Iran needs some democracy

[GostHacked]

Well to say the US and Israel and Saudi Arabia are not pushing for regime change in Iran is ... well... ignorant.

[Hudson Jones]

19 hours ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

Either you cannot read my comments or purposely close your eyes to all the facts that nobody US and Israel included wishes instability in Iran and what they want is a stable strong Iran living in peace with its neighbors.

This is a hilarious comment!

Are you blind?!

Do you not see what these countries, U.S. especially (on behalf of their donors) have done around the Middle East? Instability is the name of the game. With instability comes weaker opponents, prolonged conflict which creates a need to use and buy weapons. Which is a billion dollar industry.  

[CITIZEN_2015]

2 hours ago, Hudson Jones said:

This is a hilarious comment!

Are you blind?!

Do you not see what these countries, U.S. especially (on behalf of their donors) have done around the Middle East? Instability is the name of the game. With instability comes weaker opponents, prolonged conflict which creates a need to use and buy weapons. Which is a billion dollar industry.  

First off this is hundreds of billion dollar industry and not a billion dollar industry and second the topic is Iran not Middle East. The US administration is only one year old and is not responsible for past deeds and yes the US policies in the middle east in the past have been very inhuman starting with a military coup in 1953 which overthrew the democratically elected government in Iran (but all those responsible are six feet under and hopefully serving time in hell) and followed by other acts of good intentions like invasion of iraq and afghanistan in both cases they removed muderous regimes but the inteference and military intervention from IRAN REGIME resulted in civil wars in those countries. This will not happen in Iran because Iran is not any of those countries and Iran regime will not be around to cause civil war anymore.

Btw, you are blind if you do not see or biased if you don't mention the atrocities that Russia has committed and is committing around the world especially middle east. How soon you forget Russian invasion of Afghanistan or bombardment of civilians by Russian military in Syria as late as just a few months ago and you only mention the US!!!!

Edited June 29, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015

[CITIZEN_2015]

The US tightens screws on Iran regime as Iranians start shouting Long Live America on streets of Tehran. The slogan that "Our enemy is right here and they lie and say it is America has changed to "Our enemy is right here - Long Live America" recently!!!!.

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/06/29/trump-tightens-the-screws-on-irans-oil/

The US has warned those countries who still buy Iranian oil to stop buying Iranian oil or they will be subjected to US sanctions. India is considering out (a big exporter of Iranian oil) while traitor countries (traitor to Iranian people) like Turkey and China will need forceful pursuation like full economic sanctions imposed by US on them. They have to choose between Iran and the hundred times bigger economy, America. These countries who will continue to trade with Iran regime must know that the people of Iran will not forget their betrayal when they soon take their country back. 

Edited June 29, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015

[CITIZEN_2015]

4 hours ago, GostHacked said:

Well to say the US and Israel and Saudi Arabia are not pushing for regime change in Iran is ... well... ignorant.

It is complete ignorance to say that recent uprising is the work of US and Israel and Arabia. They definitely like to see a regime change in Iran and who doesn't. But it is the IRAN NATION not the US or Israel or Arabia who are FED UP with 40 years of extreme repression and executions and corruptions and worsening economy and mismanagements and destruction of their country and support for terrorisism and many more crimes committed by mullahs who have risen up against mullahs' regime. There has been no regime in recent history who monitors even their nation's bedrooms and private lives. This is extreme repression.

The US is just giving the nation more incentives to rise up and remove the source of all evil in the world. The world will be a much better place and those who knowingly or not knowingly are distorting the facts (denying that it is Iran people who want a regime change and misrepresent the situation) share the blame for the blood of many thousands of young Iranians spilt by this blood thirsty regime.

Edited June 29, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015

[Hudson Jones]

4 hours ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

The US administration is only one year old and is not responsible for past deeds and yes the US policies in the middle east

Any idea who John Bolton is? In case you don't know, he is one of the architects of the Iraq war.

You are so out to lunch!

The US is just giving the nation more incentives to rise up and remove the source of all evil in the world. The world will be a much better place and those who knowingly or not knowingly are distorting the facts (denying that it is Iran people who want a regime change and misrepresent the situation) share the blame for the blood of many thousands of young Iranians spilt by this blood thirsty regime.

You are distorting facts! I can't believe you want people to believe that the U.S. is just "giving incentives"! Hilarious! 

The world would definitely be a much better place if people did not try to cover, excuse and minimize all of the actors involved.

