85.7% of Covid Deaths in Canada Were Among the Multi-Vaxed from Aug to Sept of 2022. Jabbing 85% of the Population Didn't Reduce Deaths

Goddess · July 16, 2024

29 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You haven't had covid yet?

No, I haven't. **knock on wood**

Even I'm surprised because many times over the last few years, a friend will call me to say THEY have covid and I should get tested, since I was just with them. Everybody I work with has had it 2-3 times. Except my boss - he and I are the only ones who have never had it, also the only ones unvaccinated 🤔

I take Vit. D, Vit. C, NAC, Quercetin, melatonin, zinc, a multivitamin and make my own hydroxychloroquine which I take in spurts. Working for me, so far.

WestCanMan · July 16, 2024

33 minutes ago, Goddess said:

No, I haven't. **knock on wood**

Even I'm surprised because many times over the last few years, a friend will call me to say THEY have covid and I should get tested, since I was just with them. Everybody I work with has had it 2-3 times. Except my boss - he and I are the only ones who have never had it, also the only ones unvaccinated 🤔

I take Vit. D, Vit. C, NAC, Quercetin, melatonin, zinc, a multivitamin and make my own hydroxychloroquine which I take in spurts. Working for me, so far.

I got some ivermectin for my mom and I got some for us as well.

When covid was supposed to be lethal we took vit d (we always take it in the winter anyways) and added zinc to our routine. I don't take C, NAC, Quercetin and melatonin, I don't even know what the middle 2 are. I eat so much citrus, bell peppers, and tomatoes that I don't think I need a C supplement.

I've never taken ivermectin as a prophylactic, but when I got sick I took it, and whether it worked or the timing was good, my sickness ended quickly.

My mom's 82 now and apparently ivermectin works for her too.

Edited July 16, 2024 by WestCanMan

Goddess · July 16, 2024

46 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I got some ivermectin

I tried to get some in case I got covid and the gov't confiscated it. 🙄

WestCanMan · July 16, 2024

3 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I tried to get some in case I got covid and the gov't confiscated it. 🙄

How did they do that? Did they get it en route?

I have some here, and it's not getting confiscated.

I can try to get some for you if you want. I'll just take off the label and put "Fantanyl" on the side so that the gov't won't prevent it from getting through.

Goddess · July 16, 2024

5 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Did they get it en route?

Yup.

5 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I'll just take off the label and put "Fantanyl" on the side so that the gov't won't prevent it from getting through.

🤣

Goddess · July 19, 2024

Denis Rancourt is a Canadian researcher and scientist.

He writes about medicine, COVID-19, individual health, climate change, geopolitics, civil rights, political theory, sociology … and has also written over 100 peer-reviewed-journal articles in technical areas of science and technology.

He obtained BSc, MSc and PhD degrees in physics and held post-doctoral research positions at prestigious institutions in France and The Netherlands, before being a physics professor and lead scientist at the University of Ottawa for 23 years.

He has been a volunteer Researcher with the Ontario Civil Liberties Association (ocla.ca) since 2014, and now collaborates closely and works with the registered non-profit “CORRELATION Research in the Public Interest”, where he is Chair of the Board, and an Associate Researcher.

He's been analyzing studies and datasets since the beginning of COV and took the lead in exposing the Canadian government's fraud by hiring Fisman to create fake studies to release to the public. (See the book "Fisman's Fraud - The Rise of Canadian Hate Science".)

Here's his latest comprehensive report. I haven't had a chance to go over too much of it yet, but thought others here may be interested in it, as well. It's the clearest, most detailed research & report about excess mortality.

Spatiotemporal variation of excess all-cause mortality in the world (125 countries) during the Covid period 2020-2023 regarding socio economic factors and public-health and medical interventions – CORRELATION (correlation-canada.org)

Quote

‘The spatiotemporal variations in national excess all-cause mortality rates allow us to conclude that the Covid-period (2020-2023) excess all-cause mortality in the world is incompatible with a pandemic viral respiratory disease as a primary cause of death..’

