Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Im well aware of her baggage and we shall see how well this move works for JT. What I got from her statements wasnt so much that Harper was mean to her specifically, just bullying within the party in general, which has shown up in the news before.

Yeah because she'd admit she was a pariah in the CPC now. :rolleyes:

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Income splitting is one of those issues where most people are 'meh' and even if they don't really think much of it don't really see it as affecting them.

For those it DOES effect, it will be a huge issue and it will change votes.

Perhaps realizing how much of the proposed surplus the thing chews up and how so many of us are going to have to pony up to benefit so few, may also change votes.

Posted

I listen to her this morning and was starting to change my mind until she was ask what her boyfriend thoughts of her changing parties and she said her family is supporting her but the media kept asking about the boyfriend's thoughts and she wouldn't answer...why? It's not a good thing to have one person a Liberal and another a Conservative member, which the party better watch these two.

Soudas said on Twitter that he fully supports her.
Posted

Well, it looks like the cheerleaders for both sides are jumping into the fray trying to put whatever spin they can come up with. What bothers me is that the cynicism that these kinds of moves elicit in the public. Those in the voting public who are outraged or disappointed with these floor crossings become a non voting public.

When you see a leader in the house make some kind of point and the rest of his caucus stands up behind him clapping enthusiastically you begin to wonder what they are thinking. You begin to wonder that if these folks can be so phoney about their actions in the house just how phoney can they be in representing you.

For every three stripes that we tear off a particular political party for some obvious piece of mischief we tear one stripe off our respect for democracy.

BTW - Dimitri Soudas has just announced that he will now be "working with" the Liberal Party of Canada. This is a "two person" deal.

While one party may feel it gains something temporary during a floor crossing they all lose some of their credibility.

Note - For those expecting a response from Big Guy: I generally do not read or respond to posts longer then 300 words nor to parsed comments.

Posted

Yeah because she'd admit she was a pariah in the CPC now. :rolleyes:

This plays right into Harper's hands.... "The CPC held her to account for the dirty dealings. And when she found out the CPC was getting rid of her, she joined the Liberal Party. Up until 2 weeks ago, she supported Harper. Now she calls him mean"

That's a very easy spin... totally negates any benefit the Liberals were going to get from this.

If I was a Liberal supporter, I wouldn't like them taking Conservative cast-offs that were too corrupt for that party...

Posted

She did not leave because harper was a bully, she got told last week she will never run as a conservative again. And the fact ,if she runs as a liberal and loses she will receive 80g's as a severance. Bad move on JT's part.

If she's such a problem why did Harper have her as a Parliamentary Secretary when he woke up this morning?
Posted

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/eve-adams-former-conservative-mp-joins-liberal-party-1.2950048

If the Conservatives produce this letter, her credibility is shot. She jumped ship because she was being held to account for her backroom, dirty political dealings; and now she's a Liberal.

The Liberals shouldn't have gone near her with a 10 foot pole!

Once again, they still had her in a role above the backbenchers as a Parliamentary Secretary. What does that say? Those backroom dealings happened well before that. She even remained as a Parliamentary Secretary after she throw her temper tantrum at the gas station. They can paint her in as negative a light as they want, but the moment they say she has been a long-term problem, you have to question Harper's judgment in promoting her to a Parliamentary Secretary and keeping her there, despite all of these problems they claim were ongoing.
Posted (edited)

Why was she told that she can't run for the party anywhere in Canada? She told a bunch of lies today, she will fit in with the liberals.

Edited by PIK

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted

This plays right into Harper's hands.... "The CPC held her to account for the dirty dealings. And when she found out the CPC was getting rid of her, she joined the Liberal Party. Up until 2 weeks ago, she supported Harper. Now she calls him mean"

That's a very easy spin... totally negates any benefit the Liberals were going to get from this.

If I was a Liberal supporter, I wouldn't like them taking Conservative cast-offs that were too corrupt for that party...

