bush_cheney2004 Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 I think it was Derek who suggested this is exactly how we should be prosecuting this war, by destroying the things that the enemy is fighting for, it's villages, homes and children. Not helpful for the bigger picture, which includes Pakistan. This is not just about Talibanskis. This is the sort of pagan ethos that wins wars. Only a fool ever expected just a military solution in Afghanistan. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 Exactly. But why bother with facts, when you can blame deaths that occur after 9/11 for the reason for 9/11. Pretzel logic doesn't have to make any sense! Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
eyeball Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 Exactly. But why bother with facts, when you can blame deaths that occur after 9/11 for the reason for 9/11. Who did that? Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
olpfan1 Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 I didn't say that the killings were justified. I just stated that I can understand why it happened. You said Some might even say, Afghans had it coming. Tell us what you really think Shady, do you believe those 9 children had it coming? Quote
olpfan1 Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 Yes, I do realize that. Tim G's reply was about single individuals committing mass murders - as was the case in this instance - but not on 9-11. This type of killing spree is quite different from 9-11 - where people trained, planned, financed, and then carried out the attacks. and then you attack the WRONG COUNTRY in retaliation The right country would have been Saudi Arabia DOY Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 The right country would have been Saudi Arabia DOY Why? Should the US also attack Canada because that's where the Millennium Bomber came from? Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
olpfan1 Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 Why? Should the US also attack Canada because that's where the Millennium Bomber came from? Don't you have to actually bomb your target or at least a revised target to be called the Millennium Bomber? Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 Don't you have to actually bomb your target or at least a revised target to be called the Millennium Bomber? Nope...one of the 9/11 aircraft never made it to the intended target, but you have already included those hijackers in your blame the Saudis mix. So which city in Canada should the US attack? Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Shady Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 You said Some might even say, Afghans had it coming. Tell us what you really think Shady, do you believe those 9 children had it coming? No, I don't believe that those 9 children, or anyone else killed in this tragedy deserved it. However, using the logic of some of the 9/11 defenders, one could say that after the killings of the US servicemen over the burning of some paper. They, as a whole, were in line for some blowback. Actions have consequences. And when you react like rabid monkeys to the simple burning of paper by killing people. There may be repercussions, like what we've recently seen. and then you attack the WRONG COUNTRY in retaliation The right country would have been Saudi Arabia DOY No, the right country was Afghanistan. That's where the terrorist organization was stationed, that's where attacks were planned. Quote
olpfan1 Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 (edited) No, the right country was Afghanistan. That's where the terrorist organization was stationed, that's where attacks were planned. So if a bunch of Saudis trained in Russia, NATO would have invaded Russia? I'm not that stupid Shady & I didn't think you were either but alas I'm wrong again Edited March 12, 2012 by olpfan1 Quote
Guest American Woman Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 and then you attack the WRONG COUNTRY in retaliation It wasn't in "retaliation." If someone is attacking you personally and you fight back, are you doing it in retaliation or in defense? The right country would have been Saudi Arabia DOY What difference does their nationality make? The terrorist training camps weren't in Saudi Arabia. Al Qaeda wasn't operating out of Saudi Arabia. The Saudi government had revoked bin Laden's citizenship. They were 'stationed' in Afghanistan. Quote
DogOnPorch Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 So if a bunch of Saudis trained in Russia, NATO would have invaded Russia? If Russia was behind 9-11 as per the Taliban, f**k yeah. Moscow would have been a crater. Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
Guest American Woman Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 (edited) So if a bunch of Saudis trained in Russia, NATO would have invaded Russia? Absolutely. If that's where their training camps were and that's where they were operating out of - with the blessing and protection of the Russian government. What good would it do to "invade" Saudi Arabia? Edited March 12, 2012 by American Woman Quote
olpfan1 Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 (edited) rofl, I think Dog is joking but I don't think AW is ... no way in hell would the U.S have done a thing in Russia Edited March 12, 2012 by olpfan1 Quote
Guest American Woman Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 rofl, I think Dog is joking but I don't think AW is ... no way in hell would the U.S have done a thing in Russia Whatever you say. Quote
DogOnPorch Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 (edited) rofl, I think Dog is joking but I don't think AW is ... no way in hell would the U.S have done a thing in Russia I'm not joking. Had the Russians been behind 9-11 we'd be counting rad levels right now. Edited March 12, 2012 by DogOnPorch Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
GostHacked Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 Nope...one of the 9/11 aircraft never made it to the intended target, but you have already included those hijackers in your blame the Saudis mix. So which city in Canada should the US attack? The majority of the hijackers were Saudi's. But let's not let that fact get in the way either. Quote
DogOnPorch Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 The majority of the hijackers were Saudi's. But let's not let that fact get in the way either. So? Which city? Vancouver is my bet. Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
olpfan1 Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 (edited) Whatever you say. You honestly believe the RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT would allow the US military on its soil to kill people they perceive to be terrorists? WHAT WORLD DO YOU LIVE ON? Edited March 12, 2012 by olpfan1 Quote
GostHacked Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 So? Which city? Vancouver is my bet. Ever been to Vancouver? You could have said Ottawa and you'd be more correct. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 I'm not joking. Had the Russians been behind 9-11 we'd be counting rad levels right now. Yep...another case of not using metric units! Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Guest American Woman Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 You honestly believe the RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT would allow the US military on its soil to kill people they perceive to be terrorists? I don't believe one asks for such permission in a war. I don't believe we asked Japan if they would allow us on their soil to wage war after Pearl Harbor - and note that the U.S. didn't ask for permission to go into Pakistan to kill bin Laden. WHAT WORLD DO YOU LIVE ON? I live "on" the real world, not some alternate universe. Quote
olpfan1 Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 I don't believe one asks for such permission in a war. I don't believe we asked Japan if they would allow us on their soil to wage war after Pearl Harbor - and note that the U.S. didn't ask for permission to go into Pakistan to kill bin Laden. I live "on" the real world, not some alternate universe. you realize that ..that would have been nuclear war then right? my god, its like you forgot who your adversary was during the middle to end part of the last century Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 I don't believe one asks for such permission in a war. I don't believe we asked Japan if they would allow us on their soil to wage war after Pearl Harbor - and note that the U.S. didn't ask for permission to go into Pakistan to kill bin Laden. Agreed...President Wilson sent two American Expeditionary Forces to Russia during the period 1918 - 1920 to guard the railroad and American property. American troops have "occupied" small parts of Russia. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
olpfan1 Posted March 12, 2012 Report Posted March 12, 2012 Agreed...President Wilson sent two American Expeditionary Forces to Russia during the period 1918 - 1920 to guard the railroad and American property. American troops have "occupied" small parts of Russia. You are using that as an example to show that they would have let U.S troops occupy and bomb targets in their country in 2001/2002 and beyond? U.S meet Putin, Putin meet U.S, Putin no like U.S Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.