Yzermandius19 Posted May 13, 2022 Report Posted May 13, 2022 On 5/11/2022 at 11:53 AM, Nationalist said: Interesting. So...if you play a game of chess with someone, and your opponent captures your king, you would claim victory? I was agreeing with you you really are dense Quote
Nationalist Posted May 14, 2022 Report Posted May 14, 2022 1 hour ago, Yzermandius19 said: I was agreeing with you you really are dense America LOST the Vietnam war. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Yzermandius19 Posted May 14, 2022 Report Posted May 14, 2022 (edited) 7 hours ago, Nationalist said: America LOST the Vietnam war. obviously August1991 buys into anti-communist identity politics where he feels he has to defend even America's greatest mistakes in the Cold War as necessary sacrifices that were responsible for its victory just as you buy into anti-globalist identity politics and feel you have to defend even Russia's biggest mistakes while calling out the globalist elites for all of theirs if anyone calls either of you out on that you'll just claim a false dichotomy that puts anyone who disagrees with you on the other team you are so intent on virtue signalling your opposition of so you can write off their opinions without thinking for example I both hate communists and globalist elites but since I don't defend all the stupidest talking points that attack those groups those who are radical tribalist identity politics people use with us or against us purity spiral bullshit to portray me as the enemy too these are classical examples of the pitfalls of reactionary thinking and the pitfalls of basing your identity on it Edited May 14, 2022 by Yzermandius19 Quote
Nationalist Posted May 14, 2022 Report Posted May 14, 2022 2 hours ago, Yzermandius19 said: obviously August1991 buys into anti-communist identity politics where he feels he has to defend even America's greatest mistakes in the Cold War as necessary sacrifices that were responsible for its victory just as you buy into anti-globalist identity politics and feel you have to defend even Russia's biggest mistakes while calling out the globalist elites for all of theirs if anyone calls either of you out on that you'll just claim a false dichotomy that puts anyone who disagrees with you on the other team you are so intent on virtue signalling your opposition of so you can write off their opinions without thinking for example I both hate communists and globalist elites but since I don't defend all the stupidest talking points that attack those groups those who are radical tribalist identity politics people use with us or against us purity spiral bullshit to portray me as the enemy too these are classical examples of the pitfalls of reactionary thinking and the pitfalls of basing your identity on it I have never defended Russia. Jus pointing out the insanity of people who base their beliefs on one-sided propaganda. But of course you choose to say I do because when the message fails, you lie about the messager. A typical Tweenkie tactic. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Yzermandius19 Posted May 14, 2022 Report Posted May 14, 2022 (edited) 2 hours ago, Nationalist said: I have never defended Russia. Jus pointing out the insanity of people who base their beliefs on one-sided propaganda. But of course you choose to say I do because when the message fails, you lie about the messager. A typical Tweenkie tactic. you do it repeatedly any time anyone says anything negative about Russia you just assume they don't know what they are talking about and are brainwashed by propaganda when many people who say negative things about Russia are plenty educated on the matter if all you were doing is pointing out people who base their beliefs on one sided propaganda then I wouldn't take issue but you also call out people for believing in one sided propaganda who clearly don't while clearly believing in one sided propaganda yourself if you want to point fingers, point them at yourself instead of acting holier than thou and pointing them at people far less guilty of the crime you are accusing them of than you are Edited May 14, 2022 by Yzermandius19 Quote
August1991 Posted May 15, 2022 Author Report Posted May 15, 2022 (edited) On 5/13/2022 at 8:41 PM, Nationalist said: America LOST the Vietnam war. Lost? Like Dieppe, Vietnam was an important battle in a larger war. America won the Cold War. Individuals can now freely travel. Edited May 15, 2022 by August1991 Quote
August1991 Posted May 15, 2022 Author Report Posted May 15, 2022 4 minutes ago, August1991 said: Lost? I have a different view of the battle in Vietnam. Like Dieppe, to me, Vietnam was an important battle in a larger war. America won the Cold War. For the good of us all. Individuals can now freely travel. Talk openly. Quote
Nationalist Posted May 15, 2022 Report Posted May 15, 2022 22 hours ago, Yzermandius19 said: you do it repeatedly any time anyone says anything negative about Russia you just assume they don't know what they are talking about and are brainwashed by propaganda when many people who say negative things about Russia are plenty educated on the matter if all you were doing is pointing out people who base their beliefs on one sided propaganda then I wouldn't take issue but you also call out people for believing in one sided propaganda who clearly don't while clearly believing in one sided propaganda yourself if you want to point fingers, point them at yourself instead of acting holier than thou and pointing them at people far less guilty of the crime you are accusing them of than you are What horseshit. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Nationalist Posted May 15, 2022 Report Posted May 15, 2022 7 hours ago, August1991 said: Lost? Like Dieppe, Vietnam was an important battle in a larger war. America won the Cold War. Individuals can now freely travel. They LOST! Quit trying to re-write history. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