Goddess · July 19, 2024

Here's the Fisman's Fraud book, by R. Watteel:

When pseudoscience, politics & fraud converge

What lengths will ideologically or financially-driven researchers and politicians go to impose their will upon others?

Throughout the pandemic we've witnessed a slide from objective clinical research to easily manipulated "real-world" studies to purely fictional simulations completely detached from reality. "Consensus" (aka groupthink) (( Ahem..... @eyeball )) quickly replaced scientific scrutiny and civil discourse plummeted. It became difficult to distinguish scientific recommendations from political talking points.

On April 25, 2022 a very dangerous line was crossed. Leaders in the Canadian research and medical community rubber-stamped a clearly fraudulent study. Its overarching purpose: to use "science" to justify discrimination, sow hatred and reinterpret the notion of inalienable rights.

Within hours of the study's official publication, dozens of articles in top national papers flooded Canada warning of the dire risk of merely hanging out with unvaccinated people - selfish souls who refused to accept the new genetic COVID-19 vaccines. The "unvaccinated" were compared to carriers of syphilis, intoxicated drivers and reckless individuals who had no regard for others.

Can't get an operation? Blame the unvaccinated! The "science" says so.

But did it? This book examines:

The man, the politics and the intent behind the faux study.
How researchers concocted results to overwrite reality & scapegoat the unvaccinated.
The Establishment's willingness to go along with the fraud.
How political ideology fed into the analysis.
How the research is being used to swindle Canadians out of their Charter rights & freedoms.

An investigative look into Fisman's Precedent-Setting Hate Science

"FISMAN'S FRAUD is both a disturbing and an exhilarating read. The book exposes what is effectively a crime scene with various agents complicit in producing fraudulent science that was used by media and the Prime Minister to fuel hatred and societal division. Watteel reveals in precise detail how every system of oversight and accountability, from the University of Toronto to the Ontario Provincial Police failed in their duty to act with integrity. The exhilarating aspect is that the book shines a bright light on those responsible. Watteel names names and calls them out for what they are - morally bankrupt. Fisman's Fraud gives hope that by exposing the fraud justice may prevail and civility restored to this Nation." - Ted Kuntz, President Vaccine Choice Canada

"FISMAN'S FRAUD is a must read that slices through the layers of lost integrity, accountability and responsibility to reveal the greatest deception of our time." - Vincent A Gircys, Veteran Police Constable, Ontario Provincial Police - Forensic Collision Reconstructionist

eyeball · July 20, 2024

10 hours ago, Goddess said:

The "unvaccinated" were compared to carriers of syphilis, intoxicated drivers and reckless individuals who had no regard for others.

I suspect the regard for vaccinated people on your online dating site for the unvaccinated is pretty low.

So how do you tell if someone is simply lying about being unvaccinated as a ploy to take advantage of the gullible sort of pickings that are likely to congregate there?

I'd expect rubbers are advised but I doubt they'd protect you from someone who's shedding virus and probably oozing and exhaling vaccine.

CdnFox · July 20, 2024

32 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I suspect the regard for vaccinated people on your online dating site for the unvaccinated is pretty low.

So how do you tell if someone is simply lying about being unvaccinated as a ploy to take advantage of the gullible sort of pickings that are likely to congregate there?

I'd expect rubbers are advised but I doubt they'd protect you from someone who's shedding virus and probably oozing and exhaling vaccine.

Oh look , another leftie resorts to sex jokes to try to avoid addressing an issue when they know they were wrong. 🙄

eyeball · July 20, 2024

22 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Oh look , another leftie resorts to sex jokes to try to avoid addressing an issue when they know they were wrong. 🙄

Oh look, another acolyte who supports his precious Goddess' profoundly retarded dogma.

CdnFox · July 20, 2024

1 minute ago, eyeball said:

Oh look, another acolyte who supports his precious Goddess' profoundly retarded dogma.