[CITIZEN_2015]

2 hours ago, Hudson Jones said:

 

The world would definitely be a much better place if people did not try to cover, excuse and minimize all of the actors involved.

Any idea who John Bolton is? In case you don't know, he is one of the architects of the Iraq war.

Even a lot better place if people did not cover ot minimize the extend of heinous crimes committed and being committed by a most brutal regime who rapes underage children the night before their execution so that they might go to heaven if murdered virgin and they instead point their fingers to others like US to distract attentions. 

And if John Bolton was indeed the architect of Iraq invasion then good for him because he planned the removal of a very brutal mass murderer who used weapons of mass destruction against civilians and gased the Kurds and bombed defenseless shias in the south and invaded Iran and Kuwait and used e weapons in its invasions and ruled Iraq brutally and ran a repressive regime. However, his plans were torpedoed by another very brutal regime who armed the shias in Iraq in order to start a civil war and started a sectarian war and sent its terrorists to kill Americans and messed up peace and prosperity for Iraq so that to prove to Iranians and the world that US liberation will mess up the country. And everyone know who that regime was and it was not US.

Edited June 30, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015

[marcus]

5 hours ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

Iran regime ssupporters and mouth pieces will have no respect and deserve none. When you repeat exactly what the regime is saying (that the US and Israel and Arabia plotting to disintegrate Iran (to save their asses) or cause civil war and all Iran's problems is because of the US and etc. etc.) then whether you know it or not you are a regime mouthpiece.

MEK may be brutal and I have no love affair for them as they initially supported the mullahs against the Shah and brought them to power and I hate them just for that alone and of course helping Saddam too but the Iran regime has surpassed brutality by millions of light years. No comparison.

Either you cannot read my comments or purposely close your eyes to all the facts that nobody US and Israel included wishes instability in Iran and what they want is a stable strong Iran living in peace with its neighbors. Iranians are nationalist and will never START anything having the potential of falling into pieces.

I really don't care what the Iranian government says and I certainly don't take my cues from them. I base my opinion on the facts on the ground. On actions the U.S./Israel/Saudi have already taken and continue to take. I read and hear the comments they have made. I follow the money and see who is influencing policy. If you are going to sit there and tell me that the U.S. and Israel have not been part of the mess in the Middle East, then you have your head in the sand. Your dislike for the Iranian Mullahs is warranted, but unfortunately your anger has blinded your ability to see all angles in the region. You are left with a one-dimensional, superficial perspective. 

Here is the biggest donor to the Trump campaign and to the GOP candidates who listen to him:

 

[marcus]

1 hour ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

And if John Bolton was indeed the architect of Iraq invasion then good for him because he planned the removal of a very brutal mass murderer who used weapons of mass destruction

Listen to yourself: You are advocating for the Iraq attack, which has sent Iraq back at least two generations. A war that has resulted in over 1 million people killed and many more injured and maimed. And a war that allowed ISIL to nurture and go on a rampage.

You are out to lunch. You definitely do not represent majority of Iranians. 

 

[CITIZEN_2015]

7 hours ago, marcus said:

Listen to yourself: You are advocating for the Iraq attack, which has sent Iraq back at least two generations. A war that has resulted in over 1 million people killed and many more injured and maimed. And a war that allowed ISIL to nurture and go on a rampage.

You are out to lunch. You definitely do not represent majority of Iranians. 

 

I can't advocate something that has happened already!!!!. And Iranian revolution has sent Iran back 14 centuries. I have explained but you are not listening. The intention was good and it would have worked well BUT it was Iran regime interference and intervention after US invasion in Iraq which caused all those dead and clock sent back as you said by two generations. Otherwise Iraq wuld have been a prosperous progressive democracy according to plan. The hate for the US has blinded you to see the facts.

And who are you to say who I represent and don't represent? A foreigner who has no say or vote in Iran politics and only looks at the interest of his own people who are benefiting hugely from the monet stolen from poor Iran nation and given to Palestine, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen. 

Edited June 30, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015

[CITIZEN_2015]

9 hours ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

 heinous crimes committed and being committed by a most brutal regime who rapes underage children the night before their execution so that they might go to heaven if murdered virgin and they instead point their fingers to others like US to distract attentions. 

 

If the US is helping Iran nation to get rid of a regime who commits crimes against its own people like above and thousands more examples of heinous crimes committed by this regime, then as the nation shouted recently on streets of Tehran, Long Live America. Anything is better than this regime. ANYTHING. Those who help the regime to survive longer (by distortion of the facts or misrepresentation) resulting in many more deaths and executions and tortures and rapes are responsible for all these in future and their hands are stained with th blood of innocent people.

