Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

But it's Mulcair who will do the beating up. And Harper will be at the top of his list. If you've ever watched QP you know how good Tom can be, and how obvious the CPC talking points are usually nothing more than deflections. That'll be the really funny part.

Why? Muclair's potential voters would never vote for Harper anyway. He needs to move people away from the Liberals.

It the NDP win this election it'll be because JT is a complete failure at leader.

Posted

Why? Muclair's potential voters would never vote for Harper anyway. He needs to move people away from the Liberals.

It the NDP win this election it'll be because JT is a complete failure at leader.

The Harper base won't likely be affected by Harper's stumbles, but there is a lot of soft voters out there who may be. If the NDP win it will be because the country is tired of Harper and is ready for a change.

Posted

The Harper base won't likely be affected by Harper's stumbles, but there is a lot of soft voters out there who may be. If the NDP win it will be because the country is tired of Harper and is ready for a change.

You don't get the idea of the political spectrum do you? The NDP aren't swaying likely Harper voters. They've got to attack the Liberals for support. For example seats in Downtown Toronto the only way the NDP are going to win there is to go after the Liberals. Harper doesn't play into the equation. Then in the burbs it's pretty much Liberals vs CPC in every riding. So Mulclair will be doing Harper a favour by going after JT.

Posted

You don't get the idea of the political spectrum do you? The NDP aren't swaying likely Harper voters. They've got to attack the Liberals for support. For example seats in Downtown Toronto the only way the NDP are going to win there is to go after the Liberals. Harper doesn't play into the equation. Then in the burbs it's pretty much Liberals vs CPC in every riding. So Mulclair will be doing Harper a favour by going after JT.

As I already pointed out, Harper's base is his base, nuf said. But if you look at a lot of the polling research there are an unusually high number of soft voters, even among pervious CPC voters who just don't like Harper and are considering voting for Mulcair. And it also seems the tactics that worked against Dion and Ignatieff just aren't working so well this time around. Possibly because they are just such blatant rehashes of the same old same old.

Posted

As I already pointed out, Harper's base is his base, nuf said. But if you look at a lot of the polling research there are an unusually high number of soft voters, even among pervious CPC voters who just don't like Harper and are considering voting for Mulcair. And it also seems the tactics that worked against Dion and Ignatieff just aren't working so well this time around. Possibly because they are just such blatant rehashes of the same old same old.

You're going to have to cite a study or something that Previous Harper voters are going to vote for Mulclair. I'm just not going to let that one stand.

Also isn't JT currently doing worse in the polls than Dion and Iggy were this close to an election. You're just spouting platitudes hoping things happen without any evidence to support your claims.

Posted

Mulcair's masterful performance in Question Period probably explains Conservative maneuvers on debate formats - Harper wants no part of Mulcair one on one before a national television audience.

When the people have no tyrant, their public opinion becomes one.

...... Lord Lytton

Posted

Mulcair's masterful performance in Question Period probably explains Conservative maneuvers on debate formats - Harper wants no part of Mulcair one on one before a national television audience.

We have heard this fairy tale about harper getting destroyed in debates the last go round. Apparently harper was no match for an ivy league professor and one of the most popular ndp leaders out there...

"Stop the Madness!!!" - Kevin O'Leary

"Money is the ultimate scorecard of life!". - Kevin O'Leary

Economic Left/Right: 4.00

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.77

Posted

We have heard this fairy tale about harper getting destroyed in debates the last go round. Apparently harper was no match for an ivy league professor and one of the most popular ndp leaders out there...

There was nothing exceptionally impressive about Harper's performance in the 2011 debate; Ignatieff crashed and burned on his own. As for Layton's performance, the 2011 election was a real breakthrough: he took the NDP from fourth place to Official Opposition. Mulcair has always been a stronger debater than Layton imo and now Harper has a seriously threatening main competitor; this is quite different from the last two elections.

Posted

Here's a Forum poll from last month that states that 10% of 2011 CPC voters plan to vote NDP this time: http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/Federal%20Horserace%20News%20Release%20(2015%2006%2016)%20Forum%20Research.pdf

From your link.

Among those who voted Liberal in 2011, as many as one quarter will vote NDP this time around (25%)

What does that say about JT?

I'm assuming everyone's jumped ship on him now right?