Sure - everyone who disagrees with you now is an 'acolyte'

And now it's my fault you don't understand science or logic.

But you've probably been saying that for decades now.

You know, once in a while you used to make an interesting point or two. I always assumed it was by accident of course but now and again.

now your posts are just the object of pity and scorn. Is the sad truth of society's complete rejection of your political tribe weighing on you? You can always take a break if it's too much.

eyeball · July 20, 2024

9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Sure - everyone who disagrees with you now is an 'acolyte

No, anyone who supports Goddess is - especially when it helps encourage her spreading the most retarded notion to come out of the pandemic, bar none.

Goddess · July 20, 2024

8 hours ago, eyeball said:

No, anyone who supports Goddess is - especially when it helps encourage her spreading the most retarded notion to come out of the pandemic, bar none.

I post mainly peer-reviewed scientific studies and datasets, and often include the authors' credentials and achievements and conflicts of interests.

You mainly post personal insults about me without addressing the studies.

Perhaps it's just that some people see the difference?

CdnFox · July 20, 2024

9 hours ago, eyeball said:

No, anyone who supports Goddess is -

Well that would make you an acolyte then - your stupidity to her replies is doing more to promote her than anything i've done

43 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I post mainly peer-reviewed scientific studies and datasets, and often include the authors' credentials and achievements and conflicts of interests.

You mainly post personal insults about me without addressing the studies.

Perhaps it's just that some people see the difference?

Bingo.

Goddess · July 20, 2024

"This constant lying is not aimed at making people believe the lie, but at ensuring that no one believes anything any more.

A people that can no longer distinguish between truth and lies, cannot distinguish between right and wrong.

And such a people, deprived of the power to think and judge is, without knowing and willing it, completely subjected to the rule of lies.

With such people, you can do whatever you want. "

~~Hannah Arendt ~~

eyeball · July 21, 2024

10 hours ago, Goddess said:

I post mainly peer-reviewed scientific studies and datasets, and often include the authors' credentials and achievements and conflicts of interests.

It simply doesn't matter what or how much you post. Your credibility is utterly and irredeemably shot to shit by your assertions about Fauci being a mass murderer on par with Mengele.

You make your garden variety chud look like a normal person. Notwithstanding the chuds that think you're the bees knees while seemingly avoiding or disavowing your serial mass murderer angle on things. They're weird chuds.

Moonlight Graham · July 21, 2024

On 7/10/2024 at 7:02 PM, Goddess said:

Deaths by vaccination status, England - Office for National Statistics

The data shows that children who received the shots are 4423% (45x) more likely to die of any cause than unvaccinated children.

Additionally, vaxxed children are 13,633% (137x) more likely to die of COVID-19 than those who didn’t receive an mRNA injection.

The stunning figures were revealed in recently published ONS data regarding deaths by vaccination status in England.

The latest dataset from the ONS is titled “Deaths by Vaccination Status, England, 1 January 2021 to 31 May 2022.”

What are you calculating to get these numbers? I'm on table 6 and don't see what you're seeing.

What I do see is a significant reduction in deaths via COVID by those getting the vaccine, especially for adults. I also see a lower rate of non-COVID deaths among the fully vaccinated in all age groups including children. The stats are unequivocal showing the significant vaccine effectiveness in lowering mortality rates across every age group.

Moonbox · July 21, 2024

18 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:

What are you calculating to get these numbers? I'm on table 6 and don't see what you're seeing.

What I do see is a significant reduction in deaths via COVID by those getting the vaccine, especially for adults. I also see a lower rate of non-COVID deaths among the fully vaccinated in all age groups including children. The stats are unequivocal showing the significant vaccine effectiveness in lowering mortality rates across every age group.

Ser, I think you need to leave this sort of data analysis to our qualified experts. There are 84 pages of rigorously reviewed data here, from the finest graduates of Facebook School of Medicine.

Do you even do your own research?