Well said
Posted

Once again, they still had her in a role above the backbenchers as a Parliamentary Secretary. What does that say? Those backroom dealings happened well before that. She even remained as a Parliamentary Secretary after she throw her temper tantrum at the gas station. They can paint her in as negative a light as they want, but the moment they say she has been a long-term problem, you have to question Harper's judgment in promoting her to a Parliamentary Secretary and keeping her there, despite all of these problems they claim were ongoing.

People aren't going to see that nuance... I see the contradiction, and I wouldn't be surprised if they lied about not letting her run next election, but the CPC will play up that she was being booted, is dishonest, and is now a Liberal.

If she is to have any credibility, she will have to produce something that says the CPC wanted her to run in the next election but that she has taken a principled stand. I don't think she will be able to do that. I doubt she is a principled person.

Posted

Another rat runs from the nest. The more I see of Trudeau in action, the more disillusioned I become. The only thing that buoys my spirits is we have nowhere to go but up. Even if Trudeau turns out to be a backroom-dealing, low-integrity, flip-flopping airhead, he would still be so far above Harper that I would be relieved to see him as PM.

Unlimited economic growth has the marvelous quality of stilling discontent while preserving privilege, a fact that has not gone unnoticed among liberal economists.

- Noam Chomsky

It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.

- Upton Sinclair

Posted

People aren't going to see that nuance... I see the contradiction, and I wouldn't be surprised if they lied about not letting her run next election, but the CPC will play up that she was being booted, is dishonest, and is now a Liberal.

If she is to have any credibility, she will have to produce something that says the CPC wanted her to run in the next election but that she has taken a principled stand. I don't think she will be able to do that. I doubt she is a principled person.

People aren't going to see that nuance... I see the contradiction, and I wouldn't be surprised if they lied about not letting her run next election, but the CPC will play up that she was being booted, is dishonest, and is now a Liberal.

If she is to have any credibility, she will have to produce something that says the CPC wanted her to run in the next election but that she has taken a principled stand. I don't think she will be able to do that. I doubt she is a principled person.

I wouldn't surprised to learn that she has as many stories to tell about the CPC as they have about her. Might be some mutually assured destruction that keeps all of the dirty stories from coming out.

Unlimited economic growth has the marvelous quality of stilling discontent while preserving privilege, a fact that has not gone unnoticed among liberal economists.

- Noam Chomsky

It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.

- Upton Sinclair

Posted

You know you all assume she'll be parachuted in......it really could be open you know.

In any case I think BG was right, it has nothing to do with her and everything to do with the Backroom Wunderkind. She's a face...whoopdeedo....he's the prize unfortunately. Goes to show its all a sham......one suit the same as the other.....Conservatives would welcome Kinsella if it garnered votes.

Posted (edited)

Some of the Tory MP's were giving their views of her leaving online and Soudas came back and said, you do want to after her because I KNOW many things about the party.

But so what?? Disgruntled politicians who were being turfed are not very believable... If they came out a few years ago because they knew what their gov't was doing was wrong, then people might be inclined to believe them.

As it is, the CPC actually comes off looking like they were smart to run these two out of the party... and Trudeau looks like an idiot for taking them in.

Edited by The_Squid
Posted

That's your story. Time will tell.

Unlimited economic growth has the marvelous quality of stilling discontent while preserving privilege, a fact that has not gone unnoticed among liberal economists.

- Noam Chomsky

It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.

- Upton Sinclair

Posted

Some of the Tory MP's were giving their views of her leaving online and Soudas came back and said, you do want to after her because I KNOW many things about the party.

Ooooo!

Where's that?

Does he know about the robocalls? :)

.

Posted

Eve Adams just did the old "dance across the floor" to the Liberals. Did Justin do a smart thing accepting her?

Might have something to do with the latest cabinet shuffle. Maybe she didn't get whatever post she was aiming for, or maybe she was even "shuffled out" of the CPC with the coming election in sight, Lots of changed in CPC land lately.

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Posted

The interesting part is that Adams still needs to be allowed to seek a nomination - and then she has to win the nomination - unless Trudeau again autocratically appoints her. That process will be facinating - I don't see any GTA riding openly embracing a woman who has been proven to be a trickster.

Back to Basics

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,912
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...