myata

Conservative candidates as one dropping out of candidate meetings. This is straight out of Trump's playbook. Anyone still thinking that it's just normal politics perhaps only a bit unorthodox run now to see your mental doctor. They've been here not a decade ago

I pretend nothing, I see. In my neighborhood I've seen only Liberal signs vandalized. The pattern has been widespread throughout the country. And we have zero reaction from the Poilievre campaign. There aren't really any softer still objective terms than "dumb to the core", "stupidly ignorant and careless" for anyone who could still believe that trumpesque antics and agendas are only normal politics as the consequences are playing out right before our eyes. And of course binary politics don't help one bit. Trumpist Conservatives and dumbing Liberals will bring it to the same sad and miserable destination in no time at all. The clock is ticking for Canada politics to grow up - and we have not generations, not decades but counted cycles and years.

Some "Trudeau" is now responsible for PP failing to obtain his security clearance? Keep sharing please: Canada wants to know.

OK security of the land doesn't matter. Keep sharing please. These days, everyone can see in live feed how these ideas play out.

I'll take this one because the rest is pretty much Poilievre hot air that he's been blowing for two decades on public dime without much real essence. So ask yourself: why would this supposedly "transparent" measure be targeted against one specific individual he's been losing to so badly - as opposed to being applied fairly and universally? Something is inherently wrong with tax havens ->->-> shouldn't PP's cozy bunch of billionaire admirers be "divested" of them as well? No, everything is perfectly fine with the wealthy bunch who colluded on the price of bread and other necessities only out of desperate poverty (guessing why else) hiding their assets there - why pick and select one scapegoat to show pretend and false "transparency"? Make no mistake, it's no oversight it's deliberate confusion, put simply: plain, glaring bull. Same as let's stand to America by sucking up to it (and how else would one "increase trade" in the current climate)? Bull is what he's trying to sell Canada because he respects Canadians on the same or close level as his pretend (again - notice?) "adversary". Is there anything real behind that veil of games, postures and pretenses? Here's my take: maybe or maybe not, but that train has left. Off we go. Two decades was enough and no more time for gamble. This time and challenges call for competence, professionalism, character and integrity. Simple, really.

Well, why one want to disagree with the reality in our plain sight? One leader reacts immediately, clearly and strongly. And the other just cannot be reached, nothing is answering. What else is needed to get it?

I do not support and certainly condemn any attempts at dishonest campaigning whichever side they are coming from. I do not also appreciate non-professional substandard imitation of journalism. What is "staffer"? Why use jargon that means nothing to anyone outside of the political circle? Were they volunteers, paid employees of Liberal party or officials of the party itself? Is there any evidence that it was authorized by the campaign management? Seriously a "senior reporter" wouldn't have an idea of the difference? Anyways, anyone who isn't blind and dump can see the difference in bold and obvious script here - Liberal leader immediately condemned the acts - We are still waiting, and most likely in wain for Poilievre to call his goons to stop damaging campaign signage that is also a federal criminal offense. Right in their eyes and they wouldn't see it, point blank. Who's surprised though?

Look at them: if you rather not see yourself this way, in the mirror tomorrow, the time to think and decide is now. Life may not be easy and not all questions can have instant and easy answers. But you don't have to go down and become like them. This is a choice, not an obligation. While you have a human brain, there's always a choice.

You know what? It's a really nice spring day here and what if I make it even more enjoyable by making that the last stupid thing from you that I'll ever see? To think of it...

It wasn't an official debate, an event proposed by one media channel out of many in the country. You can check the schedule of the official debates or ask someone who can read if it's a challenge.

Look who's crying and whining now (not unlike the orange twat baby) having flooded the forum with based dumb sh*t not a single claim proven factually.

Sure. So if the guy happens to stand next to you pulls his pants and sticks a finger into his a$$ do you feel obliged to do the same? This is a choice. Everyone is responsible for their choices, every time. Most humans learn it by adulthood. What seems to be the problem? Lying Lying. I'm not going to continue because it's a waste of time. Sad to see people letting go of their ability to think independently and objectively but in this age, there can be no explanations only the choices. Chose to enter the dumb wagon - have to ride it all the way to the consequences. Often one way, too. Good luck.

Please don't start me there: "biological clocks" adage - is it a weirdo, just a freak thing? For two decades he voted against most affordable housing initiatives. Was housing minister under Harper - where are the results? Voted against affordable childcare, school food program. What does he care about women's "clocks"?