Edited June 30, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015

[CITIZEN_2015]

Massive Rally!!!! - Tens of thousands of Iranians in exile called for the overthrow of islamic regime today in Paris!!!!

Waving flags of Iran, supporters of the Iran Mujahidin kept chanting in Farsi ‘’We are ready,’’ and ‘’People are dying, we will take back Iran,’’ responding to the calls of the speakers to topple the Ayatollah regime. 

The rally was organized by MEK. Fot those who may not know Iranians are in this mess because of MEK (and other damn commies like Traitor Tudeh party and national front traitors) at the first place. They battled for power in the 80's and lost. Their supporters were killed in the worse possible manner (including rape of underaged by regime mullahs the night before execution and mass executions without any trial in 1988). So later out of hate for the regime and as it is a common thing with the leftists they betrated Iran and collaborated with Saddam Hussain of Iraq in its war with Iran. They are therefore hated by most Iranians inside Iran for more reasons than one. However, evidently they can indeed gather a good crowd outside Iran so may be they still stand a chance especially they appear to have the support of some powerful Americans like  Rudy Giuliani and Gingrich.

https://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Tens-of-thousands-demand-Iran-regime-change-at-mass-exile-rally-in-Paris-561218

They say the right things like:

The overthrow of this regime requires... requires an organization and a strong political alternative, and requires a liberty army."

Indeed there is a need for a liberty army as it is hard to overthrow this regime by slogans alone.

However, they appear so far to have refused to form an alliance with other much more popular opposition groups like Reza Pahlavi.

They made this statement in today's massive gathering in Paris (the content is all right but I and many iranians don't believe them to deliver):

’We call for the establishment of a society based on freedom, democracy, and equality, which has clear demarcations with despotism and dependence as well as gender, ethic and class discrimination. We have defended and will defend gender equality, the right to freely choose one’s attire, separation of religion and state, autonomy of nationalities, equal political and social rights for all citizens of Iran, abolition of the death penalty, freedom of expression, parties, the media, assembly, unions, associations and syndicates.’’

As for me if there is a choice only between plague and a flu I will choose the latter however, I am hoping for a total healthy honorable government elected by iranians who will build a strong and united Iran again to replace 40 years of destructive repressive mullahs (the return of the golden years by Pahlavi dynasty).

Edited June 30, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015

[CITIZEN_2015]

Iran regime kills again. Regime mercenaries opened fire on peaceful demonstrators who were asking for clean water in Khoramshahr.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/several-reported-killed-as-iranian-forces-open-fire-on-protesters/

They destroyed the land and sea and air and rivers by making dams and awarding corrupt contract to regime elements to steal and rob the nation and diverting the water from the poor farmers to regime elements and when people ask for a basic right of a citizen (clean water) they kill them. There are reports that after the killing now tens of thousands of people have joined the demonstrations.

Meanwhile more killings in South West Iran where regime mercenaries opened fire on peaceful protesters who were out to protest the economic conditions.

https://www.jpost.com/Breaking-News/Report-Four-protesters-killed-by-security-forces-in-southwestern-Iran-561242

Important to point out that Khuzestan is Iran's oil rich province and this regime by its action is fuelling the fire of separatism the longer they stay in power by the use of brutal force.

Down with this un-islamic republic.

Meanwhile the leader of National Council of Resistance of Iran in the largest ever rally to date has declared that the time is up for the brutal theocracy and their days are numbered.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2018/06/30/protesters-against-iranian-regime-see-free-tehran-ahead.html

Edited July 1, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015

[kactus]

The behaviour of Ayatollahs in Iran and 40 years of of theocracy rulings has created a place where Iranians are fed up with anything that comes from the horsemouth of their leader Khamenei and their supporters. 

It has created divisions and mistrust of who is pro and who is anti regime. One thing for certain no Iranian wants to see Maryam Rajavi (leader of terrorist organisations like MEK) who is is much admired and recognised by the US administration to reign over Iran after the ayatollahs....

It is regrettable that certain mindset is fixated that toppling this despicable regime can be done with the help from MEK!

In her conference yesterday in France Maryam Rajavi leader of MEK already sees herself as the president of Iran....