Posted

harper.jpg

This one is making the rounds on social media today, thought I'd share with the MLW members.

“Be like water making its way through cracks. Do not be assertive, but adjust to the object, and you shall find your way around or through it. If nothing within you stays rigid, outward things will disclose themselves. Empty your mind, be formless. Shapeless, like water. If you put water into a cup, it becomes the cup. You put water into a bottle, it becomes the bottle. You put it into a teapot, it becomes the teapot. Now, water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend.”
― Bruce Lee

Posted

We have heard this fairy tale about harper getting destroyed in debates the last go round. Apparently harper was no match for an ivy league professor and one of the most popular ndp leaders out there...

How to explain, then, Harper running scared?

When the people have no tyrant, their public opinion becomes one.

...... Lord Lytton

Posted

From your link.

What does that say about JT?

I'm assuming everyone's jumped ship on him now right?

JT is ridiculous. You'll get no argument from me there. The most surprising thing to me is that he maintained his popularity as long as he did. I preferred Dion, frankly.

Posted

There is no doubt that Mulcair has done a terrific job in attacking Harper in Parliament - but lets not lose track of what Question Period really is - it's a forum where the opposition gets to take free shots at the government. When we get to the debates, Mulcair will have to defend his own platform against the LIberals - who are fighting for their lives - and also the Bloc who are fighting for their lives as well. Both would be well-advised to train their guns on Mulcair as much as they do Harper or they risk further irrelevance. And of course, Harper will be throwing gasoline on the squabbles that will ensue - the cat amongst the canaries, so to speak. And then we also have the specter of the "Consordium" holding a debate without Harper - we can only hope that mean old Tom doesn't make Justin cry. Darn, it's going to be so interesting.

Back to Basics

Posted

There is no doubt that Mulcair has done a terrific job in attacking Harper in Parliament - but lets not lose track of what Question Period really is - it's a forum where the opposition gets to take free shots at the government. When we get to the debates, Mulcair will have to defend his own platform against the LIberals - who are fighting for their lives - and also the Bloc who are fighting for their lives as well. Both would be well-advised to train their guns on Mulcair as much as they do Harper or they risk further irrelevance. And of course, Harper will be throwing gasoline on the squabbles that will ensue - the cat amongst the canaries, so to speak. And then we also have the specter of the "Consordium" holding a debate without Harper - we can only hope that mean old Tom doesn't make Justin cry. Darn, it's going to be so interesting.

Makes you wonder just why Harper is hiding from the consortium.

Posted

It only occurred to me a day or two ago that it could be a clever Machiavellian strategy, for the reasons KIS gives: the opposition parties all get to attack each other (probably mostly focused on the NDP) while Harper sits back and watches.

Posted

According to the latest Abacus poll fully 77% of respondents "would prefer to see a change in gov't ".

Good grief, that means a sizable chunk of the Conservative base wants Harper gone.

When the people have no tyrant, their public opinion becomes one.

...... Lord Lytton

Posted

Makes you wonder just why Harper is hiding from the consortium.

Your Liberals have been taking a beating for some time. Any suggestions as to how Trudeau can turn things around?

Back to Basics

Posted

I want to see an NDP attack ad involving Del Mastro scuffling alongside the police van in leg irons and cuffs and a voice over says: "this was Harper's parliamentary secretary and ethics spokesman. Had enough?"

My request is granted, A new on-line only attack ad features Del Mastro's perp walk in chains while a female voice lists a half dozen or so criminal charges laid against Conservative caucus members.

Hard to say which is more hard hitting, Harper's ISIS beheading ad or this one.

When the people have no tyrant, their public opinion becomes one.

...... Lord Lytton

Posted

My request is granted, A new on-line only attack ad features Del Mastro's perp walk in chains while a female voice lists a half dozen or so criminal charges laid against Conservative caucus members.

Hard to say which is more hard hitting, Harper's ISIS beheading ad or this one.

Who set that up,do you have a link for it?

Posted

It only occurred to me a day or two ago that it could be a clever Machiavellian strategy, for the reasons KIS gives: the opposition parties all get to attack each other (probably mostly focused on the NDP) while Harper sits back and watches.

OTOH it could be that clever Machiavellian strategies rank high amongst the many reasons why Canadians appear to be itching for a change.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,919
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Milla
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...