Jump to content

INDICATORS FOR ANOTHER 4 YEARS!


Recommended Posts

There are several indicators that tell this could be another 2016.




1) Majority of Americans say they are better off now than they were 4 years ago.
Why would they want to risk what they have now and gamble on Biden - who was VP 4 years ago?

https://nypost.com/2020/10/09/majority-of-americans-better-off-under-trump-than-4-years-ago-poll/



2) 51% of Americans went along with Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court - despite all the negative and attacks from the Dems and left-leaning media, and the polls that say 62% Americans would want to have the next president make the appointment - still, 51% ended up supporting Trump's appointment! . They want Barrett confirmed!

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/51-of-people-want-amy-coney-barrett-confirmed-to-the-supreme-court-poll



3) Trump's secret supporters. They exist. They're quiet about it for their own reasons.

 

Quote

 

According to a recent Cato Institute poll, 77% of conservatives are now afraid to express their political views versus roughly 50% of liberals.  This includes 40% of Republicans with a college degree and 60% with a post-graduate degree, who are afraid their political views will harm their careers, versus only 25% of Democrats.  If you felt your job was threatened by expressing your political views, would you lie in response to a poll question?

There is also a psychological phenomenon known as “social anxiety” that can be caused by the fear of being judged by others.  Social anxiety can produce something called social desirability bias, which causes people answering survey questions to respond in a manner they believe will be seen favorably by anyone who hears or reads the answers.  In other words, if you felt an honest response would make you seem to be insensitive, uncaring, or even racist, would you lie in order to be seen more favorably by the pollster?  If yes, you would be exhibiting social desirability bias.

So, we have valid reasons for Republicans to be untruthful and a poll suggesting a possible number.  Is there any evidence this is happening or has happened?  Actually, there is.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/10/will_the_silent_trump_voters_roar_on_november_3rd.html



4) Though polls indicate a gloomy outlook for Trump - voters' registrations tell a different story!

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/republicans-bright-spot-voter-registration-push-73708311

 

 

5) Enthusiasm factor. Trump's crowd are huge, and enthusiastic! Biden/Harris crowd are practically non-existent.   AND, they've been CONSISTENT.

 

This was 8 months ago:

 

 

And.....indeed.....Biden's rallies must be embarrassing to Democrats.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Media going full-tthrottle,  guns ablazing!   You can smell and taste the bias of the media.  CNN had devoted its entire 24/7 attacking Trump one way or another, every which way it can. 

The first debate saw Wallace buying and promoting into the narrative that paint Trump as a white supremacist - demanding that Trump denounce white suprmacy - even to the point of naming the PROUD BOYS specifically.  Lol.   Moronic Wallace was simply following the script and didn't even do his homework - otherwise, he'd know that the leader of the Proud Boys is BLACK!

Another moron - Savannah Guthrie  - ended up being the one trying to debate Trump in that town hall meeting! It backfired!  Even 60 Minutes got in the bandwagon!  That one, backfired too!    Trump had exposed them instead, to be biased and unreliable!  Left-leaning media are going full blast, recklessly.  They don't even try to hide their bias anymore.

ALL HANDS ON DECK! 

That's what it looks like to me.   They're in panic-mode.  That's an indicator to me.

 

They know something they don't tell their viewers.  They must know their polls are not showing the facts!

Edited by betsy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, betsy said:

Another moron - Savannah Guthrie  - ended up being the one trying to debate Trump in that town hall meeting! It backfired!  Even 60 Minutes got in the bandwagon!  That one, backfired too!    Trump had exposed them instead, to be biased and unreliable!  Left-leaning media are going full blast, recklessly.  They don't even try to hide their bias anymore.

Can you cite excessive bias in either the NBC debate or the 60 Minutes piece? 

Is it when Leslie Stahl wouldn't concede that the Obama's spied on Trump? Because there's no evidence for that. He's POTUS he could have it investigated. 

Was it when Savannah Guthrie wouldn't accept that a ReTweet isn't an endorsement, especially coming from a POTUS? 

Is it when Trump played dumb, like he often does, in regards to Qannon? 

Or how about the claim that the US is "rounding the curve" regarding COVID-19 when all evidence points to things getting much much worse? 

Just curious how asking Trump to answer for his record is biased? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Boges said:

Can you cite excessive bias in either the NBC debate or the 60 Minutes piece? 

Is it when Leslie Stahl wouldn't concede that the Obama's spied on Trump? Because there's no evidence for that. He's POTUS he could have it investigated. 

Was it when Savannah Guthrie wouldn't accept that a ReTweet isn't an endorsement, especially coming from a POTUS? 

Is it when Trump played dumb, like he often does, in regards to Qannon? 

Or how about the claim that the US is "rounding the curve" regarding COVID-19 when all evidence points to things getting much much worse? 

