bush_cheney2004 Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 Threat of what. More Canadian oil services contractors...much scarier than Saddam? They moved the troops around to wherever they need them. And if they need to move them back, they will do that. As in, any nice place to fire Patriot missiles against scuds, or whatever is needed. Now you are just regurgitating whatever you vaguely remember from American news media, skipping key facts. And don't give me your sanctimonious crap, Georgie kissed the Prince and they were holding hands. I seen it. Just like any other state visit. That's the part you don't get...Saudi Arabia is a nation state just like Canada, and is afforded the same benefits of a mutually beneficial relationship, oh Superior One. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Sir Bandelot Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 Just like any other state visit. That's the part you don't get...Saudi Arabia is a nation state just like Canada, and is afforded the same benefits of a mutually beneficial relationship, oh Superior One. Now you want to make it look like I don't already know that, in your typical style. Of course I get it. Some people here didn't want to believe it. In the foreground it's all about the deal, but meanwhile there's stuff going on in the background. Yeah yeah, Canada is not above making similar deals with the devil, for the mutually beneficial relationship. Quote
Bonam Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 Saw a blurb about someone looking at putting a gay bar next to the mosque. I thought it was a brilliant suggestion that would expose the mosque supporters for the hypocrites they are (i.e. I am certain the gay bar would be opposed by the same people as unnecessarily provocative). We should surround the thing on all sides with: a gay bar, a pig butcher shop, a Mohammed cartoon printing factory, and an atheist think tank or something. All for the purposes of mutual understanding and cultural outreach, of course. Quote
Smallc Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 (i.e. I am certain the gay bar would be opposed by the same people as unnecessarily provocative). Not by this person it wouldn't. Im sure all the conservatives would be happy about a gay bar at Ground Zero though. I say, build it. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 We should surround the thing on all sides with: a gay bar, a pig butcher shop, a Mohammed cartoon printing factory, and an atheist think tank or something. All for the purposes of mutual understanding and cultural outreach, of course. Great idea..let's not forget the adult sex shops and double dongs, as well as a pork barbecue joint! Alah Akbar! Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Guest TrueMetis Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 Saw a blurb about someone looking at putting a gay bar next to the mosque. I thought it was a brilliant suggestion that would expose the mosque supporters for the hypocrites they are (i.e. I am certain the gay bar would be opposed by the same people as unnecessarily provocative). Go for it. Quote
dre Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 We should surround the thing on all sides with: a gay bar, a pig butcher shop, a Mohammed cartoon printing factory That little statement illustrates the mentality in play here quite nicely. Quote I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger
kimmy Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 That little statement illustrates the mentality in play here quite nicely. Indeed! Just imagine all the great opportunities for building bridges, healing, and breaking down barriers! It's an Awesome idea! -k Quote (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ノ(° -°ノ)
Bonam Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 (edited) That little statement illustrates the mentality in play here quite nicely. You are obviously being oversensitive and illogically emotional. I clearly specified that these facilities would be built for the purpose of cultural outreach and mutual understanding. Moreover, they are not exclusively for the use of non-Muslims. Edited August 11, 2010 by Bonam Quote
Jack Weber Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 You are obviously being oversensitive and illogically emotional. I clearly specified that these facilities would be built for the purpose of cultural outreach and mutual understanding. Moreover, they are not exclusively for the use of non-Muslims. Are you trying to tell us that there are gay Muslims??? Because Mr.Ahmedinejad strongly disputes your claim,at least in Iran... Quote The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!
DogOnPorch Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 Are you trying to tell us that there are gay Muslims??? Because Mr.Ahmedinejad strongly disputes your claim,at least in Iran... Well we know what happens when he finds some of these nonexistent gays. Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
Shakeyhands Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 Indeed. How tolerant of you to tolerate intolerance. Does it give you a warm fuzzy feeling to keep women in "their place". Or do you "allow" your wife freedom while supporting the removal of these same freedoms for others? Do you hate Jews as well? Quote "They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche
BubberMiley Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 That's true. Many christian sects believe in "keeping women in their place" as do hasidic jews. For some reason, that gets a pass among the rabid muslim-haters. Quote "I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Machjo Posted August 11, 2010 Author Report Posted August 11, 2010 No, the problem isn't that a bunch of terrorists are Saudi. The problem is that Saudi Arabia is a state designed to create extremist Muslims. In an ideal world, we should have nothing to do with such a state. Strategically and economically that may be impossible right now, but that doesn't mean we need to let them fund their extremist cultural imperialism in the West. Oh my. So protesters feel it a priority to take to the streets to challenge the building of a mosque rather than focus instead on a US alliance with a state designed to create extremist Muslims? Is the US military aware of this? And if so, what the heck is it doing in an alliance with such a country while fighting terrorism?Has it got its head screwed on straight? So looking at it that way, which ought to be the priority? Challenging the building of a mosque or a US military alliance with a terrorist state? Quote With friends like Zionists, what Jew needs enemies? With friends like Islamists, what Muslim needs enemies?
