Watch Justin Trudeaus Body Language. He's Egging on the Protestors on Purpose

[TrudeauSucks]

I find it really creepy how he say's "Who have been there for each other", right after "Unacceptable Views". Did you see how he raises his eyebrows in that speech. It's like he's raising his eyebrows in dark satisfaction over the destabilization he's causing. This my friends is the body language of a tyrant.

 

[Moonbox]

Wait...he raised his EYEBROW!?!?  

HOW DARE HE!?!? This is an outrageous affront to democracy and a clear violation of our Constitution.  

 

 

[Michael Hardner]

1 hour ago, TrudeauSucks said:

  It's like he's raising his eyebrows in dark satisfaction over the destabilization he's causing. 

How is he causing destabilization - did he send the trucks to Ottawa ?

And if it's destabilization and no longer a protest (they are saying they want to form a coalition government) then there may be more eyebrow raising in store...

[Goddess]

3 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

(they are saying they want to form a coalition government)

 

You keep saying this.

Where are you getting this information from?

Can anyone else answer? I believe he has me on "ignore". ?

[TreeBeard]

4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

 

You keep saying this.

Where are you getting this information from?

Can anyone else answer? I believe he has me on "ignore". ?

 

https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/trucker-convoy-organizers-coalition-proposal-a-non-starter-expert-says-1.5773297

 

Quote

 

At an “emergency press conference” held by some of the protest organizers on Monday night and later posted on YouTube, self-declared spokesperson Tom Marazzo proposed that a core group of organizers and their supporters could sit at a table “with the Conservatives, and the NDP, and the Bloc as a coalition.”

Though this suggestion is “a non-starter,” according to Michael Kempa, associate professor of criminology at the University of Ottawa. “No other external party can become part of a coalition government. That's just not how a constitutional democracy works,” Kempa said in an interview Tuesday on CTV News Channel.

 

 

(Is this going to get me a penalty point for thread drift?If so, I will delete.)

Edited February 9, 2022 by TreeBeard

[Goddess]

1 minute ago, TreeBeard said:

 

https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/trucker-convoy-organizers-coalition-proposal-a-non-starter-expert-says-1.5773297

 

 

Ahhhh, CTV.

Yes, that explains the misinformation.

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, TrudeauSucks said:

I find it really creepy how he say's "Who have been there for each other", right after "Unacceptable Views". Did you see how he raises his eyebrows in that speech. It's like he's raising his eyebrows in dark satisfaction over the destabilization he's causing. This my friends is the body language of a tyrant.

Actually it's a secret signal for the herd to ready itself for the order to seize total control.

It'll be any day now. Resistance is futile.

[TreeBeard]

3 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Ahhhh, CTV.

Yes, that explains the misinformation.

So you’re saying the organizers didn’t propose this?

[Goddess]

2 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

So you’re saying the organizers didn’t propose this?

I've followed it from the beginning and read all their statements.  Watched their press conference this morning where they addressed this accusation with their lawyer present.

You are welcome to find out for yourself, as well.

[Michael Hardner]

10 minutes ago, Goddess said:

   Watched their press conference this morning where they addressed this accusation with their lawyer present.

 
Here you go - you fact lover you... at the 1 minute mark....
 

 

[dialamah]

20 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Ahhhh, CTV.

Yes, that explains the misinformation.

Check the YouTube vid - he definitely said a coalition with Liberals, Conservatives, NDP and Bloc.  The YouTube vid is even a non-mainstream media, sympathetic to the convoy.  

[Goddess]

An invitation to dialogue.

Those monsters!

[Moonbox]

1 minute ago, Goddess said:

An invitation to dialogue.

Those monsters!

but you were calling it misinformation, which it obviously wasn't.  Maybe you should address the egg on your face.  

[dialamah]

1 minute ago, Goddess said:

An invitation to dialogue.

Those monsters!

He suggested a coalition with the government.  It's in the press conference, direct from their spokesman.  Why can't you admit that.

[Goddess]

1 minute ago, dialamah said:

He suggested a coalition with the government.  It's in the press conference, direct from their spokesman.  Why can't you admit that.

Oh yes, I definitely see how the hair on fire crowd who only listens to CTV and CBC and want increased restrictions would interpret this as wanting to overthrow the government.

