B.C. NDP Announce Plans to Cut 4,500 jobs and Stop Logging Across 26,000 Square Kilometers

[cougar]

8 hours ago, Yzermandius19 said:

you are the one who wants the government to kill jobs

Stop this wining "killing jobs" nonsense!

It is called business transformation.  Those 4,500 loggers better start getting training classes to become electric vehicle manufacturers.

What is 4,500 jobs compared to the 400,000 jobless immigrants imported EVERY year?   One small drop in the bucket.

Why don't all of you go hide where the sun don't shine, together with Michael Hardner .?

Edited November 8, 2021 by cougar

[Nefarious Banana]

19 minutes ago, cougar said:

 Those 4,500 loggers better start getting training classes to become electric vehicle manufacturers.

What is 4,500 jobs compared to the 400,000 jobless immigrants imported EVERY year?   

Why don't all of you go hide where the sun don't shine, together with Michael Hardner .?

Why don't you seek some psychiatric help . . . . perhaps in your country of origin?

 

[Yzermandius19]

9 hours ago, cougar said:

Stop this wining "killing jobs" nonsense!

It is called business transformation.  Those 4,500 loggers better start getting training classes to become electric vehicle manufacturers.

What is 4,500 jobs compared to the 400,000 jobless immigrants imported EVERY year?   One small drop in the bucket.

Why don't all of you go hide where the sun don't shine, together with Michael Hardner .?

it's 4,500 less jobs and it's bad for the old growth forests

all downside and no upside other than you feel good about punishing those you don't agree with

watermelon city

[cougar]

2 hours ago, Yzermandius19 said:

....................and it's bad for the old growth forests

 

When you get the 400,000 new immigrants and refugees do you say, we got 400,000 jobs less?

How is it bad for the old growth trees or us, for that matter to leave them alone?

Opinions and attitudes on this board defy any logic and belief!

[Yzermandius19]

11 minutes ago, cougar said:

When you get the 400,000 new immigrants and refugees do you say, we got 400,000 jobs less?

How is it bad for the old growth trees or us, for that matter to leave them alone?

Opinions and attitudes on this board defy any logic and belief!

no I say there are 400,000 new immigrants and you still want to kill jobs

it is bad for old growth forests to ban logging because removing trees in strategic areas reduces the damage done by forests fires to old growth forests

this is basic forest management that fake environmentalists naturally know nothing about

if all logging stopped

more old growth forest would be lost to fires

as well more homes and lives will be lost to those fires

which is already happening thanks to fake environmentalists naively out to save all the trees from logging

 

y'all care more about killing jobs you don't like than protecting the environment

your agenda is not pro-environment, it's anti-human

as proven by siding against humans even when it hurts the environment

your priorities are clear

Edited November 9, 2021 by Yzermandius19

[cougar]

3 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

no I say there 400,000 new immigrants and you still want to kill jobs

it is bad for old growth forests to ban logging because removing trees in strategic areas reduces the damage done by forests fires to old growth forests

if all logging stopped

more old growth forest would be lost to fires

which is already happening thanks to fake environmentalists naively out to save all the trees from logging

You get 395,500 immigrants next year and your fucking problem gets solved.

The forest fires are a result of climate change which is caused by removing the forests in addition to excessive burning of fossil fuels.

Continue logging and you will be looking at more fires, not less and a quicker end for all of us.

[Yzermandius19]

3 minutes ago, cougar said:

You get 395,500 immigrants next year and your fucking problem gets solved.

The forest fires are a result of climate change which is caused by removing the forests in addition to excessive burning of fossil fuels.

Continue logging and you will be looking at more fires, not less and a quicker end for all of us.

wrong

the increasing fires are a result of poor forest management

not removing enough trees in the right areas

pushed by communists masquerading as environmentalists

thanks watermelons

Edited November 9, 2021 by Yzermandius19

[cougar]

2 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

wrong

the fires are a result of poor forest management

and not removing enough trees in the right areas

pushed by communists masquerading as environmentalists

thanks watermelons

wrong

we've been listening to your type of nonsense far too long and look where it has taken us.

