AngusThermopyle

Some more Cancon.

Not sure if I've posted this before, if so, my apologies. This woman is amazing, teeth or no teeth.

There appears to be some cognitive dissonance going on here. Or perhaps, unthinkable as it may be, Wynne and her people are lying. “However, we can confirm that since becoming premier in 2013, Premier Wynne has not been informed of any complaints of this nature against any member of her cabinet. “In saying that, we take these types of matters very seriously,” she added. “When our office receives information related to sexual misconduct, we engage the services of outside counsel and, where appropriate, retain the services of those with expertise in workplace investigations." So there have never been any complaints, yet when there are they engage the services, and blah blah blah. What is it, never? Or they've engaged the services? Or maybe just a huge bunch of lies.

Let me get this straight. You say details are needed. You say it's just anonymous allegations. You say a tweet is no the way to launch an investigation. Yet you persist in insisting Brown is some monster who abused women. You base this on...wait for it...basically the same points you claim are not valid in this situation. It must really hurt to be you. The human mind is just not designed to be twisted into such illogical pretzels.

Now that's the biggest pile of sh*t posted here for quite a while. Trudeau swift? How about his swiftness in dealing with Monseff? Her citizenship and passport problems still linger and haven't been dealt with. Nor do they appear to be any sort of priority for her or Trudeau. How about Hehr, he didn't deal with those repeat problems in a swift manner. The list of painstakingly slow swift actions goes on and on with Trudeau. As for your non point of it not being his government. well it didn't seem to matter when it was Brown accused. He certainly was swift with that one. He was pontificating about it before you could blink. So no, not partisan bullcrap, as you so eloquently put it. Rather a legitimate question. He didn't hesitate to weigh in and engage in some more vacuous virtue signaling when it was Brown. So why wouldn't he do the same now? Wait a minute! I know why. He did say he waits for people to tell him what's going on, doesn't follow silly stuff like the news. Maybe he just hasn't been told yet. I expect we'll hear from him soon when someone tells him, after all he didn't need any facts or proof in Browns case.

Why are you asking this? Are you seriously trying to deflect from the inane comment you made? Are you so desperate to avoid admitting you're on the wrong side of this that you'll resort to the most inane technique in the book? We're talking about specifics here, Brown and CTV. Thought I'd remind you of that since you seem to have forgotten already.

Now this is interesting. A Provincial Liberal cabinet member accused of sexual assault, right about the same time as the Brown allegations were made. Yet not a peep from Wynne or Trudeau regarding this. They wouldn't be biased in their outrage would they? It's funny how no one heard anything about this until now, almost as if someone was trying to keep it quiet, that can't be true though. After all, everyone knows that Liberals are shining paragons of virtue. http://torontosun.com/news/provincial/ontario-liberal-cabinet-minister-sexually-assaulted-woman-lawyer?fb_comment_id=fbc_1752417928152429_1752497004811188_1752497004811188

I think you meant to say a man who committed no crime and did no harm to anyone is all sunshine and lollipops. I do object to a news organization pillorying an innocent man while doing zero due diligence to ensure that they avoid that very thing. In your world it appears that due diligence is just a pesky inconvenience and should be discounted and avoided at all costs. To hell with the laws of civil society, especially when it suits your agenda.

So the latest development in this saga is that Brown is now suing CTV for 10 million. Good stuff, they should be held accountable for their reckless and vile actions. I wonder if they'll eagerly report that?

On the other hand it could be great for the country. If he goes too far down that particular rabbit hole he could be removed. That would be a win win for Canada.

True, he may not have been drunk. Inebriated is another story. Lately he does seem to be losing the thread, even more so than his usual state of confusion.

Well...to be fair, you do have a track record of doing just that.

I can't say I'm at all surprised by this development. Since the story first broke it stank to high heaven and only the most gullible of fools would have accepted it without a huge healthy dose of scepticism. Now what? Brown is going on the offensive, but what form will that offensive take? I'm hoping it will be legal action against his accusers and also CTV. That would be a method that force the entire sordid affair into the light. I'm pretty sure CTV can be sued as it's obvious they never practised any due diligence before jumping all over this story. http://ottawacitizen.com/news/provincial/key-accusation-against-patrick-brown-false-ctv-now-admits/wcm/b0fc3b8d-f7db-4b30-a808-50ed71b6371e

That's interesting, but also doesn't change the fact that he saw himself as some kind of gangster. I'm not sure if it's still up or has been edited yet, but if you went to his FB page it's very telling. You get a clear picture that he saw himself as a gangster and thug. Lot's of posts about criminal behaviour. Also interesting is the fact that his uncle was convicted of the murder of two farmers. An uncanny similarity of circumstances wouldn't you say? It appears that criminal behaviour was, and still may be a way of life for this family. Lately there's been talk that his uncle is a member of the Indian Posse and that this young man also aspired to be a member. I'm sure that's something that won't be reported on though. It doesn't fit the narrative that's being created. I just checked, his FB page is gone.

The picture being painted by the media is one of a sweet young guy who was brutally murdered. The true story is far more nuanced than that. He didn't see himself as such by any means.

Spot on. Here is an article about that very thing. It's long but well worth the read. https://www.newcenter.ca/news/2018/1/28/6su67ib1rqszpjc2w3qrm2ys1wbm7j

I wasn't aware that Guatemala had been relocated from Central America to North America. When did that happen?

How about some Cancon?

The question is, will someone come forward and accuse him? The next question would be, what would he do in response to such an accusation? We truly do live in interesting times.

And that is why many people have now started calling him PM Touchy Feely.

I'd vote for the dog. Dogs are loyal, honest and loving creatures, all attributes that Wynne lacks.

I was just listening to 640AM on the way home and they were talking to Lisa Raitt. They asked if she would take the position of party leader and although she didn't come right out and say she would, she did indicate that she was open to the proposition (oops, maybe I should have worded that differently). Her main point was that it was a decision to be made by the party leaders. However she did indicate that if asked she would do it. After watching her regularly crush Trudeau in QP I think she would be a very strong choice, certainly more than a match for Wynne. We'll just have to wait and see.

Honestly I don't think Trudeau saw this as an opportunity for a photo opp. Remember, our wonderfully transparent infant in big boy pants tried to keep this meeting secret. That makes me wonder exactly why he felt compelled to meet with Boyle. After all, if it was all above board, why would he try to hide it?

He sure as hell can be. It's called willfull blindness and is a strong indicator of a weak character.