-
Posts
10,256 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
54
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Moonbox
-
Ottawa moves to create national securities regulator
Moonbox replied to jdobbin's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
On their own? Without government regulation? That would be 100% totally completely and catastrophically a disaster. We need regulation, despite what some nuts think, when it comes to securities trading. It's always been and always will be the smart and informed investors making money off the stupid and uninformed (in general). Government regulation doesn't necessarily prevent this, but it at least helps prevent outright fraud. -
Ottawa moves to create national securities regulator
Moonbox replied to jdobbin's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Yep those are some big ones. There are lots more I couldn't think of too. -
If I had all the books I could let you know. I just know that spending has increased faster than inflation over the last few governments. Look at Borg's list. I mostly agree with it all. Social loafing is where the cuts can be made and there is TONS of social loafing going on. As far as anger is concerned, I don't give a flying **** if some crybaby on welfare or EI moocher is unhappy that they're not getting as big of a free check. As far as I'm concerned, if you're not working for the majority of the year, and if you don't have a work history, you should have access to food, shelter and the means to find a job and NOTHING else. No I already said this. You can't cause a deficit with spending. You cause a deficit when your spending goes over your revenues. If you reduce your revenues, you should also reduce your spending. It's not the tax decrease that's the problem. It's the spending increases. Amen to that. Unfortunately our governments typically believe that they have better uses for our money and Obama and friends have decided to screw us all over with bailouts whose primary beneficiaries will be the Unions.
-
Ottawa moves to create national securities regulator
Moonbox replied to jdobbin's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
It's not the centralization that's the problem. It's just been bad regulations. -
Ottawa moves to create national securities regulator
Moonbox replied to jdobbin's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
I'm 100% in favor of a national regulatory body. The current system is so backwards it's not even funny. The benefits of a national regulatory body are as follows: 1. Being able to make trades while out of province. 2. Not having to get your securities licenses changed when you move to different provinces 3. Streamlined processes for similar transactions across the country (huge benefit) 4. Being more compatible with the SEC in the United States. Currently the SEC in the US doesn't want anything to do with our regulatory bodies. There's very little cooperation between them and this is because the SEC doesn't want to have to deal with 9 different regulators with different rules in one country. Since our economies and financial systems are so completely intertwined it's silly for us not to have uniform (or at least reasonably so) processes and laws in regards to securities. -
No argument. The deficit would have hit because of the recesssion, and in this I agree that the tax reduction left less of a cushion, but here's the crux of the argument. You CAN cut taxes as long as your spending is in line. Our spending has gone out of control under the last two governments (Harper and Martin) and thus it we're more heavily in debt than we should be. The solution then is not to raise taxes, but to lower spending. AND even if you want extra tax money, take it from the top tax brackets, not from everyone else via a gst increase. In the end, you can NEVER have a deficit because of taxes. The only thing that can cause a deficit is spending.
-
That's pure drivel. Look up some numbers and get back to us. Show me how leaving the GST stable would have allowed us enough room to maneuver. It wouldn't have even been close. Add the fact that consumption tax cuts are DEFINETLY an indirect form of stimulus in the first place, and the argument gets even stupider. The deficit is cause by the recession and over spending. Tax cuts are more money in my wallet and less for the stupid and the lazy. We pay enough to cover Health Care and legitimate EI. What we need after the recession is another Chretien-style axeing of social spending.
-
What on earth are you talking about? You make less and less sense every day. If you're going to respond, try to make sense. Your rantings are pure nonsense. Explain the connections, don't just blabber on about stuff.
-
Management should be confronted, if somehow the public sector was being treated unfairly as compared to the private sector. If not, the union can screw itself. I'm sorry, but I don't think garbage truck and bus drivers are particularly skilled or trained and as such they should earn what an unskilled and uneducated grunt is worth. Yeah. I'm sure that would go over well considering how little support public sector unions have amongst the populations. Take Toronto as an example. 24,000 people on strike in a city of millions, most of whom are angry at the striking workers. Revolution?
-
Oleg you have no idea what you're talking about, as usual. Just another pointless rant. Banks don't charge anything for welfare cheques. You can get that crap directly deposited electronically into your account.
-
For the record, Topaz, the deficits aren't due to reduced taxation. It's due to increased spending solely. Less tax is always good. Spending increases simply can't outpace tax decreases.
-
Social services like the 9 week work year (screwed up EI) and funding to special interest groups can't really be called social services. Those are penalties for working hard.
-
Ignatieff: 'no guarantee' on EI reforms
Moonbox replied to Sir Bandelot's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
I piss on the Trudeau name and everything he stood for. I'll probably leave the country if he ever becomes PM. -
The Holy Roman Empire was Germanic Catholic Empire. The Russians, as far as I know, never claimed any connection to the HRE, as they were never a catholic nation but rather an orthodox christian nation. The Russians claimed to be the 'third' Rome and that they carried on the traditions of ancient Rome and Byzantium, but everyone and their mother claims that so it means nothing. As for Ignatieff, he's an ugly mother and doesn't look anything like a Roman aristocrat. I take offense to that because I'm a Roman history buff
-
More censors will monitor your Internet activities
Moonbox replied to bjre's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
It won't pass. -
Proportional representation would be good for nothing but alienating the rest of the country even further from Toronto and Montreal.
-
I agree and it's too bad Bush paved the way for Obama. If Bush hadn't been such a disaster Obama probably wouldn't have had a chance with this crap.
-
Why many Canadian people have inaccurate knowledge of China
Moonbox replied to bjre's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Our censorship is to block junk like kiddie porn, beastiality and racial hate. China's censors are to hide the truth from their own people. The Chinese government, just like the Stalin USSR and the North Koreans, does not want a well-informed populace that questions what they do. I'm not saying the Chinese people haven't done good things. I'm saying the Chinese government holds China back from being respected by the world. -
Why many Canadian people have inaccurate knowledge of China
Moonbox replied to bjre's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
We can't read Chinese. Criticism on the internet for the Chinese government doesn't mean that the Chinese government doesn't censor a lot of the criticism it finds. -
Why many Canadian people have inaccurate knowledge of China
Moonbox replied to bjre's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
The problem with your brainwashed claims is that there are millions of Chinese immigrants in North America and they themselves have the exact same stories you call lies. You can pretend it's all made up by western media, but when you live around Toronto, and have hundreds of Chinese acquaintances and friends, you get their side of the story as well. Strangely enough, they say the same things as Western Media does, and strangely enough, a lot of them say that's why they left China in the first place. -
What does that even mean? Politics is definetly about impression management first and then managament later. Politics existed in the time of Ancient Egypt. It has always existed, and more often than not had NOTHING to do with freedom.
-
We don't win or lose anything. This was all bluster and all we did was defer the uncertainty for later.
-
No it's not. It's mostly about management...of a lot of things.
-
and the people will decide eventually to elect a minority and be done with it. We'll see who comes out on top. At this point I don't really know.
-
Why many Canadian people have inaccurate knowledge of China
Moonbox replied to bjre's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
It's because China gave up strict communism and allowed the capitalists in. It SHOULD be the 1st largest economy in the world, because over 1 billion people live there, but it's not because of its government. According to the Chinese government. According to everybody else a lot of people died there. No wait...it was SPACE ALIENS. I have nothing wrong to say about the Chinese people, especially the ones who have moved to Canada. I have dated Chinese girls when I was younger and they were smart and fun. China, the country, on the other hand, is a nasty government and is holding back the people very badly. It's like North Korea.