Next time go on Bezos' rocket and join him into space.  I want to send all of you pro-growth and pro-jobs guys right there on Mars with no option to return.

 

[Yzermandius19]

12 minutes ago, cougar said:

wrong

we've been listening to your type of nonsense far too long and look where it has taken us.

Next time go on Bezos' rocket and join him into space.  I want to send all of you pro-growth and pro-jobs guys right there on Mars with no option to return.

wrong you stopped listening to my type of insight and the result is where it's gotten you

fake environmentalists prevent proper forest management and have been doing so since the 1970's

they started listening to you and the environment is now far worse off as a result

you're a fake environmentalist who turns down any suggestions that would help the environment if it helps humans or the economy as well

the only "solutions" you accept, are more government central planning, even if that hurts your stated cause

your priority is coming up with a rubric to justify more central planning

you don't actually care about the environment at all, just controlling the behavior of others and punishing people you don't like

anti-human not pro-environment

Edited November 9, 2021 by Yzermandius19

[cougar]

12 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

............my type of insight...........

 

I wouldn't call it insight.  You have ridiculous and pathetic opinions passed on to you by someone with an agenda.

There is no such thing as FOREST MANAGEMENT.  Forests do not need to be managed as they can look after themselves.

The "management" you refer to is the devastation of forests that have never seen human presence in their multi-century history.  They are doing just fine.

What the forestry does is, it builds a road, destroying the slope, clear cuts the forest, undermining the soil stability, the water flow cycles, destroying the ecosystem - birds, wildlife, plants, insects, fish - all goes to hell.  They do it by burning tonnes of diesel and gasoline, dumping old engine oil in excavator dug pits, and then leave all logging debris to dry up and become fuel for a forest fire started by a lightning or by the next idiot who uses a quad on a hot day to fart up in the alpine.

But because you have zero idea what you are talking about you may even believe what you are posting has credibility.

As I said before, go and hide where the sun don't shine.

Edited November 9, 2021 by cougar

[Yzermandius19]

8 minutes ago, cougar said:

I wouldn't call it insight.  You have ridiculous and pathetic opinions passed on to you by someone with an agenda.

There is no such thing as FOREST MANAGEMENT.  Forests do not need to be managed as they can look after themselves

you are the fakest environmentalist

forest management is absolutely a thing

any real environmentalist worth their salt is aware of that

and is aware of how helpful and it is for both preserving and growing forests

Edited November 9, 2021 by Yzermandius19

[cougar]

Just now, Yzermandius19 said:

you are the fakest environmentalist

forest management is absolutely a thing

any real environmentalist worth their salt is aware of that

?

You know what a "real environmentalist" who believes in forest management is called?

a capitalist bribed bitch

[Yzermandius19]

12 minutes ago, cougar said:

?

You know what a "real environmentalist" who believes in forest management is called?

a capitalist bribed bitch

communism is worse for the environment than capitalism

capitalism ftw

real environmentalists don't put tearing down the economy ahead of protecting the environment

that's what watermelons do

green on the outside, red on the inside

that's you

Edited November 9, 2021 by Yzermandius19

[Nefarious Banana]

18 minutes ago, cougar said:

I wouldn't call it insight.  You have ridiculous and pathetic opinions passed on to you by someone with an agenda.

There is no such thing as FOREST MANAGEMENT.  Forests do not need to be managed as they can look after themselves.

The "management" you refer to is the devastation of forests that have never seen human presence in their multi-century history.  They are doing just fine.

What the forestry does is, it builds a road, destroying the slope, clear cuts the forest, undermining the soil stability, the water flow cycles, destroying the ecosystem - birds, wildlife, plants, insects, fish - all goes to hell.  They do it by burning tonnes of diesel and gasoline, dumping old engine oil in excavator dug pits, and then leave all logging debris to dry up and become fuel for a forest fire started by a lightning or by the next idiot who uses a quad on a hot day to fart up in the alpine.

But because you have zero idea what you are talking about you may even believe what you are posting has credibility.

As I said before, go and hide where the sun don't shine.

