Jump to content

Federal Election Polls


Recommended Posts

Maybe you could choose a name that would better reflect your current views. Like neoconservative or maybe neofascist.

Neo fascist? Are you being serious? Maybe you should have accused me of being a Liberal Fascist.

When I started this forum I was a die hard socialist, hence my name. My thoughts have changed since that time and I see socialism as a scourge to society. If I could change my name I would, but I don't think I can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neo fascist? Are you being serious? Maybe you should have accused me of being a Liberal Fascist.

When I started this forum I was a die hard socialist, hence my name. My thoughts have changed since that time and I see socialism as a scourge to society. If I could change my name I would, but I don't think I can.

I was the same as you.. :)

I was a die hard socialist from around 16-20ish, then flip flopped pretty quickly into a die hard fiscal conservative. I think getting an education in business/finance and starting to pay taxes has that effect on people.

Business/financial education should really be a part of high school curriculums if we're going to give 18 year olds the right to vote to seize assets from other members of society to fuel their childish utopian dreams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was the same as you.. :)

I was a die hard socialist from around 16-20ish, then flip flopped pretty quickly into a die hard fiscal conservative. I think getting an education in business/finance and starting to pay taxes has that effect on people.

Business/financial education should really be a part of high school curriculums if we're going to give 18 year olds the right to vote to seize assets from other members of society to fuel their childish utopian dreams.

Yes, finally someone who understands. I'm glad it happened to me and I'm embarrassed at my past ways.

As for HS curricula; they are more concerned about Social Justice. The education system is run by the left.

Edited by socialist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The latest poll, Leger/Le Devoir, has your party in third place - down 5 points in a month - and the PMO scandal is just ramping up and going nowhere. Corruption tends to do this to those seeking re-election.

Only 2,095 Canadians participated in this survey. Completely ridiculous to predict an NDP win here, even minority. Whoever gets elected however, will be a minority government. With Mulcair and Trudeau, no platforms or plans from either, I still like the devil I know. If you disagree, I will predict also that you will be very disappointed in either leader. Both of them will put in place policies you will not agree with, will do favour for their friends, will keep the Senate and appoint more Senators, will lie, cheat, etc. So, take off your rosy glasses and brace on for higher income tax, a carbon tax on top of that, higher HST, programs cancelled. You will have to live with all that and I bet the whining will start immediately after the election.

.

Edited by socialist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The latest poll, Leger/Le Devoir, has your party in third place - down 5 points in a month - and the PMO scandal is just ramping up and going nowhere. Corruption tends to do this to those seeking re-election.

Once Canadians will hear what actual carbon reduction targets Mulcair will set if he forms government, the shift towards the CPC will take place. I am not worried about any polls taken now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only 2,095 Canadians participated in this survey.

This is about twice the size of the usual poll sample.

Here is another interesting fact from the Leger poll: In answer to the question, "would you prefer to see the current government re-elected?", only 23% answered yes - less than the 27% who supported the Tories in the same poll. When a governing party's own supporters favor a change in gov't it's a good bet they are in deep trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take whatever mix it comes in as long as we get our democracy back.

Explain how you've personally suffered from our lack of democracy according to you.

have you been unlawfully detained?

Have you been denied the ability to leave the country?

Have G-men kicked down your door and aressted you or even seartched your home?

Has the government seized your assets?

Please explain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neo fascist? Are you being serious? Maybe you should have accused me of being a Liberal Fascist.

When I started this forum I was a die hard socialist, hence my name. My thoughts have changed since that time and I see socialism as a scourge to society. If I could change my name I would, but I don't think I can.

And when did you start this forum? 1850?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The people have not even started to pay attention. And how is their energy plan coming, I hear they don't have one ,except to just leave the oil in the ground. Mulcair's 15 minutes will come to a crashing end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nanos:

CPC 32

NDP 29

LPC 29

Ontario:

CPC 42

NDP 23

http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/election/election-2015-ontario-voters-push-conservatives-to-slight-lead-in-nanos-polling-1.2521476

Who's to be believed?

(and yes, I know that Nanos uses a 4 week rolling average, but the CPC number is up).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nanos:

CPC 32

NDP 29

LPC 29

Ontario:

CPC 42

NDP 23

http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/election/election-2015-ontario-voters-push-conservatives-to-slight-lead-in-nanos-polling-1.2521476

Who's to be believed?

(and yes, I know that Nanos uses a 4 week rolling average, but the CPC number is up).

I wonder what has caused the CPC to have such a large lead in Ontariowe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nanos:

CPC 32

NDP 29

LPC 29

Ontario:

CPC 42

NDP 23

http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/election/election-2015-ontario-voters-push-conservatives-to-slight-lead-in-nanos-polling-1.2521476

Who's to be believed?

(and yes, I know that Nanos uses a 4 week rolling average, but the CPC number is up).

Nanos's numbers are all messed up due to his methods. Polling 250 people each week, then stitching together the sample is a poor way of gauging public opinion during a campaign, when opinion can vary wildly from week to week. More importantly, 250 people getting weighted to be representative of a population of 35 million is not very good. We have an unrepresentative sample being weighted, then stitched together with other unrepresentative samples that are also weighted. His numbers are delayed and muddled in large margins of error. He should have never changed his methodology. The results of his party power and leadership indices show how far off his popular support numbers are.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,723
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    DACHSHUND
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • babetteteets went up a rank
      Rookie
    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      First Post
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...