Donnie is back on Twitter

[West]

Lefties yell at the sky again ?

 

 

[robosmith]

50 minutes ago, West said:

Lefties yell at the sky again ?

 

 

^This can't be. Trump said he would NOT go back. He wouldn't LIE, would he?

LMAO Of course he would. 

[West]

1 hour ago, Contrarian said:

His account is, however your leader said he is not joining Twitter. 

Trump Cites Twitter ‘Problems,’ Says He’ll Stick to Own Platform (Bloomberg). 

After a few days, he might tweet saying he rejoins it for "The People" and this way -> he can get his message out. 

I wonder if gamblers are taking bets now: 

Which day will Donald Trump tweet on?

I will say, not right away -> but closer to the Holidays the shepherd will start calling for the sheep on Twitter. 

BAAAAAAHHH.  

= )

 

My leader eh.. nah it was just fun watching how easily triggered lefties are/were during those years

[TreeBeard]

Wouldn’t it be a big admission that his own platform is a failure?

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, TreeBeard said:

Wouldn’t it be a big admission that his own platform is a failure?

Perhaps he sees Musk's disastrous running of Twitter as his opportunity to fill the void.

What would be better for him than taking Musk to the cleaners?

Odds are he'll bungle that anyway cause anyone who can't make money running a casino must be an id iot.

[West]

6 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Perhaps he sees Musk's disastrous running of Twitter as his opportunity to fill the void.

What would be better for him than taking Musk to the cleaners?

Odds are he'll bungle that anyway cause anyone who can't make money running a casino must be an id iot.

Lol has billions more dollars than you and you are claiming he doesn't know how to make money... bizarre

[West]

You know lefties went crazy at twitter when they banned satirical Babylon Bee account. When you can't compete intellectually just ban them 

[robosmith]

12 hours ago, West said:

Lol has billions more dollars than you and you are claiming he doesn't know how to make money... bizarre

Never said ^this. That is your strawman. LMAO

[Legato]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Never said ^this. That is your strawman. LMAO

Not in as many words. but the implication shines with infinite lumosity. Strawman should read strawpeople, according to Teflon McSocks.

[BeaverFever]

He’s too invested in his failing Truth Social platform to risk having followers go  back toTwitter 

[Infidel Dog]

1 hour ago, BeaverFever said:

He’s too invested in his failing Truth Social platform to risk having followers go  back toTwitter 

But would you really want that? Truth Social to fail, I mean. Because if it does where does The Donald go?

[BeaverFever]

3 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

But would you really want that? Truth Social to fail, I mean. Because if it does where does The Donald go?

I have some thoughts on where he can ho. None have anything to do with social media though. 

[Infidel Dog]

No doubt, but back in reality best guess is he'd return to Twitter.

[DogOnPorch]

14 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

No doubt, but back in reality best guess is he'd return to Twitter.

 

Three million new followers and climbing since coming back...I doubt he can resist.

[DogOnPorch]

Project Veritas is also back.

[Infidel Dog]

Babylon Bee?

[DogOnPorch]

13 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Babylon Bee?

 

Yes.

[Infidel Dog]

Good one. They didn't deserve anything like a ban.

Maybe a metal.

[DogOnPorch]

14 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Good one. They didn't deserve anything like a ban.

Maybe a metal.

 

Between Rumble and Twitter, a lot of voices once silenced by the Left are being heard again suddenly.

[Infidel Dog]

57 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

Between Rumble and Twitter, a lot of voices once silenced by the Left are being heard again suddenly.

And in the new Twitter even those who disagree have a voice:

 

[Infidel Dog]

They're upset. They tell us Trump getting his account back is another one of those things that threaten democracy. Apparently the old days of censorship and disregarding polls that didn't find what they wanted them to were so much more "Democratic."

Seriously...can anybody tell me what this new "Progressive" definition of Democracy is?

[robosmith]

27 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

They're upset. They tell us Trump getting his account back is another one of those things that threaten democracy. Apparently the old days of censorship and disregarding polls that didn't find what they wanted them to were so much more "Democratic."

Seriously...can anybody tell me what this new "Progressive" definition of Democracy is?

Democracy is what IT'S ALWAYS BEEN. Respecting the will of the voters and NOT trying to overturn an election by sending a mob to threaten those responsible for certifying the COUNT.

How many times does this have to be explained to you before YOU understand?

It is really hard to get past your cognitive dissonance. The very essence of an extreme ideologue.

A man who believes HE knows it all can never LEARN ANYTHING which contradicts what he BELIEVES he "knows."

 

 

[Infidel Dog]

38 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Democracy is what IT'S ALWAYS BEEN. Respecting the will of the voters and NOT trying to overturn an election by sending a mob to threaten those responsible for certifying the COUNT.

How many times does this have to be explained to you before YOU understand?

Until you stop lying I suppose.

This is what Trump told the crowd at his January 6, Washington rally.

"I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."

 And what about that authorizes you to pretend it affects what we were actually talking about. There was a twitter poll. Over half said they wanted Trump back.  What is democratic about rejecting that majority? What is democratic about censoring voices that disagree?

By the definition of democracy as "it's always been," I mean. I'll answer that for you. Nothing. You and yours are trying to hijack the meaning of another word to suit your mood. It's about the feels. If the feels want to say, "It's about muh democracy" then that's supposed to be good enough. And when it's challenged you'll go "Oh yeah?! Well, muh January 6th," and think you've proved something. You've proved your usual nothing.

[Infidel Dog]

BTW...

 

[robosmith]

9 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

Until you stop lying I suppose.

^Textbook cognitive dissonance.

9 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

This is what Trump told the crowd at his January 6, Washington rally.

"I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."

Really? Is that ALL YOU HEARD? Or are YOU lying?

Do you have ANY IDEA about the meetings and planning that went into PLANNING Jan 6th?

Does Fox EVER tell you about that? Do you just imagine the whole thing was spontaneous? LMAO

9 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

 And what about that authorizes you to pretend it affects what we were actually talking about. There was a twitter poll. Over half said they wanted Trump back.  What is democratic about rejecting that majority? What is democratic about censoring voices that disagree?

The FACT is, they were censoring ILLEGAL INCITEMENT OF VIOLENCE.

Even if you believe Trump's words were insufficient, the RESULT WAS SUFFICIENT to prove that.

9 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

By the definition of democracy as "it's always been," I mean. I'll answer that for you. Nothing. You and yours are trying to hijack the meaning of another word to suit your mood. It's about the feels. If the feels want to say, "It's about muh democracy" then that's supposed to be good enough. And when it's challenged you'll go "Oh yeah?! Well, muh January 6th," and think you've proved something. You've proved your usual nothing.

ONLY IF you wallow in your IGNORANCE of ALL the other EVIDENCE.

I'll bet you IGNORED the entire Jan 6th committee testimony, most of which was given by Republicans.

You know what happens when you IGNORE? Ignorance.