Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

What do you mean, thread bans?

I think he means blocking a user's access to a particular forum from which he/she been causing trouble in for an extended period of time. The user would still have access to other forums, but not the one he/she wants.

It would be something that could be used more often for minor infractions than a full blown suspension.

Edited by Sleipnir

"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure."

- Mark Twain

Posted

Yes, Certain users could be banned from certain threads.

It could be as simple as the thread starter asking that certain users not partake for certain reasons (IE people who have been known to turn topics on issue ____ into flame wars, could be asked by a threat starter on that topic to not partake) to being banned from all threads on that topic, to having it be a technical ban (not just someone asking, but the forum forcing the issue)

I think we could actually civilly discuss issues like Israel or Global Warming if certain people were thread-banned.

Feel free to contact me outside the forums. Add "TheNewTeddy" to Twitter, Facebook, or Hotmail to reach me!

Guest American Woman
Posted
Isn't that attempting to suppress opposing opinions.

Totally - and giving members the power to do it.

Posted

Totally - and giving members the power to do it.

Lol as if Greg would give members the ability to ban each other from certain threads rolleyes1.gif

"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure."

- Mark Twain

Guest American Woman
Posted

Lol as if Greg would give members the ability to ban each other from certain threads rolleyes1.gif

Agreed. I don't see it happening - I'm just agreeing that that's what's being asked.

Posted

Isn't it easier to just tune it/them out...get a better grip so to speak? I have tinnitus so tuning shit out just comes naturally I guess.

OTOH driving other people nuts is as easy as saying huh and what a lot.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted

This will "promote intelligent, honest and responsible discussion." by prohibiting people from just repeating the same tied old arguments over and over.

It will allow people to enforce the rule of "If you are not bringing anything new to the argument, then do not say anything at all."

http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums//index.php?app=forums&module=extras&section=boardrules

Feel free to contact me outside the forums. Add "TheNewTeddy" to Twitter, Facebook, or Hotmail to reach me!

Posted

If someone violates the rules they should be suspended/banned, as appropriate. If they are not breaking the rules, they should be free to post as they see fit on whatever topic they see fit.

Posted

I think he means blocking a user's access to a particular forum from which he/she been causing trouble in for an extended period of time. The user would still have access to other forums, but not the one he/she wants.

It would be something that could be used more often for minor infractions than a full blown suspension.

Then you would have those posters simply take their beef to another thread with a similar topic. It's happened before.

Posted

If someone violates the rules they should be suspended/banned, as appropriate. If they are not breaking the rules, they should be free to post as they see fit on whatever topic they see fit.

Agreed.

  • Forum Admin
Posted

Sorry, I'm not even sure we can restrict based by thread. My forum section, yes; but not by an individual thread.

However, I will not be implementing anything like this in the future. I've considered making a VIP section for senior forum members who have arisen to a certain post count; but I'm hesitant as just because a member posts a lot, does not mean the overall quality of those posts are high.

My advice is to ignore those who you feel are not engaged in intelligent, honest and responsible discussions.

Have any issues, problems using the forum? Post a message in the Support and Questions section of the forums.

Posted

I've considered making a VIP section for senior forum members who have arisen to a certain post count;

I'm sure you won't be surprised to hear that I love that idea !

In any case, I do like the idea that posting here for a long time ( or perhaps new posters who contribute a lot ) could be rewarded somehow. Maybe a subset of posters could be permitted to engage in a round table.

I`m doing what is called "you should"ing... though. :)

Posted

I'm sure you won't be surprised to hear that I love that idea !

In any case, I do like the idea that posting here for a long time ( or perhaps new posters who contribute a lot ) could be rewarded somehow. Maybe a subset of posters could be permitted to engage in a round table.

I`m doing what is called "you should"ing... though. smile.png

Once you start a separate section for these 'vip' members, then you have a possibility that they won't participate in the regular threads/sections. It's the main reason I don't use the chat function on this site.

Posted

Once you start a separate section for these 'vip' members, then you have a possibility that they won't participate in the regular threads/sections. It's the main reason I don't use the chat function on this site.

No - just the odd thread or something... a one-time round table every once in awhile.

Posted

Sounds elitist, and, unnecessary. And a whole lot of work for a programmer.

I'm sure you big boys can find a chat room if you want to be alone.

Posted

Then you would have those posters simply take their beef to another thread with a similar topic. It's happened before.

Then the mod would move in to suspend him/her from the entire forums.

"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure."

- Mark Twain

Posted

How about you have a "live debate", in which a small group of members debate a topic in the chat room. Only the group members are able to post, but anyone else can watch the debate. It can be moderated by another member, too. Specific topics and participants could be chosen beforehand, then a specific date/ time is set for the debate to take place.

Guest American Woman
Posted

I'm sure you won't be surprised to hear that I love that idea !

In any case, I do like the idea that posting here for a long time ( or perhaps new posters who contribute a lot ) could be rewarded somehow. Maybe a subset of posters could be permitted to engage in a round table.

Why? What would be the purpose? I think it goes without saying that some don't have as much free time to post as others, so why "reward" those who do at others' exclusion? I don't think that would encourage new posters or make them feel particularly welcome - I think it would come across more as a 'private' or 'elitist' board.

Posted

Not to mention it would encourage people to make large numbers of less thoughtful posts to reach the treshhold for inclusion in the "elite forums" more quickly.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,919
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Milla
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...