First a trickle....Now a flood

[Goddess]

So.

Dan Hartman, from Ontario, lost his 17-year-old son Sean, 33 days and 2 emergency room visits after the Pfizer jab.  Sean was found by his mother, dead on the floor of his bedroom one morning.  He was Dan's only child.  Against his father's wishes, Sean got the jab so he could continue to play hockey.  He loved hockey.

An autopsy revealed that spike protein from the jabs (Sean never had covid) accumulated in his adrenal glands, leading to liver failure and eventually, cardiac arrest in the early morning hours before his mother found him.  His adrenal glands and liver were full of spike and his heart had become enlarged.

Dan has lost the right to appeal the judgment that denied his right to bring suit against the government and Pfizer.

Dan's claim submitted to the VISP was rejected by the Canadian government.  Like almost everyone else's.

In the judgment, the justice determined that even if the government forces everyone to take an experimental injection, the government has no "duty of care" to citizens.

Let that sink in.

The justice also considered Pfizer's response to the suit, in which they responded, that they had never claimed the jabs were safe or effective, that they had always claimed they were experimental and therefore should not be held responsible for any deaths.

Let that sink in, too.

 

[User]

On 4/22/2026 at 12:14 PM, Goddess said:

Dan Hartman, from Ontario, lost his 17-year-old son Sean, 33 days and 2 emergency room visits after the Pfizer jab.  Sean was found by his mother, dead on the floor of his bedroom one morning.  He was Dan's only child.  Against his father's wishes, Sean got the jab so he could continue to play hockey.  He loved hockey.

This is awful... I would not wish this on anyone. You are playing fast and loose with some facts here. 

Dr Ryan Cole has been punished by professional regulatory boards for his misleading actions. The guy is hardly some reliable source for doing an autopsy here and his findings are an outlier confirmed by no one else professionally. The guy is a known liar and clearly has a biased position here.

Other doctors who reviewed this case found no verifiable link between the vaccine and this kids death. 

You are skewing what duty of care means here, this is a normal legal concept regarding the government making public health decisions like these that were in good faith during an emergency. 

Where are you getting that Pfizer said in testimony that they never claimed the jabs were safe?



 

 

[Goddess]

1 hour ago, User said:

Dr Ryan Cole has been punished by professional regulatory boards for his misleading actions.

He was punished for going against the covid narrative.

Like all doctors were, who spoke up at the time.

1 hour ago, User said:

Other doctors who reviewed this case found no verifiable link between the vaccine and this kids death. 

Other doctors said the cause of death could not be determined.  

That's why Dan paid for an independent autopsy.

Dr. Cole does the proper staining on body organs to find whether the spike protein is there or not.

Obviously Big Pharma and governments who mandated these shots don't like that.

The other doctor who worked on this was Dr. McCullough, a cardiologist who found the spike in the boy's enlarged heart.  Dr. McCullough was the most published and respected cardiologist in the US - until he spoke out about the myocarditis he was seeing in his practice.  Then he was smeared, blacklisted, cancelled.

Now there's a black box warning for myocarditis on the vaccine packaging.  It took years for them to admit it was true.

1 hour ago, User said:

You are skewing what duty of care means here, this is a normal legal concept regarding the government making public health decisions like these that were in good faith during an emergency. 

In a world first, a woman in Greece just won a judgement against the Greek government over the covid jabs because they ruled there that the government DID have a duty of care.

You obviously don't agree with that concept.  I do.

1 hour ago, User said:

Where are you getting that Pfizer said in testimony that they never claimed the jabs were safe?

Mr. Hartman posted the ruling and Pfizer's reply is in there.

I've also posted here the actual contracts between Pfizer and the Canadian government (and some of the contracts with other countries, they all say the same thing) and it states right in the contract that the governments accept that the injections may not be safe or effective and that Pfizer takes no responsibility for anything that happens.

At the Covid Commission in the EU, Pfizer also confirmed that the injections were never tested fully for safety or efficacy.

I posted that here, too.