August1991 Posted May 17, 2022 Author Report Posted May 17, 2022 On 5/13/2022 at 3:38 PM, Faramir said: Oh boy had big argument with the wife on this. I argued that as bad as colonialism was we brought Western liberalism to the world. Your welcome. The natives here engaged in barbaric coming of age rituals and we stopped that. We brought an end to much of the caste system in India. The world is better off now. Southeast asia 100 years ago was a lesson in poverty. Not any more. The wife said different is not better. Call me a western supremacist. I have thought long on this. Been there, done that. Woman/Mother: Who taught you how to tie a shoelace? Man/Father: Who taught you not to spit in the street? Sister: Who told you that you should cut your toenails? ===== I am amazed that we in the West take so much of our civilisation for granted, Quote
Nationalist Posted May 17, 2022 Report Posted May 17, 2022 On 5/13/2022 at 7:04 PM, Yzermandius19 said: one election cannot ruin America it is far too resilient for that to happen Perhaps. Yet if the information in Hunter's laptop is true...and there's no reason to doubt that...then the POTUS is a manchurian candidate. A compromised criminal. The economy is a mess and the southern borader is wide open, actively changing the demographics of the USA. And if Biden finally goads Russia into direct war...America and the entire world's population may be at risk. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
ExFlyer Posted May 17, 2022 Report Posted May 17, 2022 On 5/15/2022 at 1:02 AM, August1991 said: Lost? Like Dieppe, Vietnam was an important battle in a larger war. America won the Cold War. Individuals can now freely travel. Vietnam was a loss. Not comparable to any other skirmish. They plain lost. America won the cold war? How? When? The relationship is now worse than it has ever been. We could not freely travel before? Baloney. Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
Yzermandius19 Posted May 18, 2022 Report Posted May 18, 2022 On 5/17/2022 at 11:29 AM, ExFlyer said: America won the cold war? How? When? The relationship is now worse than it has ever been. the Berlin Wall came down the Soviet Union fell the relationship is not worse than it's ever been Quote
August1991 Posted May 19, 2022 Author Report Posted May 19, 2022 (edited) On 5/17/2022 at 11:29 AM, ExFlyer said: Vietnam was a loss. Not comparable to any other skirmish. They plain lost. America won the cold war? How? When? The relationship is now worse than it has ever been. We could not freely travel before? Baloney. The Berlin Wall no longer exists. More important: People in Poland and Hanoi- and even China - use prices to trade. ===== Like Dunkerque and Dieppe, Vietnam was a battle in a larger war. America won the Cold War for the good of us all Edited May 19, 2022 by August1991 Quote
August1991 Posted May 19, 2022 Author Report Posted May 19, 2022 2 hours ago, Yzermandius19 said: the Berlin Wall came down the Soviet Union fell the relationship is not worse than it's ever been Berlin Wall/Soviet Union? America defeated socialism. ==== Relationship? In thinking of Europe, Churchill referred to the wars of religion and the wars of nations. Quote
Yzermandius19 Posted May 19, 2022 Report Posted May 19, 2022 16 minutes ago, August1991 said: Berlin Wall/Soviet Union? America defeated socialism. ==== socialism lives the Soviet Union fell Quote
August1991 Posted May 21, 2022 Author Report Posted May 21, 2022 (edited) On 5/18/2022 at 10:28 PM, Yzermandius19 said: socialism lives the Soviet Union fell The only socialists/Marxists alive today are now teaching in Western universities. I think Vaclav Havel said that. ==== According to the western MSM, Ukraine is a place on the map. Ukraine is a nation, a country. The MSM is dead wrong. This current place on the map - called Ukraine - is a wonderful mix of people of different languages, different religions. The western part, Lemberg, is still today the best of all. I note that the MSM/CBC report from there. ===== Poland is another story. ===== Thank God for Lévesque and Trudeau Snr. We avoided a Lincoln civil war. Edited May 21, 2022 by August1991 Quote
Michael Hardner Posted May 21, 2022 Report Posted May 21, 2022 Savoj Zizek pressed Jordan Peterson, in their debate, to name some Marxists that Peterson said were dominant in academic circles. Peterson blanked, because there are none. There are no Marxists just as there are no Freudians. It was a set of ideas that had their day, and were a stepping stone in history. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Yzermandius19 Posted May 21, 2022 Report Posted May 21, 2022 51 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: Savoj Zizek pressed Jordan Peterson, in their debate, to name some Marxists that Peterson said were dominant in academic circles. Peterson blanked, because there are none. There are no Marxists just as there are no Freudians. It was a set of ideas that had their day, and were a stepping stone in history. there are lots of Marxists Peterson blanked because he blanked not because they don't exist you wishing they didn't exist does not make it so Quote
Yzermandius19 Posted May 21, 2022 Report Posted May 21, 2022 (edited) 7 hours ago, August1991 said: The only socialists/Marxists alive today are now teaching in Western universities. I think Vaclav Havel said that. ==== According to the western MSM, Ukraine is a place on the map. Ukraine is a nation, a country. The MSM is dead wrong. This current place on the map - called Ukraine - is a wonderful mix of people of different languages, different religions. The western part, Lemberg, is still today the best of all. I note that the MSM/CBC report from there. ===== Poland is another story. ===== Thank God for Lévesque and Trudeau Snr. We avoided a Lincoln civil war. there are far more socialists and Marxists than just in western universities the most populous nation on earth is run by them openly communist nations are less numerous than they used to be but still exist Ukraine is a nation, the media is correct, for once the idea that Russia is entitled to it's "sphere of influence" and any nation that lies within it isn't a real country that is imperialist drivel Edited May 21, 2022 by Yzermandius19 Quote
