think that Fauci might have scratched his head for a second and thought "Geez, didn't we send those guys some money? I wonder what that was for...."

This whole topic is just another example of leftard lies, stonewalling, confirmation bias, hypocrisy, and abject stupidity. You posting here just put the cherry on top. 

I would say that you’ve never heard of gain of function research before this, you truly don’t understand what it is, you don’t have the education to understand what it truly is, and you have absolutely no idea whether this research funding had anything to do with Covid. It’s a massive string of entirely unproven maybes and what-ifs, aka, an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory. 

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, Rebound said:

I would say that you’ve never heard of gain of function research before this, you truly don’t understand what it is, you don’t have the education to understand what it truly is, and you have absolutely no idea whether this research funding had anything to do with Covid. It’s a massive string of entirely unproven maybes and what-ifs, aka, an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory. 

I would say that you're grasping at straws and you sound entirely foolish.

1) I'd hazard a guess that even someone as stupid as you could guess what GoF research is. 

2) I'll say with absolute certainty that even if the definition of GoF Research was changed to exclude "transmissibility among humans", the fact that scientists altered that coronavirus to make it transmissible among humans in such a densely populated area was an abomination against science, logic and common sense which cost the planet dearly.

3) Whether or not the virus that Fauci's funding helped create was the one that sorta killed millions of people and gave rise to vax fascism in NA, the fact remains that he absolutely should have disclosed the BSL4 lab as a very distinct possibility. 

For Fauci, the MSM, our gov'ts and social media giants to all be in lock step about blocking us from getting information about that lab was absolutely suspect, so for leftards to act like it was a crazy conspiracy to have doubts about them is the epitome of sheepleism. 

Can you name a few of these "maybes"?

All you leftards like to dismiss everything entirely but none of you can put your finger on even one thing that you can disprove. 

If you think Fauci didn't fund any of that activity in the  lab then say it. Or pick any other item off of that laundry list and challenge it... You can't. All you have is ad hominem attacks and drivel. 

Hit the skids you drooling sycophant. 

[Rebound]

4 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I would say that you're grasping at straws and you sound entirely foolish.

1) I'd hazard a guess that even someone as stupid as you could guess what GoF research is. 

2) I'll say with absolute certainty that even if the definition of GoF Research was changed to exclude "transmissibility among humans", the fact that scientists altered that coronavirus to make it transmissible among humans in such a densely populated area was an abomination against science, logic and common sense which cost the planet dearly.

3) Whether or not the virus that Fauci's funding helped create was the one that sorta killed millions of people and gave rise to vax fascism in NA, the fact remains that he absolutely should have disclosed the BSL4 lab as a very distinct possibility. 

For Fauci, the MSM, our gov'ts and social media giants to all be in lock step about blocking us from getting information about that lab was absolutely suspect, so for leftards to act like it was a crazy conspiracy to have doubts about them is the epitome of sheepleism. 

Can you name a few of these "maybes"?

All you leftards like to dismiss everything entirely but none of you can put your finger on even one thing that you can disprove. 

If you think Fauci didn't fund any of that activity in the  lab then say it. Or pick any other item off of that laundry list and challenge it... You can't. All you have is ad hominem attacks and drivel. 

Hit the skids you drooling sycophant. 

You can say whatever you want with “absolute certainty,” but you still don’t know what on earth you’re talking about.  

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, Rebound said:

You can say whatever you want with “absolute certainty,” but you still don’t know what on earth you’re talking about.  

My advice to you is to stay silent and make people guess how stupid you are. 

[Rebound]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

My advice to you is to stay silent and make people guess how stupid you are. 

Can you describe for us what a polymerase chain reaction is, without looking it up? 

[impartialobserver]

folks do the same with labor market data (unemployment rate, jobs, wages). They google stuff and then put passionate language behind it. In all reality.. they have no idea how the data comes to be. And when I give them the nuts and bolts of it.. their digital eyes glaze over and then they blast away with how I am obfuscating. Translation... they are confused and can not just say that. 

[WestCanMan]

13 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Can you describe for us what a polymerase chain reaction is, without looking it up? 

No. Of course not.

Can you describe for us what "altering a virus to make it communicable to humans" means without looking it up? 

Of course. Anyone can. 

 

Can you tell me the difference between:

1) "We already have a strain of this coronavirus in the lab that we altered to become transmissible between humans but we think this one came from nature" and

2) "What we know is that this coronavirus strain became communicable to humans when a bat was in close proximity to a pangolin or some other exotic species for a while. It jumped from bat --> pangolin --> human. Lab? What lab? If anyone talks about a lab we will ban them from social media!"?

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Because he's an 1d10t. Where's my prize?

That was explaining to me why he's wrong. If you can get HIM to understand it, THEN you get a prize

[WestCanMan]

12 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

That was explaining to me why he's wrong. If you can get HIM to understand it, THEN you get a prize

Just say "It was on CNN". He'll eat out of your hand. 

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Just say "It was on CNN". He'll eat out of your hand. 

LOL - here's your prize

[eyeball]

On 6/22/2023 at 1:28 PM, herbie said:

The guy standing up to his knees in floodwater while reading his evacuation order notice as the forest burns 100 feet away, looking for his phone to post more climate change denial on his favourite MAGA website.

Reminds me of the government employee in Florida who was ordered to take a leave of absence to seek mental health care after mentioning climate change in a report he'd written.

[WestCanMan]

On 6/22/2023 at 1:28 PM, herbie said:

The guy standing up to his knees in floodwater while reading his evacuation order notice as the forest burns 100 feet away, looking for his phone to post more climate change denial on his favourite MAGA website.

The guy who thinks that rusty 57 Chevy up on blocks in the back field will fetch $25,000 and complaining that a 2 bdrm bungalow costs $2.5 million.

Or moaning that Drag Queens are the problem over his morning toast, unaware that bread is $5 now a loaf.

Those flooding fires are the worst, right?

The global warming floodfire deniers are gonna be eatin' crow soon, and I'll be glad to watch the earth flood-burn just to get the last laugh. 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Those flooding fires are the worst, right?

The global warming floodfire deniers are gonna be eatin' crow soon, and I'll be glad to watch the earth flood-burn just to get the last laugh. 

I'm buying a fishing pole and a bag of marshmallows so i'm good either way.

[WestCanMan]

53 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I'm buying a fishing pole and a bag of marshmallows so i'm good either way.

Good idea bro. You could cook a lot of marshmallows very quickly with the heat from a burning planet.

I'm gonna bring a net and catch the flying fish after they soar through the flames. It's so much more efficient than catching them while they're still sushi (that's not meant to be racist against Japanese, I actually have this tattoo on my forearm from a really good Japanese friend that reads:  愚かなクラッカー. So cool, hey? It probably means Highly Enlightened or something, or maybe it's even a haiku about how awesome I am. I should google-translate it. 

Edited June 27, 2023 by WestCanMan