Goddess · July 21, 2024

10 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

What are you calculating to get these numbers? I'm on table 6 and don't see what you're seeing.

What I do see is a significant reduction in deaths via COVID by those getting the vaccine, especially for adults. I also see a lower rate of non-COVID deaths among the fully vaccinated in all age groups including children. The stats are unequivocal showing the significant vaccine effectiveness in lowering mortality rates across every age group.

This post is older now but I'll go back to the data and the x-space discussion of it to confirm. If you're truly interested.

There's a group of researchers who analyze the ONS data weekly and discuss on x-space but I don't always have time to listen weekly.

Be aware that very often, important data is "tucked away" in footnotes, appendices and indexes in the official reports- much like the Pfizer trials which stated outright in the main body of the report that the vax was efficacious but in the additional small-print information, it was revealed that more people died in the vaccine arm than in the placebo arm.

I'll see what I have time for on this but I'm on holidays this week and am landscaping my back yard.

Goddess · July 21, 2024

10 hours ago, Moonbox said:

Ser, I think you need to leave this sort of data analysis to our qualified experts. There are 84 pages of rigorously reviewed data here, from the finest graduates of Facebook School of Medicine.

Do you even do your own research?

It's nice that you're finally admitting that you just blindly believe and obey and are not intelligent enough to think critically on your own.

The first step is admitting. 😊

Maybe next time they tell you there's no such thing as natural immunity and that ivermectin is horsepaste, you'll check that out.

Goddess · July 21, 2024

@Moonlight Graham

Here's another reason why it's important to be cautious about gov't or pharma paid for studies and datasets, besides important info being relegated to the small print.

The children's trials for Pfizer reported no injuries, but a tiny, one sentence footnote said one participant experienced "minor stomach issues.

It turned out that participant was Maddie de Garay, a 13 yr old girl who is now in a wheelchair, on a feeding tube and disabled for life. Does that sound like like tummy troubles to you? Now reason for yourself: there were 1100 kids in that trial and this is what happened to one of them. The odds for devastating injury to children are thus, at best, 1 out of 1100. Is that good odds to you? And this was before they finally admitted to the myocarditis issue. In the fine print of that trial it also showed a large portion of parents pulled their kids from the trial after the first dose. No explanation is given as to why. And like Maddie, whatever happened to those kids was not tracked by the study. It was just "You dropped out, we don't want or need to hear from you ever again."

Read for yourself. Think critically.

The multi-billion dollar pharma industry that has a record of fines for falsifying data and rubber-stamping dangerous drugs with terrible profiles, did not suddenly grow a conscience.

There's a reason why N. America, the heart of big pharma, is the only one still pushing the jabs on kids.

Unless you're like eyeball who outright said he doesn't care what happens to kids as long as he "feels" safer.

Moonlight Graham · July 21, 2024

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

This post is older now but I'll go back to the data and the x-space discussion of it to confirm. If you're truly interested.

There's a group of researchers who analyze the ONS data weekly and discuss on x-space but I don't always have time to listen weekly.

Be aware that very often, important data is "tucked away" in footnotes, appendices and indexes in the official reports- much like the Pfizer trials which stated outright in the main body of the report that the vax was efficacious but in the additional small-print information, it was revealed that more people died in the vaccine arm than in the placebo arm.

I'll see what I have time for on this but I'm on holidays this week and am landscaping my back yard.

Yes that's fine, it took me a while to get back to your post because of summer stuff happening.

eyeball · July 22, 2024

12 hours ago, Goddess said:

Unless you're like eyeball who outright said he doesn't care what happens to kids as long as he "feels" safer.

Put up or fu ck off.

Moonbox · July 22, 2024

22 hours ago, Goddess said:

It's nice that you're finally admitting that you just blindly believe and obey and are not intelligent enough to think critically on your own.

Where did I admit that? 🤔

I'm just acknowledging your expertise, and how 7-10 years of formal study in medicine etc pales in comparison to your rigorous interweb research.