At the time Sean Hartman got his shot, the package inserts for the vaccines were blank.  Because they didn't know what the shots would do to people - pregnant women, children, teenagers, anybody.

The method of delivery for the shots - the LNPs were also largely unknown.  The pre-human testing of them had not gone well, but they decided to sue them anyways.

Normally vaccines go through about a decade of testing, these were less than a year.  We still don't know long-term how they will affect people.  And we wont' know for quite a while.  Things like fertility (they know the spike settles in the testes and ovaries.)  

The shots were never tested for whether they increased cancer or not - we're still learning, still looking at data, still studying.

It was a big experiment, dude.

And children like Sean - never needed it in the first place.  They were never at risk.

Just so you know - there's a lot of dead kids out there from the shots.  And a lot of the parents are like Dan.  They want acknowledgement of their wrongful deaths.

2 hours ago, User said:

This is awful... I would not wish this on anyone.

I appreciate you saying that.  When I first posted here about what happened to Sean, quite a few people called his father a liar, said he probably didn't even have a son, he was a grifter, just wanted money, etc.  I expected that again.

When they couldn't deny what happened to Sean anymore, then they switched to "Well, some children have to die to save others."

I saw yesterday that Dan is going to fight this all the way to the Supreme Court.

I've never seen a dad fight so hard for his kid and his grief is.......awful.  It's one thing if your kid dies in an accident or something but when this is like your kid being murdered.

[Goddess]

Maddie de Garay was in the vaccine trials for children and was catastrophically injured.  She was 12, now in a wheelchair and on a feeding tube.  I've followed her mother Stephanie, since the beginning, too.

Pfizer covered it up by telling the FDA that Maddie had "stomach issues" and dropped out of the trials.

There were 2,268 children in that trial.  What happened to Maddie should have told them that these shots had AT LEAST a 1 in 2,200 risk of serious harm to children.

Look:

Safety, side effects, allergies and doses. The COVID-19 Pfizer vaccine for 5-11 year olds explained

 

What does the trial data say about safety and efficacy?

The Pfizer vaccine trial included 2,268 children aged 5-11. Of these children, 1,517 were given two doses of 10 microgram vaccine three weeks apart, and 751 who were given a placebo. The results found the vaccine was safe and had good efficacy.

Children given the vaccine had similar antibody levels after the second dose to older adolescents and young adults (aged 16-25). This indicates their immune system was able to recognise the lower amount of vaccine mRNA – the vital ingredient in the Pfizer vaccine – and still produce a good amount of antibody to protect against the virus.

There were no serious reactions in this trial, however the sample size wasn’t large enough to detect rare adverse events.

 

Parents were lied to.  

[Goddess]

Normally vaccines go through a vast amount of testing before being marketed to the public.  The covid vaccines were not because....it was an emergency.  Apparently.

Covid jabs never went through carcinogenicity testing.  Whether they cause cancer or not.

Following the rollout, oncologists all over the world started reporting increases in all kinds of cancer, in younger & younger populations, with very aggressive and quick mortality cancers.

The CDC wasn't releasing new cancer data so no one could really tell from data if this was really happening.  But there were signs.  Besides oncologists reporting increases, sales of cancer drugs were also going through the roof.

I've posted the studies here before that detail the possible mechanisms for how the jabs promote cancer.  Recall all the studies about how the jabs disable the body's p53, enabling unhindered tumor growth and SV40 contamination (the reason polio vaccines were removed from the market fora time.)

The CDC has finally released the data.  And ya. Cancer is skyrocketing.

Overall cancers in those under 50 JUMPED 6.4% from 2021 to 2023.

BRAIN TUMORS: +19.5%

COLON/RECTAL CANCER: +19.4%

SMALL INTESTINE CANCER: +15.5%

OVARIAN CANCER: +12.8%

STOMACH CANCER: +7.3%

BREAST CANCER: +3.6%

 

Edited April 24 by Goddess

[User]

On 4/24/2026 at 9:39 AM, Goddess said:

The CDC has finally released the data.  And ya. Cancer is skyrocketing.

