Trump hid a 19million dollar loan from S. Korea

[CrakHoBarbie]

Looks like Donald hid a 19million dollar loan from S. Korean conglomerate Daewoo while he was POTUS. If this is verified, Donald's gunna be in a World of shite...

 

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-kept-19-million-korean-loan-hidden-as-president-report-2022-12&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiWvvalsej7AhV6LUQIHemeA7AQFnoECAoQAg&usg=AOvVaw23o-6UfgFzHsTjRfXLgAU7

[robosmith]

Will never matter to his CULT. Nothing does.

[WestCanMan]

Whoooooooa, this is a big deal. 

Trump had a loan for 5 months, from a company with no ties to an adversarial government.

I can tell ya, I'm pretty freaked out about this.

This is worse than Watergate, and way worse than cheating on the 2016 and 2020 elections. 

[Aristides]

I don't think this is a huge deal either but don't you think people should know who is carrying a presidents debts? 

 

I dare say you would be screaming your lungs out if it was Biden.

Edited December 8, 2022 by Aristides

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

I don't think this is a huge deal either but don't you think people should know who is carrying a presidents debts? 

 

I dare say you would be screaming your lungs out if it was Biden.

I don't think a loan is all that important of a thing TBH. 

He borrowed some money, paid interest on it, and gave it back, as people do regularly. He paid them back within half a year.

It's not like he entered into a 10% partnership stake with some S Korean government agents for a few hundred K, and then they poured tens of billions of dollars into the company and just hand him his 10% cut on all of their business. And Trump is an actual businessman, like him or not, he's not just a crackhead who spends the majority of his time with hookers.

Hunter's job description read like: "Sit there and pretend to understand the language, but don't say anything, and then take these wheelbarrows full of money home. Got it? Good. Now tell you dad he needs to come here soon, and then you can go back to your CrakHos." 

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Whoooooooa, this is a big deal. 

Trump had a loan for 5 months, from a company with no ties to an adversarial government.

IF you read the cite, you would see that Daewoo had long standing ties to North Korea.

And the loan was NOT held for just 5 months. It was 5 months of violating his reporting requirements as POTUS.

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I can tell ya, I'm pretty freaked out about this.

This is worse than Watergate, and way worse than cheating on the 2016 and 2020 elections. 

You just can't stop lying, can you?

[robosmith]

Just now, WestCanMan said:

I don't think a loan is all that important of a thing TBH. 

He borrowed some money, paid interest on it, and gave it back, as people do regularly. He paid them back within half a year.

It's not like he entered into a 10% partnership stake with some S Korean government agents for a few hundred K, and then they poured tens of billions of dollars into the company and just hand him his 10% cut on all of their business. And Trump is an actual businessman, like him or not, he's not just a crackhead who spends the majority of his time with hookers.

Hunter's job description read like: "Sit there and pretend to understand the language, but don't say anything, and then take these wheelbarrows full of money home. Got it? Good. Now tell you dad he needs to come here soon, and then you can go back to your CrakHos." 

Hunter HAS NEVER been POTUS with the financial reporting REQUIREMENTS that entails.

If ONLY you would hold Trump to the HIGH STANDARDS you hold Hunter..... LMAO

[WestCanMan]

5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

IF you read the cite, you would see that Daewoo had long standing ties to North Korea.

And the loan was NOT held for just 5 months. It was 5 months of violating his reporting requirements as POTUS.

You just can't stop lying, can you?

I did read it, and I don't care about "ties with North Korea." It's a S Korean company. We're done here.

It was paid off within 6 months of him being POTUS, so obviously he had a plan to repay it. No big deal.

I don't need to 'stop' lying, because unlike you, I never started. 

[Rebound]

But AOC went to a party!

[WestCanMan]

5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Hunter HAS NEVER been POTUS with the financial reporting REQUIREMENTS that entails.

If ONLY you would hold Trump to the HIGH STANDARDS you hold Hunter..... LMAO

Hunter was a proxy for Joe's influence peddling racket. That's why it was so important for Joe and Hunter to pretend that Joe was completely oblivious to it all. They directly lied about it for years until the picture of Joe, Hunter and Devon Archer golfing together surfaced, then Joe had to admit that he actually was aware of what Hunter was doing. 

Trump did something that didn't follow protocols, but he just had an existing loan from back when he was a civilian that he failed to report. It's not like he got that loan because he was president.

Hunter got lucrative income for no other reason than selling access to the US gov't. 

[Aristides]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

I don't think a loan is all that important of a thing TBH. 

He borrowed some money, paid interest on it, and gave it back, as people do regularly. He paid them back within half a year.

It's not like he entered into a 10% partnership stake with some S Korean government agents for a few hundred K, and then they poured tens of billions of dollars into the company and just hand him his 10% cut on all of their business. And Trump is an actual businessman, like him or not, he's not just a crackhead who spends the majority of his time with hookers.