A random or inspired coincidence, I came across a post in one of the soc media feeds at to "what's really wrong with CPC campaign" and then, right here "The CPC is nothing at all like the Republican party". So I thought, true, it's wrong when and if politics is reduced to making an adversary, then enemy, and then, an existential opposite of the political opponent. Is someone inventing this antagonistic view? Is it fictional? All valid questions. For that reason I looked and tried to understand it. And here's the list, in my view and assessment entirely objective and factual why following my analysis of this reality, and facts in it I have to conclude that yes, indeed Canadian conservatives have stepped on the same path that Republican party was on some years or decades earlier, and if they fail to see it, and correct it now, it will lead them, all the way, to the same dismal and disgusting destination. Which is right here, before our eyes. Vicious personal attacks in all channels as opposed to civilized and respectful arguments. This is U.S. style politics and we can watch in real time where it leads. Repeated and persistent spreading of false pseudo-information, insinuations and claims targeting the individual as opposed to their policy. U.S. politics, worst of. Apparent refusal to condemn uncivilized and criminal campaign tactics as widespread interference with election signs and commit fully and unconditionally to the rules and practices of civilized democratic campaigning. Less than a clear, unconditional and unequivocal answer to the question about accepting the results of election. Closeness, tight control of the media access in this critical time when Canadians have the full right to learn as much as possible of their candidates. Shameful and shameless avoidance of candidate debates that appears to be the set policy of the said party. Failure and/or blatant refusal to heed concerns of Canadians in answering questions about the security clearance - even in these troubling times in the world. Some weird statements about women. Absence of clear priorities and strategy in the international politics and the economy. Confused, self-contradictory or deliberately misleading claims like doing more trade with the U.S. (how? in exchange for what?) to build up "sovereignty". Endorsement by most grotesque U.S. MAGA personalities including Musk, Jones, Shapiro, Tucker Carson and others. Can't say this is all, can be more on further thought. So yes, there are reasons and they are objective, real and factual.

Just don't go there. Stay back wait for it to fail miserably, then talk about why and how you got into it and how you'll make sure it never happens again - at least not in your lifetime. It can be literally, the last chance to stand back from a dumb and disgusting failure. Republican party today can be your future tomorrow. You know it. You've seen it. There can be no excuses.

No you don't "discuss" with this old, nasty sh*t - you disinfect it first, then take it out far and safe from your home. There's neither the ground nor the language to discuss in, because it wants to drain and consume all sanity, dignity, integrity and then the freedom too. Just watch it, in real time no black-n-white documentaries needed. You laugh it out, ostracize it out and kick it out. You show and explain to your misguided young men that real men can think and know what is right. They stand for what's right and they take out and kick out liars and thugs peddling false promises whenever they show up on their doorstep, quick and hard. Real men respect women's choices because it's about freedom too, because they know what freedom is, value it and can live it. This is who real men are and what they do. Now get you lost losers.

You nailed it! Wasn't even hard, eh? Like a nobrainer, like not a zillionth of other chance, in this layout

No such luck: it's maple maga that is throwing around lies, division and hatred here, in Canada. Yes, they are doing it by choice, consciously and deliberately. No: nobody made them follow a pathological liar, convicted rapist and scoundrel, also a wannabe dictator. No, no way and no such luck: they chose it, freely and consciously having other options and choices. And they only have to carry full responsibility for their choices. This is how this reality works.

Who needs comments these days? What's there to comment if we have eyes and at a small, even a smallest part of a working brain? Left: Mussolini

Yes some progress but still work to do, can't be more than three words for a single brain cell remember? (the golden rule of a brainless trampist convert). WTH is "completely", "sustainable" who needs that?

Yeah 70 million brainless !diots marching to liberate Greenland in their perfectly pure spiritual minds. Been there seen that, the prime contender for the most boringly recurring story in human history. When (and a big if) they learn to live what they preach do call back. Would be worth a look, sure.

Did God command them to invade Denmark, Panama and Canada too? What if one could try to see and think, for once?

Adults don't talk politics based on "information" from youtube videos and shady pseudo journalism tales. Kids, the dumb ones and/or liars may though. Make your choice. Where is verified, factual confirmation that the meeting took place? Post it now or apologize for spreading bullshit. One or the other is what an adult respecting themselves would do in this situation. Your turn.

You ever heard of the Occam's razor? Tiger will use its power, brutal force to take his food from a weaker one. And a human will use their mind and tongue. This is the only difference. Did tigers and pretty much all of the animal world somehow fall from divine grace too? Trees that take light from shorter and smaller species? Bacteria that want to consume all the nutrients without regard for others who may need them? All of this works only on the principles of science, thermodynamics, physics, chemistry and doesn't need fairy tale books for it to work. But those minds that are looking for tales will sure find them.. or make.

Let me break it to you: our intelligence is the source of lies. The moment we knew how we could create this imaginable fruit in our minds almost instantly we figured out how to use it to our advantage: how to lie. A strong predator in the animal world can take the prey from a smaller and weaker one. When we say and promise something to someone, without any intent of delivering it we do the same thing. Some of us learned the trick better. And others, are too simple to figure out that someone can and will use it against them. Simple really - and no fairy tales needed, agree?