Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, blueblood said:

It was different.  They commented and the times didn't.  There's a reason CNN got slapped and the others didn't.

What do you mean they commented? There's a reason CNN got slapped, but you just don't know so you won't say?

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted (edited)
59 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

Not debunked at all. Probably true, in fact. And there's more....

:rolleyes:

 

Even if it's a train load, if it's unverified, it's not important!  It's not news!

Edited by betsy
Posted
2 minutes ago, betsy said:

:rolleyes:

 

Even if it's a train load, if it's unverified, it's not important!  It's not news!

You should have said that during the election when the DNC emails came out and when the Podesta emails came out. But instead you talked about it as if they were full of verified facts. Donald himself quoted unverified emails. Once again, he created this environment and you encouraged it. Now you just have to suck it up.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

You should have said that during the election when the DNC emails came out and when the Podesta emails came out. But instead you talked about it as if they were full of verified facts. Donald himself quoted unverified emails. Once again, he created this environment and you encouraged it. Now you just have to suck it up.

 

They were true!  They've been verified by newspapers that published them!  They're emails!!!  That's the difference!


 

Quote

 

Claim: Donna Brazile was fired from CNN after leaked e-mails suggested she used her position to pass information to the Clinton campaign about upcoming appearances.

 

TRUE!

 

http://www.snopes.com/donna-brazile-leaves-cnn/

Edited by betsy
Posted
2 minutes ago, betsy said:

They were true!  They've been verified by newspapers that published them! 

Wrong! There was absolutely no way of knowing whether the hackers had added incriminating details to them.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted
1 minute ago, BubberMiley said:

Wrong! There was absolutely no way of knowing whether the hackers had added incriminating details to them.

Brazille resigned!

Posted
Just now, betsy said:

Brazille resigned!

That doesn't mean they were verified. And she resigned after they were reported on.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted
Just now, BubberMiley said:

That doesn't mean they were verified. And she resigned after they were reported on.

 

Newspapers - especially main stream media who are pro-Hillary - wouldn't be publishing them had they not been authentic!

Posted
Just now, betsy said:

 

Newspapers - especially main stream media who are pro-Hillary - wouldn't be publishing them had they not been authentic!

They had no way of knowing if they were authentic because they weren't verified. So maybe the MSM actually wasn't in the tank for Hillary after all, if that's your only argument.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted

If the left wants trump to win in 4 yrs, then keep acting like cry babies.

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted
Just now, PIK said:

If the left wants trump to win in 4 yrs, then keep acting like cry babies.

Actually it's Trump supporters whining about being treated like Hillary was treated before the election.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted
Just now, BubberMiley said:

Actually it's Trump supporters whining about being treated like Hillary was treated before the election.

What Hillary been given essentially a pass 

"Stop the Madness!!!" - Kevin O'Leary

"Money is the ultimate scorecard of life!". - Kevin O'Leary

Economic Left/Right: 4.00

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.77

Posted
Just now, BubberMiley said:

Actually it's Trump supporters whining about being treated like Hillary was treated before the election.

No it is not. Hollywood has lost thier marbles over this and now we have women from Canada marching in DC. Not even close in IMO. But that is just a opinion of one man. :)

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

They had no way of knowing if they were authentic because they weren't verified. So maybe the MSM actually wasn't in the tank for Hillary after all, if that's your only argument.

Everyone implicated in those leaks didn't deny them.  They just sought to change the subject!

 

Look at her Wall Street speech as an example - she can't deny that! :lol:

Edited by betsy
Posted
29 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

What do you mean they commented? There's a reason CNN got slapped, but you just don't know so you won't say?

I showed you two articles and your just sticking your fingers in your ears, CNN put something out and got slapped royally.  Boo hoo!!!

"Stop the Madness!!!" - Kevin O'Leary

"Money is the ultimate scorecard of life!". - Kevin O'Leary

Economic Left/Right: 4.00

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.77

Posted
2 minutes ago, betsy said:

Everyone implicated in those leaks didn't deny them.  They just sought to change the subject!

 

Look at her Wall Street speech as an example - she can't deny that! :lol:

If you recall, Trump even quoted from a Podesta email with something he thought was particularly incriminating that he thought he said. It wasn't until later that a writer (I believe from Newsweek) alerted people that it wasn't what Trump was saying it was at all. It was his own commentary that was sent in an email between two other parties. Trump thought it was the DNC speaking and it wasn't because he hadn't bothered to read the whole context.