Just curious how asking Trump to answer for his record is biased? 

 

I don't have to cite to you.   DO YOUR HOMEWORK!

Watch the interview - the one that Trump released BEFORE it aired on Sunday.  Lol, the network can't edit it. :lol:

 

 

 

Edited by betsy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, betsy said:

 

I don't have to cite to you.   DO YOUR HOMEWORK!

Watch the interview - the one that Trump released BEFORE it aired on Sunday.  Lol, the network can't edit it. :lol:

Way to not answer.

I asked 4 questions questions as to why you think those issues are biased. And why? 

Cleary you're incapable of voicing how exactly those interviews were particularly biased. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Are any of the breathless ALL CAPS people here brave enough to put their guess on my post ?

People who are so sure that Trump is going to win could at LEAST guess a win of 270 EC votes to 268 no ???

:lol:

The ridiculousness of this EC is apparent. 

Biden is competitive in states that would be considered solidly red. Georgia, Iowa, North Carolina, Texas, Arizona. 

But if Trump can hold on to those states by the skin of his teeth, all he needs is Pennsylvania and he wins the EC. 

The EC doesn't reflect the changing demo's in any of those states and how they're purpling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Boges said:

The ridiculousness of this EC is apparent. 

...The EC doesn't reflect the changing demo's in any of those states and how they're purpling. 

 

The EC is functioning just as it was designed, and should not be tampered with just because you hate Trump....from another country.

Let us know when the "popular vote" always wins in Canada too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

The EC is functioning just as it was designed, and should not be tampered with just because you hate Trump....from another country.

Let us know when the "popular vote" always wins in Canada too.

Popular vote isn't the metric. 

It's the idea that close races are weighted the same as landslide races. 

In the Westminster system, each seat is its own race. In the Electoral model system entire states give all their EC votes to the winner even if the race is tight. 

It would be akin to giving all Ontario seats to Trudeau if the Liberals won the popular vote in that Province. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Boges said:

Popular vote isn't the metric. 

It's the idea that close races are weighted the same as landslide races.

 

You can try to rationalize it all you want...doesn't matter.

If Trump gets four more years because of the EC, then it is perfectly constitutional, and as it should be.

Tell us again how Trump had to win Florida in 2016 (he didn't)....because of the "EC".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

Tell us again how Trump had to win Florida in 2016 (he didn't)....because of the "EC".

I'll tell you right now, that if he loses Florida. He'll need to sweep Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

As well as Arizona, Georgia and North Carolina. All are either competitive or Trump is losing by around 5%+. 

The truth is, Pennsylvania is the most important state in the Union. That's why Trump has been pretty much campaigning there for a week straight.

The system creates a political environment where only a handful of states matter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Boges said:

I'll tell you right now, that if he loses Florida. He'll need to sweep Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

 

Brilliant...now you are an expert on "swing state" math....again.   Dammit...why won't those "stupid 'muricans" just vote the way you want them too ?!

 

Quote

The truth is, Pennsylvania is the most important state in the Union. That's why Trump has been pretty much campaigning there for a week straight.

The system creates a political environment where only a handful of states matter. 

 

Nonsense...."All States Matter", if only because of other federal and state races on the ballot.   Trump (and Pence) have visited my state several times...and it ain't Pennsylvania.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

Nonsense...."All States Matter", if only because of other federal and state races on the ballot.  

Well I'm talking about the EC, the fact you guys have to pivot to down ballot races kind of proves the point. 

Quote

 

Trump (and Pence) have visited my state several times...and it ain't Pennsylvania.

 

 

Oh yeah, last time he was there he was throwing COVID-19 infected hats into the crowd. Good times! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Boges said:

Well I'm talking about the EC, the fact you guys have to pivot to down ballot races kind of proves the point.

 

I know...you are obsessed with the EC...because Trump won.   What will you do if he wins again because of the EC ?  

 

Quote

Oh yeah, last time he was there he was throwing COVID-19 infected hats into the crowd. Good times! 

 

It was great...the crowds were huge and much more excited than small, boring Biden crowds when he is not hiding in his basement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bush_cheney2004 said:

I know...you are obsessed with the EC...because Trump won.   What will you do if he wins again because of the EC ?  

What will you do if Biden wins and moves to reform the EC? 

 

Quote

It was great...the crowds were huge and much more excited than small, boring Biden crowds when he is not hiding in his basement.

Victims of Natural Selection can often be enthusiastic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Boges said:

What will you do if Biden wins and moves to reform the EC?

 

Nothing...unlike in Canada, the constitution has been amended many times without a national conniption fit.

 

Quote

Victims of Natural Selection can often be enthusiastic. 

 

Victims of 2016 on the other hand, just drive themselves into an even deeper depression.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,741
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    timwilson
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • User earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • User earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Videospirit earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Videospirit went up a rank
      Explorer
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...