Black Dog

They are both things that aren't true but are the foundational myth of a fascist movement. No no, you admitted you;'re a pedo. In fact you made sure everyone knew you were into little boys specifically. That's the myth, yes. If I can be perfectly honest: I wish the Biden "regime" as you freaks call it was even half as zealous about pursuing its political enemies as you scumbags think they were. We wouldn't have the problems we have today.

He was charged and he was tried.

The stab in the back and the idea that Trump was unfairly prosecuted are both myths that fascists used to justify their activities. I'm too old for you anyway, what with you being an admitted pedophile and all. Prosecuting criminals like Trump is different from prosecuting political enemies on, ahem, trumped-up fake charges.

How could he be offered a sweetheart plea deal if he wasn't prosecuted in the first place, which was what you implied? You kinda f*cked yourself here.

I dunno were they on Turkish soil or something?

Not really. The quid pro quo is about helping ICE, not letting Elon Musk steal money from the city. In surprise move, Hunter Biden pleads guilty to tax charges President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, is convicted of all 3 felonies in federal gun trial

Declining to sponsor a study not because of its goals or methodology but because it uses wrong words is absolutely censorship, you pea brained loser.

The Nazis had the Dolchstoßlegende, today's equivalents in the GOP and its sycophants like you have "lawfare" and whatever insane myths you've gorged yourselves on over the last few years. I imagine you say the same thing after you beat your partner over spilling your drink or at least you would if anyone was actually stupid enough to be in a relationship with you. Give me a link showing that it's not or that telling someone about the general activities of ICE is ilegal.

Censorship by another name is still censorship.

Because that's what the law is referring to. It's not and no sane person would think so. Stretching the law to cover things like this would almost certainly be a violation of the First Amendment. You might have a case if there was a instance of people being tipped off about a specific law enforcement action at a specific place and time but a general statement that ICE likes to hang out at immigration check ins or parole appointments is no more actionable than telling them that the pigs like to hang out at the doughnut shop.

Not a real thing. They are limiting the ideas that people are allowed to express because they include certain words or support certain ideas: that's censorship. Its' funny how here you're defining censorship in an extremely specific and narrow way, while elsewhere you're defining "concealing" in an extremely broad way. You define words according to how a given definition serves your ideology, which i'm pretty sure is exactly what you accuse others of doing in your dumbass rules.

It's "literally" not. Literally shielding someone from detection would be physically hiding them. Telling them to watch out for the pigs when they're out and about is not that.

Telling people how to avoid ICE isn't "concealing, harboring, or shielding from detection" either.