Shady Posted October 21, 2009 Report Posted October 21, 2009 The table below compares the White House's February 2009 projection of the number of jobs that would be created by the 2009 stimulus law (through the end of 2010) with the actual change in state payroll employment through September 2009 (the latest figures available). According to the data, 49 States and the District of Columbia have lost jobs since stimulus was enacted. Only North Dakota has seen net job creation following the February 2009 stimulus. While President Obama claimed the result of his stimulus bill would be the creation of 3.5 million jobs, the Nation has already lost a total of 2.7 million – a difference of 6.2 million jobs. Pic Quote
weareone Posted October 21, 2009 Report Posted October 21, 2009 The table below compares the White House's February 2009 projection of the number of jobs that would be created by the 2009 stimulus law (through the end of 2010) with the actual change in state payroll employment through September 2009 (the latest figures available).According to the data, 49 States and the District of Columbia have lost jobs since stimulus was enacted. Only North Dakota has seen net job creation following the February 2009 stimulus. While President Obama claimed the result of his stimulus bill would be the creation of 3.5 million jobs, the Nation has already lost a total of 2.7 million – a difference of 6.2 million jobs. Pic How stupid. At least 250,000 people in America enter the work force every month. To think that any country could create that many jobs in this economy is unrealistic. Try to create 250,000 new jobs and then create jobs for those unemployed. Impossile. Besides, Obama has to create jobs that were lost under the bushidiot administration. Quote
Oleg Bach Posted October 21, 2009 Report Posted October 21, 2009 I could never figure out why no one noticed that when the stimulas packages were doled out that they STILL fired all the workers..? You would assume that logic dictates that a stimulas incentive was to save the industry - not..save the executives and keep them in the style they are accustomed... Where did you think the tax money was going - the so-called brilliant rich screw up and made themselves poor though stupidy, lazyness and lieing...so because they have the solid right of eternal entilement..They and their governmental friends came to the average person and said.."We are use to being on the top of society..can you poor average people give us all your money..we don't want to be tramatized... So because we are conditioned to believe that the rich and powerful are smart and good - we hand over our life savings... Quote
lictor616 Posted October 21, 2009 Report Posted October 21, 2009 (edited) The table below compares the White House's February 2009 projection of the number of jobs that would be created by the 2009 stimulus law (through the end of 2010) with the actual change in state payroll employment through September 2009 (the latest figures available).According to the data, 49 States and the District of Columbia have lost jobs since stimulus was enacted. Only North Dakota has seen net job creation following the February 2009 stimulus. While President Obama claimed the result of his stimulus bill would be the creation of 3.5 million jobs, the Nation has already lost a total of 2.7 million – a difference of 6.2 million jobs. Pic The stimulus bill is so stupid... so laughably absurd that only a doo gooding liberal could fail to see its fundamental flaw... When massah Obama says he injects money into "da ekonomy" where do you suppose that money comes from? Mount Everest? the Bermuda triangle? no!! It comes from the tax paying boobs. in essence its a communist nationalization of sorts... the government steals the tax payer's cash to spend it FOR THEM... its plain nationalization of wealth. Is money created in that way? OF COURSE NOT it merely switches hands! I'll let that most brilliant and noble son of Europe Daniel Hannan: say it for me: 1/ bailouts: 2/ stimulus nonsense: Edited October 21, 2009 by lictor616 Quote -Magna Europa Est Patria Nostra-
Oleg Bach Posted October 21, 2009 Report Posted October 21, 2009 Put simply. You can not continue to make something out of nothing forever. It is absurd that when big buisness or the banks run out of illusions to barter in that they expect to take money from the have nots and continue to operate. That would be like me asking you for all of your money then lend it back to you at an interest. Why would any sane person go for this? Some just don't want to let go. My well traveled sister once said to me. "Rich is not for ever" _ I suppose that poor is not forever either. Natural evolutions and revolutions take place. Those that inhabit the top always after a few generations fall to the bottom..You would not believe how many people I have met who are on welfare..are the decendants of former high ranking families - I know one young woman that is of royal lineage..and she has no teeth left... I am not making this up. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted October 22, 2009 Report Posted October 22, 2009 .....Besides, Obama has to create jobs that were lost under the bushidiot administration. That lame excuse didn't work for Bush, and it's not going to work for Obama either. Next we'll read more Obama excuses for the "jobless recovery". Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
GostHacked Posted October 22, 2009 Report Posted October 22, 2009 The only way government can 'create' jobs is to expand government. Kind of like the saying "The bureaucracy is expanding to meet the needs of an expanding bureaucracy" Private enterprise creates jobs. Private enterprise can axe jobs as well. Quote
BubberMiley Posted October 22, 2009 Report Posted October 22, 2009 The only way government can 'create' jobs is to expand government. Uh...no. They can hire people on contracts to do things for them. Like, you know, build roads and stuff. Quote "I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
GostHacked Posted October 22, 2009 Report Posted October 22, 2009 Uh...no. They can hire people on contracts to do things for them. Like, you know, build roads and stuff. I would not count contracts in with that. Contracts are temporary employment and not a full time job/career. Contracts range from 3 months to a few years. And I am sure the US government uses contracts as much as as our Canadian government. However I am sure both use it as statistics to say that WE GURT SUM JERBS !! (south park) Quote
Moonlight Graham Posted October 22, 2009 Report Posted October 22, 2009 So Shady, how would your ultra-partisan self spin this story if this was the Republicans "fault"? Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
sharkman Posted October 22, 2009 Report Posted October 22, 2009 Yeah, Obama's chicken's are definitely coming home to roost. Quote
Shady Posted October 22, 2009 Author Report Posted October 22, 2009 So Shady, how would your ultra-partisan self spin this story if this was the Republicans "fault"? His only chance is to try and blame it on the previous administration. Unfortunately, the expiration date on that excuse is fast approaching. The Dems have controlled all of congress for almost 3 years now. And they've held every branch of the elected federal government for close to a year. So it's a rather difficult task. I do not envy him. Quote
Shady Posted November 16, 2009 Author Report Posted November 16, 2009 (edited) Here's an interesting graph, produced by the Obama Administration. I'm sure voters will see it a lot next year around election time. Graph Edited November 16, 2009 by Shady Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.