eyeball

No, she's just an incredibly gullible victim of her own imagination. But it does sounds like you have a sizable number of acquaintances who use pronouns. Do you use them yourself?

Nope, it's just the answer I get from search results. You alluded to similar results when you said... It's true that economists loved the idea...

I've never had to consider it. My guess is because it's such a rare circumstance. Are you like Goddess who inexplicably knows dozens if not hundreds of people who've been killed by vaccine?

And the vast majority still do for the same reason. It's the best most effective measure against climate change. Which probably explains why the fossil fuel companies abandoned it. They're like old asbestos industry execs.

Nope, you don't have a clue.

Not the vast majority of them. Most know the long term gain is worth the short term pain.

Not by the vast majority of economists. It was only you people who had a problem. Fossil fuel companies have pivoted and seem happy to side with you now. They prefer tax credits and subsidies too.

While you chirp...it's left wing! LMAO!

Don't forget that was a conservative market-based solution the vast majority of economists and fossil fuel companies applauded.

It's a hoax...a scam. Donald Trump, repeatedly, to millions of cheering adoring fans.

You people claim the world and economy will collapse if we do anything about climate change. But I'm all for just letting nature take its course too.

So do we.

So it exists but doesn't apply. Your confusion certainly isn't shocking.

There's a bit truth to this alright but it's just the same right wing left wing hatred you folks have going for you. Everything defaults to that.

Seriously, given the socioeconomic catastrophism you people subscribe to? LMAO!

It's about time. Of course it spells disaster - the death of the economy will be worse than climate change.

We need more humans squabbling over increasingly scarce resources? Yup, that's the ticket.

When's the last time a warhawk that's gung-ho on military spending ever complained about effectiveness when it comes to the bazillions wasted on offensive warfare - something that's rarely if ever gained anything since WW2? Oh...wait a minute...they complained all the time - they always cried about needing just a little more money.

What does this even mean anymore given the apparent inability of modern military superpowers to knock off far weaker opponents? This trend has been with us going back to Korea and Vietnam and is only getting more obvious. All it seems we really need are guns, bullets some capacity to churn out drones and Bob's our uncle. In the unlikely event we get down to just one person left standing, they could touch off a nuclear plant converted to Doomsday Bomb and it's Sayonara. Better dead than fill-in-blank here right? Right?

LMAO!

Sure, so was Hitler according to you. Next you'll be saying Einstein was a hard boiled right winger. LMAO!

Yup, it's always this way with you. Sure. Can't you?

So do Isralies. Right wing religious conservatives are all crazy throughout the entire ME region. Secular lefties are the only hope for the place. We should try to evacuate them at the very least - save as many as we can.

It's just that you sound like so many others around here it's all Hamas, Hamas, Hamas. Palestinians are constantly omitted, forgotten and erased like they don't exist and never did. Nothing really makes it more obvious who's on the right side of history than listening to you people.

It's becoming pretty much unusable most times.