[CITIZEN_2015]

In the 4th richest country in the world and in a province which sits on black gold and can be as rich as Kuwait the untreated water poissons 230 people!!!!! Thanks to regime policies past 40 years and building unplanned dams in order to divert rivers to regime elements and guards starving the poor farmers of water supply.

http://www.tampabay.com/the-latest-iran-says--people-poisoned-by-untreated-water-ap_world2307e49d739847ad9c0cb6fd451267f7

On another note, the popular opposition (Reza Pahlavi) should take the initiative and start negotiations with the Trump administration. However, he has said and it appears he means what he has said that he is not interested in the crown. Therefore the US see no other alternative except the NCRI.

It is unfortunate. Even in those demonstrations which the regime accuse MEK of organising the crowd is shouting Pahlavi's founder Reza Shah Pahlavi who ruled Iran for only 16 years and turned Iran into an advanced strong country from a complete collapsed backward state. They want Pahlavi dynasty restored but the main player is not interested. Very sad.

Edited July 1, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015

[GostHacked]

On 6/29/2018 at 5:58 PM, CITIZEN_2015 said:

It is complete ignorance to say that recent uprising is the work of US and Israel and Arabia.

That is not correct. I said that to think that the the trio does not WANT change in Iran, is ignorant.  But then we can point to several attacks within Iran carried out by foreign entities (ahem it is not the Russians or Chinese, or Zimbabwe) on their military bases and science centers (Remember the computer virus stuxnet built by Israel?) and various other places. The western media rarely reports on this stuff as it would counter the narrative that Iran is bad.  In  the end we agree on a lot of things and hope than Iran can come out of this on their own terms. But history shows that is not likely going to happen.  And history has already shown that the US already tried regime change in Iran. That did not work out so well.

Edited July 1, 2018 by GostHacked

[CITIZEN_2015]

5 hours ago, GostHacked said:

That is not correct. I said that to think that the the trio does not WANT change in Iran, is ignorant. 

.  In  the end we agree on a lot of things and hope than Iran can come out of this on their own terms. But history shows that is not likely going to happen.  And history has already shown that the US already tried regime change in Iran. That did not work out so well.

Thank you for the clarifications. Yes indeed the trio want a regime change of course like everyone else but it is the Iranian nation who are risking their lives every day battling the mercenaries of most brutal regime in history to make that change without any outside government ordering them to do so or paying them to do so. That is crystal clear.

The second part is not correct. In 1953 the Shah was in power as a King and the prime minister was elected under his kingdom. Therefore the Shah coming back to his own legitimate crown was not a regime change.

The King had the constitutional right to order the prime minister to step down (as economy started diving down and chaos ruled the capital because of his hardline policies) and the prime minister refused and started to rule in a way that many regard it as undemocratic (like arresting some opponents and disobeying the constitution). The country's economy started a dive and country's stability and security was compromised. The King left the country to Italy when the CIA backed coup occurred,  he had no knowledge or part in it. When they brought him the news about it they told him that the nation has risen and asking the return of their King and he said, yes I knew the nation loved me!!!!.  At the end Dr. Mossadegh policies nationalized Iran's oil and stopped robbery and theft of Iran's wealth by the damn British and God bless his soul for this. But I am not sure him remaining in power would have meant a better Iran in the long term.

And indeed it worked well as afterwards Iran enjoyed its best years called golden years with double digit economic growth, a social revolution in a positive way, a complete and total stability called the island of stability, equality and freedom for women and minorities and a strong Iran (the fifth strongest army in the world) both politically and economically. God bless his and his father's souls. May they rest in heaven for services they did for 50 golden years for Iran and its nation turning a country in a state of collapse to a most advanced nation in the world by 1979 after which the mullahs took over in an UNHOLLY aliance with traitor commies and turned Iran into A PLANET OF THE APES.  

Edited July 1, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015

[marcus]

On 6/30/2018 at 5:12 AM, CITIZEN_2015 said:

I can't advocate something that has happened already!!!!. And Iranian revolution has sent Iran back 14 centuries. I have explained but you are not listening. The intention was good and it would have worked well BUT it was Iran regime interference and intervention after US invasion in Iraq which caused all those dead

Looks like you are not educated in this area. ISIS was funded by Saudi and Qatar. This is well-established. Iran and ISIS could not be more on the opposite sides.

"The intention was good". Just stop already.

[marcus]

On 6/30/2018 at 11:38 AM, CITIZEN_2015 said:

Massive Rally!!!! - Tens of thousands of Iranians in exile called for the overthrow of islamic regime today in Paris!!!!