Hunter's job description read like: "Sit there and pretend to understand the language, but don't say anything, and then take these wheelbarrows full of money home. Got it? Good. Now tell you dad he needs to come here soon, and then you can go back to your CrakHos." 

It's important to know who elected officials are indebted to so we know who might be able to put pressure on them. Trump likely has more international dealings than any President in history. Your double standard when it comes to Trump and Hunter Biden who was never a member of an administration is noted.

Another question could be, where did the money come from to pay off Daewoo?

[sharkman]

49 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Hunter was a proxy for Joe's influence peddling racket. That's why it was so important for Joe and Hunter to pretend that Joe was completely oblivious to it all. They directly lied about it for years until the picture of Joe, Hunter and Devon Archer golfing together surfaced, then Joe had to admit that he actually was aware of what Hunter was doing. 

Trump did something that didn't follow protocols, but he just had an existing loan from back when he was a civilian that he failed to report. It's not like he got that loan because he was president.

Hunter got lucrative income for no other reason than selling access to the US gov't. 

And reams of evidence of these crimes are on Hunter’s laptop.  Which is why Twitter was told to censor, ban and the like.

Old Joe is a pro…

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

I did read it, and I don't care about "ties with North Korea." It's a S Korean company. We're done here.

It was paid off within 6 months of him being POTUS, so obviously he had a plan to repay it. No big deal.

I don't need to 'stop' lying, because unlike you, I never started. 

Yes, we know you are a non-stop excuse for Trump manufacturing machine.

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Hunter was a proxy for Joe's influence peddling racket. That's why it was so important for Joe and Hunter to pretend that Joe was completely oblivious to it all. They directly lied about it for years until the picture of Joe, Hunter and Devon Archer golfing together surfaced, then Joe had to admit that he actually was aware of what Hunter was doing. 

Trump did something that didn't follow protocols, but he just had an existing loan from back when he was a civilian that he failed to report. It's not like he got that loan because he was president.

Hunter got lucrative income for no other reason than selling access to the US gov't. 

Too bad you (and Trump) have NO EVIDENCE there were ANY unethical POLICIES provided for ANYONE.

"Access" in DC is a dime a dozen.

[robosmith]

14 minutes ago, Aristides said:

It's important to know who elected officials are indebted to so we know who might be able to put pressure on them. Trump likely has more international dealings than any President in history. Your double standard when it comes to Trump and Hunter Biden who was never a member of an administration is noted.

Another question could be, where did the money come from to pay off Daewoo?

Not just "noted," but EXTREME HYPOCRISY, as usual.

[Rebound]

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Whoooooooa, this is a big deal. 

Trump had a loan for 5 months, from a company with no ties to an adversarial government.

I can tell ya, I'm pretty freaked out about this.

This is worse than Watergate, and way worse than cheating on the 2016 and 2020 elections. 

Presidents should have no financial interests with anyone, foreign or domestic. They have massive, massive amounts of discretionary money and they have to be independent of financial interests.  

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

It's important to know who elected officials are indebted to so we know who might be able to put pressure on them. Trump likely has more international dealings than any President in history. Your double standard when it comes to Trump and Hunter Biden who was never a member of an administration is noted.

Another question could be, where did the money come from to pay off Daewoo?

Trump took out a normal loan as a normal businessman, long before he was POTUS. Not a big deal at all. He just failed to report it.

When Hunter's dad was VPOTUS, the Chinese gov't started doing business with him on a scale that matches the GDP of small countries. It made absolutely no sense, given his personal qualifications and his drug habit. 

If you think those two things are similar you're insane. 

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

Presidents should have no financial interests with anyone, foreign or domestic. They have massive, massive amounts of discretionary money and they have to be independent of financial interests.  

I don't think it's a big deal at all that he had that loan, he just should have disclosed it. 

It's a really big deal that Hunter paid a pittance for a 10% stake in a company that the gov't of China is bankrolling, and doing deals over $10,000,000,000.00. 

If one of those deals turns a 5% profit, that's $500,000.00. 10% of that is $5M. All that for a buy-in of less than half a million dollars? 

IIRC Hunter made $11M in China alone, but that might include his billions that he got from Burisma while his dad was VP. In any event, it's a lot. Having a VPOTUS as a dad opens some pretty crazy doors. 

[Rebound]

12 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I don't think it's a big deal at all that he had that loan, he just should have disclosed it. 

It's a really big deal that Hunter paid a pittance for a 10% stake in a company that the gov't of China is bankrolling, and doing deals over $10,000,000,000.00. 

If one of those deals turns a 5% profit, that's $500,000.00. 10% of that is $5M. All that for a buy-in of less than half a million dollars? 

