Jump to content

One of the reasons I won't be voting for Harper: Economic record


Recommended Posts

I am tired of martin being called genius, when anybody could do what he did when the world economy was moving along nicely . But he was able to fix the tax rules to save his shipping company money. And I find it funny how liberals are upset with Harper calling Justin, Justin ,when the liberals branded him that way. And smiling tom should go back to be a natural angry tom, his smile is to fake.

Well, it was quite genius of him to skulk 54 billion dollars of illegally taxed ei money from us while everything was running smoothly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 398
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well, it was quite genius of him to skulk 54 billion dollars of illegally taxed ei money from us while everything was running smoothly.

that "skulking" you presume on was ruled constitutional by the Supreme Court Of Canada... notwithstanding a similar earlier ruling by the Quebec Court of Appeal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that "skulking" you presume on was ruled constitutional by the Supreme Court Of Canada... notwithstanding a similar earlier ruling by the Quebec Court of Appeal.

It was deemed that the way they appropriated the funds from Canadians was illegal.

Regardless, you are defending Liberals using fittyfour big bs of our money for purposes not intended?

kind of like the health "premium", used for other liberal shortcomings

I love you defending the rApe and pillage perpetrated on Canadians by liberals.

Edited by drummindiver
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was deemed that the way they appropriated the funds from Canadians was illegal.

Regardless, you are defending Liberals using fittyfour big bs of our money for purposes not intended?

kind of like the health "premium", used for other liberal shortcomings

I love you defending the rApe and pillage perpetrated on Canadians by liberals.

no - your claimed "skulking" was in regards to the transfer into 'general revenue'... again, both the SCOC and the Quebec COA ruled that constitutional/allowed within powers available to the federal government. You really need to educate yourself!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no - your claimed "skulking" was in regards to the transfer into 'general revenue'... again, both the SCOC and the Quebec COA ruled that constitutional/allowed within powers available to the federal government. You really need to educate yourself!

Damn. And here I thought grade 7 was going to be enough.

I clearly said "skulk" not steal. They diverted fittyfour bs.

That was deemed dirty pool, however not illegal

Crazy, right?

The means in which they collected these funds to steal sorry skulk from taxpayers was however deemed illegal.

I know. Skulk fat stacks..not illegal. Over tax Canadians then refusing them rewards purportedly gained from skulking..illegal.

of course, this raping and pillaging of Canadians is still being defended by the left because those of us who work and pay taxes don't deserve our money.

http://www.ctvnews.ca/top-court-says-ottawa-broke-law-in-financing-ei-1.350900

Edited by drummindiver
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be to sure about that. The recent surge in exports will likely only serve to reduce the amount of the Q2 decline. So it very likely will happen.

Liberal Socialist believe they are the elite and have every right to take your money and tell you how to run your life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harper has lower my taxes, except I live in ONT and what ever we save, Wynne takes.

"The New Democratic Party believes that the social, economic and political progress of Canada can be assured only by the application of democratic socialist principles to government and the administration of public affairs".

From the NDP constitution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever. We are talking about budget numbers here.

Interestingly . . . isn't the NDP normally the party of folks that oppose outsourcing? Isn't this exactly the kind of unintentional result of such outsourcing that the NDP and friends warn about?

As the party of central planning and control, does it not behoove the party leadership to make sure that the work they contract out isn't handled by slimy organizations who exploit the workers by paying them the market rate for their services?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

..... it not behoove the party leadership to make sure that the work they contract out isn't handled by slimy organizations who exploit the workers by paying them the market rate for their services?

Ah, I love it.... labour as a market-rate commodity....

You know, maybe labour has it all wrong. Instead of unionizing, they should form themselves into a huge corporation... Labour Inc.... If you want something done, you have to buy your labour from Labour Inc.... Of course, Labour Inc would find that it is quite inefficient to get their raw materials (workers) from such things as independent small families, so they would have to vertically integrate.... create huge farms where they could grow their labour... Also, it might make sense to get some raw material from 3rd world countries... much cheaper raw resource..

If it is smart, Labour Inc. could corner the market on this market-rate commodity. Its shareholders will make a killing.

I think this may have been tried in North America in the 17th century. It was called slavery. And if we treat labour as a "market-rate-commodity", that is where we are heading again.

Labour is every bit as entitled to a piece of the profits from a production as are the financiers, the designers, the shareholders. the executives. The fact.... fact.... that the wealth gap is growing between richest and poorest is a sign that labour is not receiving its share. Will it get reversed or will it continue to drift toward feudalism or worse?

...

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, I love it.... labour as a market-rate commodity....

You know, maybe labour has it all wrong. Instead of unionizing, they should form themselves into a huge corporation... Labour Inc.... If you want something done, you have to buy your labour from Labour Inc.... Of course, Labour Inc would find that it is quite inefficient to get their raw materials (workers) from such things as independent small families, so they would have to vertically integrate.... create huge farms where they could grow their labour... Also, it might make sense to get some raw material from 3rd world countries... much cheaper raw resource..

If it is smart, Labour Inc. could corner the market on this market-rate commodity. Its shareholders will make a killing.

I think this may have been tried in North America in the 17th century. It was called slavery. And if we treat labour as a "market-rate-commodity", that is where we are heading again.

Labour is every bit as entitled to a piece of the profits from a production as are the financiers, the designers, the shareholders. the executives. The fact.... fact.... that the wealth gap is growing between richest and poorest is a sign that labour is not receiving its share. Will it get reversed or will it continue to drift toward feudalism or worse?

...

.

Douglas Porter, Chief Economist of BMO -- whose opinion is far more informed than yours:

"There is no debate here: Canadian employment is mixed, but not in recession terrain."

As for the deficits, last I checked Ontario has a worse debt to GDP ratio, higher deficit, and worse credit rating, all with no conceivable plan back to reality. Oh, and they're the most indebted sub-sovereign state on the planet. Bravo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Where's your evidence? The federal government takes the smallest percentage of GDP that it has in over 60 years.

Well, here one example for people who have kids and everything we buy from China has an increase in price because of the increase tariffs to China. https://businessincanada.com/2014/11/03/ottawa-stephen-harper-conservative-tax-increase-income-splitting-uccb/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently you stopped praying to the historical reality God, since you don't seem to recall the events that led to those things.

Typical. More excuses. Just like the economic god, himself. He doesn't take responsibility for being one of the worst, if not the worst, Prime Minister Canada has had when you look at the economic record.

I'm hoping that at least a few of the 36% who voted for Harper, can finally accept and admit that Harper has been terrible at handling the economy. The rest will continue to be in denial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...