War In Ukraine

[Dougie93]

6 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And you are disloyal by your own admission -

how so ?

[Dougie93]

7 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And you're not just disloyal, you're stupid if you think that russia doesn't care about denmark becoming part of nato and the potential for land forces being based there.

Denmark is a founding member of NATO since 4 April 1949

[Dougie93]

23 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

everything i said remains true.

circular logic fallacy

[Dougie93]

24 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

 which you don't make a 'considered' response to, but rather to which you blather and attempt to justify your disloyalty in the most painfully ridiculous ways.

if someone is ranting & raving

 charging me for not being loyal to something I am not bound to be loyal to by any reasonable standard

I explain to that person why they are misguided

wash, rinse, repeat

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Dougie93 said:

Denmark is a founding member of NATO since 4 April 1949

True, slip of the tounge.

59 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

circular logic fallacy

No, that is not a circular logic fallacy. My god could you please stop using words if you don't know what they mean.

Quote

if someone is ranting & raving

You are the only one who rants and raves, desperate to explain  your disloyalty and dishonor in a sad attempt to make it look like its opposite.

But yes - you certainly do rinse and repeat.

[Dougie93]

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

True, slip of the tounge.

No, that is not a circular logic fallacy. My god could you please stop using words if you don't know what they mean.

You are the only one who rants and raves, desperate to explain  your disloyalty and dishonor in a sad attempt to make it look like its opposite.

But yes - you certainly do rinse and repeat.

you assert something to be true based on your own assertions : circular logic

I am not ranting & raving at you

what is it I am supposedly disloyal to ?

you don't even say what it is

I am not seeking your approval, but I don't know what you are pointing to as supposed disloyalty

I find the topic fascinating, so I will continue to try to find out what you are referring to

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

you assert something to be true based on your own assertions : circular logic

No, i asserted it was true. I did not make any claim as to why it's true. You're an !diot.

2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

I am not ranting & raving at you

You rant and rave continually.

2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

what is it I am supposedly disloyal to ?

you don't even say what it is

I did in fact. Go back and read again. This gets beyond tedious if i have to explain everything to you TWICE.

2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

I am not seeking your approval, but I don't know what you are pointing to as supposed disloyalty

Nobody cares what you're seeking. That was the point.

[Dougie93]

4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

No, i asserted it was true. I did not make any claim as to why it's true. You're an !diot.

You rant and rave continually.

I did in fact. Go back and read again. This gets beyond tedious if i have to explain everything to you TWICE.

Nobody cares what you're seeking. That was the point.

you asserted that your opinion is true, which is a fallacy obviously, your opinion not being proof of anything

I don't rant & rave at you

you still won't say what it is I am supposed to be loyal to and how I am disloyal

if it's tedious for you, you can stop mentioning it

again, I find the topic fascinating, what Canadians think is loyalty and how

so I will discuss it unless and until the moderator tells me to stop

if you don't care, then you can just move on

I find most of your posts to be tedious drivel, thus I ignore them

unless you address me about something I am interested in

[CdnFox]

31 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

you asserted that your opinion is true, which is a fallacy obviously, your opinion not being proof of anything

that would make it unsubstantiated, not a logical fallacy. And that is only for such things that require proof. If i say "the sun will rise in the east tomorrow" and say "this is true", then you COULD say you didn't believe it without proof, but the rest of the world would know you were an !diot and that it's probably true.

In either case however it is not a logical fallacy.  And you're still an !diot.

31 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

 

you still won't say what it is I am supposed to be loyal to and how I am disloyal

Of course i did. As i said earlier go back and read. Me typing it out again won't make it any easier for you to get your disloyal little brain around than the first time, will it.

 

[Dougie93]

8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Of course i did. As i said earlier go back and read. Me typing it out again won't make it any easier for you to get your disloyal little brain around than the first time, will it.

all I have ever said is that Canada is a monarchy and I am  only required to be loyal to the monarch therein

thus I follow that constitution, the Canada Act 1982, to the letter

that is how Canada is supposed to work

I don't see how that is disloyal, in Canada, that is called being a Loyalist

[Dougie93]

23 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Me typing it out again won't make it any easier for you to get your disloyal little brain around than the first time, will it.

you can't say what it is

because it doesn't exist

whatever you think it is, some sort of Canadian republic where I am bound to be loyal to the public

a unified nationalist Canada with one definition of patriotism

that doesn't exist, it's not in the constituion

there's nothing binding anybody to be loyal to a fake country which people make up in their heads

that would be the rule of a mob, in contravention of the rule of the monarchy

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

you can't say what it is

It's like the first line i wrote about your disloyalty.  It's right there for everyone to see.