Waving flags of Iran, supporters of the Iran Mujahidin kept chanting in Farsi ‘’We are ready,’’ and ‘’People are dying, we will take back Iran,’’ responding to the calls of the speakers to topple the Ayatollah regime. 

The rally was organized by MEK. Fot those who may not know Iranians are in this mess because of MEK (and other damn commies like Traitor Tudeh party and national front traitors) at the first place. They battled for power in the 80's and lost. Their supporters were killed in the worse possible manner (including rape of underaged by regime mullahs the night before execution and mass executions without any trial in 1988). So later out of hate for the regime and as it is a common thing with the leftists they betrated Iran and collaborated with Saddam Hussain of Iraq in its war with Iran. They are therefore hated by most Iranians inside Iran for more reasons than one. However, evidently they can indeed gather a good crowd outside Iran so may be they still stand a chance especially they appear to have the support of some powerful Americans like  Rudy Giuliani and Gingrich.

https://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Tens-of-thousands-demand-Iran-regime-change-at-mass-exile-rally-in-Paris-561218

They say the right things like:

The overthrow of this regime requires... requires an organization and a strong political alternative, and requires a liberty army."

Indeed there is a need for a liberty army as it is hard to overthrow this regime by slogans alone.

However, they appear so far to have refused to form an alliance with other much more popular opposition groups like Reza Pahlavi.

They made this statement in today's massive gathering in Paris (the content is all right but I and many iranians don't believe them to deliver):

’We call for the establishment of a society based on freedom, democracy, and equality, which has clear demarcations with despotism and dependence as well as gender, ethic and class discrimination. We have defended and will defend gender equality, the right to freely choose one’s attire, separation of religion and state, autonomy of nationalities, equal political and social rights for all citizens of Iran, abolition of the death penalty, freedom of expression, parties, the media, assembly, unions, associations and syndicates.’’

As for me if there is a choice only between plague and a flu I will choose the latter however, I am hoping for a total healthy honorable government elected by iranians who will build a strong and united Iran again to replace 40 years of destructive repressive mullahs (the return of the golden years by Pahlavi dynasty).

More on this once forgotten cult, who has now become a tool for the neo-cons and their Saudi funders - Here is a report from just before the MEK was removed from the U.S. terrorist list:

 

[CITIZEN_2015]

6 hours ago, marcus said:

Looks like you are not educated in this area. ISIS was funded by Saudi and Qatar. This is well-established. Iran and ISIS could not be more on the opposite sides.

"The intention was good". Just stop already.

Looks like you are distorting again. I never talked about ISIS. I talked about Iran regime destabilizing Iraq and making it weak which as a result ISIS was able to form years after US invasion.. If Iraq was under a strong democratic government there would have been no ISIS. To give you an example so that you understand. It is like the body immiune system. When the immune system gets weak (like Iran did to Iraq ) then opportunistic germs and viruses (like ISIS) appear and take over and make the body sick.

The intention was to  establish a democratic Iraq as a model for other regional countries and this would have been a thorne in the eye of Iran regime that a democratic country is established as a result of US invasion and Iran people may have demand same so the Iran regime ensured by its actions that the opposite of what intended to occur.

Edited July 2, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015

[CITIZEN_2015]

10 hours ago, marcus said:

More on this once forgotten cult, who has now become a tool for the neo-cons and their Saudi funders - Here is a report from just before the MEK was removed from the U.S. terrorist list:

 

So what is your solution????

The video is one-sided likely paid by Iran regime but as I said they are no angels but they are an alternative to this brutal regime. They have made mistakes in the past but they are reformed and evolved and at least they promise democracy and it is a sure thing that they will end Iran's isolation and hence people's lives will be improved as economy will start growing again and international investments start flowing because they are supported by the US and Iran is the best place to invest. Many iranian experts will return and the country's enormous problems caused by mullahs will be addressed. It will not be as great and bright as it was before the 1979 coup or a return of monarchy but the monarchy will come back only if there is a free election in Iran as what the people want and that is not very likely considering the nature of mullahs' regime.

The alternatives are really scarey. Unless the mullahs give up power (which is extremely unlikely) and an election is held to see what Iranians want (which most likely they will vote for the return of monarchy) then one possibility is a military coup by the hated sepah. A military dictatorship likely a religious dictatorship at first, will replace the mullahs. Maybe an improvement in many ways but really this is not a better alternative to MEK.