IIRC Hunter made $11M in China alone, but that might include his billions that he got from Burisma while his dad was VP. In any event, it's a lot. Having a VPOTUS as a dad opens some pretty crazy doors. 

And Saudi Arabia gave Jared Kushner $2 billion. 

[WestCanMan]

2 minutes ago, Rebound said:

And Saudi Arabia gave Jared Kushner $2 billion. 

No, they invested $2B in a company that he created, and managing that investment earns his firm $25M a year. 

But I'll tell ya, it doesn't look good at all. 

You have to ask yourself, did he set that company up knowing that SA was going to invest billions in it, or was he going to do it anyways? 

In fairness to Kushner, he's got a pretty impressive resume.

Quote

 

At the Trump White House, Kushner helped broker deals between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco in a six-month flurry last year. He also helped negotiate a new U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement.

 

Not everyone can say "I brokered a peace deal between the Arabs and Israelis."

In fact, no one else on earth can, and the most qualified people on earth have been trying for 60 years.  

Quote

The firm has hired about 20 people, including private equity veterans Bret Perlman and Asad Naqvi, and plans to focus on U.S. based investments as well as those in the Middle East.

If you said 5 years ago that Jared Kushner could either walk on water, or that he'd broker a peace deal between the Arabs and Israelis, 99% of the people on earth would have said "OMG, science has come a long way. I wonder how he does it."

I would never compare "investing with Hunter Biden" with "investing with Kushner". If I could get in on what those guys were investing their own money I'd definitely invest with Kushner, unless of course Hunter's dad was in the WH somehow. 

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

I don't think it's a big deal at all that he had that loan, he just should have disclosed it. 

It's a really big deal that Hunter paid a pittance for a 10% stake in a company that the gov't of China is bankrolling, and doing deals over $10,000,000,000.00. 

If one of those deals turns a 5% profit, that's $500,000.00. 10% of that is $5M. All that for a buy-in of less than half a million dollars? 

IIRC Hunter made $11M in China alone, but that might include his billions that he got from Burisma while his dad was VP. In any event, it's a lot. Having a VPOTUS as a dad opens some pretty crazy doors. 

You better check your math. "billions that he got from Burisma"? LMAO

Check the other numbers, too.

[WestCanMan]

58 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You better check your math. "billions that he got from Burisma"? LMAO

Check the other numbers, too.

Millions from Burisma. Pretty bad, right?

He got hired to work in an industry he had no experience in, in a country where he doesn't speak the language, and he made over $30K/month. His only real job skill was to summon his father to Ukraine on behalf of corrupt Burisma execs.

I'll admt that Burisma got their money's worth when Joe Biden got Ukraine's top prosecutor fired, and unilaterally appointed a new one. 

[robosmith]

5 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Millions from Burisma. Pretty bad, right?

ANY results from that "access"?

5 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

He got hired to work in an industry he had no experience in, in a country where he doesn't speak the language, and he made over $30K/month. His only real job skill was to summon his father to Ukraine on behalf of corrupt Burisma execs.

I'll admt that Burisma got their money's worth when Joe Biden got Ukraine's top prosecutor fired, and unilaterally appointed a new one. 

Joe got the prosecutor fired for FAILING to investigate corruption, NOT to keep him from investigating Burisma.

As usual, you got it bass ackwards.

Biden, allies pushed out Ukrainian prosecutor because he didn't pursue corruption cases

Quote

But sources ranging from former Obama administration officials to an anti-corruption advocate in Ukraine say the official, Viktor Shokin, was ousted for the opposite reason Trump and his allies claim. It wasn't because Shokin was investigating a natural gas company tied to Biden's son; it was because Shokin wasn't pursuing corruption among the country's politicians, according to a Ukrainian official and four former American officials who specialized in Ukraine and Europe.

You should learn to stop believing Trump's LIES. Esp when he has NO EVIDENCE as usual.

Edited December 9, 2022 by robosmith

[WestCanMan]

10 minutes ago, robosmith said:

ANY results from that "access"?

Yes.

On the laptop they found an email that a Burisma exec sent to Hunter, he was asked to get Joe to come to Ukraine. Joe was there less than a month later. 

Quote

Joe got the prosecutor fired for FAILING to investigate corruption, NOT to keep him from investigating Burisma.

If that's a fact then why did the new prosecutor, who was unilaterally appointed by Joe, leave Burisma alone, and allow the old CEO to come back?

Quote

As usual, you got it bass ackwards.

Lol, sure.

Quote

Biden, allies pushed out Ukrainian prosecutor because he didn't pursue corruption cases

You should learn to stop believing Trump's LIES. Esp when he has NO EVIDENCE as usual.

That's an opinion. But it's a fact that the new prosecutor left Burisma alone ?

 

[herbie]