Was a west coast logger for 43 years.  Forest management is real and it's effective if done right.

You are a delusional fraud.  

[Yzermandius19]

8 minutes ago, Nefarious Banana said:

Was a west coast logger for 43 years.  Forest management is real and it's effective if done right.

You are a delusional fraud.  

using the environmentalist cause to sell their communist bullshit

green on the outside

red on the inside

watermelon

 

to the watermelons

it's all about tearing down capitalism

not about protecting the environment

the latter is simply a fraudulent excuse to justify the former

because the label of environmentalist has less baggage than communist

they simply changed the branding, but their ideology is the same

they just hijacked a movement with better PR to fool the rubes

Edited November 9, 2021 by Yzermandius19

[cougar]

9 hours ago, Nefarious Banana said:

Was a west coast logger for 43 years.  Forest management is real and it's effective if done right.

You are a delusional fraud.  

If you were a logger for 43 years you would have known what I say is the truth.

But you've been somewhere else instead.

Who was "managing" the trees 500-1000 years ago, which accidentally led to the creation of the magnificent forests that are now being destroyed by "forest management" ?

Take a red chilly pepper the colour of your font and you know where to put it...

[Army Guy]

On 11/3/2021 at 2:14 PM, EastCanada90 said:

don't blame them we need to save some forests.. they can find other jobs.

Your talking like there are only a few trees left, in case you have not noticed, this nation including BC have an enormous amount of trees tress as far as the eyes can see, and for the most part is logged to sustain it for generations to come...before i go where is Justin new 1 billion tree he claimed he was going to plant...no where, just like his climate change plans...

[Army Guy]

On 11/4/2021 at 4:50 PM, Shady said:

The left is just going to keep banning jobs.  Forestry, gas, oil, etc.  They actually think it’s going to help make Canada better.  They’re insane.

This nation was built by selling off it's natural resources and not one is conducive with climate change, go figure...then again Nothing is conducive with climate change...

[cougar]

6 hours ago, Army Guy said:

This nation was built by selling off it's natural resources and not one is conducive with climate change, go figure...then again Nothing is conducive with climate change...

Your statements put this way are correct.

So this is why it is time to step back, re-evaluate the situation and make the changes needed to prevent further damage.

[RedDog]

Utter madness. Canada is falling apart.

I was walking on a sidewalk today and moved to the right as a courtesy to an Asian couple blathering in a foreign language and they also took the same side of the walk.

There is no effort to assimilate. I should move for them. Cancel Culture. We're doomed.

[cougar]

11 minutes ago, RedDog said:

Utter madness. Canada is falling apart.

I was walking on a sidewalk today and moved to the right as a courtesy to an Asian couple blathering in a foreign language and they also took the same side of the walk.

There is no effort to assimilate. I should move for them. Cancel Culture. We're doomed.

I may or may not agree, but what does this have to do with the forestry?

[Nefarious Banana]

3 minutes ago, cougar said:

I may or may not agree, but what does this have to do with the forestry?

What do you have to do with forestry . . . . . other than bitch and complain?  Any experience at all?  We're waiting . . .

[Shady]

On 11/8/2021 at 1:11 PM, cougar said:

Stop this wining "killing jobs" nonsense!

It is called business transformation.  Those 4,500 loggers better start getting training classes to become electric vehicle manufacturers.

What is 4,500 jobs compared to the 400,000 jobless immigrants imported EVERY year?   One small drop in the bucket.

Why don't all of you go hide where the sun don't shine, together with Michael Hardner .?

.

Edited November 10, 2021 by Shady

[cougar]

47 minutes ago, Nefarious Banana said:

What do you have to do with forestry . . . . . other than bitch and complain?  Any experience at all?  We're waiting . . .

I have nothing to discuss with you.

If you want to get any response at all, tone down your abusive language and then , you the guy with the experience, answer this one question first:

How did the old growth forests survive for hundreds of years and covered all of BC without your "forest management"?

Edited November 10, 2021 by cougar

[Charles Anthony]

Folks,

Please avoid trolling and personal attacks. Do not post if you have nothing to add to the discussion.