That is not a chart showing cancer skyrocketing; it is a chart showing excess deaths as compared to historical trends. 

There is no surprise here, this was predicted... because during the lockdowns there were less screenings, less early prevention, less early intervention and treatments, so more people died of cancer.

Nothing you showed here shows any causal relationship that the COVID vaccine caused cancer let alone this increase in cancer deaths. 

[User]

On 4/23/2026 at 6:08 PM, Goddess said:

There were 2,268 children in that trial.  What happened to Maddie should have told them that these shots had AT LEAST a 1 in 2,200 risk of serious harm to children.

She was in the older age trial, not this one. Your logic is flawed as well, as rates/risks are not determined like this and was can even look and see that in the US alone, some 25+ million children were vaccinated against COVID. 

If there were a 1 in 2200 risk, there would be 12,000 children in her condition. 

There is no evidence that Pfizer was trying to cover anything up. That is just your skewed characterization of events. 

[User]

On 4/23/2026 at 5:54 PM, Goddess said:

He was punished for going against the covid narrative.

Like all doctors were, who spoke up at the time.

The dude was punished for lying. Also providing Ivermectin prescriptions over telehealth. For all the crap you cite about how bad everyone or anyone was with the response to COVID, you excuse and support this kind of practice?

Not to even bring up how he screwed over someone on a cancer diagnosis. I mean, for all the anecdotal stories you share here on how can you ignore this?

https://idahocapitalsun.com/2023/04/14/she-had-invasive-surgery-after-idaho-dr-ryan-cole-misdiagnosed-her-now-shes-suing/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

She had invasive surgery after Idaho Dr. Ryan Cole misdiagnosed her. Now she’s suing.

Medical malpractice lawsuit in Ada County accuses Cole of negligence and other harms

 

[Goddess]

17 hours ago, User said:

Not to even bring up how he screwed over someone on a cancer diagnosis. I mean, for all the anecdotal stories you share here on how can you ignore this?

https://idahocapitalsun.com/2023/04/14/she-had-invasive-surgery-after-idaho-dr-ryan-cole-misdiagnosed-her-now-shes-suing/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

How come you only post the accusation but not the resolution to the case?

I suspect it's because you just quickly goggled something "bad" about Dr. Cole and posted it.

 

Idaho medical malpractice lawsuit against Dr. Ryan Cole ends in legal agreement

Attorneys in a lawsuit against Idaho pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole for his alleged false cancer diagnosis that led a woman to undergo major surgery reached an agreement to dismiss the case.

 

Cole is still licensed to practice medicine in Idaho, the Idaho Board of Medicine’s licensing records website shows.

Cole remains on the Central District Health board.

[User]

32 minutes ago, Goddess said:

How come you only post the accusation but not the resolution to the case?

I suspect it's because you just quickly goggled something "bad" about Dr. Cole and posted it.

Reached an agreement to dismiss…

Why are you defending a man accused like this of reaching secret agreements to dismiss the charges?

 

[Goddess]

20 minutes ago, User said:

Reached an agreement to dismiss…

Why are you defending a man accused like this of reaching secret agreements to dismiss the charges?

 

Why didn't you post the resolution?

Doctors get sued maliciously all the time.  One of the biggest expenses for opening a practice is malpractice insurance.

Edited May 2 by Goddess

[User]

1 minute ago, Goddess said:

Why didn't you post the resolution?

What is the importance of the resolution here?

Do you care about "the resolution" with every other major medical organization, Fauci, etc... after COVID that you sit here still railing against even though "the resolution" is that they are all still going along in their professions?

 

[Goddess]

1 minute ago, User said:

What is the importance of the resolution here?

You don't see the importance of a resolution?  🙄

2 minutes ago, User said:

Do you care about "the resolution" with every other major medical organization, Fauci,

Yes, I do.  If you don't, then knock yourself out.

 

[User]

3 minutes ago, Goddess said:

You don't see the importance of a resolution?  🙄

No, I asked you why this matters so much to you in the context of this discussion. What is your point?

