overthere Posted November 25, 2015 Report Posted November 25, 2015 It does make Russia blink though. They know the West will turn turtle and not intervene in the Russian assault on the enemies of Assad, which is who the Russians were attacking in this case. The Russians don't really give a stuff about ISIS, unless it is ISIS versus the Kurds- then the Turks will support whomever kills Kurds. While Russia and Putin are overly fond of brinkmanship- the rubber hits the road when Turkey(NATO member) is shooting down their warplanes. Putin will exact revenge from Turkey, but not militarily. Mission accomplished for the Turks, in a way. Quote Science too hard for you? Try religion!
-1=e^ipi Posted November 25, 2015 Report Posted November 25, 2015 Canada either needs to leave NATO or kick Turkey out of NATO. Quote
-1=e^ipi Posted November 25, 2015 Report Posted November 25, 2015 (edited) I'm going to make a layman's guess here that this incident won't amount to anything and I hope I'm right. Of course it won't. Putin is intelligent and knows the consequences of retaliation. Due to NATO, Turkey can shoot down Russian jets with impunity in order to help their Islamist allies, and Russia cannot do anything about it. Edited November 25, 2015 by -1=e^ipi Quote
msj Posted November 25, 2015 Report Posted November 25, 2015 Canada either needs to leave NATO or kick Turkey out of NATO. You are so quick to believe any little thing your friend Putin says, aren't you? Quote If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist) My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx
Argus Posted November 25, 2015 Report Posted November 25, 2015 I can remember when Canada was respected as a problem solver. No, you remember a fantasy. Harper was not a "Great Satan". He had a vision of what Canada should be, tried to change us and it did not work. And as Prime Minister did not do any "hard and heavy and bloody work required in places like Afghanistan" - he sent our young out to do it. Many came home in body bags. Aside from the cliche about body bags - the dead actually came home in caskets - this interesting view of reality leaves out the fact that it was the Liberal party and Jean Chretien who sent our troops to Afghanistan in the first place, five full years before Stephen Harper was elected. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Argus Posted November 25, 2015 Report Posted November 25, 2015 Of course it won't. Putin is intelligent and knows to consequences of retaliation. There have been numerous reports that Putin is a megalomaniac. It's quite possible Erdogan is as well. I do not really want to be on either side if they decide to start pummeling each other. Neither side is in the right on this. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Moonlight Graham Posted November 25, 2015 Report Posted November 25, 2015 (edited) I'm of the belief that "don't fly in our airspace!" is a less important principle than "don't poke the bear." Ya but at least there's one member in NATO who won't let Putin eff with them. Not flying warplanes in a foreign country's airspace unless having a permission is very basic international relations. But honestly I don't believe either government on their word, we don't really know where the plane was shot down, though more likely than not over Turkey. Honestly, the West and Putin/Russia need to grow up then kiss & make up. People call Putin a bully, but the US/West has also tried to bully and provoke Putin, ie: in 2002 pulling out of the 1972 AMB treaty and trying to set up a missile defense shield in Europe over Russian objections, and trying to sign up Russian neighbours to NATO and the EU. Russia sees the US/NATO/EU as a threat, and not for illegitimate reasons. Seeing things from Russia's perspective makes Putin seem like less of a bad dude and more of a defender of Russian interests. Honestly is there that much difference in the US/UK invading Iraq (legally, so they say) vs Russia annexing Crimea (legally via referendum, so they say)? Many people in Russia like Putin. Edited November 25, 2015 by Moonlight Graham Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
DogOnPorch Posted November 25, 2015 Report Posted November 25, 2015 I hear that Russia has put the big boys to work. Tu-95's, Tu-22M3's and Tu-160's are now pounding enemy positions. First time in combat action for the old Tu-95 if I'm not mistaken. Not sure who the enemy is in this case, mind-you...lol. Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
-1=e^ipi Posted November 25, 2015 Report Posted November 25, 2015 Neither side is in the right on this. I disagree. Turkey shot down a Russian jet for no good reason. What did Russia do that was wrong? Is fighting ISIS wrong? Quote
ReeferMadness Posted November 25, 2015 Report Posted November 25, 2015 There was no Turkish air space violation. None. This is pure Western/Turkey propaganda. See RT and Sputniknews. They have the real radar flight data. No one disputes the Turkish plane was in Syrian air space when it shot down the Russian plane. Perhaps Assad should give the Russian's authorization to shot down Turkish plane that enter its air space... What do you think? The Russian media aren't exactly famous for being impartial. And this is the first I've heard that the Turkish plane was in Syrian air space. But what if it was? I don't think Assad wants NATO to pack up and go home because that's going to leave him and the Russians to face the all the various rebel factions, including ISIS. There's a reason that he was losing the civil war - he wasn't very popular. Quote Unlimited economic growth has the marvelous quality of stilling discontent while preserving privilege, a fact that has not gone unnoticed among liberal economists. - Noam Chomsky It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it. - Upton Sinclair
-TSS- Posted November 25, 2015 Report Posted November 25, 2015 I can't see how NATO can stand up for Turkey in this. If it turns out that the incursion lasted a few seconds, NATO should tell Turkey that they're on their own. They need to make immediate reparations to Russia.Stoltenberg has already declared that NATO will stand by Turkey. Besides, if NATO did what you are proposing its credibility would be shattered. Quote
socialist Posted November 25, 2015 Report Posted November 25, 2015 The Russian media aren't exactly famous for being impartial. And this is the first I've heard that the Turkish plane was in Syrian air space. But what if it was? I don't think Assad wants NATO to pack up and go home because that's going to leave him and the Russians to face the all the various rebel factions, including ISIS. There's a reason that he was losing the civil war - he wasn't very popular. I din't know you were an expert on Russian media. Good to have one of you guys around. Qadaafi (sp) was popular in Libya and look what Obama had done to him? Quote Thankful to have become a free thinker.