A second possibility is that fed up people may arm themselves (as the demonstrators in Kazerun were shouting) and armed conflict against the regime may break out in provinces like Kuzestan and Kurdestan and spread to others. The fed up provinces may even decide to break out from Iran and free their people from mullahs by breaking out after a long while as they may find the islamic republic hopeless and with no future in there for them.  This is as bad if not worse then mullahs' regime in power.

A third possibility is the mullahs stay in power (and they have proven that they are NOT reformable again and again) and continue to crack down on dissent and country's situation will get worse day by day and street protests in towns and cities and violent crack downs and more and more people get killed and jailed and human rights suppressed until the total and complete destruction and disintegration of the country. The longer this regime stays the higher is the chances for discontent, civil war and disintegration. This is also much worse than MEK.

As a last but very unlikely possibility is US military invasion (very unlikely because US does not have the military power or will to invade Iran) and subsequent occupation and holding of a free election under UN. Most likely monachy will return if free election is held but the price may be too high as in any invasion country's remaining infrastructure will be destroyed and inevitably civilians get killed as well by mistake.

You claimed that you also want regime change. So when you oppose the MEK alternative (and I must say there are good reasons for concern based on their past behaviour) then what is that you are proposing? Are you suggesting any of the alternatives above? It is easy to oppose and criticize BUT PROPOSE A BETTER PRACTICAL SOLUTION!!!!

Edited July 2, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015

[CITIZEN_2015]

On 6/30/2018 at 2:38 PM, CITIZEN_2015 said:

Massive Rally!!!! - Tens of thousands of Iranians in exile called for the overthrow of islamic regime today in Paris!!!!

Plot of bomb attack by Iran terrorist regime on NRCI rally as an Iranian diplomat in Germany is arrested as well as the plotters.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-attacks-belgium-iran/iran-diplomat-among-four-arrested-over-suspected-plot-against-iranian-opposition-meeting-idUSKBN1JS1C3

This group (MEK aka NRCI) must have really scared the mullahs' regime as a viable alternative to the hated regime to plot an attack on them in a foreign soil. They rooted them out in Iran by mass execution of its supporters, bombed and attacked their base in Iraq by Iraqi hired mercenaries and now the mullahs are after them even in France. They seem to be the only opposition group organized enough to topple the regime with military power. The other opposition group (the monarchy) has massive support but no military power.

Edited July 2, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015

[CITIZEN_2015]

I  did propose a blockage of Iranian oil export a few weeks ago as a mean to accelerate regime change and it appears the US is gradually adopting that policy. My proposal was military blockage of Iran oil export however, US is doing it in a non-military way by putting pressure on Iran customers to stop buying Iranian oil. My ultimate goal was regime change but it appears that the US goal is regime change of behaviour.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/07/aims-reduce-irans-oil-revenue-180702171030835.html

 

[GostHacked]

7 hours ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

Looks like you are distorting again. I never talked about ISIS. I talked about Iran regime destabilizing Iraq and making it weak which as a result ISIS was able to form years after US invasion.. If Iraq was under a strong democratic government there would have been no ISIS. To give you an example so that you understand. It is like the body immiune system. When the immune system gets weak (like Iran did to Iraq ) then opportunistic germs and viruses (like ISIS) appear and take over and make the body sick.

The intention was to  establish a democratic Iraq as a model for other regional countries and this would have been a thorne in the eye of Iran regime that a democratic country is established as a result of US invasion and Iran people may have demand same so the Iran regime ensured by its actions that the opposite of what intended to occur.

Actually Iran has been helping Iraq as much as they can. A stable neighbor means more stability for Iran.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/this-iran-backed-militia-helped-save-iraq-from-isis-now-washington-wants-them-to-disband

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iraq-security-iran-insight/irans-elite-guards-fighting-in-iraq-to-push-back-islamic-state-idUSKBN0G30GE20140803

The USA single-handedly created the vacuum in Iraq which allowed ISIS to rise. Not to mention the amount of hardware the USA left behind, that all fell into ISIS hands.  So, no you are incorrect with stating Iran is causing problems in Iraq, it seems to be quite the opposite.

[GostHacked]

30 minutes ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

I  did propose a blockage of Iranian oil export a few weeks ago as a mean to accelerate regime change and it appears the US is gradually adopting that policy. My proposal was military blockage of Iran oil export however, US is doing it in a non-military way by putting pressure on Iran customers to stop buying Iranian oil. My ultimate goal was regime change but it appears that the US goal is regime change of behaviour.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/07/aims-reduce-irans-oil-revenue-180702171030835.html

 

All while Trump begs the Saudis (the real backers of ISIS) to produce more oil.