[dialamah]

8 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Oh yes, I definitely see how the hair on fire crowd who only listens to CTV and CBC and want increased restrictions would interpret this as wanting to overthrow the government.

I listened to the press conference.  He clearly suggested a coalition.  Definition: an alliance for combined action, especially a temporary alliance of political parties forming a government or of states.

Discussion is not the same as a coalition.  

[Michael Hardner]

25 minutes ago, dialamah said:

Check the YouTube vid - he definitely said a coalition with Liberals, Conservatives, NDP and Bloc.  The YouTube vid is even a non-mainstream media, sympathetic to the convoy.  

Nope he didn't say the Liberals...

[Michael Hardner]

21 minutes ago, dialamah said:

Why can't you admit that.

Because that would require breaking with her tribe...

[Goddess]

1 minute ago, dialamah said:

I listened to the press conference.  He clearly suggested a coalition.  Definition: an alliance for combined action, especially a temporary alliance of political parties forming a government or of states.

Discussion is not the same as a coalition.  

You are free to interpret a sound byte any way you like.

I've watched every press conference, I've heard the lawyers speak, I've watched every interview.

You are welcome to watch all the interviews and press conferences and lawyer statements and judge for yourself. 

I find that clarifies things for me, when I let people express what their actual thoughts and feelings are, instead of looking up a word they used in the dictionary and then forcing them to stick to a "dictionary definition" in a deliberate effort to misinterpret what they are trying to express.

[dialamah]

10 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Nope he didn't say the Liberals...

 

2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

You are free to interpret a sound byte any way you like.

I've watched every press conference, I've heard the lawyers speak, I've watched every interview.

You are welcome to watch all the interviews and press conferences and lawyer statements and judge for yourself. 

Did he use the word coalition?  That's a yes or no answer.

4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

find that clarifies things for me, when I let people express what their actual thoughts and feelings are

You should try that here, instead of telling people what they think, resorting to insults and hurling accusations.

[Moonbox]

6 minutes ago, Goddess said:

You are free to interpret a sound byte any way you like.

Yes, most certainly.  It's just that when you do mental contortions and back-flips to re-imagine and interpret everything you see in order to have it not conflict with what you're saying, it's hard to find a basis on which you can be debated with intelligently.  

Edited February 9, 2022 by Moonbox

[Goddess]

1 minute ago, dialamah said:

 

Did he use the word coalition?  That's a yes or no answer.

You should try that here, instead of telling people what they think, resorting to insults and hurling accusations.

I'm saying I've seen all the press conferences, the interviews and the lawyer speaking about this from the beginning. So I feel I have a good handle on what their intentions are.

You are welcome to listen to them all, as well.

Hope you're having a wonderful day. 

[dialamah]

23 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I'm saying I've seen all the press conferences, the interviews and the lawyer speaking about this from the beginning. So I feel I have a good handle on what their intentions are.

You are welcome to listen to them all, as well.

Hope you're having a wonderful day. 

It's pretty hilarious that you can't even bring yourself to admit that he used the word coalition.  

[Goddess]

23 minutes ago, dialamah said:

It's pretty hilarious that you can't even bring yourself to admit that he used the word coalition.  

No.  I just disagree with the meaning you are putting to it.  Because I have listened to all the press conferences and interviews and heard the lawyer speak.

You want to take one word and make it mean something other than what their intentions are.  And you want to force me to accept your interpretation.

You are free to think whatever you like. But I find what you are doing very disingenuous.

I hope you have a great evening. 

[Moonbox]

3 minutes ago, Goddess said:

No.  I just disagree with the meaning you are putting to it.  Because I have listened to all the press conferences and interviews and heard the lawyer speak.

You want to take one word and make it mean something other than what their intentions are.  And you want to force me to accept your interpretation.

but this is exactly what you usually do yourself, just like with how you were earlier quoting Jody Wilson-Raybould the other day to make-believe that she supported the Trucker's convoy.  In both that case and this, you're the one coming up with creative interpretations that stretch common sense beyond breaking.  

3 minutes ago, Goddess said:

You are free to think whatever you like. But I find what you are doing very disingenuous.

That demonstrates a worrying lack of perspective.