Jump to content

Keystone XL Delayed


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 147
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest American Woman

Don't mess with the Beaver

They might be proud and noble animals but they'll chew your ankles off

that is your future

Last I heard, "Joe Canada" moved to the United States to try to make it in Hollywood. Did he leave his Beaver behind - or has it, too, become enamored of America? ;)

Gotta say, though, loved the commercial. That Beaver rocks. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is over. How much would you like to bet that Obama snubs Harper ...they were supposed to meet and talk Sunday along with the Mexican President but he had to cancel due to the tragic death of one of his ministers. I see no reason why the two of them can't sit down and discuss the pipeline decision.

But yeah if you expect Canada to wait until the 2012 election is over you can kiss our asses

Really?

Who do you speak for olp?

I understand the disappointment some feel but it seems not constructive to me to throw vengeful statements around. What happened is just democracy in action. I realize democracy is frustrating to business/industry autocrats, but at some point they have to get accustomed to it. If TransCanada had paid attention to people's concerns earlier in the game and presented alternative routes up front, maybe they'd be proceeding now.

They can buy the politicians but not the people. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Derek L

And we'd get even more with the terminal in BC...

It’s not an either/or proposition……..The Chevron refinery here is being upgraded/expanded and the TransMountain line is currently being expanded………Keystone was in addition to this………You might be confusing the issue with Enbridge’s proposed Northern Gateway pipeline……..which is being stalled with negotiations with First Nations……….The other proposal, by Enbridge, is to extend the current lines that terminate in Oklahoma, to Houston (The proposed destination of Keystone XL). See “Wrangler Pipeline”

This pipeline was supposed to carry 800k barrels per day. Right now we're selling oil at a $20 a barrel discount, right?

800k x 20 is $16 m per day X 365 is a cost of $5.8 billion per year the lack of a pipeline is costing. Seems to me that building a refinery to handle it here is the no brainer.

It’s not that easy……Say they build a refinery…..Instead of having to transport crude/bitumen, now you have to transport the various refined products, each requiring their own pipelines……Figure the cost of one pipeline, multiplied by 3-4 (Low grade Gasoline, Diesel, Kerosene & bunker fuel) as a minimum, to say nothing of the various other grades and requirements for petrochemicals…..

What you (and others are proposing) is a major expansion of infrastructure that’s not needed with current output. Also, you (and others) are looking at this as an antagonistic perspective, most of these companies, both Canadian and American owned, have interests in both countries (amongst others)…..

Keystone XL doesn’t get built…….. Their competitors, Enbridge (for example) will find other options…..As I’ve suggested, the ‘Wrangler” pipeline won’t require negotiations with Nebraskan farmers, BC first nations or Middle East despots……

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really?

Who do you speak for olp?

I understand the disappointment some feel but it seems not constructive to me to throw vengeful statements around. What happened is just democracy in action. I realize democracy is frustrating to business/industry autocrats, but at some point they have to get accustomed to it. If TransCanada had paid attention to people's concerns earlier in the game and presented alternative routes up front, maybe they'd be proceeding now.

They can buy the politicians but not the people. :)

the obama administration PICKED that route...there was quite a few routes proposed

I have no idea what you're talking about

Edited by olp1fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest American Woman

the obama administration PICKED that route...there was quite a few routes proposed

Guess again.

The U.S. Department of State issued a Presidential Permit authorizing the construction, maintenance and operation of facilities at the United States and Canada border in March of 2008.

Obama was sworn in as POTUS on January 20, 2009.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Derek L

Guess again.

The U.S. Department of State issued a Presidential Permit authorizing the construction, maintenance and operation of facilities at the United States and Canada border in March of 2008.

Obama was sworn in as POTUS on January 20, 2009.

Why let facts get in the way of a good attack hey? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest American Woman

Why let facts get in the way of a good attack hey? ;)

Yeah, it's a bummer when that happens. :P

I'm still expecting to see this pipeline go through. From what I've read, even the costs of a delay and rerouting it will be cheaper than other alternatives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect the Chinese will be willing to help with as much money as we want. Might even build us a refinery if we guarantee they get the proceeds.

This is more than possible. The Chinese have been paving roads and building infrastructure in Africa with absolutely no guarantee of returns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is more than possible. The Chinese have been paving roads and building infrastructure in Africa with absolutely no guarantee of returns.

The Chinese have already taken an $11 billion stake in the oil sands. If the Americans won't let us pipe it there the Chinese will certainly do whatever we want to get it sent to them. That includes paying higher prices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest American Woman

The Chinese have already taken an $11 billion stake in the oil sands. If the Americans won't let us pipe it there the Chinese will certainly do whatever we want to get it sent to them. That includes paying higher prices.

Makes one wonder why TransCanada is pushing so hard for this pipeline, and is willing to work with Americans to get it done. Perhaps they aren't privy to this information? Or perhaps there's more to it?

Edited by American Woman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Makes one wonder why TransCanada is pushing so hard for this pipeline, and is willing to work with Americans to get it done. Perhaps they aren't privy to this information? Or perhaps there's more to it?

The western lines aren't being built by TransCanada. But my understanding is that company has already spent a billion dollars preparing for the keystone construction, including stockpiling pipe along the route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Derek L

Makes one wonder why TransCanada is pushing so hard for this pipeline, and is willing to work with Americans to get it done. Perhaps they aren't privy to this information? Or perhaps there's more to it?

Exactly, people are looking at the entire thing as a zero sum game……..Oil, like any commodity, will go where it’s in demand…….The already existing lines into the States won’t be “turned off”, but expanded……Expansion as opposed to new construction out manoeuvres much of the regulatory process, especially when crossing the boarder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Derek L

Hmmmm

TransCanada agrees not to put Keystone XL pipeline in Sand Hills

A Canadian pipeline company agreed Monday to move the controversial Keystone XL pipeline outside the Sand Hills region of Nebraska, where many feared it would threaten one of the nation’s most important agricultural aquifers.

Sen. Mike Flood, speaker of the Nebraska legislature, announced on the floor that TransCanada Corp. would move the pipeline to another area of the state. Sources in Nebraska said it would likely be located farther east, nearer an existing Keystone pipeline that already carries Canadian tar sands oil into the U.S.

Interesting........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest American Woman

Who cares how many cross it already? The residents don't want another pipeline crossing it and are probably miffed about those ones, since many of them have leaked.

My point, in response to Argus' post, was that there aren't "zillions of pipelines" in the Sandhills - the area that Nebraskans are concerned about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,749
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Betsy Smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Charliep earned a badge
      First Post
    • Betsy Smith earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Charliep earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • wwef235 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • CrazyCanuck89 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...