This is what i mean - you blather like a retard and haven't got a clue.

whatever - go to bed jr ,the adults are talking. Maybe tomorrow you can find a 5 year old with better reading skills to help you figure it out.

Pathetic.

[Dougie93]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

It's like the first line i wrote about your disloyalty.

you don't state what I am supposedly disloyal to

I am not bound to be loyal to something which doesn't exist

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, Dougie93 said:

you don't state what I am supposedly disloyal to

I am not bound to be loyal to something which doesn't exist

It literally does specifically. So at this point you're just playing childish games. So - disloyal, dumb,and childish. Your parents must be so proud.

[Dougie93]

Just now, CdnFox said:

It literally does specifically.

you just went off on a tirade calling me disloyal

but there is nothing in the post which indicates what I am disloyal to

Canada is simply the British Crown, that is all I am loyal to, as a condition of citizenship

there's no requirement from Canada to be loyal to anything else in Canada

[CdnFox]

Just now, Dougie93 said:

you just went off on a tirade calling me disloyal

 

No tirade - just stated a fact. Pretty simple. And it's a fact you yourself have repeated a dozen times that i've seen alone.

 

[Dougie93]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

No tirade - just stated a fact. Pretty simple. And it's a fact you yourself have repeated a dozen times that i've seen alone.

I've never declared myself to be disloyal to King Charles III

I don't love the man like I did his mother

but I am not bound to love the King

only to obey his laws where constitutional & his Parliamentary Supremacy

there is no other loyalty oath in Canada

[CdnFox]

27 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

I've never declared myself to be disloyal to King Charles III ....

No, just Canada.  And lookie there, you knew what i was talking about the entire time but were just playing childish games. Pretending that i never said that, which i'd very clearly done first sentence.

You're a dishonest person as well as disloyal. shameful.

[Dougie93]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

No, just Canada.  And lookie there, you knew what i was talking about the entire time but were just playing childish games. Pretending that i never said that, which i'd very clearly done first sentence.

You're a dishonest person as well as disloyal. shameful.

Canada is the monarchy

the monarch is the living embodiment of Canada

the only loyalty oath in Canada is to the monarch

it's not a game, that is Canadian constitutional law

I did suspect that you were inventing some other "Canada" to be loyal to which does not exist

this explains a lot about Canada, this nebulous "Canada" that Canadians invent but which has no basis in law

what Americans call a "fake country", which provokes Canadians of course, but only because it's true

[CdnFox]

5 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

Canada is the monarchy

 

No, Canada is Canada.

And yes - here's your list of reasons you hate canada and feel it's ok to be disloyal to Canada and it IS nothing but a huge game with you.  Just like the "i don't know what you're talking about, oh actually i did all along" game.

[Dougie93]

6 hours ago, CdnFox said:

No, Canada is Canada.

i was born British, in the British Empire, under the rule of the British Crown

I have never pledged any allegiance

to the Liberal Party of Canada's Post National State which has no history nor identity

the only loyalty oath I have ever sworn, was to Queen Elizabeth II

I am not bound to be loyal to something which I have never promised to be loyal to

[Dougie93]

6 hours ago, CdnFox said:

And yes - here's your list of reasons you hate canada and feel it's ok to be disloyal to Canada and it IS nothing but a huge game with you.  Just like the "i don't know what you're talking about, oh actually i did all along" game.

I simply find Canadian Confederation to be a failed state

the purpose of Canada was to be an east - west trade federation defending the British Crown in North America

"Canada" however has turned out to be the exact opposite

a collection of de facto colonies which prevent east - west trade

to instead be in federation individually with America

which do not defend themselves nor anything else

but are rather totally dependant on America to run their affairs for them

an absurd Post National State which doesn't even believe in nor follow its own constitution

there's no reason as a British North American to have any particular love for nor fealty to that

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Dougie93 said:

i was born British, in the British Empire, under the rule of the British Crown

I have never pledged any allegiance

to the Liberal Party of Canada's Post National State which has no history nor identity

the only loyalty oath I have ever sworn, was to Queen Elizabeth II

I am not bound to be loyal to something which I have never promised to be loyal to

Blah blah blah reason i'm disloyal bunch of bullcrap

Whatever kid.

[CdnFox]

45 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

I simply find Canadian Confederation to be a failed state

 

Blah blah blah more reasons why i'm not really a canadian try to justify my disloyalty  blah blah

Sure kid.

[Dougie93]

11 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Blah blah blah reason i'm disloyal bunch of bullcrap

there's no requirement to be loyal to Confederation in Canada

in fact, one is free to advocate for secession from Confederation, the only caveat being the Clarity Act

Quebec has in fact passed a law which states that Quebeckers are only required to be loyal to Quebec

if the French Canadians only have to be loyal to French Canada

then I am perfectly within my rights to only be loyal to British Canada