When you are faced with thousands of emails, there is simply no way to confirm or deny the veracity of any of it without a considerable amount of time. Nobody had that time to devote to verification before they were released and reported on. Whether or not it was true is irrelevant, just as you feel it is irrelevant whether the Trump's leaks are true or not.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted
Just now, blueblood said:

I showed you two articles and your just sticking your fingers in your ears, CNN put something out and got slapped royally.  Boo hoo!!!

I read the articles but they don't differ from what the rest of the media put out. I asked you to express in words what that difference was and you started making crying noises.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted

If Obama had the love for Putin like Trump does, there would be impeachment hearings and the right would be screaming Treason!

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

If you recall, Trump even quoted from a Podesta email with something he thought was particularly incriminating that he thought he said. It wasn't until later that a writer (I believe from Newsweek) alerted people that it wasn't what Trump was saying it was at all. It was his own commentary that was sent in an email between two other parties. Trump thought it was the DNC speaking and it wasn't because he hadn't bothered to read the whole context.

When you are faced with thousands of emails, there is simply no way to confirm or deny the veracity of any of it without a considerable amount of time. Nobody had that time to devote to verification before they were released and reported on. Whether or not it was true is irrelevant, just as you feel it is irrelevant whether the Trump's leaks are true or not.

 

Comparing the wikileaks with these unverified tabloid materials is like comparing apples and poo!

 

If there's any incriminating evidence to support them, they would've already come out by now!

 

Edited by betsy
Posted
2 minutes ago, betsy said:

 

Comparing the wikileaks with these unverified tabloid materials is like comparing apples and poo!

 

If there's any incriminating evidence to support them, they would've already come out by now!

 

No, it's comparing exactly the same thing: unverified information coming from anonymous sources. Oh wait, they know who the source was for the Trump leak, and it turns out he's a credible source. So that's different.

Why do you think the evidence would already be out by now? Putin is holding on to it to ensure the puppet doesn't get any ideas. It's keeping Trump in line for the next four years.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted
10 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

No, it's comparing exactly the same thing: unverified information coming from anonymous sources. Oh wait, they know who the source was for the Trump leak, and it turns out he's a credible source. So that's different.

Why do you think the evidence would already be out by now? Putin is holding on to it to ensure the puppet doesn't get any ideas. It's keeping Trump in line for the next four years.

Tin foil hattery.  Trump listens to no one but himself.  If the GOP billionaires can't keep him quiet no one can

"Stop the Madness!!!" - Kevin O'Leary

"Money is the ultimate scorecard of life!". - Kevin O'Leary

Economic Left/Right: 4.00

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.77

Posted
Just now, blueblood said:

Tin foil hattery.  Trump listens to no one but himself.  If the GOP billionaires can't keep him quiet no one can

People with videos of prostitutes peeing on him can get him to do whatever they want. And it's not tinfoil hattery when there's a credible intelligence agent saying that is exactly what's going on.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted
14 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

People with videos of prostitutes peeing on him can get him to do whatever they want. And it's not tinfoil hattery when there's a credible intelligence agent saying that is exactly what's going on.

Except it's been debunked.  Mike cohen in Prague?

now he's getting peed on, you said it was the bed getting peed on.  It is tinfoil hattery. The dossier story is so outlandish that the only ones who brought it forward was buzzfeed.  He's not getting manipulated no matter which fantasy to bring him down you want to believe.

"Stop the Madness!!!" - Kevin O'Leary

"Money is the ultimate scorecard of life!". - Kevin O'Leary

Economic Left/Right: 4.00

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.77

Posted
4 minutes ago, blueblood said:

Except it's been debunked.  Mike cohen in Prague?

now he's getting peed on, you said it was the bed getting peed on.  It is tinfoil hattery. The dossier story is so outlandish that the only ones who brought it forward was buzzfeed.  He's not getting manipulated no matter which fantasy to bring him down you want to believe.

The report was that the bed was peed on but Trump's defence that he is a germophone suggests he also got peed on. The CIA brought it forward. Buzzfeed only published the report.

As I have read, the report was referencing a different Michael Cohen.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    TheGx Forum
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...