TimG Posted November 26, 2015 Report Posted November 26, 2015 Stoltenberg has already declared that NATO will stand by Turkey.NATO only comes into play with an invasion of Turkey and if Russia was stupid enough to try that then NATO would have to act. Russia could shoot a Turkey plane down "by accident" over Syria and there would be no obligation. Quote
msj Posted November 26, 2015 Report Posted November 26, 2015 I disagree. Turkey shot down a Russian jet for no good reason. What did Russia do that was wrong? Is fighting ISIS wrong? Russia has flown into Turkey airspace on many occasions. No reason to believe that it didn't happen here too. What did Turkey do wrong? Is protecting your sovereign airspace wrong? Quote If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist) My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx
-1=e^ipi Posted November 26, 2015 Report Posted November 26, 2015 (edited) Russia has flown into Turkey airspace on many occasions. Yes, and that is no good reason to shoot down Russian jets if they are fighting ISIS and it's like 1 km into airspace. What did Turkey do wrong? They side with ISIS and shoot down a Russian jet. They've attacked to Kurds and funded 'rebels'. They are lead by an Islamist government. Is protecting your sovereign airspace wrong? Not always. On the other hand, Turkey has flown into Syrian airspace on many occasions. Can Russia therefore shoot down Turkish jets that go into Syrian airspace? Of course not, because that would cause all of NATO to retaliate and therefore nuclear war. Hurray for double standards. Edited November 26, 2015 by -1=e^ipi Quote
msj Posted November 26, 2015 Report Posted November 26, 2015 (edited) Yes, and that is no good reason to shoot down Russian jets if they are fighting ISIS and it's like 1 km into airspace. Doesn't matter - sovereign airspace is sovereign airspace. They side with ISIS and shoot down a Russian jet. They've attacked to Kurds and funded 'rebels'. They are lead by an Islamist government. Turkey has more complicated relations than Russia. Does not justify a violation of their airspace. On the other hand, Turkey has flown into Syrian airspace on many occasions. Can Russia therefore shoot down Turkish jets that go into Syrian airspace? Of course not, because that would cause all of NATO to retaliate and therefore nuclear war. Hurray for double standards. Russia may shoot a one down. NATO will not retaliate. There will not be a war over this incident - especially nuclear. Turkey doesn't have any bombs (on its own) and NATO is not going to be dropping any on their behalf no matter how many chicken littles think otherwise. The sky is not falling so relax. Edited November 26, 2015 by msj Quote If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist) My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx
-1=e^ipi Posted November 26, 2015 Report Posted November 26, 2015 Doesn't matter - sovereign airspace is sovereign airspace. And fighting ISIS is fighting ISIS. Turkey has more complicated relations than Russia. Does not justify a violation of their airspace. The claim that Russia violated airspace is disputed. And Turkey was violating Syrian airspace at the time. Quote
msj Posted November 26, 2015 Report Posted November 26, 2015 And Turkey was violating Syrian airspace at the time. How is that relevant? If Syria shoots down a Turkish jet then do we cry like the Russians? Do we expect Turkey to cry like Russia? Quote If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist) My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx
-1=e^ipi Posted November 26, 2015 Report Posted November 26, 2015 If Syria shoots down a Turkish jet then do we cry like the Russians? Do we expect Turkey to cry like Russia? You realized a person died over this right? And that it helps ISIS, right? Why trivialize it by calling it crying? Quote
Argus Posted November 26, 2015 Report Posted November 26, 2015 I disagree. Turkey shot down a Russian jet for no good reason. What did Russia do that was wrong? Is fighting ISIS wrong? Russia is not fighting ISIS. It is bombing the opponents to Asad who are supported by the Turks and the West. And it has been supporting Asad, a pig of a man, with arms and military aid. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
msj Posted November 26, 2015 Report Posted November 26, 2015 You realized a person died over this right? And that it helps ISIS, right? Why trivialize it by calling it crying? ISIS is not the only enemy. Russia is too. Quote If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist) My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx
Argus Posted November 26, 2015 Report Posted November 26, 2015 Russia has flown into Turkey airspace on many occasions. No reason to believe that it didn't happen here too. What did Turkey do wrong? Is protecting your sovereign airspace wrong? It flew into their airspace, even by their own claims, for a few seconds. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
msj Posted November 26, 2015 Report Posted November 26, 2015 Russia is not fighting ISIS. It is bombing the opponents to Asad who are supported by the Turks and the West. And it has been supporting Asad, a pig of a man, with arms and military aid. Agreed. Russia is not a white knight. Quote If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist) My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx
-1=e^ipi Posted November 26, 2015 Report Posted November 26, 2015 (edited) ISIS is not the only enemy. Russia is too. Russia is not our enemy. Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states are. Most people are just too stupid to realize it. Russia is not fighting ISIS. It is bombing the opponents to Asad who are supported by the Turks and the West. And it has been supporting Asad, a pig of a man, with arms and military aid. Glad to see you have been brainwashed by western media propaganda. Those 'moderate rebels' being bombed by Russia are primarily allies of ISIS. Most of them believe that gays and apostates should be killed. Edited November 26, 2015 by -1=e^ipi Quote
Argus Posted November 26, 2015 Report Posted November 26, 2015 (edited) Agreed. Russia is not a white knight. On the other hand, Turkey has been supporting ISIS, and its so called bombing intervention was aimed at the Kurds, who the West supports, so it could restart its civil war and win an election through fear mongering. Its government is corrupt, Islamist and anti-democratic. Edited November 26, 2015 by Argus Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.