DogOnPorch Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 Do you hate Jews as well? Did you get it up the you know where when you were in prison? Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
Machjo Posted August 11, 2010 Author Report Posted August 11, 2010 I think it does necessarily show a problem. Saudi money is dirty money. Would a church funded by a drug cartel fly? I don't think so. Same thing here. If it wasn't for their vast supply of oil and opposition to Iran, we would have Saudi Arabia economically sanctioned to hell and back, it is one of the most backward and repressive regimes in the middle east. Oh, I see. So it's all about forming marriages of convenience. So if the Saudis were investing in some company in the US, great for jobs. But a mosque. Oh my. Quote With friends like Zionists, what Jew needs enemies? With friends like Islamists, what Muslim needs enemies?
GostHacked Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 Oh, I see. So it's all about forming marriages of convenience. So if the Saudis were investing in some company in the US, great for jobs. But a mosque. Oh my. Yes, I am more concerned with dealing with a country that is known for producing a great deal of the terrorists out there. I mean, we get worked up over a stoning in Iran, when stoning I would guess takes place in Saudi Arabia more often than we know, or like to admit. Quote
Machjo Posted August 11, 2010 Author Report Posted August 11, 2010 Yes, I am more concerned with dealing with a country that is known for producing a great deal of the terrorists out there. I mean, we get worked up over a stoning in Iran, when stoning I would guess takes place in Saudi Arabia more often than we know, or like to admit. Then intstead of wasting their time protesting the building of a mosque and the practicing of freedom of religion, could these protesters not put their energy to better use protesting US diplomatic ties with Saudi Arabia? Would that not be wiser? After all, most of the congregants at that mosque are probably Americans who've never set foot on Saudi soil except maybe to on pilgrimage and that's it. Quote With friends like Zionists, what Jew needs enemies? With friends like Islamists, what Muslim needs enemies?
kimmy Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 Not by this person it wouldn't. Im sure all the conservatives would be happy about a gay bar at Ground Zero though. I say, build it. So... here's the response from the Islamic center's Twitter account: "You’re free to open whatever you like. If you won’t consider the sensibilities of Muslims, you’re not going to build dialog." Park51 Twitter Gutfeld can build it, but it won't build a dialog because it doesn't respect their sensibilities. So, uh, what was the rationale for building a Muslim center at this location, again? -k Quote (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ノ(° -°ノ)
bloodyminded Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 (edited) So... here's the response from the Islamic center's Twitter account: "Youre free to open whatever you like. If you wont consider the sensibilities of Muslims, youre not going to build dialog." Park51 Twitter Gutfeld can build it, but it won't build a dialog because it doesn't respect their sensibilities. So, uh, what was the rationale for building a Muslim center at this location, again? -k The gay bar "proposal" is not serious; we know this because most of its rhetorical "supporters" throw tantrums at the fact of homosexuality becoming normalized (which they oppose). The very idea is to declare Muslim hypocrisy, without even pretending to be serious about the dialogue in the first place. In other words, they don't want dialogue; they cherish their "clash of civilizations narrative too much to ruin it. What they're saying is, "we won't build dialogue on this issue"...hoping that the Muslims in question will return the sentiment in kind. The response you quote could be more about the fact of the intended provocation than of the subject of the provocation itself. Similarly, there are few insults which actually bother me; it's the fact of the intention to insult me that I consider bothersome. The disingenuousness of the "proposal" becomes clear when we realize (as most of us surely do) that most of the "let's build a gay bar" giggling children actually find such things repugnant. And, all things being equal, would no doubt oppose a gay bar being opened too close to the Hallowed site of the Worst Crime in History. Edited August 11, 2010 by bloodyminded Quote As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand. --Josh Billings
Jack Weber Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 Well we know what happens when he finds some of these nonexistent gays. Yes!!! And it's the same rupugnant thing he intends to do to Irael on a more massive scale,if given the chance. Quote The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!
Sir Bandelot Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 Why is it surprising or somehow vindicating that muslims would not want a gay bar right next to their mosque. Or rather, that they don't consider it constructive to a dialog? Because they know why it's being proposed, as a foil to their plans. Not too many churches would like the gay bar either. Certainly not the RC church. So much for that argument. Quote
Sir Bandelot Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 Then intstead of wasting their time protesting the building of a mosque and the practicing of freedom of religion, could these protesters not put their energy to better use protesting US diplomatic ties with Saudi Arabia? Would that not be wiser? After all, most of the congregants at that mosque are probably Americans who've never set foot on Saudi soil except maybe to on pilgrimage and that's it. The silence in regard to these Saudi related posts, speaks volumes. Quote
DogOnPorch Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 The silence in regard to these Saudi related posts, speaks volumes. Big fan of Saudi Arabia? Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
Sir Bandelot Posted August 11, 2010 Report Posted August 11, 2010 Big fan of Saudi Arabia? Gimme a big snarf there, Dog... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.