Moonlight Graham

You're incapable of reason. You're ideologically locked in a cage and can't get out. You're a tyrant who denies the basic principles of due process and justice to people he dislikes. No amount of evidence can convince you. You're not 1 ounce better than all the chuds.

You're nuts dude. What conspiracy exactly? Give me specifics.

How am I behaving like that. Address me. I'm not responsible for anyone else but myself and i'm not on any "side" other than truth and democracy. FYI you're the one that wants to exile Ezra Levant based on lies of the state (CBC) that never happened. So I guess you're the Roman Inquisitor. Not saying Rebel didn't do things they shouldn't have (e.g. David Menzies putting a bright light close to a Liberal staffers face), but they deserve a fair "trail". You want to throw him in journalism jail without even considering the evidence because of your personal feelings about him. That's not how justice works. The Rebel asked some loaded and insulting questions. That's their crime. Not nearly as bad as the CBC lying 4-5 times on air to get back at some media outlet they dislike. Haven't heard you or @Michael Hardner criticize the CBC's undemocratic behaviour (and illegal aka defamation).

Here's Ezra's take @Michael Hardner and @eyeball: Cochrane said on CBC that Ezra/Rebel had their press pass revoked and removed from the property. Ezra says this never happened. So that's potentially a 4th lie (slander defamation) from a journalist on our objective public broadcaster. Cochrane can't be trusted, he needs to be fired for lying to the public 3-4 times. What else does he lie about? Ezra also has FOOTAGE here of him talking to Cochrane/Barton. It shows they weren't "live on the air" when they spoke, which Cochrane lied about when he did go back live on air. CBC also had to post a correction about when Barton said something factually incorrect when she fact-checked the question about indigenous unmarked graves by Rebel News. Ezra did say Rebel didn't have those ad truck vans, which is technically true but Ezra owns ForCanada, so it's deceptive and bad faith to not mention that, but not a lie.

LOL "you guys".

Here's what a 3rd party is defined in Canada: In Canada, a registered third party is a "a person or group that wants to participate in or influence elections other than as a political party, electoral district association, nomination contestant or candidate." Third parties register with Elections Canada and are regulated under the terms of the Canada Elections Act. Yeah sorry, newspaper endorsements count. Influencing election results is the whole point. Is it any different if it's on a page than a billboard?

If it quacks like a duck... They're trying to persuade people to vote a certain way. Hey remember this: https://www.huffpost.com/archive/ca/entry/postmedia-sun-front-pages-replaced-with-full-page-political-ads_n_8326634 Ok, what did The Rebel do?

Which flags? I don't know the guy at all. He has political opinions. Andrew Coyne mouths off every day. So did David Cochrane after the debates for the CBC.

So a newspaper endorsing a particular party or candidate isn't an advertisement? What's the difference between that and the Rebel van? The bias of the National Post is obvious. They are trying to get the CPC elected. Non-stop activism, they just aren't clowns like The Rebel.

That's false. No human remains have been found. Only "potential human remains" via ground-penetrating radar. 100% of the excavations they've done of these "potential graves" have turned up no human remains. The "ground disturbances" have turned out to be things like rocks, tree roots, parts of old buildings etc. No bones or anything like that. And? You don't like his politics or his age. How is he not a journalist though? What makes someone a journalist? They must conform to your ideological and age restrictions? We need objective measures, not "feelings".

Define what a journalist is though... This is a tough situation with a lot of gray area

Define what a journalist is though... Define what a journalist is though... This is a tough situation with a lot of gray area Define what a journalist is though... This is a tough situation with a lot of gray area Define what a journalist is though... This is a tough situation with a lot of gray area Define what a journalist is though... This is a tough situation with a lot of gray area

That's a hard argument to reject. The Rebel may have a constitutional right to join the line to ask questions. Can you reject them for being clowns? I dunno.

The Hill Times guy is a nut. I'd be fine banning him, and banning David Menzies for provoking people by shoving bright lights 6 inches from someones face to annoy them and just being a troll. David Cochrane of the CBC should also be fired from our public broadcaster, and CBC News should include no political opinions, especially when they're lies/misinformation. ZERO. They're the public broadcaster, they must remain 100% politically objective and only present factual information to the public. And i was talking about the rules for getting in to ask questions in the first place. 2 of the questioned Rebel asked were biased nonsense, but the other 2 were legit questions.

The billboard van happened. Rebel News are activists. Any outlet that behaves like activists rather than only informing the public should not be invited to these debates IMO. But then that would eliminate some mainstream outlets as well, like the National Post, Toronto Star etc. Billboard vans aren't the only way to spread biased political propaganda. That aside, the main problem with the debates was the Debate Commission rules/decisions and The Hill reporter freaking out unprofessionally and creating a security situation.

That's literally what CBC reporters did on-air too though after the debates. And CBC lied at least 3 times on-air in the post-debate coverage. It's literally on camera. I point out the lies here: https://canadianpoliticalevents.createaforum.com/canada-discussion-forum/debate-gate/?message=142177 And here: https://canadianpoliticalevents.createaforum.com/canada-discussion-forum/debate-gate/?message=142304

And what about newspapers who run editorials supporting specific parties and candidates? What about the Toronto Star that hasn't endorses a right-leaning party for many decades? What about the CBC that lied on the air about The Rebel reporter during the debate scrum asking a question mentioning that no remains of indigenous children from unmarked graves have been found and Rosemary Barton doing a "fact-check" and saying yes there have been remains found (a lie)? What about CTV News and CBC News and Global News having their journalists become MP's and Senators? Is there a conflict of interest there? Rebel are clowns but It's not as black and white as people make out. The purpose of journalism is to INFORM the public, it is not to PERSUADE the public towards one party/candidate/ideology or another. Especially a state broadcaster.

Says its real for me

I don't root for anti-Canadian separatists who don't represent Canada's interests.

Keep crying and whining.

PP has not run a good campaign. Going with Trump-like slogans like "Canada First" when everyone in the country hates Trump amid a tariff war is mind-numbingly bad decision-making. Read the room dude.

You can keep throwing as many toddler tantrums as you like. Trump supporters like yourself have no right to complain about lawbreaking or rioting. This is the behavior Trump supports. I assume he'll pardon all these rioters if they get terrorism charges LOL. Go fascism! Pretty rich for Trump supporters telling people they're speaking out of both sides of their mouths on this topic lol.

Like I said., Jan 6 pardoners complaining about torched Tesla's is pot calling kettle. Elon and every other Trump supporter either needs to support the rule of law or not, there's no picking and choosing. Torching cars is a no no. But Trumpsters suddenly complaining about people breaking the law should be ignored and laughed at for the hypocrites they are. I would even agree this is terrorism. I don't support the vandalism but it's hilarious seeing Trumpsters suddenly care about the rule of law.

The Liberal Party of Canada sucks hard.

I didn't read 80% of that drivel. Stop using Elon and Musk's testicles as mouthwash.