[Goddess]

4 minutes ago, User said:

"the resolution" is that they are all still going along in their professions?

These kinds of cases take time.  

For instance, it typically takes years to pull a drug from the market, even though the harms are well known during all that time.  Opioid crisis ring any bells for you?

Morens, recently indicted in the US for fraud, concealing and deleting records, was "still going along in his profession".....until he wasn't.

It's looking like Fauci will be next.

It will take time, but your "experts" are falling.

Just now, User said:

No, I asked you why this matters so much to you in the context of this discussion. What is your point?

Excuse me?

It mattered to you that Dr. Cole had a complaint against him, but now you scold me that the resolution to the complaint matters?

GTFO.

[User]

1 minute ago, Goddess said:

It will take time, but your "experts" are falling.

And yours took a secret deal when he messed up. 

[User]

23 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Excuse me?

It mattered to you that Dr. Cole had a complaint against him, but now you scold me that the resolution to the complaint matters?

GTFO.

No, I was just pointing out your duplicity in that you tout all these one-off stories of victims to attack the COVID vaccination while you ignore the cancer victim of the very doctor you tout. 

If you are just fine with him harming someone and then getting off with some secret deal... that is on you, I am just pointing out what you are doing. 

 

[Goddess]

44 minutes ago, User said:

I am just pointing out what you are doing. 

Same here.

We went from "If it saves JUST ONE LIFE....."  to   "Any previously healthy children who die from the jab is totally worth it."

[User]

2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Same here.

We went from "If it saves JUST ONE LIFE....."  to   "Any previously healthy children who die from the jab is totally worth it."

Who is this we? 

I never said one thing about if it saves just one life. 

Once again, you have to resort to making up crap to argue against. 

[Goddess]

2 minutes ago, User said:

I never said one thing about if it saves just one life. 

C'mon.

Stop acting like you had no clue that the prevailing narrative at the time was that mandates were justified, forcing everyone to jab was justified "if it saved just one life."

[Goddess]

Some will recall the information I posted here about the amyloid clots that embalmers began raising alarms about in early 2021.

No one knew what they were at first, they've never been seen before.  It was embalmers and morticians that first reported them, as they were unable to drain the blood from bodies in preparation for burial.

It was a Canadian scientist that finally identified them as fibrous amyloid clots, thick and rubbery, and then went on to identify the mechanism for how and why they were forming.  Misfolded fibrinogen.

It was a huge breakthrough discovery because once identified, they can now be identified as a cause in living people and pulled from the veins of living people.

We know now that the spike protein in the jabs causes abnormal clotting.

Here are some pictures of them.

 

In this video, you can see one being removed and see how fibrous and rubbery they are:

https://x.com/MaryBowdenMD/status/2050570308667711585?s=20

 

[User]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

C'mon.

Stop acting like you had no clue that the prevailing narrative at the time was that mandates were justified, forcing everyone to jab was justified "if it saved just one life."

That may have been someone's motivations, as absurd as it would have been... what does that have to do with me? With this discussion? 

Your narrative seems to be the exact opposite: that no matter how many lives were saved, if the vaccine harmed one person, it was bad. 

No?

[User]

35 minutes ago, Goddess said:

We know now that the spike protein in the jabs causes abnormal clotting.

We do?

Says who? What study? What is the nature of the risk - e.g. how many face this risk per million?

 

[Goddess]

31 minutes ago, User said:

We do?

Says who? What study? What is the nature of the risk - e.g. how many face this risk per million?

 

Were you unaware that 2 of the 4 mandated jabs were removed from the market for this?

[User]

45 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Were you unaware that 2 of the 4 mandated jabs were removed from the market for this?

So, you were only talking about 2 specific COVID vaccines that are off the market when you said we know they cause blood clots? Are the rest cool? You admit these were very rare conditions either way?

You should be more specific next time. 

Also, only 1 I know of was specifically limited and paused over these concerns, never fully stopped, the market demand brought much newer variations of the vaccines in the end.