Michael Hardner Posted May 21, 2022 Report Posted May 21, 2022 6 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said: there are lots of Marxists Peterson blanked because he blanked not because they don't exist you wishing they didn't exist does not make it so Yes but in positions of influence? I have heard real Marxists and they are pretty clear that they're not even IN politics now. It's a dead philosophy. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Yzermandius19 Posted May 21, 2022 Report Posted May 21, 2022 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: Yes but in positions of influence? I have heard real Marxists and they are pretty clear that they're not even IN politics now. It's a dead philosophy. in positions of influence real Marxists are in politics now the ideology is not dead at all it just rebranded in many instances and you are fooled into thinking they aren't "real" Marxists just because some Marxists say they aren't "real" Marxists they use different labels to call themselves and deny they are Marxists when called out for being such common examples of lies that communists tell to pretend they aren't commies "I'm not a Marxist, I'm a Democratic Socialist" "I'm not a Marxist, I'm just in favor of social justice" "I'm not a Marxist, I'm just a fan of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion" commie dogwhistles over 9000 Edited May 21, 2022 by Yzermandius19 Quote
Michael Hardner Posted May 21, 2022 Report Posted May 21, 2022 33 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said: 1. and you are fooled into thinking they aren't "real" Marxists just because some Marxists say they aren't "real" Marxists they use different labels to call themselves 2. "I'm not a Marxist, I'm just in favor of social justice" "I'm not a Marxist, I'm just a fan of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion" 1. Do you believe that words have meaning? If so, then you need to know that Marxism describes how private capital forms our society. For someone to say 'identity politics is like Marxism because they decry power ' or somesuch bends the principal of meaning to the point where someone calling Trudeau 'elite' could also be called Marxism. 2. The implication is that someone who disagrees with racism is therefore Marxist. -- -- -- The irony here is that the people who used to declare that they could redefine words to mean what they wanted to were the postmodernists, who are strongly related to the Wokists that you despise. So you don't like Wokism but you buy into their most central premise - that words can be bent to mean anything in context? @eyeballTHIS is why I am conservative. I believe that words have meaning, and that labelling things Communist Marxist Liberal Democratic Wokism etc. Is revolutionary nonsense. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Yzermandius19 Posted May 21, 2022 Report Posted May 21, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said: 1. Do you believe that words have meaning? If so, then you need to know that Marxism describes how private capital forms our society. For someone to say 'identity politics is like Marxism because they decry power ' or somesuch bends the principal of meaning to the point where someone calling Trudeau 'elite' could also be called Marxism. 2. The implication is that someone who disagrees with racism is therefore Marxist. 1) I am referring to underlying philosophy whether that ideology has an economic or cultural focus it's the same ideology switching the focus doesn't make it completely different rebranding does change the nature of the product 2) the implication is that those claiming to be anti-racists are actually just racist Marxists who trick people into thinking they aren't racist by preaching Marxism they redefined the words diversity, equity and inclusion to trick people into supporting: - adherence to narrow dogma, while denouncing any intolerance toward any dissent of that dogma as racism this is what they call diversity - anti-meritocratic redistribution and quotas based on group identity, while denouncing meritocratic equality of opportunity for all as racism this is what they call equity - segregation based on group identity, while denouncing opposition to segregation based on group identity as racism what is what they call inclusion they are liars who use nice words to justify harmful actions by conflating the two so people don't notice the latter because they are wrapped in the former Edited May 21, 2022 by Yzermandius19 Quote
August1991 Posted May 25, 2022 Author Report Posted May 25, 2022 (edited) On 5/21/2022 at 7:25 AM, Yzermandius19 said: === Ukraine is a nation, the media is correct, for once the idea that Russia is entitled to it's "sphere of influence" ==== If Ukraine is a nation, then Quebec is a nation too. And how do we define a "nation"? By language? Geography? Frankly, I don't see much difference between a Scottish English and the English of a Yorkshireman. Ta. ====== But as a Westerner, I can understand and respect a different way of doing things, If Russians and Chinese want to organise life and their societies differently, I respect that. ==== Lincoln famously wrote that he would maintain the Union - even if it meant slavery. It is clear that he took care to state his view. Edited May 25, 2022 by August1991 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.